Journal of Men's Health,2025,21(6):33-40 DOI:10.22514/jomh.2025.078
Original Research

Re-sperm collection with a short abstinence time: a strategy for successful cryopreservation in cryptozoospermia

Wen-Rui Zhao1,2, Bo Liu1,2, Xue-Feng Luo1,2, Jin-Yan Xu1,2, Chen Luo1,2, Yuan Liu1,2, Yang Xian1,2,*,, Fu-Ping Li1,2,*,

1Department of Andrology/Sichuan Human Sperm Bank, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, 610000 Chengdu, Sichuan, China

2Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, 610000 Chengdu, Sichuan, China

*Corresponding Author(s):lfpsnake@scu.edu.cn (Fu-Ping Li); xianyang0402@163.com (Yang Xian)

History Submitted: 06 March 2025 | Accepted: 27 March 2025 | Published: 30 June 2025
Copyright:  ©2025  The Author(s). Published by MRE Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Collapse table of contents

Abstract

Background: Recent studies suggest that short-term abstinence may improve semen parameters; however, its impact on cryptozoospermia remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a 2-hour abstinence interval on sperm cryopreservation outcomes and assisted reproductive success in patients with cryptozoospermia. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at a human sperm bank affiliated with a tertiary hospital from September 2023 to September 2024. A total of 78 patients diagnosed with cryptozoospermia or severe oligozoospermia undergoing fertility preservation were included. Each participant provided two semen samples via masturbation: the first after 2–7 days of abstinence, and the second following a 2-hour abstinence interval. The study compared sperm cryopreservation efficacy and assisted reproductive outcomes between these two collection protocols. Results: Comparative analysis revealed a significant reduction in semen volume with short-term abstinence (p < 0.001). Notably, in cryptozoospermic patients, the second sample showed a significantly higher motile sperm concentration (p = 0.003), increasing cryopreservation success rates from 53.19% (25/47) to 63.83% (30/47). However, no significant difference was observed in post-thaw sperm survival rates between the first and second samples (45.59% ± 21.16% vs. 40.83% ± 19.82%, p = 0.626). Preliminary clinical data from 7 patients utilizing cryopreserved sperm revealed 4 clinical pregnancies, including 2 live births. Conclusions: These findings indicate that short-interval sperm collection enhances cryopreservation feasibility for cryptozoospermic patients without compromising post-thaw viability, potentially reducing reliance on invasive testicular sperm extraction. While larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these reproductive outcome benefits, this dual-collection protocol offers a cost-effective strategy to optimize sperm availability for intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles in cases of severe male factor infertility. These results highlight the clinical value of tailored abstinence protocols in fertility preservation programs.

Keywords:Cryptozoospermia;Extremely severe oligozoospermia;Motile sperm;Sperm cryopreservation;Short abstinence
PDF(670.75 kB)|EndNote (RIS)|BibTeX|RefMan|RefWorks

Cite this article

Wen-Rui Zhao, Bo Liu, Xue-Feng Luo, Jin-Yan Xu, Chen Luo, Yuan Liu, et al.Re-sperm collection with a short abstinence time: a strategy for successful cryopreservation in cryptozoospermia.Journal of Men's Health,2025,21(6):33-40 DOI:10.22514/jomh.2025.078

1. Introduction

Approximately 17.5% of childbearing-age couples are unable to conceive naturally, with 50% of these cases attributable to male factors [1]. A low sperm count is a significant cause of male infertility. Cryptozoospermia is defined as the absence of sperm cells in freshly ejaculated semen, although rare spermatozoa can be detected in the sediment after high-speed centrifugation [2]. In contrast, extremely severe oligozoospermia is characterized by the presence of spermatozoa in some semen samples under direct microscopic examination, but in concentrations too low to be accurately quantified [3].

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is an effective treatment for both cryptozoospermia and extremely severe oligozoospermia. However, not all patients with cryptozoospermia can find sufficient viable sperm on the day of egg retrieval, necessitating testicular sperm extraction (TESE) [4]. Patients undergoing TESE may experience pain, hematoma and inflammation, and they also face a risk of androgen deficiency due to testicular failure [5]. Although a study by K. Alrabeeah et al. [4] demonstrated that micro-TESE enabled successful sperm retrieval in 92% (22/24) of cryptozoospermic patients, it must be emphasized that there remains a subset of these individuals for whom surgical sperm retrieval is unattainable. Freezing sperm in advance at a sperm bank can increase their chances of achieving pregnancy using their own sperm [4, 6].

