Journal of Men's Health,2024,20(6):25-34 DOI:10.22514/jomh.2024.087
Original Research
Health information-seeking behaviour, intimate partner violence, and sexual risk-taking among MSM in Bali, Indonesia
Ngakan Putu Anom Harjana1,2, Dinar Saurmali Lubis1, Nelsensius Klau Fauk3, Hailay Abrha Gesesew3, Paul Russell Ward3, Pande Putu Januraga1,2,*,

1Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, 80232 Denpasar, Indonesia

2Center for Public Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, 80232 Denpasar, Indonesia

3Centre for Public Health, Equity and Human Flourishing, Torrens University, 5000 Adelaide, SA, Australia

*Corresponding Author(s):januraga@unud.ac.id (Pande Putu Januraga)

History Submitted: 11 December 2023 | Accepted: 22 February 2024 | Published: 30 June 2024
Copyright:  ©2024  The Author(s). Published by MRE Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Collapse table of contents

Abstract

“Men who have sex with men” (MSM) had predominantly driven the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) transmission in Indonesia. This study was aimed to investigate the health information-seeking behaviours, intimate partner violence, and sexual risk-taking among MSM in Bali, Indonesia. Total of 165 eligible responses were enrolled through an online survey. The descriptive and cross-tabulation statistical analyses were conducted. More than half of MSM never accessed information pertaining to HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Furthermore, MSM faced various types of violence from partners: 24.24% psychological, 37.58% verbal, 20.61% physical, and 16.97% sexual. The unprotected sex prevalence among MSM was 23.03% and varied for those experiencing verbal and physical violences, having transactional sex, and number of sexual partners. Health promotions for MSM population included an increase in awareness of HIV and STIs risks, condom negotiation capacity, and condom use practices.

Keywords:MSM;Sexual risk-taking;Health information-seeking behaviour;Intimate partner violence;Indonesia
PDF(644.39 kB)|EndNote (RIS)|BibTeX|RefMan|RefWorks

Cite this article

Ngakan Putu Anom Harjana, Dinar Saurmali Lubis, Nelsensius Klau Fauk, Hailay Abrha Gesesew, Paul Russell Ward, Pande Putu Januraga. Health information-seeking behaviour, intimate partner violence, and sexual risk-taking among MSM in Bali, Indonesia.Journal of Men's Health,2024,20(6):25-34 DOI:10.22514/jomh.2024.087

1. Introduction

HIV had been a widespread health burden globally. The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) data had estimated 39 million people living with HIV (PLHIV) in 2022 globally, wherein 1.3 million were newly diagnosed, and 0.63 million died from Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)-related illnesses in the same year [1]. The number of PLHIV in Asia and the Pacific region was 6.5 million, i.e., 16.6% of the global burden, of whom ~0.3 million were newly diagnosed and 0.15 million died in 2022 [2]. Key population groups (sex workers and their clients, MSM, people injecting drugs and transgenders) accounted for over 90% of new HIV infections in Asia and the Pacific region.

Indonesia had growing HIV epidemic with ~377,650 PLHIV till March 2023 [3]. The annual number of newly diagnosed HIV people had increased in the past decade from 21,511 in 2012 to 50,282 in 2019, and declined to 13,279 in March 2023 [3]. In 2023 alone, 29% of the total HIV cases in country were diagnosed in MSM population compared to 26.6% in 2021 [3]. Engagement in high-risk sexual behaviours including multiple sexual partners and taking alcohol or drugs before sex were the major contributing factors towards unprotected receptive and insertive anal intercourse for HIV transmission in them [4]. MSM and homosexuality had not been widely accepted in communities and regarded as the violation of socio-cultural and religious values in Indonesia [5]. This situation got complex when Indonesian parliament enacted a new criminal code on 06 December 2022, that included the provisions contradicting international human rights, laws, and standards. The provisions undermined fundamental rights pertaining to freedom of speech and association for individuals identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) [6]. The prohibitive socio-cultural and religious values and norms against same-sex relations had thus been supportive of the factors for concealing sexual orientation, and engaging in unprotected sex because of the reluctance in accessing condoms to avoid negative judgement or labelling [7]. Factors such as subjective norms of MSM peers and perceived behavioural control had also influenced their intention and willingness in using condoms [8]. Other studies also reported that intimate partner violence had a strong negative impact on MSM’s condom usage [9, 10]. The MSM sex workers experiencing violence from partners were likely to engage in unprotected sex, and thus susceptible to HIV transmission [11, 12].

