Effect of athletes' ethical sensitivity on doping mindset and tendency: moderated by sex and age

It is essential to check athletes’ mindset and tendency toward doping to prevent it. This study aimed to determine the effect of athletes’ ethical sensitivity on their mindset and tendency toward doping, and whether age and sex have a moderating effect. To achieve the purpose of this study, 1003 athletes registered in the Korea Sports Association were surveyed with a questionnaire consisting of 34 questions including ethical sensitivity items and a Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale (PEAS). To verify the reliability and validity of the data, an Item Response Theory (IRT)-based Rasch model was applied. Consequently, we deleted three questions from ethical sensitivity and five questions from PEAS. Our results are as follows: First, ethical sensitivity showed differences according to sex, and mindset and tendency toward doping showed differences according to age. Second, ethical sensitivity was found to have a statistically significant effect on mindset and tendency toward doping. Third, regarding the effect of ethical sensitivity on their mindset and tendency toward doping, the moderating effect of sex and age was not found to have a statistically significant effect. Our findings confirmed that ethical sensitivity has a positive relationship with the mindset and tendency toward doping. In other words, improving the ethical sensitivity of athletes will increase their ethical awareness and help prevent unethical behavior such as doping.

Athletes; Ethical sensitivity; PEAS (Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale); Doping mindset; Doping tendency; Moderating effect

[1] Rabouin EM. Walking the talk: transforming law students into ethical transactional lawyers. DePaul Bus. L.J. 1996; 9: 1.

[2] Wittmer DP. Ethical sensitivity in management decisions: developing and testing a perceptual measure among management and professional student groups. Teaching Business Ethics. 2000; 4: 181–205.

[3] Clarkeburn H. A test for ethical sensitivity in science. Journal of Moral Education. 2002; 31: 439–453.

[4] Rest JR. Moral development: advances in research and theory. Praeger: New York. 1986.

[5] Lim M. Effects of moral sensitivity and critical thinking disposition on perceived ethical confidence in nursing students. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society. 2016; 17: 610–618.

[6] Mattison M. Ethical decision making: the person in the process. Social Work. 2000; 45: 201–212.

[7] Rest JR. Morality. In: W. Damon, R. M. Lerner, & N. Eisenberg (eds). Handbook of Child Psychology (pp. 556–629). Wiley: New Jersey. 1983.

[8] Choi C. Ethical sensitivity of adult athletes to sports manipulation. The Korean Data Analysis Society. 2018; 20: 949–959.

[9] Gucciardi DF, Jalleh G, Donovan RJ. An examination of the sport drug control model with elite Australian athletes. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2011; 14: 469–476.

[10] World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). Anti-Doping Rule Violations (ADRVs) Report. 2016. Available at: https://www.playtruejapan. org/code/provision/pdf/2016_adrvs_report_web_release_ april_2018_0.pdf (Accessed: 14 August 2022).

[11] Morente-Sánchez J, Zabala M. Doping in sport: a review of elite athletes’ attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge. Sports Medicine. 2013; 43: 395–411.

[12] Petróczi A. Attitudes and doping: a structural equation analysis of the relationship between athletes’ attitudes, sport orientation and doping behaviour. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy. 2007; 2: 34.

[13] Zucchetti G, Candela F, Villosio C. Psychological and social correlates of doping attitudes among Italian athletes. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2015; 26: 162–168.

[14] Sekulic D, Tahiraj E, Zvan M, Zenic N, Uljevic O, Lesnik B. Doping attitudes and covariates of potential doping behaviour in high-level team-sport athletes; gender specific analysis. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine. 2016; 15: 606–615.

[15] Kisaalita NR, Robinson ME. Attitudes and motivations of competitive cyclists regarding use of banned and legal performance enhancers. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine. 2014; 13: 44–50.

[16] Erickson K, McKenna J, Backhouse SH. A qualitative analysis of the factors that protect athletes against doping in sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2015; 16: 149–155.

[17] Petróczi A, Aidman E. Measuring explicit attitude toward doping: review of the psychometric properties of the performance enhancement attitude scale. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2009; 10: 390–396.

[18] Petróczi A. Measuring attitude toward doping: further evidence for the psychometric properties of the performance enhancement attitude scale. In 14th Congress of the European Association for Sport Management, Nicosia, Cyprus. 2006.

[19] Kim EK, Kim TG. Attitudes and dispositions toward doping in Korean national players. Korean Journal of Sports Science. 2014; 23: 215–224.

[20] Linacre JM. Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement. 2002; 3: 85–106.

[21] Seo H. A study on the factors influencing unethical pro-organizational behavior of intercollegiate athletes. The Korean Journal of Physical Education. 2018; 57: 221–233.

[22] Browning DH, Graves SA. Incidence of aspiration with endotracheal tubes in children. The Journal of Pediatrics. 1983; 102: 582–584.

[23] Beak SY, Park BD. The study on the ethical sensitivity and the consciousness of the vocational ethics for the prospective adapted sport instructors. Korea Journal of Adapted Physical Activity. 2016; 24: 23–33.

[24] Muwonge H, Zavuga R, Kabenge PA. Doping knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Ugandan athletes’: a cross-sectional study. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy. 2015; 10: 37.

[25] Alaranta A, Alaranta H, Holmila J, Palmu P, Pietilä K, Helenius I. Self-reported attitudes of elite athletes towards doping: differences between type of sport. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2006; 27: 842–846.

[26] Moran A, Guerin S, Kirby K, MacIntyre T. The development and validation of a doping attitudes and behaviour scale. World Anti-Doping Agency and The Irish Sports Council. 2008.

[27] Kim T, Kim YH. Korean national athletes’ knowledge, practices, and attitudes of doping: a cross-sectional study. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy. 2017; 12: 7.

[28] Chu Z, Kim YJ, Kim T. The influence of demographic information, knowledge of doping and education of anti-doping on attitude toward doping among elite handball players. Journal of Digital Convergence. 2018; 16: 553–560.