Journal of Men's Health,2024,20(6):70-77 DOI:10.22514/jomh.2024.093
Original Research
Predominant genotypes of human papillomavirus in Korean men
Jieun Hwang1,, Hee Seung Song2,, Jae Kyung Kim3, Jang Mook Kim1,*,

1Department of Health Administration, College of Health Science, Dankook University, 31116 Cheonan, Republic of Korea

2Department of Nursing, Sangji University, 26339 Wonju, Republic of Korea

3Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, College of Health Science, Dankook University, 31116 Cheonan, Republic of Korea

*Corresponding Author(s):jangmook@dankook.ac.kr (Jang Mook Kim)

† These authors contributed equally.

History Submitted: 26 December 2023 | Accepted: 31 January 2024 | Published: 30 June 2024
Copyright:  ©2024  The Author(s). Published by MRE Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Collapse table of contents

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is associated with several types of cancers in men, including head and neck, anal and genital cancers. However, research on HPV has primarily focused on women, and available data from men are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the positivity rate, genotype distribution, and co-infection rates of HPV in Korean men who visited a hospital owing to a suspected sexually transmitted infection. A total of 14,994 samples sent to specialized laboratories between January 2020 and June 2023 were included in this study. HPV genotypes were determined in the collected specimens (including swabs and urine, semen and prostatic fluid samples). The HPV genotypes varied with age; single infections and co-infections with two or more genotypes were confirmed. A high positivity rate of HPV was observed among Korean men from their teens to their 70s. Single and co-infection positivity rates differed significantly among ages (χ2 = 81.502, p < 0.0001). The most frequently identified HPV genotypes were 6 and 11, whereas the positivity rate of the high-risk genotype 16 increased with age (χ2 = 1012.028, p < 0.0001). Sexual health management efforts should be directed toward both men and women to mitigate disease burden and transmission risks and prevent cervical cancer. A comprehensive analysis of HPV infections in men is warranted.

Keywords:Cervical cancer;Genotype;Human papillomavirus;Male;Multiple infection
PDF(7.59 MB)|EndNote (RIS)|BibTeX|RefMan|RefWorks

Cite this article

Jieun Hwang, Hee Seung Song, Jae Kyung Kim, Jang Mook Kim. Predominant genotypes of human papillomavirus in Korean men.Journal of Men's Health,2024,20(6):70-77 DOI:10.22514/jomh.2024.093

1. Introduction

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the leading cause of cervical cancer and caused the death of more than 340,000 women worldwide in 2020 according to data from the World Health Organization. The management and treatment of cervical cancer are costly, and certain HPV genotypes (including genotypes 16 and 18) are associated with a high risk of developing the disease [1, 2]. In addition, HPV has been linked with other cancers, including head and neck, anal, male genital and prostate cancers. Although HPV-related cervical cancer in women has been extensively researched, interest in HPV infections in men has only recently begun to increase [3, 4, 5].

Previous studies on HPV infection in men have primarily focused on younger age groups that are commonly sexually active [6]. These studies have reported positivity rates, infection symptoms, vaccination awareness and barriers and knowledge gaps. However, research in healthy male populations of various ethnicities is still limited, and existing studies have reported inconsistent results. This gap in research regarding HPV infection in men contrasts with the relatively extensive literature addressing the diagnosis, treatment and prevention in women [6, 7].

Because HPV infection in men can affect women, research on reducing the transmission of HPV-related diseases by focusing on the role of men is imperative [8, 9]. Studies and efforts aimed at preventing HPV infection in men can contribute to understanding sex differences and play a role in reducing health inequalities and sex-based medical biases [10, 11]. Disseminating information and preventive measures for HPV-related diseases to both men and women will contribute to building healthier societies.

Many countries have implemented vaccination programs, but disease progression and treatment may differ according to specific HPV genotypes [12]. Therefore, evaluating the positivity rate of different HPV genotypes in the general male population is crucial. However, large amounts of data on HPV infection are required. In this study, we investigated HPV infection rates in men using a high-throughput HPV monitoring initiative, representing a large-scale research effort.