It had been suggested that interventions regarding health promotion would improve the knowledge and awareness about condom usage because the risky sexual behaviours had mainly contributed in HIV transmission among MSM populations. However, the findings of a study in Bali had demonstrated that good level HIV knowledge was not always translated into protected sex, positive health information-seeking behaviour, and HIV treatment compliance among MSM [13]. Understanding of their health information-seeking behaviours regarding HIV/AIDS was thus essential. A study in Vietnam had reported that MSM would seek information of HIV/AIDS and STIs, and search for sex partners via mobile apps, websites or dating apps [14]. Similarly, a study in Indonesia had found that MSM used mobile or dating apps to find sex partners and build MSM specific social networks [7]. The online platforms could thus be benefitted for health promotion and intervention in HIV transmission to target MSM populations in the Indonesian context.

The existing literature provided limited evidence on (i) HIV and STIs related health information-seeking behaviours; and (ii) the link between intimate partner violence and condom usage, among MSM in Indonesia. This study was thus aimed to fill these gaps by exploring health information-seeking behaviours, intimate partner violence, and sexual risk-taking among MSM in Bali, Indonesia. Understanding these aspects would be beneficial for improving HIV services to MSM populations, developing HIV policy and interventions to address their needs, and support their access to condoms, and HIV care and treatment.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Methods

This was a cross-sectional study based on the dataset from project entitled “Kita Banget App: Mobile Apps Development to Improve HIV Services”, conducted from September to November 2020 by the Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Indonesia. The data were collected using Google Forms as the exact number of MSM population was not available and MSM was difficult to reach at the time of study because of COVID-19. The data validation procedure was employed using Google Form features. Prospective participants from MSM-related communities were invited to improve the data quality. Filter questions were used to ensure the respondents being MSM, i.e., (1. Assigned sex at birth? a. Male; b. Female; and 2. Ever had sex with? a. Male; b. Female). Informants answering “Male” for both questions were classified as MSM. Five seed samples from the local non-government organization in Bali were recruited for the data collection procedure. These seed samples spread the online questionnaires link to their communities via social media (Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, etc.). The questionnaires were anonymous and took 15–20 min for completion. Each respondent completing the survey received phone credit (Rp. 25.000 = USD 1.75) to reimburse for their time. OpenEpi Version 3 (https://www.openepi.com) was employed to calculate the sample by assuming following parameters: MSM population size of 3539 based on Ministry of Health Indonesia (MOH) data in 2019, 62.3% of MSM experiencing violence [11], 10% margin of error, and 80% confidence interval. Finally, the minimum sample consisted of 89 respondents. Total of 182 responses were collected with 17 duplicates (duplicate phone numbers), which led to 165 eligible responses included in the analysis.

2.2 Variables

This study had the dependent variable of unprotected sex defined via self-reporting as “inconsistent” or “not every time” or “not always” regarding the use of condoms while having sex with the partner in previous six months. The independent variables were personal attributes, health information-seeking behavior, intimate partner violence experience, and sexual behavior. Personal factors included age, place of residence, employment status, sexual orientation, and HIV and STIs infection. Health information-seeking behavior defined as, whether MSM ever searched for information of STIs and HIV prevention and treatment services. Four types of intimate partner violence (IPV) were measured in this study, i.e., psychological (e.g., manipulation, exploitation, abuse, humiliation, etc.), verbal (e.g., yelling, scolding, shouting, etc.), physical (e.g., hitting, slapping, grabbing, kicking, stabbing, burning, slashing, etc.), and sexual (e.g., rape, sexual intimidation including threats or attempted rape, etc.). The factors of sexual behavior consisted of transactional sex (receiving money, gifts, or other items in exchange for or paid for sexual intercourse), number of sexual partners, and sex under alcohol and drugs usage. The detailed questions for measuring these factors had been given in Supplementary Table 1.

2.3 Statistical analysis

Descriptive analysis was employed to assess the prevalence of unprotected sex, and intimate partner violence, and illustrate other characteristics. The Chi-square and Fisher’s Exact tests were conducted to assess the differences for prevalence of unprotected sex in MSM. All statistical analyses were performed via the statistical program Stata (Version 12.0, StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

3. Results

The characteristics of study participants regarding personal factors, health information-seeking behaviour, intimate partner violence, and sexual behaviour are given in Table 1. More than one-quarter of MSM were 26–30 years old (30.30%). About 70.30% MSM lived in Denpasar. More than three-quarters of MSM were employed (78.79%). More than three-quarters of MSM identified themselves as homosexual (89.09%). Almost all MSM (97.58%) never sought STIs information as per the health information-seeking behaviour. More than three-quarters had never pursued for information about HIV prevention (80.00%). More than one-half of MSM never inquired about HIV treatment (60.61%), HIV test service (58.79%) and antiretroviral therapy (ART) service (66.67%).