Several studies have indicated that the duration of abstinence is linked to semen parameters [7, 8, 9]. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends an optimal abstinence period of 2 to 7 days for men, while the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) suggests a shorter interval of 3 to 4 days [10]. The optimal abstinence time remains controversial, particularly for men with low fertility, where a 2 to 7-day abstinence period may be less beneficial [7]. Furthermore, some studies have reported that ejaculating shortly after a standard abstinence period (e.g., 2–7 days) results in a second semen sample with higher sperm concentration, improved morphology, increased motility, and reduced sperm DNA damage compared to the first sample [11]. Notably, sperm DNA damage has been shown to adversely affect post-implantation development and increase the risk of spontaneous abortion [12]. These findings may explain why short-term abstinence (e.g., <2 days) before ejaculation has been associated with improved outcomes in assisted reproduction techniques [13, 14].

In patients with cryptozoospermia, the impact of short abstinence periods on sperm quality has been rarely investigated. Notably, one study demonstrated that when patients with cryptozoospermia provided multiple semen samples within 24 hours, sperm concentration did not decrease, while motility significantly improved [15]. The unpredictability of detecting spermatozoa in semen samples constitutes a critical determinant for assisted reproductive technology outcomes, rendering preemptive sperm cryopreservation an essential strategy [6]. Importantly, no studies to date have systematically examined the correlation between short-term abstinence duration and sperm cryopreservation effectiveness.

The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate whether the total number of motile sperm in patients with cryptozoospermia increases after short-term abstinence, and to determine whether the efficacy of sperm cryopreservation in these patients is improved by subsequent sample collection after such abstinence periods. The secondary objectives are to compare the post-freeze-thaw sperm survival rates between semen ejaculated after a normal abstinence period and that ejaculated after short-term abstinence and to preliminarily explore whether there are differences in the assisted reproductive outcomes of sperm from the two different sources.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Patients

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 78 male infertility patients diagnosed with cryptozoospermia or extremely severe oligospermia, where spermatozoa could be found in some semen samples under direct microscopic examination but in concentrations too low to count. These patients consulted about sperm cryopreservation at the Human Sperm Bank, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University (Chengdu, China), from September 2023 to September 2024. The inclusion criteria for this study were having undergone at least one semen analysis within six months in which sperm were detected, sperm concentration less than 10,000/mL, and consent to provide a second semen sample via masturbation two hours after the first sample. Data such as age, body mass index (BMI), testicular volume, hormone levels, and azoospermia factor (AZF) microdeletion results were recorded. This study received approval from the Institutional Review Board of West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University (Chengdu, China; Approval No. 2023297).

2.2 Semen sample collection and processing

All semen samples were collected by masturbation at the clinic to minimize variables affecting semen parameters. The first semen sample was collected after an abstinence period of 2 to 7 days. A second sample was collected using the same method two hours after the first collection. All samples were incubated at 37 °C for at least 20 minutes to allow liquefaction before analysis. Subsequently, 10 µL of each semen sample was evenly spread on a glass slide, and motile sperm within the entire droplet were counted independently by two experienced embryologists. The average of their counts was recorded.

2.3 Cryopreservation and thawing of sperm

Before cryopreservation, all semen samples underwent centrifugation at 800× g for 30 minutes. Subsequently, the supernatant was carefully aspirated, leaving behind a 100-µL aliquot of the sample, which included the sediment. The sediment was then distributed on a sterile petri dish, and the total count of motile sperm was assessed under an inverted microscope.

Only those samples with more than 10 motile sperm advanced to the subsequent freezing stage. In cases where the motile sperm count was below this threshold, patients were promptly informed that their semen did not satisfy the criteria for freezing.

Next, 25 µL cryoprotectant solution was added to the samples and thoroughly mixed to ensure homogeneous distribution of the cryoprotectant. The resulting mixture was then equally divided and transferred into two straws. To initiate the freezing process, the straws were first exposed to liquid nitrogen vapor for 10 minutes, after which they were fully submerged in liquid nitrogen.

Thawing procedures were conducted on the same day as freezing. If the patient’s consent was obtained, we selected one of the two straws in the same batch for thawing to evaluate the sperm survival rate after freezing and thawing. Otherwise, both straws would be retained for subsequent assisted reproductive technology treatments.