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the positivity rates, circulating genotypes, and co-infection rates of HPV in Korean men who visited a hospital owing to a suspected sexually transmitted infection (STI). This study aimed to provide foundational data for the development of specialized treatment and prevention strategies targeting HPV strains with specific genotypes that predominantly infect men.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Study design and methods

Men who had been referred to an outsourced testing center (U2Bio) for HPV testing at hospitals nationwide (including primary hospitals with 30 or fewer beds, secondary hospitals with 30–300 beds, and tertiary hospitals with more than 300 beds) between January 2020 and June 2023 were included. They mainly visited the hospital owing to suspected STIs. All personal information except sex and age was removed, and only test result data were collected. After sample collection, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction and multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were conducted to identify HPV genotypes. All testing procedures adhered to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Swabs and tissue, urine and other samples, including semen and prostatic fluid, were collected. No data were collected regarding the anatomical site of swab collection. Swabs were collected by rubbing a sterile cotton swab on the affected area. Tissue was obtained by biopsy, and urine was collected once. DNA was extracted from samples within 48 h using QIAsymphony (SP type, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and refrigerated at 4 °C until testing. The OmniPlex™-HPV kit (GM 3300, Genematrix, Seongnam, Korea) with a CFX96 real-time thermocycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used to perform RT-PCR. The reaction mixture included 2.5 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphates (5 µL), 10× reaction buffer (5 µL), primer mixture (20 pmol), Taq polymerase (0.5 µL), and distilled water adjusted to a final volume of 40 µL. Subsequently, 10 µL of each sample was added to the mixture immediately before the reaction. The PCR conditions involved denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 51 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, repeated for 35 cycles. Finally, extension was carried out at 72 °C for 10 min. HPV genotypes were identified based on the methods employed. The following 41 HPV genotypes could be identified: 6, 11, 16, 18, 26, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 58, 59, 61, 62, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 81, 82, 83, 84, 87 and 99. Twelve HPV genotypes (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58 and 59) were classified as being high risk and 29 (6, 11, 26, 30, 32, 40, 42, 43, 44, 53, 54, 55, 61, 62, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 81, 82, 83, 84, 87 and 99) as being low risk. The HPV positivity rate in this study was defined as the presence of at least one positive result among the 41 HPV genotypes, irrespective of the specific genotype detected.

2.2 Procedure

The sample selection process for data collection is illustrated in Fig. 1. Of the 32,565 HPV specimens tested between January 2020 and June 2023, we excluded cases with insufficient information on sex (n = 417) or age (n = 194), those with data entry errors in age (n = 79), those without a personal identification number (n = 85), and those with a missing HPV genotype (n = 1).

The study was restricted to samples from adult men and excluded samples from women (n = 16,795). The total number of samples included in this study was 14,994.

Sample selection process for data collection. ID, 
identification.

Fig. 1.Sample selection process for data collection. ID, identification.

2.3 Data analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (version 9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), Excel for Microsoft 365 MSO (version 2308, Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA), and RStudio (version 2023.06.1, Posit, PBC, Boston, MA, USA). Nominal data such as HPV positivity rates are presented as frequencies and percentages, and differences in positivity rates were analyzed using the chi-squared test. Continuous data such as age are presented as means and standard deviations. Differences in means were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. Statistical significance was set at p-values < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1 Number of HPV infections and testing types

The infection rate was 62.9%, with the remaining 37.1% of patients not presenting evidence of infection. The maximum number of simultaneous co-infections was 10, reported in one person. The majority of samples (57.6%) exhibited single-type infection. Dual-type co-infections accounted for 25.1% of the positive samples; co-infections with three genotypes, for 10.9%; and co-infections with four or more genotypes, for 6.3%. Tissue samples and swabs accounted for the majority of the samples (Table 1).