Table 1.Personal, health information-seeking behaviour, types of intimate partner violence, and sexual behaviour characteristics of MSM (n = 165).
VariablesFrequency (%)
Age
≤20 yr5 (3.03)
21–25 yr42 (25.45)
26–30 yr50 (30.30)
31–35 yr39 (23.64)
36–40 yr20 (12.12)
>40 yr9 (5.45)
Place of residence
Outside Denpasar49 (29.70)
Denpasar116 (70.30)
Employment status
Employed130 (78.79)
Unemployed35 (21.21)
Sexual orientation
Bisexual18 (10.91)
Homosexual147 (89.09)
Information about STIs prevention
No161 (97.58)
Yes4 (2.42)
Information about HIV prevention
No33 (20.00)
Yes132 (80.00)
Information about HIV treatment
No100 (60.61)
Yes65 (39.39)
Information about HIV test services
No97 (58.79)
Yes68 (41.21)
Information about ART service
No110 (66.67)
Yes55 (33.33)
Psychological violence
No125 (75.76)
Yes40 (24.24)
Verbal violence
No103 (62.42)
Yes62 (37.58)
Physical violence
No131 (79.39)
Yes34 (20.61)
Sexual violence
No137 (83.03)
Yes28 (16.97)
Transactional sex
No53 (32.12)
Yes112 (67.88)
Number of sexual partner
Single118 (71.52)
Multiple47 (28.48)
Sex under the influence of drugs or alcohol
No35 (21.21)
Yes130 (78.79)
STIs infection
No129 (78.18)
Yes36 (21.82)
HIV status
Negative84 (50.91)
Never tested/do not know54 (32.73)
Positive27 (16.36)
Condom usage
Inconsistent38 (23.03)
Consistent (every time)127 (76.97)
STIs: sexually transmitted infections; HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus; ART: antiretroviral therapy.

MSM also experienced violence from their partner. About 24.24% MSM faced psychological violence, 37.58% verbal violence, 20.61% physical violence, and 16.97% sexual violence from the partner. More than two-thirds (67.88%) of MSM were engaged in transactional sex, while more than three-quarters (78.79%) had sex under the influence of drugs or alcohol in the last six months. Only 28.48% MSM had multiple (more than one) sex partners. There were 21.79% MSM infected by STIs in the last six months wherein 16.36% were HIV positive. About 32.73% MSM were never tested or did not know their HIV status. About 23.03% MSM had inconsistently used condoms.

Fig. 1 exhibits the percentage of MSM experiencing any type of IPV like single and multiple. Among single type of IPV, 4.1% MSM experienced psychological violence, 18.9% verbal, 4.1% physical, and 5.4% sexual. Furthermore, 16.2% MSM suffered all types of violence. The detailed MSM proportions experiencing multiple types of IPV could be seen in the Venn diagram (Fig. 1).

Types of intimate partner violence experienced by MSM (n = 
165).

Fig. 1. Types of intimate partner violence experienced by MSM (n = 165).

The prevalence of unprotected sex among MSM by characteristics such as intimate partner violence, and health information-seeking behaviour (Table 2). The unprotected sex prevalence was higher (p = 0.029) in those experiencing verbal violence (32.26%) compared to who never experienced it (17.48%). The unprotected sex prevalence was higher (p = 0.018) in those with physical violence (38.24%) compared to who never experienced it from their partner (19.08%). Regarding sexual behaviour, the unprotected sex prevalence was higher (p = 0.014) in those involved in transactional sex (28.57%) compared to who never engaged in this (11.32%). The unprotected sex prevalence was higher (p = 0.017) in MSM having one sexual partner (27.97%) compared to with multiple sexual partners (10.64%).

