Quality of life in elderly men after a radical prostatectomy. A qualitative study

Prostate cancer is the second most frequent cancer in Spain. One of its main treatments is radical prostatectomy. This intervention generates a series of physical and psychological consequences in the patient that result in reducing their quality of life. The objective of this study was therefore to explore the experiences and perceptions of older adults about their quality of life after a radical prostatectomy. A descriptive qualitative study was conducted with 18 patients who had undergone a radical prostatectomy, with a mean age of 70.6 years. A focus group of 8 people was formed, and 10 individual interviews were carried out and transcribed in ATLAS.ti for later analysis. The quality of the criteria for qualitative research was guaranteed, and the pertinent ethical aspects were respected. Participants demonstrated worse urinary (incontinence) and sexual (erectile dysfunction) function after radical prostatectomy. Due to these consequences, they manifested shame, despair and relationship problems (lack of communication, absence of sexual life, etc.), thus causing a clear decrease in their quality of life. The participants also stated that they did not feel well-protected by the health care received. The physical sequelae on urinary and erectile function of prostatectomized patients decrease the patient’s quality of life. These limitations in their sexual life cause them additional psychological consequences that also contribute to a deterioration in the perceived quality of life. In a social environment, patients can find understanding and freedom to share feelings, which contributes to improving their quality of life. However, pressure and lack of communication can appear in the couple, which is perceived as a source of deterioration in quality of life. The care conditions in the health system are not appropriate to address the quality of life of this type of patient in a comprehensive manner.

Quality of life; Prostate cancer; Qualitative research; Prostatectomy

[1] Mucci LA, Wilson KM, Giovannucci EL. Epidemiology of prostate cancer. Pathology and Epidemiology of Cancer. 2017; 349: 107–125.

[2] Sociedad española de oncologia médica (SEOM). Cifras del cancer en españa 2020. 2020. Available at: https://seom.org/seomcms/images/stories/recursos/Cifras_del_cancer_2020.pdf. (Accesed 05 may 2022).

[3] Holze S, Lemaire E, Mende M, Neuhaus P, Arthanareeswaran V, Truss MC, et al. Quality of life after robotic‐assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (LAP‐01). The Prostate. 2022; 82: 894–903.

[4] Chao H, Soni PD, Dahman B, Stilianoudakis SC, Ford H, Singh R, et al. Outcomes following radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation for veterans with Gleason 9 and 10 prostate cancer. Cancer Medicine. 2022; 11: 2886–2895.

[5] Kesch C, Heidegger I, Kasivisvanathan V, Kretschmer A, Marra G, Preisser F, et al. Radical prostatectomy: sequelae in the course of time. Frontiers in Surgery. 2021; 8: 684088.

[6] Kord E, Jung N, Boehm B, Conti G, Kuo H-C, Frankel J, et al. Prospective quality of life in men choosing open vs. robotic radical prostatectomy: long-term results from a racially diverse multi-institutional database. World Journal of Urology. 2022; 40: 1427–1436.

[7] Park JK, Kim MK, Shin YS. Letter to the editor: changes in health-related quality of life after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a longitudinal cohort study in Korea. Investigative and Clinical Urology. 2019; 6: 222–224.

[8] Maruyama Y, Sadahira T, Araki M, Mitsui Y, Wada K, Tanimoto R, et al. Comparison of longitudinal health-related quality-of-life outcomes between anterior and posterior surgical approaches to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 2020; 14: 255–260.

[9] Ngoo KS, Honda M, Kimura Y, Yumioka T, Iwamoto H, Morizane S, et al. Longitudinal study on the impact of urinary continence and sexual function on health‐related quality of life among Japanese men after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. 2019; 15: e2018.

[10] Odeo S, Degu A. Factors affecting health-related quality of life among prostate cancer patients: a systematic review. Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice. 2020; 26: 1997–2010.

[11] Naccarato AMEP, Consuelo Souto S, Matheus WE, Ferreira U, Denardi F. Quality of life and sexual health in men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. The Aging Male. 2020; 23: 346–353.