Table 1.Rate of concurrent HPV infections and positivity rate in Korean men (N = 14,994).
Categoryn%
Negative556637.1
Positive942862.9
Concurrent infection
Single542757.7
Double237125.1
Triple103210.9
≥Quadruple5986.3
Specimen
Swab509554.0
Tissue374439.7
Urine1561.7
Others4334.6
N, total number of participants; n, number of cases in the category; Others, semen, prostatic fluid.

3.2 Positivity rates for HPV infection according to age

Table 2 illustrates age-specific positivity rates for HPV infection by specimen. The overall HPV positivity rate was 62.9%, consistently exceeding 50% across all age groups. The highest positivity rate was observed in individuals in their 50s (69.6%), whereas the lowest was observed in teenagers (54.5%). For almost all age groups (except individuals in their 70s), single infections were significantly more common than co-infections (χ2 = 81.502, p < 0.0001).

Table 2.Age-specific positivity rates and co-infection rates by specimen (N = 9428).
Anatomic siteSingle≥DoubleDoubleTriple≥Quadruple
Age group (yr)n%2n%n%n%n%
Total (N = 14,994)
≤19 (N = 143, n = 78, 54.5%)14152.63747.41620.51114.11012.8
20s (N = 6179, n = 3750, 60.7%)206155.0168945.093925.046312.32877.7
30s (N = 5824, n = 3680, 66.8%)214058.2154041.896526.23569.72196.0
40s (N = 1929, n = 1289, 66.8%)78260.750739.331124.114110.9554.3
50s (N = 713, n = 496, 69.6%)31964.317735.711222.6499.9163.2
60s (N = 174, n = 116, 66.7%)7867.23832.82420.786.965.2
≥70 (N = 32, n = 19, 59.4%)631.61368.4421.1421.1526.3
χ2 = 81.502, p < 0.00013χ2 = 126.930, p < 0.00014
Swab (N = 9073)
≤19 (N = 89, n = 38, 42.7%)12257.91642.1615.8718.437.9
20s (N = 3725, n = 2002, 53.7%)107953.992346.149624.826813.41597.9
30s (N = 3547, n = 2012, 56.7%)115657.585642.553026.31919.51356.7
40s (N = 1157, n = 698, 60.3%)41158.928741.117324.87711.0375.3
50s (N = 422, n = 264, 62.6%)16161.010339.06524.62810.6103.8
60s (N = 112, n = 68, 60.7%)4769.12130.91319.168.822.9
≥70 (N = 21, n = 12, 57.1%)433.3866.7325.0325.0216.7
χ2 = 49.5861, p < 0.00013χ2 = 73.5006, p < 0.00014
Tissue (N = 4050)
≤19 (N = 37, n = 35, 94.6%)11542.92057.11028.6411.4617.1
20s (N = 1611, n = 1485, 92.2%)83055.965544.138025.616611.21097.3
30s (N = 1566, n = 1441, 92.0%)85059.059141.038426.61429.9654.5
40s (N = 562, n = 529, 94.1%)32962.220037.812623.85710.8173.2
50s (N = 221, n = 206, 93.2%)13967.56732.54220.4209.752.4
60s (N = 44, n = 41, 93.2%)2868.31331.7819.524.937.3
≥70 (N = 9, n = 7, 77.8%)228.6571.4114.3114.3342.9
χ2 = 27.7083, p = 0.00613χ2 = 66.1813, p < 0.00014
Urine (N = 823)
≤19 (N = 7, n = 2, 28.6%)1150.0150.000.000.0150.0
20s (N = 340, n = 67, 19.7%)4567.22232.8913.4811.957.5
30s (N = 306, n = 56, 18.3%)4071.41628.61221.423.623.6
40s (N = 118, n = 19, 16.1%)1473.7526.3315.8210.500.0
50s (N = 38, n = 9, 23.7%)777.8222.2111.100.0111.1
60s (N = 12, n = 3, 25.0%)266.7133.300.000.0133.3
≥70 (N = 2, n = 0, 0%)00.000.000.000.000.0
χ2 = 3.8982, p = 0.98523χ2 = 25.5594, p = 0.37594
Others (N = 1048)
≤19 (N = 10, n = 3, 30.0%)13100.0--------
20s (N = 503, n = 196, 39.0%)10754.68945.45427.62110.7147.1
30s (N = 405, n = 171, 42.2%)9455.07745.03922.82112.3179.9
40s (N = 92, n = 43, 46.7%)2865.11534.9920.9511.612.3
50s (N = 32, n = 17, 53.1%)1270.6529.4423.515.9--
60s (N = 6, n = 4, 66.7%)125.0375.0375.0----
χ2 = 14.2868, p = 0.16033χ2 = 25.1409, p = 0.19614

