Article Data

  • Views 301
  • Dowloads 144

Original Research

Open Access

Application effect of a Donabedian three-dimensional quality evaluation model in perioperative nursing of early gastric cancer male patients undergoing endoscopic mucosal dissection

  • Tingting Cao1
  • Qiuyan Wang1,*,

1Digestive Endoscopy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 215000 Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2023.078 Vol.19,Issue 8,August 2023 pp.108-114

Submitted: 10 May 2023 Accepted: 28 July 2023

Published: 30 August 2023

*Corresponding Author(s): Qiuyan Wang E-mail:


The effect of Donabedian three-dimensional quality evaluation model is explored for the high-quality nursing during perioperative period of endoscopic mucosal dissection in early gastric cancer male patients. Seventy-eight early gastric cancer male patients were randomly grouped as 39 cases in control having received routine care, while 39 in the intervention group having received routine care combined with the three-dimensional quality evaluation model. Clinical recovery indicators including anxiety, depression, pain, life quality and complications were compared for the two groups. The intervention group’s clinical nursing recovery indicator scored higher than that of the control. The scores of each the short-form 36 item health survey questionnaire (SF-36) dimension were better than those of control, and the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The incidence of complications in intervention group was 5.12%, and that in the control was 20.5%. The intervention group experienced less complications than the control, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Treating early gastric cancer male patients with endoscopic mucosal dissection using three-dimensional quality evaluation model can improve clinical recovery and life quality, and reduce anxiety, depression, pain and complications.


Early gastric cancer male patients; Perioperative nursing; Endoscopic mucosal dissection; Three-dimensional quality evaluation model

Cite and Share

Tingting Cao,Qiuyan Wang. Application effect of a Donabedian three-dimensional quality evaluation model in perioperative nursing of early gastric cancer male patients undergoing endoscopic mucosal dissection. Journal of Men's Health. 2023. 19(8);108-114.


[1] Liu Q, Ding L, Qiu X, Meng F. Updated evaluation of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery. 2020; 73: 28–41.

[2] Ishihara R, Arima M, Iizuka T, Oyama T, Katada C, Kato M, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissectionendoscopic mucosal resection guidelines for esophageal cancer. Digestive Endoscopy. 2020; 32: 452–493.

[3] Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano H, Saito S, et al. JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Digestive Endoscopy. 2015; 27: 417–434.

[4] Li H, Feng L, Bian Y, Yang L, Liu D, Huo Z, et al. Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection with surgical gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. 2019; 11: 161–171.

[5] Gu L, Khadaroo PA, Chen L, Li X, Zhu H, Zhong X, et al. Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2019; 23: 1493–1501.

[6] Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966. The Milbank Quarterly. 2005; 83: 691–729.

[7] Jiang X, Chang T, Wang J, Xie J, Miao Q, Zhang X, et al. Construction of nursing quality evaluation index system for kidney transplant patients: a Delphi method. To be published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2022. [Preprint].

[8] Gong S, Dong J, Wang L, Zhao X, Zheng L, Xi X. Significance of constructing quality of care sensitive indicators based on Donabedian structure-process-outcome three-dimensional quality model in quality control of pediatric endoscopy. Archives of Clinical Psychiatry. 2022; 49: 55–60.

[9] Wu Y, Levis B, Sun Y, He C, Krishnan A, Neupane D, et al. Accuracy of the hospital anxiety and depression scale depression subscale (HADS-D) to screen for major depression: systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. BMJ. 2021; 373: n972.

[10] Shafshak TS, Elnemr R. The visual analogue scale versus numerical rating scale in measuring pain severity and predicting disability in low back pain. Journal of Clinical Rheumatology. 2021; 27: 282–285.

[11] Alisherovna KM, Erkinovna KZ, Jamshedovna KD, Toshtemirovna EM. Study of quality of life indicators in patients with coronary heart disease using the SF-36 questionnaire. Web of Scientist: International Scientific Research Journal. 2022; 3: 558–564.

[12] Li J, Kang G, Liu T, Liu Z, Guo T. Feasibility of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols implemented perioperatively in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a single-center retrospective study. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2023; 33: 74–80.