For thawing, the semen samples were immersed in water maintained at 37 °C for 2 minutes. Following thawing, a 10-µL aliquot of the sample was spread evenly on a glass slide to facilitate the counting of motile sperm. The survival rate of the sperm was determined by dividing the number of motile sperm after thawing by the pre-freeze count.

2.4 Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were presented as mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range) and percentages as appropriate. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess data normality. For data that met parametric test assumptions, the Student’s t-test was applied. Otherwise, the Mann-Whitney U test or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test was utilized. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 27, IBM Corporation, Somers, NY, USA).

3. Results

From September 2023 to September 2024, a total of 78 male infertility patients met the inclusion criteria based on their semen parameters. Among them, 10 patients declined to provide a second semen sample for various reasons: 4 due to time constraints, 3 due to physical discomfort, 1 because sufficient sperm had already been frozen, and 2 for other unspecified reasons. Consequently, 68 patients were included in the final analysis, with 47 (69.12%) diagnosed with cryptozoospermia and 21 (30.88%) diagnosed with severe oligoasthenospermia. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics and hormone levels between the two groups (Table 1).

Table 1.Comparison of the baseline characteristics and hormone levels: cryptozoospermia vs. extremely severe oligospermia.
TotalCryptozoospermiaExtremely severe oligospermiap
Patients684721
Age (yr)30.78 ± 4.2230.81 ± 4.6030.71 ± 3.320.933
BMI (kg/m2)23.61 (21.24, 26.72)23.03 (21.22, 26.23)24.72 (21.83, 27.24)0.189
Left testicular volume (mL)8.63 ± 4.828.45 ± 4.899.03 ± 4.740.649
Right testicular volume (mL)8.54 ± 5.108.16 ± 5.209.40 ± 4.910.358
Total testicular volume (mL)17.17 ± 9.5816.60 ± 9.8618.43 ± 9.020.472
FSH (IU/L)22.66 ± 14.3121.70 ± 13.1125.55 ± 17.840.447
LH (IU/L)7.58 ± 4.617.45 ± 3.857.97 ± 6.530.892
E2 (pg/mL)26.14 ± 6.8426.71 ± 7.1824.43 ± 5.640.343
T (ng/mL)3.44 ± 1.683.54 ± 1.843.15 ± 1.090.518
AZF microdeletions, n (%)15 (22.06%)8 (17.21%)7 (33.33%)0.134
BMI: Body mass index; AZF: azoospermia factor; FSH: Follicle - Stimulating Hormone; E2: Estradiol; T: Testosterone; LH: Luteinizing Hormone.

3.1 Effect of abstinence interval on the quality of semen samples

All 68 patients provided their first semen samples by masturbation after a standard abstinence period of 4.93 ± 1.75 days, with the second samples collected two hours later. Significant differences were observed between the two samples in terms of semen volume and total number of motile sperm. However, there was no significant difference in motile sperm concentration between the first and second collections (Table 2).

Table 2.Comparison of semen parameters between the first and second semen samples (n = 68).
Semen ParameterFirst SampleSecond Samplep
Abstinence time4.93 ± 1.75 d2 h
Volume (mL)3.18 ± 1.551.65 ± 0.85<0.001
Motility sperm Concentration (sperm/mL)*16.50 (0.00, 537.5)50.00 (0.00, 475.00)0.953
Total motile sperm count (sperm)*64.35 (0.00, 1583.75)25.00 (0.00, 777.50)0.007
*: Both the motility sperm concentration and total motile sperm represent the characteristics of the raw semen without centrifugation treatment.

Both the motility sperm concentration and total motile sperm represent the characteristics of the raw semen without centrifugation treatment.

Among the 47 patients diagnosed with cryptozoospermia, 14 patients (29.79%) showed no sperm in either the first or second semen samples. In contrast, sperm was detected in at least one of the samples for the remaining 33 patients (70.21%). The volume of the first semen sample was greater than that of the second (p < 0.001), while the second sample demonstrated a significantly higher motile sperm concentration (p = 0.003). However, no significant difference was observed in the total number of motile sperm between the two samples (p = 0.248) (Table 3).