1N, Total participants; n, Number of positive cases; %, Positivity rate. 2Percentage refers to each case compared with the total number of positive cases. 3The χ2 value represents the difference between single and co-infection rates by age group in each specimen. 4The χ2 value represents the difference between single HPV infection and rates of co-infection with 2, 3 and ≥4 HPV genotypes by age group in each specimen.

Among the specimens, the highest positivity rate for swabs was in the group of men in their 50s (62.6%), while the lowest was in the group of men 19 years old and younger (42.7%). The group with the highest number of single infections was men in their 60s (69.1%), and the highest number of multiple infections was seen in the group of men in their 70s and older (66.7%). For tissues, the highest positivity rate was among those aged 19 years and younger (94.6%), while the lowest positivity rate was among those aged 70 years and older (77.8%). For urine, the highest positivity rate was among those aged 19 years and younger (28.6%), and the lowest was among those aged 70 years and older (0%), but this group only had two specimens.

3.3 Rates of single and multiple HPV infections

Rates of single and multiple HPV infections in men were 57.6% and 42.4%, respectively. When examining multiple HPV infections in men across all age groups, the highest rate was found in men aged ≥70 years (13, 68.4%), although the sample size was limited.

3.4 Age-specific HPV co-infections

Examining age-specific concurrent HPV infections in men revealed that dual infections with two viruses were most prevalent in those in their 30s, whereas infections with three or more viruses concurrently were most common in individuals aged ≥70 years.

3.5 Genotypes and average ages of HPV-positive men

The mean age of HPV-positive men was 33.3 years, with a standard deviation of ±9.0 years. Fig. 2 presents the genotypes and average ages of HPV-positive Korean men. Excluding the age of individuals infected with genotype 69 (45.3 ± 15.5 years), the average age of individuals infected with HPV ranged from 30.4 ± 7.9 years (type 18, high risk) to 37.6 ± 11.0 years (type 32). The highest mean age corresponded to individuals infected with genotype 69 (F = 7.38, p < 0.0001).

Average ages of HPV-positive men according to HPV genotype (N = 
9428). HPV, Human papillomavirus.

Fig. 2.Average ages of HPV-positive men according to HPV genotype (N = 9428). HPV, Human papillomavirus.

Further details of each specimen are provided in Supplementary Table 1, which shows the mean age of HPV-positive men by genotype and specimen. For swabs, patients with genotype 69 had the highest mean age (45.9 ± 0.0 years). For tissue samples, patients with genotype 32 had the highest mean age (36.9 ± 9.3 years), and for urine samples, patients with genotype 54 had the highest mean age (48.0 ± 18.7 years).

3.6 Age-specific positivity rates of high-risk HPV infection according to genotype

Fig. 3 illustrates age-specific positivity rates of high-risk HPV infection according to genotype. The positivity rate for genotype 16 increased with age (χ2 = 1012.028, p < 0.0001). The positivity rates for all genotypes varied with age, decreasing in diversity with increasing age.

Further details on each specimen are presented in Supplementary Table 2.

Age-specific positivity rates of high-risk HPV infection 
according to genotype (N = 9428).

Fig. 3.Age-specific positivity rates of high-risk HPV infection according to genotype (N = 9428).

