Article Data

  • Views 260
  • Dowloads 122

Original Research

Open Access

The influence of verbal encouragement on heart rate, maximum oxygen uptake, and distance covered in young male adults during beep test

  • Martin Pacholek1,2,*,

1Department of General Studies, Sport Sciences and Diagnostics Research Group, Prince Sultan University, 12435 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

2Physical Education Department, College of Applied and Supporting Studies, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, 31261 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2023.001

Submitted: 19 September 2022 Accepted: 09 December 2022

Online publish date: 11 January 2023

*Corresponding Author(s): Martin Pacholek E-mail: mpacholek@post.cz; mpacholek@psu.edu.sa

Abstract

Communication and motivation from physical education teachers is an important part of physical education classes. Therefore, it is necessary to look for suitable and effective methods to maximize students’ effort and performance. This study aimed to investigate the changes in aerobic performance after applying verbal encouragement (VE) to the beep test for university students. A group of 397 male students with average body mass index (BMI) 24.81 ± 5.88 and age 19.1 ± 1.3 was randomly selected for this study. Students were divided into two groups: physically active (237 PAS) and non-active students (160 NAS). These students underwent a beep test with and without VE in a counterbalancing manner. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was employed to find differences between the distance covered, maximum oxygen uptake and maximum heart rates after verbal VE and without stimulus (WS) in a beep test. The results showed that all students improved in the distance covered after VE compared to WS in the beep test (47.3 m, 5.53%, p < 0.0001), NAS (34.2 m, 4.44%, p = 0.013) and PAS (60.2 m, 6.62%, p < 0.0001). All students also increased maximal heart rate (beats per minute—BPM) values after VE stimulus compared to WS in the same test (1.01 BPM, 0.51%, p = 0.001) and PAS (1.58 BPM, 0.80%, p = 0.001). Only the NAS group did not significantly improve in maximal heart rate. These findings indicate that VE (“go-go or faster-faster”) applied every 60 seconds is more effective for improving endurance than without any stimulus and that VE improved performance statistically the same in both groups (NAS, PAS). Therefore, the positive effect of VE is similar to NAS and PAS.


Keywords

Physical education; Motivation; Fitness test; Endurance; Quality education


Cite and Share

Martin Pacholek. The influence of verbal encouragement on heart rate, maximum oxygen uptake, and distance covered in young male adults during beep test. Journal of Men's Health. 2023.doi:10.22514/jomh.2023.001.

References

[1] Penry JT, Wilcox AR, Yun J. Validity and reliability analysis of Cooper’s 12- minute run and the multistage shuttle run in healthy adults. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2011; 25: 597–605.

[2] Paspalj D, Gužvica M. The usage of tests of endurance during the work with the students of faculty of security sciences. Sportlogia. 2016; 12: 41–54.

[3] Pacholek M. The effects of various stimuli on motivation and physical fitness of physically active and non-active students. Annals of Applied Sport Science. 2021; 9: 1–12.

[4] Morgan K, Carpenter P. Effects of manipulating the motivational climate in physical education lessons. European Physical Education Review. 2002; 8: 207–229.

[5] Guéguen N, Martin A, Andrea CR. “I am sure you’ll succeed”: when a teacher’s verbal encouragement of success increases children’s academic performance. Learning and Motivation. 2015; 52: 54–59.

[6] Anzak A, Tan H, Pogosyan A, Brown P. Doing better than your best: loud auditory stimulation yields improvements in maximal voluntary force. Experimental Brain Research. 2011; 208: 237–243.

[7] Díaz-García J, Pulido JJ, Ponce-Bordón JC, Cano-Prado C, López-Gajardo MÁ, García-Calvo T. Coach encouragement during soccer practices can influence players’ mental and physical loads. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2021; 79: 277–288.

[8] Halperin I, Pyne DB, Martin DT. Threats to internal validity in exercise science: a review of overlooked confounding variables. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2015; 10: 823–829.

[9] ATS committee on proficiency standards for clinical pulmonary function laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2002; 166: 111–117.

[10] American Thoracic Society; American College of Chest Physicians. ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2003; 167: 211–277.

[11] Ferguson B. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription 9th Ed. 2014. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association. 2014; 58: 328.

[12] Graham JE, Ostir GV, Fisher SR, Ottenbacher KJ. Assessing walking speed in clinical research: a systematic review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2008; 14: 552–562.

[13] Belkhiria C, De Marco G, Driss T. Effects of verbal encouragement on force and electromyographic activations during exercise. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2018; 58: 750–757.

[14] Rendos NK, Harriell K, Qazi S, Regis RC, Alipio TC, Signorile JF. Variations in verbal encouragement modify isokinetic performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2019; 33: 708–716.