Table 2.Prevalence of unprotected sex by characteristics such as types of intimate partner violence, and health information-seeking behaviour (n = 165).
VariablesConsistent condom usagep-value
Consistent n (%)Inconsistent n (%)
Age
≤20 yr5 (100.00)0 (0.00)0.746b
21–25 yr30 (71.43)12 (28.57)
26–30 yr41 (82.00)9 (18.00)
31–35 yr29 (74.36)5 (25.64)
36–40 yr15 (75.00)5 (25.00)
>40 yr7 (77.78)2 (22.22)
Domicile
Outside Denpasar38 (77.55)11 (22.45)0.908a
Denpasar89 (76.72)27 (23.28)
Employment status
Employed97 (74.62)33 (25.38)0.166a
Unemployed30 (85.71)5 (14.29)
Sexual orientation
Bisexual15 (83.33)3 (16.67)0.767b
Homosexual112 (76.19)35 (23.81)
Information about STIs prevention
No123 (76.40)38 (23.60)0.575b
Yes4 (100.00)0 (0.00)
Information about HIV prevention
No25 (75.76)8 (24.24)0.853a
Yes102 (77.27)30 (22.73)
Information about HIV treatment
No76 (76.00)24 (24.00)0.714a
Yes51 (78.46)14 (21.54)
Information about HIV test services
No72 (74.23)25 (25.77)0.318a
Yes55 (80.88)13 (19.12)
Information about ART service
No83 (75.45)27 (24.55)0.513a
Yes44 (80.00)11 (20.00)
Physiological violence
No98 (78.40)27 (21.60)0.440a
Yes29 (72.50)11 (27.50)
Verbal violence
No85 (82.52)18 (17.48)0.029*a
Yes42 (67.74)20 (32.26)
Physical violence
No106 (80.92)25 (19.08)0.018*a
Yes21 (61.76)13 (38.24)
Sexual violence
No108 (78.83)29 (21.17)0.209a
Yes19 (67.86)9 (32.14)
Transactional sex
No47 (88.68)6 (11.32)0.014*a
Yes80 (71.43)32 (28.57)
Number of sexual partners
Single85 (72.03)33 (27.97)0.017*a
Multiple42 (89.36)5 (10.64)
Having sex under the influence of drugs or alcohol
No26 (74.29)9 (25.71)0.671a
Yes101 (77.69)29 (22.31)
STIs infection
No99 (76.74)30 (23.26)0.896a
Yes28 (77.78)8 (22.22)
HIV status
Negative67 (79.76)17 (20.24)0.367a
Never tested/do not know42 (77.78)12 (22.22)
Positive18 (66.67)9 (33.33)
Note: aChi-square test; bFisher’s exact test; *p-value < 0.05. STIs: sexually transmitted infections; HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus; ART: antiretroviral therapy.

The prevalence of HIV and STIs cases by characteristic like types of intimate partner violence, and health information-seeking behaviour in MSM (Table 3). The HIV-positive prevalence was higher (p < 0.001) in MSM who searched for information about HIV treatment (32.31%) compared to who did not (6.00%). HIV-positive prevalence was higher (p = 0.011) in MSM searching for information about ART services (23.64%) compared to who did not (12.73%). STI-positive prevalence was higher (p = 0.048) in MSM searching for information about HIV services (29.41%) compared to who did not (16.49%). STI-positive prevalence was higher (p = 0.016) in MSM searching for information about ART services (32.73%) compared to who did not (16.36%). STI-positive prevalence was higher (p = 0.033) in MSM experiencing verbal violence (30.65%) compared to who did not (16.50%). STI-positive prevalence was higher (p = 0.028) in MSM never involved in transactional sex (32.08%) compared to who were involved (16.94%). STI-positive prevalence was higher (p = 0.047) in MSM with multiple sexual partners (31.91%) compared to with single sexual partner (17.80%).

