Article Data

  • Views 911
  • Dowloads 162

Original Research

Open Access

Evaluation of the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted closure in the treatment of Fournier gangrene

  • Mehmet Demir1
  • İsmail Yağmur1
  • Bülent Katı1
  • Eyyup Sabri Pelit1
  • Adem Tunçekin1
  • Halil Çiftçi1

1Department of Urology, Harran University, 63500 Sanliurfa, Turkey

DOI: 10.31083/jomh.2021.089 Vol.17,Issue 4,September 2021 pp.304-309

Submitted: 21 March 2021 Accepted: 26 May 2021

Published: 30 September 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): Mehmet Demir E-mail:

PDF (140.27 kB)


Background and objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) in the treatment of Fournier gangrene (FG).

Material and methods: Forty-eight male patients treated for Fournier gangrene were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups (Group I: conventional dressing, Group II: VAC therapy). Characteristics of the patients, laboratory parameters, number of debridement procedures, daily number of dressings, visual analogue scale (VAS) during dressing, analgesic requirement, colostomy requirement, time from the first debridement to wound closure, wound closure method, length of hospital stay, and mortality rates were compared.

Results: Group I comprised 33 patients and Group II comprised 15 patients. The number of dressings, VAS score and daily analgesic requirement were statistically significantly lower in Group II (p < 0.05) than in Group I. The number of debridement procedures, colostomy requirement, orchiectomy rate, time from first debridement to wound closure, length of hospital stay, wound closure method and mortality rate were similar between these two groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The clinical results of conventional dressing and VAC therapy were similar for treating FG. VAC therapy is an effective postoperative wound care method that offers less requirement for dressing changes, less pain, less analgesic requirement and more patient satisfaction compared to conventional dressing.


Fournier gangrene; Debridement; Vacuum-assisted closure; Wound therapy; Mortality

Cite and Share

Mehmet Demir,İsmail Yağmur,Bülent Katı,Eyyup Sabri Pelit,Adem Tunçekin,Halil Çiftçi. Evaluation of the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted closure in the treatment of Fournier gangrene. Journal of Men's Health. 2021. 17(4);304-309.


[1] Fournier JA. Gangrène foudroyante de la verge (overwhelming gangrene). Sem Med 1883. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 1988; 31: 984–988.

[2] Eke N. Fournier’s gangrene: a review of 1726 cases. British Journal of Surgery. 2000; 87: 718–728.

[3] Hong KS, Yi HJ, Lee R, Kim KH, Chung SS. Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes for patients with Fournier’s gangrene: a retrospective study. International Wound Journal. 2017; 14: 1352–1358.

[4] Sorensen MD, Krieger JN, Rivara FP, Broghammer JA, Klein MB, Mack CD, et al. Fournier’s Gangrene: Population Based Epidemiology and Outcomes. Journal of Urology. 2009; 181: 2120–2126.

[5] Oguz A, Gümüş M, Turkoglu A, Bozdağ Z, Ülger BV, Agaçayak E, et al. Fournier’s Gangrene: a Summary of 10 Years of Clinical Experience. International Surgery. 2015; 100: 934–941.

[6] Jeong HJ, Park SC, Seo IY, Rim JS. Prognostic factors in Fournier gangrene. International Journal of Urology. 2005; 12: 1041–1044.

[7] Stephens BJ, Lathrop JC, Rice WT, Gruenberg JC. Fournier’s gangrene: historic (1764-1978) versus contemporary (1979-1988) dif-ferences in etiology and clinical importance. The American Surgeon. 1993; 59: 149–154.

[8] Singh A, Ahmed K, Aydin A, Khan MS, Dasgupta P. Fournier’s gan-grene. A clinical review. Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologial. 2016; 88: 157–164.

[9] Tucci G, Amabile D, Cadeddu F, Milito G. Fournier’s gangrene wound therapy: our experience using VAC device. Langenbeck’S Archives of Surgery. 2009; 394: 759–760.

[10] Czymek R, Frank P, Limmer S, Schmidt A, Jungbluth T, Roblick U, et al. Fournier’s gangrene: is the female gender a risk factor?Langenbeck’S Archives of Surgery. 2010; 395: 173–180.

[11] Cuccia G, Mucciardi G, Morgia G, Stagno d’Alcontres F, Galì A, Cotrufo S, et al. Vacuum-Assisted Closure for the Treatment of Fournier’s Gangrene. Urologia Internationalis. 2009; 82: 426–431.