[12] Bernardes MFVG, Chagas SC, Izidoro LCR, Veloso DFM, Chianca TCM, Mata LRFPD. Impact of urinary incontinence on the quality of life of individuals undergoing radical prostatectomy. Revista Latino-americana de Enfermagem. 2019; 27: e3131

[13] Kadono Y, Nohara T, Kadomoto S, Nakashima K, Iijima M, Shigehara K, et al. Investigating urinary conditions prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in search of a desirable method for evaluating post-prostatectomy incontinence. Anticancer Research,2016; 36: 4293–4298.

[14] Wang C, Song Z, Li S, Tai S. Extended nursing for the recovery of urinary functions and quality of life after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Supportive Care in Cancer: Official Journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. 2018; 26: 1553–1560.

[15] Ramsey SD, Zeliadt SB, Blough DK, Moinpour CM, Hall IJ, Smith JL, et al. Impact of prostate cancer on sexual relationships: a longitudinal perspective on intimate partners’ experiences. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2013; 10: 3135–3143.

[16] Schalock RL, Verdugo MA, Braddock DL. Handbook on quality of life for human service practitioners. American Association on Mental Retardation: Washington, DC. 2002.

[17] Schalock RL, Baker A, Claes C, Gonzalez J, Malatest R, van Loon J, et al. The use of quality of life scores for monitoring and reporting, quality improvement, and research. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities. 2018; 15: 176–182.

[18] Martínez-Bordajandi Á, Fernández-Sola C, Puga-Mendoza A P, et al. Sexual experiences after non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem. 2020; 33: 1–10.

[19] Song M. Influence of a continuous nursing model based on network cloud platforms for urinary control, urination function and quality of life of patients after radical prostatectomy. American Journal of Translational Research, 2021; 13: 5356–5361.

[20] Bergius S, Roine RP, Taari K, Sintonen H. Health-related quality of life and survival in prostate cancer patients in a real-world setting. Urologia Internationalis. 2020; 104: 939–947.

[21] Kao YL, Ou CH, Lin SH, Chang SM, Wang J Der, Tsai YS. Article dynamic changes of generic quality of life after different treatments for localized prostate cancer. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2021;10: 158.

[22] Downing A, Wright P, Hounsome L, Selby P, Wilding S, Watson E, et al. Quality of life in men living with advanced and localised prostate cancer in the UK: a population-based study. The Lancet Oncology. 2019; 20: 436–447.

[23] Granero-Molina J, Fernández-Sola C, Hernández-Padilla JM. Why qualitative research should be used to explore and understand men’s health. Journal of Men’S Health. 2022; 18: 143.

[24] Colorafi KJ, Evans B. Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal. 2016; 9: 16–25.

[25] Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care: Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care. 2007; 19: 349–357.

[26] Fernández Sola C, Granero-Molina J, Hernández-Padilla JM. Compren-der para cuidar Avances en investigación cualitativa en ciencias de la salud. EDUAL: Almería. 2020.

[27] Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006; 3: 77–101.

[28] Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2021; 18: 328–352.

[29] Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. ECTJ. 1982; 30: 233–252.

[30] Posielski N, Frankel J, Kuo H, Ho O, Elsamanoudi S, Nousome D, et al. Impact of age and race on health-related quality of life outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. Urology. 2022; 163: 99–106.

[31] Moss JL, Pinto CN, Mama SK, Rincon M, Kent EE, Yu M, et al. Rural-urban differences in health-related quality of life: patterns for cancer survivors compared to other older adults. Quality of Life Research. 2021; 30: 1131–1143.

[32] Spratt DE, Shore N, Sartor O, Rathkopf D, Olivier K. Treating the patient and not just the cancer: therapeutic burden in prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases. 2021; 24: 647–661.

[33] Barone B, Napolitano L, Abate M, Cirillo L, Reccia P, Passaro F, et al. The role of testosterone in the elderly: what do we know? International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23: 3535.

[34] Akin-Odanye EO, Ogo CN, Sulaiman FA, Suleiman L, Ogunsanya ME, Odedina FT. Examining the influence of illness perception and financial toxicity on the quality of life of prostate cancer patients. African Journal of Urology. 2021; 27: 72.

[35] Goineau A, Campion L, d’Aillières B, Vié B, Ghesquière A, Béra G, et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment and quality of life after localized prostate cancer radiotherapy in elderly patients. PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0194173.