Table 3.Prevalence of HIV and STIs cases by characteristics such as types of intimate partner violence, and health information-seeking behaviour (n = 165).
VariablesHIV Statusp-valueSTI Statusp-value
Negative n (%)Do not know n (%)Positive n (%)Negative n (%)Positive n (%)
Age
≤20 yr2 (40.00)3 (60.00)0 (0.00)0.890b4 (80.00)1 (20.00)0.469b
21–25 yr23 (54.76)12 (28.57)7 (16.67)35 (83.33)7 (16.67)
26–30 yr27 (54.00)15 (30.00)8 (16.00)37 (74.00)13 (26.00)
31–35 yr19 (48.72)15 (38.46)5 (12.82)30 (76.92)9 (23.08)
36–40 yr9 (45.00)7 (35.00)4 (20.00)14 (70.00)6 (30.00)
>40 yr4 (44.44)2 (22.22)3 (33.33)9 (100.00)0 (0.00)
Domicile
Outside Denpasar23 (46.94)37 (31.90)9 (18.37)0.791a39 (79.59)10 (20.41)0.776a
Denpasar61 (52.59)37 (31.90)18 (15.52)90 (77.59)26 (22.41)
Employment status
Employed60 (46.15)46 (35.38)24 (18.46)0.058a100 (76.92)30 (23.08)0.451a
Unemployed24 (68.57)8 (22.86)3 (8.57)29 (82.86)6 (17.14)
Sexual orientation
Bisexual10 (55.56)4 (22.22)4 (22.22)0.556b16 (88.89)2 (11.11)0.367b
Homosexual74 (50.34)50 (34.01)23 (15.65)113 (76.87)34 (23.13)
Information about STIs prevention
No81 (50.31)53 (32.92)27 (16.77)1.000b125 (77.64)36 (22.36)0.577b
Yes3 (75.00)1 (25.00)0 (0.00)4 (100.00)0 (0.00)
Information about HIV prevention
No14 (42.42)11 (33.33)8 (24.24)0.341a28 (84.85)5 (15.15)0.300a
Yes70 (53.03)43 (32.58)19 (14.39)101 (76.52)31 (23.48)
Information about HIV treatment
No59 (59.00)35 (35.00)6 (6.00)<0.001*a82 (82.00)18 (18.00)0.141a
Yes25 (38.46)19 (29.23)21 (32.31)47 (72.31)18 (27.69)
Information about HIV test services
No51 (52.58)31 (31.96)15 (15.46)0.866a81 (83.51)16 (16.49)0.048*a
Yes33 (48.53)23 (33.82)12 (17.65)48 (70.59)20 (29.41)
Information about ART service
No65 (59.09)31 (28.18)14 (12.73)0.011*a92 (83.64)18 (16.36)0.016*a
Yes19 (34.55)23 (41.82)13 (23.64)37 (67.27)18 (32.73)
Physiological violence
No62 (49.60)40 (32.00)23 (18.40)0.456a100 (80.00)25 (20.00)0.317a
Yes22 (55.00)14 (35.00)4 (10.00)29 (72.50)11 (27.50)
Verbal violence
No54 (52.43)33 (32.04)16 (15.53)0.870a86 (83.50)17 (16.50)0.033*a
Yes30 (48.39)21 (33.87)11 (17.74)43 (69.35)19 (30.65)
Physical violence
No67 (51.15)42 (32.06)22 (16.79)0.921a106 (80.92)25 (19.08)0.095a
Yes17 (50.00)12 (35.29)5 (14.71)23 (67.65)11 (32.35)
Sexual violence
No68 (49.64)44 (32.12)25 (18.25)0.424b109 (79.59)28 (20.44)0.342a
Yes16 (57.14)10 (35.71)2 (7.14)20 (71.43)8 (28.57)
Transactional sex
No28 (52.83)20 (37.74)5 (9.43)0.229a36 (67.92)17 (32.08)0.028*a
Yes56 (50.00)34 (30.46)22 (19.64)93 (83.04)19 (16.94)
Number of sexual partners
Single63 (53.39)34 (28.81)21 (17.80)0.228a97 (82.20)21 (17.80)0.047*a
Multiple21 (44.68)20 (42.55)6 (12.77)32 (68.09)15 (31.91)
Having sex under drug or alcohol influence
No18 (51.43)14 (40.00)3 (8.57)0.306a26 (74.29)9 (25.71)0.530a
Yes66 (50.77)40 (32.73)27 (16.36)103 (79.23)27 (20.77)
Condom usage
Inconsistent17 (44.74)12 (31.58)9 (23.68)0.367a30 (78.95)8 (21.05)0.896a
Consistent67 (52.76)42 (33.07)18 (14.17)99 (77.95)28 (22.05)
Note: aChi-square test; bFisher’s exact test; *p-value < 0.05. STIs: sexually transmitted infections; HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus; ART: antiretroviral therapy.

4. Discussion

This study finding would improve the HIV and STI programs for reducing their transmission among the MSM population in Bali, Indonesia. It was found herein that transactional sex was associated with unprotected sex. MSM engaged in transactional sex to attain particularly the socioeconomic benefits from partners [15]. Transactional sex might create imbalance in power relations to lead into intimate partner violence among MSM [16]. The sexual partner type was also linked with transactional sex wherein romantic MSM partners were engaged in unprotected sex as an expression of love to the partner [17], which in turn increased the HIV and STIs transmission risk [18].

A study in United States had highlighted that MSM considering the relationship as serious tended to perform unprotected sex with partner [19]. MSM with single sexual partner faced difficulties in negotiating for condom usage, especially if they considered the partner as romantic [20]. The same had been reflected in this study where MSM with only one sexual partner had higher prevalence of unprotected sex compared to with multiple partners. Contrarily, MSM with multiple sexual partners had higher STI prevalence compared to with single partner. The findings indicated that condom negotiation and condom usage in MSM population was crucial issue to be addressed via HIV and STI interventions to prevent their transmission among them. Furthermore, limited HIV and STI programs on transmission prevention in MSM population were found in the study setting and Bali, Indonesia in general.

This study found that the unprotected sex prevalence in MSM experiencing verbal and physical violence was higher compared to who did not experience them. A higher STI prevalence was also found in MSM experiencing verbal violence. This might imply that IPV could increase the HIV transmission risk and cause mental health problems in MSM [21]. This could worsen the overall health condition of MSM because they already had suffered from social pressure, multiple layers of stigma, and discrimination [22]. A comprehensive meta-analysis involving 13,797 participants depicted that IPV not only increased the likelihood of substance usage but also led to the higher prevalence of depressive symptoms, HIV positivity, and engagement in unprotected anal sex in MSM [23].