[15] Pacholek M, Zemková E. Effects of verbal encouragement and performance feedback on physical fitness in young adults. Sustainability. 2022; 14: 1753.

[16] Sahli H, Haddad M, Jebabli N, Sahli F, Ouergui I, Ouerghi N, et al. The effects of verbal encouragement and compliments on physical performance and psychophysiological responses during the repeated change of direction sprint test. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021; 12: 698673.

[17] Bullinger DL, Hearon CM, Gaines SA, Daniel ML. Concurrent verbal encouragement and Wingate anaerobic cycle test performance in females: athletes vs. non-athletes. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2010; 42: 415–416.

[18] Obmiński Z, Mroczkowska H. Verbal encouragement does not improve maximal isometric hand grip strength in male judokas. A short report. Journal of Combat Sports and Martial Arts. 2015; 6: 63–66.

[19] Engel FA, Faude O, Kölling S, Kellmann M, Donath L. Verbal en-couragement and between-day reliability during high-intensity functional strength and endurance performance testing. Frontiers in Physiology. 2019; 10: 460.

[20] Marinho PEM, Raposo MC, Dean E, Guerra RO, Dornelas de Andrade A. Does verbal encouragement actually improve performance in the 6-minute walk test? Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 2014; 30: 540–543.

[21] Chitwood LF, Moffatt RJ, Burke K, Luchino P, Jordan JC. Encouragement during maximal exercise testing of type A and type B scorers. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1997; 84: 507–512.

[22] Moffatt RJ, Chitwood LF, Biggerstaff KD. The influence of verbal encouragement during assessment of maximal oxygen uptake. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 1994; 34: 45–49.

[23] Edwards AM, Dutton-Challis L, Cottrell D, Guy JH, Hettinga FJ. Impact of active and passive social facilitation on self-paced endurance and sprint exercise: encouragement augments performance and motivation to exercise. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine. 2018; 4: e000368.

[24] Neto JM, Silva FB, De Oliveira AL, Couto NL, Dantas EH, de Luca Nascimento MA. Effects of verbal encouragement on performance of the multistage 20 m shuttle run. Acta Scientiarum. Health Sciences. 2015; 37: 25–30.

[25] Midgley AW, Marchant DC, Levy AR. A call to action towards an evidence-based approach to using verbal encouragement during maximal exercise testing. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging. 2018; 38: 547–553.

[26] Andreacci JL, Lemura LM, Cohen SL, Urbansky EA, Chelland SA, Duvillard SPV. The effects of frequency of encouragement on performance during maximal exercise testing. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2002; 20: 345–352.

[27] McCormick A, Meijen C, Marcora S. Psychological determinants of whole-body endurance performance. Sports Medicine. 2015; 45: 997–1015.

[28] Dimarucot HC, Macapagal LS. The validity and reliability of three field tests for assessing college freshmen students’ cardiovascular endurance. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences. 2021; 9: 363–374.

[29] Eurofit CO. Eurofit handbook for the Eurofit test of physical fitness. 2nd edn. Council of Europe: Strasbourg. 1993.

[30] Léger LA, Mercier D, Gadoury C, Lambert J. The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. Journal of Sports Sciences. 1988; 6: 93–101.

[31] Giersch GEW, Huggins RA, Benjamin CL, Adams WM, Belval LN, Curtis RM, et al. Validity and reliability of a shirt-based integrated Gps sensor. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2018; 50: 673.

[32] McLeod S.A. What Does Effect Size Tell You? 2019. Available at: https://www.simplypsychology.org/effect-size.html (Accessed: 15 April 2020).

[33] Thomas D, Credeur DP. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing techniques to evaluate exercise intolerance. Diagnostic Tests in Pediatric Pulmonology. 2015; 167: 211–255.

[34] Noetel M. Psychological components of the beep test. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2012; 15: S256.

[35] Hassel TE. Effect of verbal encouragement on wingate performance evaluating both gender and training level. The College of St. Scholastica ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. 2010; 1482525: 46.

[36] Karaba-Jakovljevic D, Popadic-Gacesa J, Grujic N, Barak O, Drapsin M. Motivation and motoric tests in sports. Medical Review. 2007; 60: 231–236.

[37] Schaun GZ. The maximal oxygen uptake verification phase: a light at the end of the tunnel? Sports Medicine—Open. 2017; 3: 44.

[38] Næss HS, Säfvenbom R, Standal ØF. Running with Dewey: is it possible to learn to enjoy running in high school physical education? Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. 2014; 6: 301–315.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus CiteScore 0.7 (2021) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top