MALE BARIATRIC PATIENTS SIX YEARS LATER: WHERE ARE THEY NOW?

Main Article Content

Darren D. Moore
Pooja Mamidana, Ms.
Miciah Lyons
Traci Holmes
Felicia Jefferson

Keywords

Obesity, Weight Loss, Bariatric Surgery, Male Patients, Qualitative Research, Post-operative.

Abstract

Background and objective
Researchers have suggested that while bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity, patients still experience difficulties in maintaining initial weight loss, over time. The purpose of this study was to explore men’s experiences after 6 or more years of weight loss surgery.


Material and methods
Utilizing qualitative research, the authors conducted a 6-year follow-up investigation to a previous study regarding life after bariatric surgery among male patients. In this study, the authors completed 13 semi-structured interviews with male bariatric patients and explored their lived experiences as indi-viduals and as partners within couple relationships.


Results
The study found three emerging themes: (1) weight loss as a struggle, (2) fading support and feeling alone, and (3) perceptions of marriage and family therapists.


Conclusion
This discusses clinical implications and recommendations for marriage and family therapists and other allied health professionals who may work with males transitioning beyond the initial phase of the weight loss surgical process to include continued social support and utilizing a relational perspective for male patients.


 


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 42 | PDF Downloads 27 HTML Downloads 6 XML Downloads 1

References

1. Sung-Chan P, Sung YW, Zhao X, et al. Family-based models for childhood-obesity intervention: A systematic review of randomized controlled tri-als. Obes Rev 2013;14(4):265–78.
2. Moore D, Willis M. Men’s experiences and per-spectives of social support after weight-loss sur-gery. J Men’s Health 2016;12(2): 25–34.
3. Young MT, Phelan MJ, Nguyen NT. A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of male vs. female patients who underwent bariatric surgery. J Am Coll Surgeons 2016;222(3):226–31.
4. Fuchs HF, Broderick RC, Harnsberger CR, et al. Benefits of bariatric surgery do not reach obese men. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2015;25(3):196–201.
5. Mazzeo SE, Saunders R, Mitchell KS. Gender and binge-eating among bariatric surgery candi-dates. Eat Behav 2006;7(1):47–52.
6. Moore D, Cooper C. Life after bariatric surgery: Perceptions of male patients and their intimate relationships. J Marital Fam Ther 2016;43(3): 495–508. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12155.
7. Natvik E, Gjengedal E, Moltu C, et al. Translating weight loss into agency: Men’s experiences 5 years after bariatric surgery. Int J Qual Stud Health Well Being 2015;10(1):27729.
8. Arterburn D, Livingston EH, Schifftner T, et al. Predictors of long-term mortality after bariatric surgery performed in Veterans Affairs medical centers. Arch Surg 2009;144(10):914–20.
9. Connelly LM. What is phenomenology? Medsurg Nurs 2010;19(2):127–29.
10. Groenewald T. A phenomenological research design illustrated. Int J Qual Methods 2004;3(1): 42–55.
11. Lewis S. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Health Promot Pract 2015;16(4):473–75.
12. Thomson R, Holland J. Hindsight, foresight and insight: The challenges of longitudinal qualitative research. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2003;6(3):233–44.
13. Britten N. Qualitative research: Qualitative inter-views in medical research. BMJ 1995;311(6999): 251–53.
14. Burnard P, Gill P, Stewart K, et al. Analysing and presenting qualitative data. Br Dent J 2008; 204(8):429.
15. Chen A, Gussenhoven C, Rietveld T. Language-specificity in the perception of paralinguistic into-national meaning. Lang Speech 2004;47(4):311-49.
Sikorski W. Paralinguistic communication in the therapeutic relationship. Arch Psychiatry
Psychother 2012;1:49–54.
17. Birks M, Chapman Y, Francis K. Memoing in qualitative research: Probing data and processes. J Res Nurs 2008;13(1):68–75.
18. Sgier L. Qualitative data analysis. An Initiat Gebert Ruf Stift 2012;April 19:19–21.
19. Basit T. Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Educ Res 2003;45(2):143–54.
20. Zhang Y, Wildemuth BM Qualitative analysis of content. In: Wildemuth, B.M., editor. Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Infor-mation and Library Science. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO; 2016.
21. Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, et al. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and valid-ity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods 2002;1(2):13–22.
22. Berger R. Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qual Res 2015;15(2):219–34.
23. Tufford L, Newman P. Bracketing in qualitative research. Qual Soc Work 2012;11(1):80–96.
24. Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. Am J Occup Ther 1991;45(3):214–22.
25. Shenton AK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthi-ness in qualitative research projects. Educ Inform 2004;22(2):63–75.
26. Bradley LE, Forman EM, Kerrigan SG, et al. Project HELP: A remotely delivered behavioral intervention for weight regain after bariatric sur-gery. Obes Surg 2017;27(3):586–98.
27. Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liberman M, et al. Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg 2004;240(3):416.
28. Mobarki H, Bian F. How much weight loss is expected after each type of bariatric surgery procedure? Bioactive Compounds Health Dis 2018;1(1):217–20.
29. Perez-Pevida B, Aldhwayanand M, Gibson R, et al. Poor responsiveness after bariatric surgery: Clinical and eating behaviour characteristics. Obes Update 2018; 53. BioScientifica.
30. Rusch MD, Andris D. Maladaptive eating pat-terns after weight-loss surgery. Nutr Clin Pract 2007;22(1):41–49.
31. Jung J, Forbes GB, Chan P. Global body and muscle satisfaction among college men in the United States and Hong Kong-China. Sex Roles 2010;63(1–2):104–17.
32. Yang CFJ, Gray P, Pope Jr HG. Male body image in Taiwan versus the West: Yanggang Zhiqi meets the Adonis complex. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162(2):263–69.
33. Sobal J. Men, meat, and marriage: Models of  masculinity. Food Foodways 2005;13(1–2): 135–58.
34. Sierra Hernandez CA, Han C, Oliffe JL, et al. Understanding help-seeking among depressed men. Psychol Men Masculinity 2014; 15(3):346.
35. Willott S, Griffin C. ‘Wham bam, am I a man?’: Unemployed men talk about masculinities. Feminism Psychol 1997;7(1):107–28.
36. Artazcoz L, Cortès I, Escribà-Agüir V, et al. Understanding the relationship of Long work-ing hours with health status and health-related behaviours. J Epidemiology Commun Health 2009;63(7):521–27.
37. Martin M, Beekley A, Kjorstad R, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in eligibility and access to bariatric surgery: A national population-based analysis. Surg Obes Related Dis 2010;6(1): 8–15.
38. Livhits M, Mercado C, Yermilov I, et al. Is social support associated with greater weight loss after bariatric surgery?: A systematic review. Obes Rev 2011;12(2):142–48.
39. McGoldrick M, Carter B, Garcia-Preto N. The expanded family life cycle: Individual, family, and social perspectives. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 2011.
40. Neill JR, Marshall JR, Yale CE. Marital changes after intestinal bypass surgery. J Am Med Assoc 1978;240(5):447–50.
41. Anderson WA, Greene GW, Forse RA, et al. Weight loss and health outcomes in African Americans and whites after gastric bypass surgery. Obes 2007;15(6):1455–63.