Some studies depicted that IPV had detrimental impact on MSM mental health. Studies conducted in Guatemala and China revealed that experiencing IPV raised the anxiety and depression in MSM individuals [21, 24]. Serious mental health problems could reduce ART retention and adherence in MSM [25]. MSM experiencing IPV had been reported to less likely access the HIV testing [26]. Thus, HIV-related health outcomes could be enhanced in MSM with IPV history by prioritizing mental health as a focal point for intervention [27]. A strategy could involve the integration of HIV services, mental health services, and IPV prevention. Providing mental health services could also increase the uptake of HIV testing and PrEP in MSM [28]. A study in Japan found that the integration of HIV and mental health services increased the treatment retention in PLHIV [29]. IPV screening was imperative in providing mental health services to MSM experiencing violences [29]. Implementing a community-based intervention in MSM communities could improve the access to IPV screening and mental health services for MSM individuals [30]. It was thus crucial for the governments’ and non-governmental organisations’ HIV programs to provide mental health services and IPV prevention.

This study found that above three-quarters of MSM had searched for information about HIV prevention. In contrast, less than one-half of MSM had searched for information about STI prevention, HIV test service, and ART service. MSM in this study lacked information on STIs, HIV tests, and treatments which could lower the uptake of HIV and STIs tests, and non-engagement in treatment programs [31]. Several factors could contribute to persistent problems regarding HIV-related knowledge and limited access to information on HIV and STI prevention in MSM. MSM in Indonesia were often compelled to conceal identities out of societal stigma, fear thereof, and potential criminalization [32]. Conducting HIV programs regarding outreach and health promotion to reach MSM population became difficult in such situation [33]. Conversely, MSM in Indonesia mostly employed secretive platforms such as mobile and web applications to meet other men for sex [34]. Health promotion targeting the MSM population through these platforms could thus be a strategy to improve the MSM knowledge related to HIV and STI [35].

HIV programs could employ a collaborative approach in delivering health promotion, especially by empowering the social network and digital platform used by MSM as communication media [36, 37]. Studies in China and the United States found that providing information and HIV-related services through digital platforms (e.g., mobile health and websites) had increased the engagement of MSM population in accessing HIV-related services [38, 39]. MSM preferred to communicate via digital platform as it provided exclusive and safe environment to interact with others. Providing health information through digital platform was thus a good strategy to access comprehensive information about HIV and STIs in MSM population.

The present study had certain limitations. It was unable to establish causality or draw inferences because of a cross-sectional approach with convenient sampling. Furthermore, the online survey relied on self-reporting which introduced the possibility of recall bias, self-bias, and a tendency to provide socially desirable responses. The duplicate phone numbers were removed during the data validation process of this study. However, it was possible for the multiple families to share the same number. This exclusionary practice could result in systematic bias. Despite these constraints, the study provided valuable insights into the health information-seeking behaviour, intimate partner violence, and sexual risk-taking in the MSM community of Bali, Indonesia. The outcomes of this online survey could be a foundational reference for conducting qualitative studies in future.

5. Conclusions

Most participants of this study consisted of MSM aged 26–30 years, residing in Denpasar, employed, identified as homosexual, not infected by recent STIs, and HIV negative. Pertaining to the trends in health information-seeking behaviour, over one-third of MSM searched for information on HIV prevention, while less than half sought information on STI prevention, HIV treatment, HIV testing services and ART services. The unprotected sex prevalence varied and was associated with physical and verbal violence, transactional sex, and the number of sexual partners. Consequently, the health promotion efforts targeting the MSM community should prioritize STI prevention, HIV treatment, HIV testing services, ART services, and address the impact of intimate partner violence.

Availability of data and materials

The data from this study can be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

NPAH—responsible for conceiving the idea; prepared the initial draft of the manuscript. NPAH and DSL—analyzed the data. PPJ—oversaw the English proofreading and managed the APC (Article Processing Charge) costs. NPAH, PPJ, DSL, HAG, NKF and PRW—critical review the manuscript and approval for its final version. All authors made significant contributions to the development of the article and have approved the version submitted for publication.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The studies involving human participants underwent a review and received approval from the Research Ethics Commission at the Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University/Sanglah General Public Hospital, Bali Province, Indonesia (No. 1335/UN 14.2.2/V.I.I/4/T/2020). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the participants to publish this paper.

Acknowledgment

We express our gratitude to the Center for Public Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine Udayana University, for facilitating the research permits and funding the study. We would also like to extend our appreciation to all the study respondents for generously devoting their valuable time and effort to complete the questionnaire.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at https://oss.jomh.org/files/article/1806557885571710976/attachment/Supplementary%20material.docx.