Table 3.Comparison of semen parameters between the first and second semen samples, in patients with cryptozoospermia (n = 33) and patients with extremely severe oligospermia (n = 21).
Cryptozoospermia (n = 33)pExtremely severe oligospermia (n = 21)p
Semen ParameterFirst SampleSecond SampleFirst SampleSecond Sample
Abstinence time4.64 ± 2.06 d2 h5.05 ± 1.28 d2 h
Volume (mL)3.11 ± 1.701.58 ± 0.95<0.0013.65 ± 1.422.07 ± 0.67<0.001
Motility sperm Concentration (sperm/mL)*0.00 (0.00, 150.00)100.00 (0.00, 700.00)0.003666.00 (300.00, 1367.00)200.00 (25.00, 925.00)0.005
Total motile sperm count (sperm)*0.00 (0.00, 462.50)100.00 (0.00, 830.00)0.2482450.00 (1262.70, 5400.45)380.00 (75.00, 1616.45)<0.001
*: Both the motility sperm concentration and total motile sperm represent the characteristics of the raw semen without centrifugation treatment.

In all 21 patients diagnosed with severe oligospermia, sperm were detected in both semen samples. Significant differences were observed between the first and second samples in terms of semen volume, motile sperm concentration, and total number of motile sperm (Table 3).

Both the motility sperm concentration and total motile sperm represent the characteristics of the raw semen without centrifugation treatment.

3.2 Cryopreservation and thawing of semen samples

Overall, 49 patients (72.06%) successfully cryopreserved sperm at the sperm bank. Detailed cryopreservation success rates are presented in Table 4. Concisely, in patients with cryptozoospermia, the contribution of the second semen sample increased the cryopreservation success rate from 25/47 (53.19%) to 30/47 (63.83%). A total of 17 first-collection and 12 second-collection semen samples were thawed. No significant difference was found in the thawed sperm survival rate between the first and second semen samples (45.59% ± 21.16% vs. 40.83% ± 19.82%, p = 0.626) (Fig. 1). The criteria for successful cryopreservation and the methodology for calculating thawed sperm survival rates are detailed in earlier sections.

Table 4.The cryopreservation success rate of patients.
TotalCryptozoospermiaExtremely severe oligospermia
Patients684721
Number of patients with Sample cryopreservation, n (%)49 (72.06%)30 (63.83%)19 (90.48%)
Number of patients with first Sample cryopreservation, n (%)44 (64.71%)25 (53.19%)19 (90.48%)
Number of patients with second Sample cryopreservation, n (%)40 (58.82%)23 (48.94%)17 (80.95%)
Comparison of post-thaw sperm survival rates between the first 
and second semen samples. ns: no significant difference.

Fig. 1.Comparison of post-thaw sperm survival rates between the first and second semen samples. ns: no significant difference.

3.3 Outcomes of using cryopreserved sperm in assisted reproductive technology

A total of 7 patients utilized their cryopreserved sperm for assisted reproductive technology. Currently, 4 patients have achieved clinical pregnancy. Among these, 2 have resulted in live births, while the outcomes of the other 2 are still unknown (Table 5).

Table 5.The outcomes of using cryopreserved sperm in assisted reproductive technology.
PatientDisease categoriesOrigin of frozen spermCryopre-servation duration (d)Number of retrieve oocytesNumber of injected spermNumber of fertilizationsNumber of available embryosNumber of transplantationsPregn-ancyTake-home baby
1ESO1st29643222No-
2ESO1st2529161251YesYes
3ESO1st912416222No-
4CZ1st and 2nd321813732YesYes
5CZ1st40174222YesUnknown
6CZ2nd9854211YesUnknown
7CZ1st and 2nd186205222No-
ESO: extremely severe oligozoospermia; CZ: cryptozoospermia; 1st: The first semen sample; 2nd: The second semen sample; “Unknown” means that the outcome cannot be traced or has not occurred yet.