4. Discussion

While considerable attention has been dedicated to HPV infection in women, studies focusing on the male population are lacking. To comprehensively understand this virus, a closer examination of the characteristics of infection in men is imperative [13, 14]. Therefore, this study used large-scale population-based data to determine the positivity rates, genotypes, and co-infection rates of HPV in Korean men.

The results of this study indicated that positivity rates consistently exceeded 50% across all age groups. The highest positivity rate was observed in individuals in their 50s, whereas the lowest rate was noted in teenagers. The reasons for the differences in HPV positivity rates among age groups may include differences in immunity depending on age and higher vaccination rates in young people.

An analysis of infection rates discriminated by sex in seven testing facilities in Iran comprising 2727 samples revealed a higher positivity rate in men than in women [15]. Conversely, a meta-analysis incorporating HPV data from 35 countries revealed an overall positivity rate of 31% (95% confidence interval: 27–35) for all HPV genotypes. The highest positivity rate was observed in young men in the age range of 25–29 years, and it stabilized or slightly decreased thereafter [16]. Previous studies have reported diverse positivity rates in different countries. One study in which the integrated positivity rates for each country varied widely (from 1% to 84%) suggests that regional differences, variations in sample types, and differences in testing methods contributed to these variations [17].

The high-risk genotype 16 accounted for a significant positivity rate of cases with increasing age. This supports previous findings suggesting that men may be a reservoir for HPV infection and a potential target for monitoring and that the risk of developing an HPV infection in women may persist across different age groups [18]. Therefore, HPV infection management should not be limited to younger sexually active age groups but should cover all ages.

In the present study, the number of genotypes infecting men varied with age. As age increased, the diversity of genotypes decreased, and the positivity rate for high-risk genotype 16 increased. As these genotypes are associated with cancer development, the role of men in female infections should not be overlooked, even with aging [19].

In this study, the most common HPV genotypes in men were 6 and 11, which are categorized as low-risk HPV genotypes. According to previous research on HPV genotypes in men in East and Southeast Asia, genotype 6 had the highest positivity rate, with genotype 11 being the sixth most common [16]. Additionally, Hoai et al. [20] reported positivity rates of 36.7% and 21.4% for genotypes 6 and 11, respectively, and identified them as the two most common low-risk genotypes. Although HPV genotypes 6 and 11 are classified as low risk, they are associated with genital warts and recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Previous research has emphasized the importance of promoting the early use of HPV vaccines targeting genotypes 6 and 11 in men for the prevention of these conditions [21, 22].

The present study revealed a high positivity rate of HPV co-infections in men, with an overall positivity rate of 62.9%. The maximum number of co-infecting HPV genotypes was 10.

Although there is currently no clear explanation for the mechanism underlying co-infections, their occurrence has been reported in previous studies. It is crucial not to overlook the causative roles of different HPV subtypes in various malignancies. Additionally, differences in variants between complex HPV genotypes due to co-infections with other HPV genotypes may be involved in this mechanism [23, 24].

4.1 Implications for clinical practice

In this study, men showed a high positivity rate of HPV infection across all age ranges. This represents a risk to their sexual partners in terms of increased risk of transmission and potential health implications. Therefore, efforts should be directed toward proactive prevention and control of infections, including those among non-heterosexual individuals. Additionally, there should be an increase in awareness, promotion of vaccination, and implementation of public education programs covering HPV, including those targeted at adolescents. By focusing efforts on all genders, these initiatives aim to reduce the disease burden and transmission risk, ultimately contributing to the prevention of cervical cancer [25, 26].

4.2 Study strengths

The strength of our study lies in the use of a large-scale participant-based dataset encompassing individuals from their teenage years to their 70s.