References

UNAIDS. Global HIV statistic. AIDS by the number 2022. 2022. Available at: https://www.unaids.org/en (Accessed: 12 January 2024).

[Google Scholar]

UNAIDS. Global HIV statistics 2022. 2022. Available at: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/UNAIDS_FactSheet_en.pdf (Accessed: 12 January 2024).

[Google Scholar]

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Laporan Eksekutif Perkembangan HIV AIDS dan Penyakit Infeksi Menular Seksual (PIMS) Triwulan I Tahun 2023. 2023. Available at: https://hivaids-pimsindonesia.or.id/download/file/LaporanTW_I_2023.pdf (Accessed: 12 January 2024).

[Google Scholar]

Johnston LG, Soe P, Widihastuti AS, Camellia A, Putri TA, Rakhmat FF, et al. Alarmingly high HIV prevalence among adolescent and young men who have sex with men (MSM) in Urban Indonesia. AIDS and Behavior. 2021; 25: 3687–3694.

[Google Scholar]

Martiana I, Edianto E. A secondary analysis of peer support and family acceptance among homosexual living with HIV and antiretroviral therapy: quality of life perspectives. Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia. 2021; 24: 1–8.

[Google Scholar]

Kurniawan W. Indonesia: new criminal code disastrous for rights. 2022. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/12/08/indonesia-new-criminal-code-disastrous-rights (Accessed: 14 January 2023).

[Google Scholar]

Fauk NK, Merry MS, Sigilipoe MA, Putra S, Mwanri L. Culture, social networks and HIV vulnerability among men who have sex with men in Indonesia. PLOS ONE. 2017; 12: e0178736.

[Google Scholar]

Fauk NK, Sukmawati AS, Wardojo SSI, Teli M, Bere YK, Mwanri L. The intention of men who have sex with men to participate in voluntary counseling and HIV testing and access free condoms in Indonesia. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2018; 12: 1175–1184.

[Google Scholar]

Zhu Y, Hou F, Chen C, Wei D, Peng L, You X, et al. Moderating effect of self-efficacy on the association of intimate partner violence with risky sexual behaviors among men who have sex with men in China. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2021; 21: 895.

[Google Scholar]

Callan A, Corbally M, McElvaney R. A scoping review of intimate partner violence as it relates to the experiences of gay and bisexual men. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2021; 22: 233–248.

[Google Scholar]

Decker MR, Lyons C, Guan K, Mosenge V, Fouda G, Levitt D, et al. A systematic review of gender-based violence prevention and response interventions for HIV key populations: female sex workers, men who have sex with men, and people who inject drugs. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2022; 23: 676–694.

[Google Scholar]

Decker MR, Park JN, Allen ST, Silberzahn B, Footer K, Huettner S, et al. Inconsistent condom use among female sex workers: partner-specific influences of substance use, violence, and condom coercion. AIDS and Behavior. 2020; 24: 762–774.

[Google Scholar]

Giri MKW, Suwastini NKA, Artini NN. Knowledge and perception of reproductive health among men who have sex with men. in: 3rd international conference on innovative research across disciplines (ICIRAD 2019). Atlantis Press. 2020; 196–201.

[Google Scholar]

Nguyen MX, Krishnan A, Le GM, Nguyen QT, Bhadra NM, Nguyen SM, et al. The use of technology to find sexual health information online among men who have sex with men in Hanoi, Vietnam, 2016. International Journal of STD & AIDS. 2018; 29: 505–510.

[Google Scholar]

Bauermeister J, Eaton L, Stephenson R. A multilevel analysis of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and transactional sex with casual partners among young men who have sex with men living in metro Detroit. Behavioral Medicine. 2016; 42: 197–204.

[Google Scholar]

Gallén ÀG, Tomás C. The gap of masculinity in the research on HIV among men who have sex with men: a review of quantitative literature and theoretical contributions on gender and masculinity approaches. Social Theory & Health. 2015; 13: 202–218.

[Google Scholar]

Larmarange J, Wade AS, Diop AK, Diop O, Gueye K, Marra A, et al. Men who have sex with men (MSM) and factors associated with not using a condom at last sexual intercourse with a man and with a woman in Senegal. PLOS ONE. 2010; 5: e13189.

[Google Scholar]

Oldenburg CE, Perez-Brumer AG, Reisner SL, Mimiaga MJ. Transactional sex and the HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men (MSM): results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS and Behavior. 2015; 19: 2177–2183.

[Google Scholar]

Mustanski B, Newcomb ME, Clerkin EM. Relationship characteristics and sexual risk-taking in young men who have sex with men. Health Psychology. 2011; 30: 597.

[Google Scholar]

Bauermeister JA. Sexual partner typologies among single young men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior. 2015; 19: 1116–1128.