4. Discussion

Over recent decades, a steady decline in global male semen quality has been observed, particularly manifested by declining sperm concentration and total sperm count [16]. Factors including obesity, suboptimal dietary patterns, psychological stress, ionizing radiation, abuse of tobacco and alcohol, as well as the COVID-19 pandemic, have collectively led to the decline in male spermatogenic function [17, 18, 19]. In cases of cryptozoospermia, testicular tissue may harbor only a limited number of viable spermatogenic foci. However, this residual spermatogenic capacity demonstrates progressive deterioration with disease progression, advancing age, alterations in hormonal profiles, and pathologically elevated inhibin B expression—biochemical changes that may ultimately culminate in complete spermatogenic failure [20, 21]. ICSI has become a cornerstone in assisted reproductive technology for addressing male infertility. However, its clinical efficacy remains critically dependent on successful sperm retrieval, posing significant challenges in cryptozoospermic patients who may face consistent absences of sperm in semen samples. In our study, sperm was absent in the semen of 17 out of 68 patients (25%). This aligns closely with findings by Chong Won Bak et al. [22], who reported that 18 out of 65 patients (27.7%) with oligospermia eventually developed azoospermia, particularly those who initially had fewer sperm. This similarity underscores the importance of addressing cryptozoospermia to enhance sperm availability.

Most existing research indicates that shorter abstinence periods lead to reduced semen volume [13, 23, 24, 25], similar findings were also observed in our study. Semen volume is a reliable marker of the secretory functions of accessory glands, particularly the seminal vesicles. The reduction in semen volume following short-term abstinence is likely due to insufficient time for these glands, especially the seminal vesicle and prostate gland, to replenish fully [26]. High serum testosterone levels are known to enhance the secretory activities of these glands, suggesting that the observed reduced volume may be associated with limited testosterone exposure during shorter abstinence periods [27].

While ICSI can fertilize an oocyte by injecting immotile sperm, the random use of immotile sperm often leads to lower fertilization rates [28]. The pH of seminal plasma, influenced by the secretions of accessory glands, plays a significant role in sperm motility. Moreover, longer abstinence periods can lead to sperm damage due to prolonged exposure to reactive oxygen species in the epididymal environment, potentially impairing motility [29]. Previous studies on abstinence duration and sperm motility have shown mixed results, but uniformly used the “percentage of motile sperm” as a motility indicator [23, 30, 31]. However, in conditions like cryptozoospermia and severe oligospermia, even minor counting inaccuracies can cause significant deviations in motility percentages. Therefore, the traditional semen parameters such as “Progressive motility” and “Sperm concentration”, may not effectively characterize these conditions. Our study therefore included both motile sperm concentration and total motile sperm count to provide a more precise assessment. We observed that shorter abstinence improved motile sperm concentration in cryptozoospermia patients but not in those with severe oligospermia, likely due to longer epididymal transit times in the latter. Moreover, the presence of pyruvate and lactate, which is crucial for sperm mitochondrial function and motility, are more abundant relative to the lower total sperm count in cryptozoospermia, potentially enhancing motility [32]. However, despite these findings, the total motile sperm count showed no significant difference between the two semen samples, which aligns with the findings of Jessica A. Marinaro et al. [15]. Total motile sperm count is influenced by both motile sperm concentration and semen volume. Although the motile sperm concentration increased, the semen volume significantly decreased, offsetting the potential improvement in total motile sperm count.

Semen cryopreservation is pivotal for managing male-factor infertility, particularly among male cancer patients on the verge of undergoing chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In severe oligozoospermia and cryptozoospermia, testicular function worsens over time, making early semen freezing and storage advisable [33]. The freezing process can damage sperm by forming ice crystals that disrupt cell membranes and organelles, reducing sperm survival rate and motility [34]. For those with poor semen quality, the sperm motility rate after freezing ranges from 0 to 92% [35]. These variations can be attributed to differences in the pre-freezing semen quality and the freezing methods employed. Typically, poorer semen parameters lead to low post-thaw recovery of motile and viable spermatozoa [36]. In our study, no significant differences were observed in post-thaw sperm survival rates between semen samples collected after different abstinence periods. This represents the first investigation to explore the feasibility of short abstinence intervals for cryopreservation in cryptozoospermia patients, demonstrating that repeated sperm collection with short abstinence is a viable strategy. In the case of cryptozoospermia, freezing, thawing and selecting an adequate number of sperm pose significant challenges, as cryopreserving a limited quantity of human spermatozoa remains a major hurdle for embryologists. Notably, 63.83% (30/47) of cryptozoospermic patients in our cohort successfully cryopreserved sperm, with 16.67% (5/30) achieving this through short abstinence protocols—highlighting a significant advancement for those who might otherwise struggle with sperm preservation. Moreover, male patients with reduced fertility are more likely to experience pronounced anxiety and psychological stress [37], leading them to frequently visit sperm banks to freeze more sperm for ICSI and gain psychological comfort. Thus, obtaining a larger number of motile sperm for cryopreservation is of dual therapeutic and strategic significance for both the fertility outcomes and the psychological well-being of patients with cryptozoospermia.