[12] Morpurgo E, Galandiuk S. Fournier’s gangrene. Surgical Clinics of North America. 2002; 82: 1213–1224.

[13] Nisbet AA, Thompson IM. Impact of diabetes mellitus on the presentation and outcomes of Fournier’s gangrene. Urology. 2002; 60: 775–779.

[14] Uluğ M, Gedik E, Girgin S, Çelen MK, Ayaz C. The evaluation of microbiology and Fournier’s gangrene severity index in 27 patients. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2009; 13: e424–e430.

[15] Thwaini A, Khan A, Malik A, Cherian J, Barua J, Shergill I, et al. Fournier’s gangrene and its emergency management. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2006; 82: 516–519.

[16] Sugihara T, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Fujimura T, Ohe K, Matsuda S, et al. Impact of surgical intervention timing on the case fatality rate for Fournier’s gangrene: an analysis of 379 cases. BJU International. 2012; 110: E1096–E1100.

[17] Yanaral F, Balci C, Ozgor F, Simsek A, Onuk O, Aydin M, et al. Comparison of conventional dressings and vacuum-assisted closure in the wound therapy of Fournier’s gangrene. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia, Andrologia. 2017; 89: 208–211.

[18] Marathe US, Sniezek JC. Use of the Vacuum-Assisted Closure Device in Enhancing Closure of a Massive Skull Defect. Laryngoscope. 2004; 114: 961–964.

[19] Syllaios A, Davakis S, Karydakis L, Vailas M, Garmpis N, Mpaili E, et al. Treatment of Fournier’s Gangrene with Vacuum-assisted Closure Therapy as Enhanced Recovery Treatment Modality. In Vivo. 2020; 34: 1499–1502.

[20] Rosser CJ, Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC. A new technique to manage perineal wounds. Urology Infection. 2000; 13: 45–55.

[21] Aslam R, Rehman B, Nasir II. Comparison of vacuum assisted closure versus conventional dressings in treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences. 2015; 8: 226.

[22] Franco-Buenaventura D, García-Perdomo HA. Vacuum-assisted clo-sure device in the postoperative wound care for Fournier’s gangrene: a systematic review. International Urology and Nephrology. 2021; 53: 641–653.

[23] Chawla SN, Gallop C, Mydlo JH. Fournier’s gangrene: an analysis of repeated surgical debridement. European Urology. 2003; 43: 572–575.

[24] Barkel DC, Villalba MR. A reappraisal of surgical management in necrotizing perineal infections. American Surgeon. 1986; 52: 395–397.

[25] Horsanali MO, Eser U, Horsanali BO, Altaş O, Eren H. Comparison of vacuum-assisted closure therapy and debridement with primary surgical closure for fournier’s gangrene treatment: 10 years’ experience of a single center. International Brazilian Journal of Urology. 2017; 43.

[26] Kızılay F, Akıncıoğlu E, Semerci B. Comparison of Vacuum Assisted Closure and Conventional Dressing in Fournier Gangrene Treatment. The New Journal of Urology 2019; 14: 13–20.

[27] Garg G, Singh V, Sinha RJ, Sharma A, Pandey S, Aggarwal A. Outcomes of patients with Fournier’s Gangrene: 12-year experience from a tertiary care referral center. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2019; 45: S111–S116.

[28] Furr J, Watts T, Street R, Cross B, Slobodov G, Patel S. Contemporary Trends in the Inpatient Management of Fournier’s Gangrene: Pre-dictors of Length of Stay and Mortality Based on Population-based Sample. Urology. 2017; 102: 79–84.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Social Sciences Citation Index Social Sciences Citation Index contains over 3,400 journals across 58 social sciences disciplines, as well as selected items from 3,500 of the world’s leading scientific and technical journals. More than 9.37 million records and 122 million cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in the social and behavioral sciences.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

SCOPUS Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

DOAJ DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals.

CrossRef Crossref makes research outputs easy to find, cite, link, assess, and reuse. Crossref committed to open scholarly infrastructure and collaboration, this is now announcing a very deliberate path.

Portico Portico is a community-supported preservation archive that safeguards access to e-journals, e-books, and digital collections. Our unique, trusted process ensures that the content we preserve will remain accessible and usable for researchers, scholars, and students in the future.

Submission Turnaround Time