[Google Scholar]

Davis DA, Rock A, Santa Luce R, McNaughton-Reyes L, Barrington C. Intimate partner violence victimization and mental health among men who have sex with men living with HIV in Guatemala. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2022; 37: NP1637–NP1657.

[Google Scholar]

Finneran C, Chard A, Sineath C, Sullivan P, Stephenson R. Intimate partner violence and social pressure among gay men in six countries. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2012; 13: 260.

[Google Scholar]

Buller AM, Devries KM, Howard LM, Bacchus LJ. Associations between intimate partner violence and health among men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Medicine. 2014; 11: e1001609.

[Google Scholar]

Wang L, Hong C, He N, Xavier Hall CD, Simoni JM, Wong FY. Depression as a mediator between intimate partner violence (IPV) and CD4 cell count among men who have sex with men (MSM) living with HIV in China. AIDS Care. 2023; 35: 1667–1676.

[Google Scholar]

Yi S, Tuot S, Chhoun P, Pal K, Choub SC, Mburu G. Mental health among men who have sex with men in Cambodia: implications for integration of mental health services within HIV programmes. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2016; 15: 53.

[Google Scholar]

Gyamerah AO, Taylor KD, Atuahene K, Anarfi JK, Fletcher M, Raymond HF, et al. Stigma, discrimination, violence, and HIV testing among men who have sex with men in four major cities in Ghana. AIDS Care. 2020; 32: 1036–1044.

[Google Scholar]

Tominari S, Nakakura T, Yasuo T, Yamanaka K, Takahashi Y, Shirasaka T, et al. Implementation of mental health service has an impact on retention in HIV care: a nested case-control study in a Japanese HIV care facility. PLOS ONE. 2013; 8: e69603.

[Google Scholar]

Underhill K, Morrow KM, Colleran CM, Holcomb R, Operario D, Calabrese SK, et al. Access to healthcare, HIV/STI testing, and preferred pre-exposure prophylaxis providers among men who have sex with men and men who engage in street-based sex work in the US. PLOS ONE. 2014; 9: e112425.

[Google Scholar]

Daniel MA, Milligan G. Intimate partner violence: how clinicians can be an asset to their patients. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services. 2013; 51: 20–26.

[Google Scholar]

Sharps PW, Njie-Carr VPS, Alexander K. The syndemic interaction of intimate partner violence, sexually transmitted infections, and HIV infection among African American Women: best practices and strategies. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma. 2021; 30: 811–827.

[Google Scholar]

Wirtz AL, Kamba D, Jumbe V, Trapence G, Gubin R, Umar E, et al. A qualitative assessment of health seeking practices among and provision practices for men who have sex with men in Malawi. BMC International Health and Human Rights. 2014; 14: 1–11.

[Google Scholar]

Septarini NW, Chih H, Hendriks J, Maycock B, Burns S. Prevalence of stigma and discrimination amongst men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (Waria) in Bali, Indonesia. Journal of Homosexuality. 2023; 1–23.

[Google Scholar]

Lubis DS, Harjana NPA, Kurniati DPY, Ulandari LPS. Kita Banget application: developing a smartphone-based mobile application for better access to key population’s HIV test and treatment. Annals of Tropical Medicine & Public Health. 2021; 24.

[Google Scholar]

Gedela K, Luis H, Wignall FS, Fridayantara WD, Irwanto. A social context perspective to the increasing HIV epidemic in MSM in Indonesia. International Journal of STD & AIDS. 2020; 31: 1327–1329.

[Google Scholar]

Harjana NPA. Setara mobile app: comprehensive HIV services for men who have sex with men and transgender women during COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Kumpulan Karya Esai Juara. 2022; 1: 79.

[Google Scholar]

Syred J, Holdsworth G, Howroyd C, Spelman K, Baraitser P. Choose to test: self-selected testing for sexually transmitted infections within an online service. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2019; 95: 171–174.

[Google Scholar]

Nugroho A, Erasmus V, Krier SE, Reviagana KP, Laksmono PA, Widihastuti A, et al. Client perspectives on an outreach approach for HIV prevention targeting Indonesian MSM and transwomen. Health Promotion International. 2020; 35: 916–924.

[Google Scholar]

Ko JS, Stafylis C, Klausner JD. Mobile health promotion of human immunodeficiency virus self-testing in the United States. mHealth. 2020; 6.

[Google Scholar]

Li C, Xiong Y, Sit HF, Tang W, Hall BJ, Muessig KE, et al. A men who have sex with men—friendly doctor finder hackathon in Guangzhou, China: development of a mobile health intervention to enhance health care utilization. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2020; 8: e16030.

[Google Scholar]