Based on the current assisted reproductive technology outcome data from our study, patients with cryptozoospermia exhibit a higher utilization rate of cryopreserved sperm obtained following short-term abstinence. This trend is primarily attributed to the increased likelihood of insufficient sperm retrieval on the day of oocyte retrieval, necessitating a greater reliance on cryopreserved specimens to fulfill the treatment requirements. Although our sample size remains limited, preliminary observations indicate a potential correlation between the enhanced clinical pregnancy rate in cryptozoospermia patients and the use of sperm samples collected after short-term abstinence. These findings are consistent with those reported by Filomena Scarselli et al. [23], who demonstrated that the use of sperm collected after a 1-hour abstinence interval could improve the outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, further research with a larger case series is needed to confirm whether cryopreserving sperm after short abstinence periods offers similar benefits.

Given the scarcity of sperm in cryptozoospermia cases, every retrieved spermatozoon is critically preserved for potential ICSI cycles. This conservation strategy necessitates prioritizing cryopreservation over ancillary assessments like DNA fragmentation analysis. Moreover, conventional laboratory assessment methods, such as semen analysis based on the WHO criteria, may not apply to semen samples with such a limited number of spermatozoa, further complicating this research. Due to these limitations, we were unable to collect data on DNA fragmentation rates or sperm morphology, both of which are important factors in assisted reproductive outcomes and represent a limitation of our study. In future research, we aim to focus more on these aspects.

Patients undergoing self-sperm cryopreservation often face prolonged treatment cycles when using frozen sperm for ART, resulting in extended follow-up periods for assessing pregnancy and miscarriage rates. Future research should focus on whether these findings translate into differences in fertility outcomes. Although numerous studies have explored the effects of short abstinence periods on semen parameters, very few have specifically examined patients with severe oligozoospermia and cryptozoospermia. To our knowledge, no studies have compared the post-thaw survival rates of sperm between normal and short abstinence periods. Our study did not find significant differences, suggesting that cryopreservation of sperm after a short abstinence period is feasible. Nevertheless, for some cryptozoospermic patients who initially lack sufficient motile sperm, performing two consecutive sperm collections increases the chances of successful sperm cryopreservation. This approach also reduces the time and cost associated with multiple visits to the sperm bank.

5. Conclusions

In summary, our research demonstrates that neither normal nor short abstinence periods significantly affect the freeze-thaw survival rate of sperm. Importantly, performing dual semen collections within a short abstinence interval improves the success rate of cryopreservation and increases the number of preserved sperm in patients with cryptozoospermia. These findings support the adoption of short-interval dual semen collection as a standard protocol for fertility preservation in cryptozoospermic patients, potentially reducing their reliance on invasive TESE procedures. This approach may enhance the likelihood of successful outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies.

Availability of data and materials

Data regarding any of the subjects in the study can be shared after reasonable request to the corresponding author. No identifying data will be provided.

Author contributions

WRZ—participated in the experimental operations; completed the collection; verification and statistical analysis of the data; and wrote the draft. CL—provided drawing assistance and participated in the experimental operation. BL, JYX, XFL and YL—participated in the experimental operation. FPL and YX—put forward experimental ideas and reviewed and revised the paper. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University (No: 2023297). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to express their heartfelt gratitude to the professional team at the Sichuan Human Sperm Bank for their dedicated technical support, while extending sincere appreciation to all clinical participants in this research for their invaluable assistance and steadfast cooperation.

Funding

This study was supported by Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2024NSFSC0647) and Health commission of Sichuan Province Medical Science and Technology Program (24SYJS01).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Shi S, Tang X, Long S, Yang J, Wang T, Wang H, et al. A novel homozygous LRRC6 mutation causes male infertility with asthenozoospermia and primary ciliary dyskinesia in humans. Andrology. 2025; 13: 459–472.

[Google Scholar]

Hibi H, Tokoro M, Sonohara M, Ihara K, Fukunaga N, Asada Y. Cryptozoospermia: should we use ejaculated sperm or surgically retrieved sperm for assisted reproductive technology? Reproductive Medicine and Biology. 2023; 22: e12546.