4.3 Limitations and scope for future studies

This study was constrained by limited data (restricted to sex, age and sample results) and lacked additional information on clinical symptoms or underlying conditions of the participants. Furthermore, samples used in this study included swabs and tissue and urine samples. The absence of a direct comparison between sample categories and adjustments for each sample type in comparison with other studies may impose limitations to the interpretation of the results and analyses. As the samples were mainly from patients who had visited the clinic due to a suspected STIs, it is not possible to assume that all the samples are representative of those from a population of healthy men.

5. Conclusions

Our analysis of HPV genotypes in a large dataset of Korean men revealed significant differences in positivity rates across various age groups. The most prevalent HPV genotypes were 6 and 11. Although genotypes 16 and 18 were associated with a lower average patient age, they accounted for a higher proportion of positive samples as patient age increased. The detected genotypes varied with age, with genotype 69 being the most frequently detected. Additionally, the occurrence of HPV co-infections was common. These findings underscore the importance of implementing HPV prevention and infection management strategies throughout the lifespan in men.

Abbreviations

HPV, human papillomavirus; IRB, Institutional Review Board.

Availability of data and materials

The data utilized in this study were obtained from U2Bio laboratories. Due to company policy, we are unable to make the data publicly available. However, the data are accessible through the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Author contributions

JH and HSS—made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study, and these authors contributed equally to this study. JKK and JMK—made substantial contributions to the acquisition and analysis of the data. JKK—made a substantial contribution to the data analysis. JH, HSS and JMK—wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the IRB of U2Bio (IRB No. 2023066) and conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. As the data were analyzed retrospectively and personal information from the participants was not used, the requirement for obtaining informed consent was waived by the IRB of U2Bio.

Acknowledgment

We thank the employees at our testing center in U2Bio (Seoul, South Korea) for their assistance in accessing the HPV PCR assay data.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at https://oss.jomh.org/files/article/1806563269636177920/attachment/Supplementary%20material.docx.

References

World Health Organization. Global Cancer Observatory. Cancer Today. Estimated number of incident cases and deaths: world, both sexes, all ages 2020. 2020. Available at: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home (Accessed: 22 December 2023).

[Google Scholar]

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). STI prevalence, incidence, and cost estimates in the United States, 2018. 2021. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/prevalence-2020-at-a-glance.htm (Accessed: 07 December 2023).

[Google Scholar]

Anic GM, Giuliano AR. Genital HPV infection and related lesions in men. Preventive Medicine. 2011; 53: S36–S41.

[Google Scholar]

Muscianisi F, De Toni L, Giorato G, Carosso A, Foresta C, Garolla A. Is HPV the novel target in male idiopathic infertility? A systematic review of the literature. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2021; 12: 643539.

[Google Scholar]

McNicol PJ, Dodd JG. Detection of human papillomavirus DNA in prostate gland tissue by using the polymerase chain reaction amplification assay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1990; 28: 409–412.

[Google Scholar]

Dibble KE, Maksut JL, Siembida EJ, Hutchison M, Bellizzi KM. A systematic literature review of HPV vaccination barriers among adolescent and young adult males. Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology. 2019; 8: 495–511.

[Google Scholar]

Han JJ, Beltran TH, Song JW, Klaric J, Choi YS. Prevalence of genital human papillomavirus infection and human papillomavirus vaccination rates among US adult men: national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES) 2013–2014. JAMA Oncology. 2017; 3: 810–816.

[Google Scholar]

Tuominen H, Rautava J, Kero K, Syrjänen S, Collado MC, Rautava S. HPV infection and bacterial microbiota in the semen from healthy men. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2021; 21: 373.

[Google Scholar]

Ingles DJ, Lin H, Fulp WJ, Sudenga SL, Lu B, Schabath MB, et al. An analysis of HPV infection incidence and clearance by genotype and age in men: the HPV infection in men (HIM) study. Papillomavirus Research. 2015; 1: 126–135.

[Google Scholar]

Magana K, Strand L, Love M, Moore T, Peña A, Ford AI, et al. Health inequities in human papillomavirus prevention, diagnostics and clinical care in the USA: a scoping review. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2023; 99: 128–136.

