Article Data

  • Views 761
  • Dowloads 126

Original Research

Open Access

Conventional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound quantitative analysis for diagnosing lung cancer metastases in neck lymph nodes

  • Anran Wang1
  • Mei Zhang1
  • Shufang Xiang1
  • Can Liu1,*,

1Department of Ultrasonography, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, 434000 Jinzhou, Hubei, China

DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2023.035 Vol.19,Issue 4,April 2023 pp.70-79

Submitted: 02 March 2023 Accepted: 03 April 2023

Published: 30 April 2023

*Corresponding Author(s): Can Liu E-mail: lc_liucan888@163.com

Abstract

Lung cancer remains one of the most common malignant tumors. Identifying cervical lymph node metastases is important to stage lung cancer, evaluate patients’ prognosis and select appropriate treatments. This study evaluated the utility of conventional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) quantitative analysis in diagnosing lung cancer metastases in the lymph nodes of the neck. The cervical lymph nodes of 39 patients with primary lung cancer who underwent CEUS and ultrasound-guided needle biopsy were assessed. Routine type B ultrasound was used to record the morphology of the lymph nodes and the presence of lymphatic hilum structure. The Vuebox quantitative analysis software was used to collect lymph node CEUS peak enhancements (PE), rise time (RT) and fall time (FT). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of various parameters and imaging characteristics. The cohort comprised 26 cervical lymph nodes with lung cancer metastasis and 13 cervical lymph nodes with reactive hyperplasia. Most hilum of lymph gland were absent in the metastasis group (92.30%), most lymph nodes showed a full shape (80.77%), and few were irregularly shaped (19.23%). Most hilum of lymph gland were present in the hyperplasia group (76.95%) and showed a full shape (61.54%). The PE of the metastasis group (4852.29 a.u) was significantly lower than the hyperplasia group (11,464.70 a.u), while the difference between RT and FT indicators was not significant. ROC analysis showed that combined PE of the quantitative ultrasound contrast analysis and the presence of the lymphatic phylum structure showed satisfactory diagnostic ability for detecting lung cancer lymph node metastasis in the neck (sensitivity 73.10%, specificity 76.90%, accuracy 48.73%, p = 0.004). Conventional ultrasound observation of lymph node structure combined with quantitative analysis of peak enhancement of contrast-enhanced ultrasound showed promising value for diagnosing lung cancer metastatic lymph nodes.


Keywords

Ultrasonography; CEUS; Quantitative analysis; Cervical lymph node; Metastatic lymph nodes


Cite and Share

Anran Wang,Mei Zhang,Shufang Xiang,Can Liu. Conventional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound quantitative analysis for diagnosing lung cancer metastases in neck lymph nodes. Journal of Men's Health. 2023. 19(4);70-79.

References

[1] Liu ZC, Li ZX, Zhang Y, Zhou T, Zhang JY, You WC, et al. Interpretation on the report of Global Cancer Statistics 2020. Journal of Multidisciplinary Cancer Management. 2021; 7: 1–14. (In Chinese)

[2] Khaltaev N, Axelrod S. Global lung cancer mortality trends and lifestyle modifications: preliminary analysis. Chinese Medical Journal. 2020; 133: 1526–1532.

[3] Ma TT, Wan YX, Shi L. Pathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with primary lung cancer. The Practical Journal of Cancer. 2019; 34: 1835–1838. (In Chinese)

[4] Xie X, Li X, Tang W, Xie P, Tan X. Primary tumor location in lung cancer: the evaluation and administration. Chinese Medical Journal. 2022; 135: 127–136.

[5] Chammas MC, Macedo TAA, Lo VW, Gomes AC, Juliano A, Cerri GG. Predicting malignant neck lymphadenopathy using color duplex sonogra-phy based on multivariate analysis. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound. 2016; 44: 587–594.

[6] Mei M, Ye L, Quan J, Huang P. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differential diagnosis between benign and metastatic superficial lymph nodes: a meta-analysis. Cancer management and research. 2018; 10: 4987–4997.

[7] Liu HF, Xiao JD. Flow imaging of residual neck lymph nodes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by contras-enhanced ultrasonography after radiotherapy. Journal of Central South University (Medical sciences). 2010; 35: 861–863. (In Chinese)

[8] Wang DL, Yang GY, Shao YQ, Zhang WZ. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for research on tuberculosis of axillary lymph node. Journal of Medical Research. 2013; 42: 187–189.

[9] Giacomini CP, Jeffrey RB, Shin LK. Ultrasonographic evaluation of malignant and normal cervical lymph nodes. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI. 2013; 34: 236–247.

[10] Ying M, Bhatia KS, Lee YP, Yuen HY, Ahuja AT. Review of ultrasonography of malignant neck nodes: greyscale, Doppler, contrast enhancement and elastography. Cancer Imaging. 2014; 13: 658–669.

[11] Bialek EJ, Jakubowski W, Szczepanik AB, Maryniak RK, Prochorec-Sobieszek M, Bilski R, et al. Vascular patterns in superficial lymphoma-tous lymph nodes: a detailed sonographic analysis. Journal of Ultrasound. 2007; 10: 128–134.

[12] Liu Y, Chen J, Zhang C, Li Q, Zhou H, Zeng Y, et al. Ultrasound-based radiomics can classify the etiology of cervical lymphadenopathy: a multi-center retrospective study. Frontiers in Oncology. 2022; 12: 856605.

[13] Sidhu PS, Cantisani V, Dietrich CF, Gilja OH, Saftoiu A, Bartels E, et al. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations for the clinical practice of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in non-hepatic applications: update 2017 (long version). Ultraschall in der Medizin. 2018; 39: e2–e44.

[14] Dudau C, Hameed S, Gibson D, Muthu S, Sandison A, Eckersley RJ, et al. Can contrast-enhanced ultrasound distinguish malignant from reactive lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancers? Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 2014; 40: 747–754.

[15] Weskott HP. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnostic workup of lymph nodes. Radiologe. 2018; 58: 563–571. (In German)

[16] Xin L, Yan Z, Zhang X, Zang Y, Ding Z, Xue H, et al. Parameters for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of enlarged superficial lymph nodes for the evaluation of therapeutic response in lymphoma: a preliminary study. Medical Science Monitor. 2017; 23: 5430–5438.

[17] Yin S, Cui Q, Fan Z, Yang W, Yan K. Diagnostic value of arrival time parametric imaging using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in superficial enlarged lymph nodes. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2019; 38: 1287–1298.

[18] Nie J, Ling W, Yang Q, Jin H, Ou X, Ma X. The value of CEUS in distinguishing cancerous lymph nodes from the primary lymphoma of the head and neck. Frontiers in Oncology. 2020; 10: 473.

[19] Schwarz S, Clevert DA, Ingrisch M, Geyer T, Schwarze V, Rübenthaler J, et al. Quantitative analysis of the time-intensity curve of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver: differentiation of benign and malignant liver lesions. Diagnostics. 2021; 11: 1244.

[20] Lu Q, Zhang X, Han H, Huang B, Ding H, Wang W. Value of perfusion parameters for differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastasis with hypervascularity and a normal hepatic background on contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2019; 38: 2601–2608.

[21] Lerchbaumer MH, Wakonig KM, Arens P, Dommerich S, Fischer T. Quantitative multiparametric ultrasound (mpUS) in the assessment of inconclusive cervical lymph nodes. Cancers. 2022; 14: 1597.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.7 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top