[Google Scholar]

Zhu YT, Luo C, Li Y, Li H, Quan S, Deng YJ, et al. Differences and similarities between extremely severe oligozoospermia and cryptozoospermia in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2016; 18: 904–907.

[Google Scholar]

Alrabeeah K, Wachter A, Phillips S, Cohen B, Al-Hathal N, Zini A. Sperm retrieval outcomes with microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in men with cryptozoospermia. Andrology. 2015; 3: 462–466.

[Google Scholar]

Schill T, Bals-Pratsch M, Küpker W, Sandmann J, Johannisson R, Diedrich K. Clinical and endocrine follow-up of patients after testicular sperm extraction. Fertility and Sterility. 2003; 79: 281–286.

[Google Scholar]

Lahav-Baratz S, Rothschild E, Grach B, Koifman M, Shiloh H, Ishai D, et al. The value of sperm pooling and cryopreservation in patients with transient azoospermia or severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia. Human Reproduction. 2002; 17: 157–160.

[Google Scholar]

Du C, Li Y, Yin C, Luo X, Pan X. Association of abstinence time with semen quality and fertility outcomes: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Andrology. 2024; 12: 1224–1235.

[Google Scholar]

Lo Giudice A, Asmundo MG, Cimino S, Cocci A, Falcone M, Capece M, et al. Effects of long and short ejaculatory abstinence on sperm parameters: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2024; 15: 1373426.

[Google Scholar]

Chen GX, Li HY, Lin YH, Huang ZQ, Huang PY, Da LC, et al. The effect of age and abstinence time on semen quality: a retrospective study. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2022; 24: 73–77.

[Google Scholar]

Meitei HY, Uppangala S, Lakshmi RV, Guddattu V, Hegde P, Kumar P, et al. Sperm characteristics in normal and abnormal ejaculates are differently influenced by the length of ejaculatory abstinence. Andrology. 2022; 10: 1351–1360.

[Google Scholar]

Li Y, Wang S, Li D, Huang Y, Liu H, Zhang X, et al. Short-interval second ejaculation improves sperm quality, blastocyst formation in oligoasthenozoospermic males in ICSI cycles: a time-lapse sibling oocytes study. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2023; 14: 1250663.

[Google Scholar]

Vallet-Buisan M, Mecca R, Jones C, Coward K, Yeste M. Contribution of semen to early embryo development: fertilization and beyond. Human Reproduction Update. 2023; 29: 395–433.

[Google Scholar]

Ciotti PM, Calza N, Zuffa S, Notarangelo L, Nardi E, Damiano G, et al. Two subsequent seminal productions: a good strategy to treat very severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermic infertile couples. Andrology. 2021; 9: 1185–1191.

[Google Scholar]

Barbagallo F, Cannarella R, Crafa A, La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Manna C, et al. The impact of a very short abstinence period on assisted reproductive technique outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Antioxidants. 2023; 12: 752.

[Google Scholar]

Marinaro JA, Brant A, Kang C, Punjani N, Xie P, Zaninovic N, et al. Successful cryptozoospermia management with multiple semen specimen collection. Fertility and Sterility. 2023; 120: 996–1003.

[Google Scholar]

Levine H, Jørgensen N, Martino-Andrade A, Mendiola J, Weksler-Derri D, Jolles M, et al. Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of samples collected globally in the 20th and 21st centuries. Human Reproduction Update. 2023; 29: 157–176.

[Google Scholar]

Rotimi DE, Singh SK. Implications of lifestyle factors on male reproductive health. JBRA Assisted Reproduction. 2024; 28: 320–330.

[Google Scholar]

Wang S, Zhang A, Pan Y, Liu L, Niu S, Zhang F, et al. Association between COVID-19 and male fertility: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. World Journal of Men’s Health. 2023; 41: 311–329.

[Google Scholar]

Demyashkin GA, Kogan E, Demura T, Boldyrev D, Vadyukhin M, Schekin V, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of spermatogenesis in patients with SARS-CoV-2 invasion in different age groups. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2023; 45: 2444–2451.

[Google Scholar]

Wren J, Hudnall M, Pham M, Darves-Bornoz AL, Halpern JA, Bennett NE, et al. A prior history of cryptozoospermia is associated with a significantly higher chance of a successful microdissection testicular sperm extraction compared to non-obstructive azoospermia. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12: 7255.