[Google Scholar]

López ED. Vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) in vulnerable populations—sexual minorities. Molecular Mechanisms in Cancer. 1st edn. IntechOpen: London. 2022.

[Google Scholar]

Tsu VD, LaMontagne DS, Atuhebwe P, Bloem PN, Ndiaye C. National implementation of HPV vaccination programs in low-resource countries: lessons, challenges, and future prospects. Preventive Medicine. 2021; 144: 106335.

[Google Scholar]

Foresta C, Garolla A, Parisi S, Ghezzi M, Bertoldo A, Di Nisio A, et al. HPV prophylactic vaccination in males improves the clearance of semen infection. EBioMedicine. 2015; 2: 1487–1493.

[Google Scholar]

Ventimiglia E, Horenblas S, Muneer A, Salonia A. Human papillomavirus infection and vaccination in males. European Urology Focus. 2016; 2: 355–362.

[Google Scholar]

Rezaee Azhar I, Yaghoobi M, Mossalaeie MM, Kollaee Darabi A, Nejadeh AH, Jamshidi M, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes between outpatients males and females referred to seven laboratories in Tehran, Iran. Infectious Agents and Cancer. 2022; 17: 7.

[Google Scholar]

Bruni L, Albero G, Rowley J, Alemany L, Arbyn M, Giuliano AR, et al. Global and regional estimates of genital human papillomavirus prevalence among men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Global Health. 2023; 11: e1345–e1362.

[Google Scholar]

Sabet F, Mosavat A, Ahmadi Ghezeldasht S, Basharkhah S, Shamsian SAA, Abbasnia S, et al. Prevalence, genotypes and phylogenetic analysis of human papillomaviruses (HPV) in northeast Iran. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2021; 103: 480–488.

[Google Scholar]

Zou K, Huang Y, Li Z. Prevention and treatment of human papillomavirus in men benefits both men and women. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2022; 12: 1750.

[Google Scholar]

Rodríguez-Álvarez MI, Gómez-Urquiza JL, Husein-El Ahmed H, Albendín-García L, Gómez-Salgado J, Cañadas-De la Fuente GA. Prevalence and risk factors of human papillomavirus in male patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018; 15: 2210.

[Google Scholar]

Hoai BN, Cao TN, Luong Thi LA, Nguyen MN, Duong HQ, Than VT. Human papillomavirus prevalence and genotype distribution in Vietnamese male patients between 2016 and 2020. Journal of Medical Virology. 2022; 94: 2892–2896.

[Google Scholar]

Goldstone SE, Giuliano AR, Palefsky JM, Lazcano-Ponce E, Penny ME, Cabello RE, et al. Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of a quadrivalent HPV vaccine in men: results of an open-label, long-term extension of a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2022; 22: 413–425.

[Google Scholar]

Gou T, Liu P, Yao X, Zhang L. Clinical characteristics of human papillomavirus infection in the male genital tract. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine. 2023; 29: 425–429.

[Google Scholar]

Hussain S, Rani J, Tulsyan S, Sisodiya S, Chikara A, Nazir SU, et al. Influence of HPV infection in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gene Reports. 2022; 28: 101640.

[Google Scholar]

Jin H, Kim DH, Lee KE. Human papillomavirus prevalence in urine samples of asymptomatic male sexual partners of women with sexually transmitted diseases. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18: 11706.

[Google Scholar]

Kim HW, Kim SE, Ahn HY, Lee EJ, Lee JL, Kang SY, et al. Association of the perceived severity of the human papillomavirus with the preventive intention of HPV infection in male adolescents: a cross-sectional survey. Journal of Men’s Health. 2019; 15: 47–57.

[Google Scholar]

Grewal R, Deeks SL, Hart TA, Cox J, De Pokomandy A, Grennan T, et al. HPV vaccination among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Canada’s three largest cities: a person-centred approach. Journal of Men’s Health. 2023; 19: 22–33.

[Google Scholar]