[13] Chinda D, Shimoyama T. Assessment of physical stress during the perioperative period of endoscopic submucosal dissection. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2022; 28: 4508–4515.

[14] Pimentel-Nunes P, Libânio D, Bastiaansen BAJ, Bhandari P, Bisschops R, Bourke MJ, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal lesions: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) guideline—update 2022. Endoscopy. 2022; 54: 591–622.

[15] Han C, Sun Y. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diseases of the Esophagus. 2021; 34: doaa081.

[16] Xu H, Cao X, Zhang Y, Chen Z. Continuous improvement of quality management in the fall prevention process for inpatients: a historically controlled study. To be published in Research Square. 2021. [Preprint].

[17] Draganov PV, Wang AY, Othman MO, Fukami N. AGA institute clinical practice update: endoscopic submucosal dissection in the United States. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2019; 17: 16–25.e1.

[18] Liu BB, Liu YL, Ge X. Evaluation on the efficacy of nursing intervention based on the self-efficacy theory model in elderly patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2023; 44: 93–97.

[19] Xia R, Zeng H, Liu Q, Liu S, Zhang Z, Liu Y, et al. Health-related quality of life and health utility score of patients with gastric cancer: a multicentre cross-sectional survey in China. European Journal of Cancer Care. 2020; 29: e13283.

[20] Religioni U, Czerw A, Budzik MP, Deptała A, Badowska-Kozakiewicz AM. Assessment of pain, acceptance of the disease, adaptation to life and strategies for coping with the disease among patients with ovarian cancer. Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2021; 50: 833–834.

[21] Li T, Xiang PLB. Therapeutic effects of endoscopic mucosal resection on the recovery and prognosis of early gastric cancer. Journal of BUON. 2019; 24: 1087–1091.

[22] Li Y, Hong M, Liu G. Changes in the quality of life, psychological status, medication compliance, and prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction after PCI by applying PDCA cycle management model. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2021; 2021: 7318653.

[23] Wei J, Fang X, Qiao J, Liu H, Cui H, Wei Y, et al. Construction on teaching quality evaluation indicator system of multi-disciplinary team (MDT) clinical nursing practice in China: a Delphi study. Nurse Education in Practice. 2022; 64: 103452.

[24] Ikenoyama Y, Iri A, Imai H, Nakagawa H. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of an early-stage gastric tumor with minimal bleeding using full-time red dichromatic imaging. Endoscopy. 2022; 54: E1001–E1002.

[25] Tae CH, Shim KN, Kim BW, Kim JH, Hong SJ, Baik GH, et al. Comparison of subjective quality of life after endoscopic submucosal resection or surgery for early gastric cancer. Scientific Reports. 2020; 10: 6680.

[26] Wu Y, Zhang Y, Zou L. Effects of anxiety, depression, and fatigue on quality of life in early esophageal cancer patients following endoscopic submucosal dissection. Annals of Palliative Medicine. 2020; 9: 3766–3775.

[27] Cao X, Wang X, Li P, Ju W. Psychological effects of advanced care on patients received endoscopic gastric cancer resection. Medicine. 2019; 98: e17497.

[28] Wang Y, Zhou Q. The effect of accelerated rehabilitation nursing on postoperative recovery, nutritional status, and psychological status in patients with gastric cancer. American Journal of Translational Research. 2021; 13: 3666–3673.

[29] Lee KE, Lim KH. Mediation effect of adaptation on the quality of life in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy: a structure equation model. Asian Nursing Research. 2019; 13: 38–46.

[30] Hekmatpou D, Nasiri A, Mohaghegh F. Investigating the effect of self-care training on life expectancy and quality of life in patients with gastrointestinal cancer under radiotherapy. Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2019; 6: 198–205.

[31] Lin Y, Docherty SL, Porter LS, Bailey DE. Symptom experience and self-management for multiple co-occurring symptoms in patients with gastric cancer: a qualitative study. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2020; 49: 101860.

[32] Chen XB, Jiang MM, Gu WJ, Wang Y, Ye JH, Liu J, et al. Construction of quality control evaluation system for community diabetes management in different disease stages. Chinese General Practice. 2020; 23: 837–843.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.7 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (

Submission Turnaround Time