[Google Scholar]

Demyashkin GA. Inhibin B in seminiferous tubules of human testes in normal spermatogenesis and in idiopathic infertility. Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine. 2019; 65: 20–28.

[Google Scholar]

Bak CW, Song SH, Yoon TK, Lim JJ, Shin TE, Sung S. Natural course of idiopathic oligozoospermia: comparison of mild, moderate and severe forms. International Journal of Urology. 2010; 17: 937–943.

[Google Scholar]

Scarselli F, Cursio E, Muzzì S, Casciani V, Ruberti A, Gatti S, et al. How 1 h of abstinence improves sperm quality and increases embryo euploidy rate after PGT-A: a study on 106 sibling biopsied blastocysts. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2019; 36: 1591–1597.

[Google Scholar]

Manna C, Barbagallo F, Manzo R, Rahman A, Francomano D, Calogero AE. Sperm parameters before and after swim-up of a second ejaculate after a short period of abstinence. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9: 1029.

[Google Scholar]

Hussein TM, Elariny AF, Elabd MM, Elgarem YF, Elsawy MM. Effect of repeated sequential ejaculation on sperm DNA integrity in subfertile males with asthenozoospermia. Andrologia. 2008; 40: 312–317.

[Google Scholar]

Ayad BM, Horst GV, Plessis SSD. Revisiting the relationship between the ejaculatory abstinence period and semen characteristics. International Journal of Fertility and Sterility. 2018; 11: 238–246.

[Google Scholar]

Gonzales GF. Basal serum testosterone as an indicator of response to clomiphene treatment in human epididymis, seminal vesicles and prostate. Andrologia. 2002; 34: 308–316.

[Google Scholar]

Ortega C, Verheyen G, Raick D, Camus M, Devroey P, Tournaye H. Absolute asthenozoospermia and ICSI: what are the options? Human Reproduction Update. 2011; 17: 684–692.

[Google Scholar]

Agarwal A, Saleh RA, Bedaiwy MA. Role of reactive oxygen species in the pathophysiology of human reproduction. Fertility and Sterility. 2003; 79: 829–843.

[Google Scholar]

Alipour H, Van Der Horst G, Christiansen OB, Dardmeh F, Jørgensen N, Nielsen HI, et al. Improved sperm kinematics in semen samples collected after 2 h versus 4–7 days of ejaculation abstinence. Human Reproduction. 2017; 32: 1364–1372.

[Google Scholar]

Kulkarni V, Kaingade P, Kulkarni N, Bhalerao T, Nikam A. Assessment of semen parameters in consecutive ejaculates with short abstinence period in oligospermic males. JBRA Assisted Reproduction. 2022; 26: 310–314.

[Google Scholar]

Alipour H, Duus RK, Wimmer R, Dardmeh F, Du Plessis SS, Jørgensen N, et al. Seminal plasma metabolomics profiles following long (4–7 days) and short (2 h) sexual abstinence periods. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2021; 264: 178–183.

[Google Scholar]

Koscinski I, Wittemer C, Lefebvre-Khalil V, Marcelli F, Defossez A, Rigot JM. Optimal management of extreme oligozoospermia by an appropriate cryopreservation programme. Human Reproduction. 2007; 22: 2679–2684.

[Google Scholar]

Zandiyeh S, Kalantari H, Fakhri A, Nikkhah M, Janani BJ, Sabbaghian M. A review of recent developments in the application of nanostructures for sperm cryopreservation. Cryobiology. 2024; 115: 104890.

[Google Scholar]

Huang C, Gan RX, Hu JL, Liu F, Hong Y, Zhu WB, et al. Clinical benefit for cryopreservation of single human spermatozoa for ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Andrology. 2022; 10: 82–91.

[Google Scholar]

Degl’Innocenti S, Filimberti E, Magini A, Krausz C, Lombardi G, Fino MG, et al. Semen cryopreservation for men banking for oligospermia, cancers, and other pathologies: prediction of post-thaw outcome using basal semen quality. Fertility and Sterility. 2013; 100: 1555–1563.e1–3.

[Google Scholar]

Simbar M, Ghasemi V, Taherian R, Kalhor M, Mohammadian F, Kiani Z. Prevalence of anxiety symptoms in infertile men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2024; 24: 1805.

[Google Scholar]