Technical elements on the rings in men's artistic gymnastics—a systematic review
1Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Niš, 18000 Niš, RS, Serbia
2Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, RS, Serbia
3Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Pazar, 36300 Novi Pazar, RS, Serbia
4Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
5Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
6Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, 10110 Zagreb, Croatia
DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2023.095 Vol.19,Issue 10,October 2023 pp.7-15
Submitted: 31 August 2022 Accepted: 03 January 2023
Published: 30 October 2023
† These authors contributed equally.
Although rings can move freely in all possible directions, by which they differ from all other apparatuses, physical performance at highest level is essetial in men’s artistic gymnastics to fulfill the exercise’s technical requirements in the interest of effective and accurate performance. We have aimed to compile the scientific evidence regarding exercises on the rings in men’s artistic gymnastics and, based on it, to investigate the necessary requirements for their successful realization. In regard to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the database search (Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science and Research Gate) has identified 5759 potential studies. Original cross-sectional studies published between 2000 and 2022 written in English, active male gymnasts who do not suffer from injury as a sample of participants, and studies that have evaluated different types of elements on the rings were reconsidered. Lastly, 15 full-text studies were identified. A total of seven elements were evaluated, four strength elements (swallow, Azarian, iron cross and support scale), two dismounts (double backflip straight and double backflip straight with a 360◦ turn), and one swing element (backward giant swing). Two studies have conducted a dismount kinematic analysis, another four strength elements electromyography, while two studies have used force plates to evaluate the required specific strength for their successful performance. Hence, handgrip strength, pectoralis muscles, teres major, deltoids and serratus anterior are crucial. In addition, handgrip strength, proper swing movement, lateral arm movement during the descending phase, and hip flexor/extensor muscle activity are also essential for both giant swings and dismounts. Progressive strength upgrade of key movements in younger gymnasts is necessary to make successful generations on the rings. Therefore, in order to upgrade the above, researchers and scientists should discover a method for providing more relevant and updated information for practitioners, i.e., coaches and gymnasts.
Rings; Men’s artistic gymnastics; Strength; Swing; Dismount
Dušan Đorđević,Miloš Paunović,Saša Veličković,Petar Veličković,Mima Stanković,Danilo Radanović,Rifat Mujanović,Dino Mujanović,Igor Jelaska,Luka Pezelj,Goran Sporiš. Technical elements on the rings in men's artistic gymnastics—a systematic review. Journal of Men's Health. 2023. 19(10);7-15.
 Albuquerque PA, Farinatti PTV. Development and validation of a new system for talent selection in female artistic gymnastics: the PDGO Battery. Brazilian Journal of Sports Medicine. 2007; 13: 157–164.
 Bradshaw E, Hume P, Calton M, Aisbett B. Reliability and variability of day-to-day vault training measures in artistic gymnastics. Sports Biomechanics. 2010; 9: 79–97.
 Bressel E, Yonker JC, Kras J, Heath EM. Comparison of static and dynamic balance in female collegiate soccer, basketball, and gymnastics athletes. Journal of Athletic Training. 2007; 42: 42–46.
 Gautier G, Thouvarecq R, Larue J. Influence of experience on postural control: effect of expertise in gymnastics. Journal of Motor Behavior. 2008; 40: 400–408.
 Sleeper MD, Kenyon LK, Elliott JM, Cheng MS. Measuring sport-specific physical abilities in male gymnasts: the men’s gymnastics functional measurement tool. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2016; 11: 1082–1100.
 Minganti C, Capranica L, Meeusen R, Amici S, Piacentini MF. The validity of sessionrating of perceived exertion method for quantifying training load in teamgym. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2010; 24: 3063–3068.
 Mellos V, Dallas G, Kirialanis P, Fiorilli G, Di Cagno A. Comparison between physical conditioning status and improvement in artistic gymnasts and non-athletes peers. Science of Gymnastics Journal. 2014; 6: 33–43.
 Bassa H, Michailidis H, Kotzamanidis C, Siatras T, Chatzikotoulas K. Concentric and eccentric isokinetic knee torque in pre-pubeiscent male gymnasts. Journal of Human Movement Studies. 2002; 42: 213–227.
 French DN, Gómez AL, Volek JS, Rubin MR, Ratamess NA, Sharman MJ, et al. Longitudinal tracking of muscular power changes of NCAA Division I collegiate women gymnasts. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2004; 18: 101–107.
 Gorosito MA. Relative strength requirement for Swallow element proper execution: a predictive test. Science of Gymnastics Journal. 2013; 5: 59–67.
 Sommer C. Building the gymnastic body: the science of gymnastics strength training. 1st edn. Olympic Bodies, LLC: Anthem, Arizona. 2008.
 Wilmore J, Costill DL, Kenney W. Physiology of sport and exercise. 4th edn. Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL. 2008.
 Schärer C, Tacchelli L, Göpfert B, Gross M, Lüthy F, Taube W, et al. Specific eccentric-isokinetic cluster training improves static strength elements on rings for elite gymnasts. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16: 4571.
 International Gymnastics Federation. Code of points 2017–2020 for men’s artistic gymnastics competitions. 2017. Available at: https://www.docdroid.net/dR5jZJ9/mag-cop-2017-2020-draft-1-pdf (Accessed: 19 August 2022).
 International Gymnastics Federation. Code of points 2022–2024 for men’s artistic gymnastics competitions. 2022. Available at: https://www.gymnastics.sport/publicdir/rules/files/en_ 2022-2024 MAG CoP.pdf (Accessed: 19 August 2022).
 Prassas S, Sanders R. Biomechanical research in gymnastics: what is done, what is needed. In: Applied Proceedings of the XVII International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports: Acrobatics. 1999; 1–10.
 Prassas S, Kwon Y, Sands WA. Biomechanical research in artistic gymnastics: a review. Sports Biomechanics. 2006; 5: 261–291.
 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372: n71.
 Rethlefsen ML, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, Ayala AP, Moher D, Page MJ, et al. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews. 2021; 10: 39.
 de Morton NA. The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2009; 55: 129–133.
 Dunlavy JK, Sands WA, McNeal JR, Stone MH, Smith SL, Jemni M, et al. Strength performance assessment in a simulated men’s gymnastics still rings cross. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine. 2007; 6: 93–97.
 Kolimechkov S, Yanev I, Kiuchukov I, Petrov L. Kinematic analysis of double back straight somersault and double back straight somersault with full twist on rings. Science of Gymnastics Journal. 2021; 13: 191–202.
 Campos MJA, Côrte-Real C, Lebre E. The importance of the “Swallow” on structuring and valuing rings exercises of men’s artistic gymnastics. Palestrica of the Third Millennium Civilization & Sport. 2009; 10: 190–195.
 Campos M, Sousa F, Lebre E. The swallow element and muscular activations. In: ISBS-Conference Proceedings Archive. 2011.
 Yeadon MR, Brewin MA. Optimised performance of the backward longswing on rings. Journal of Biomechanics. 2003; 36: 545–552.
 Sprigings EJ, Lanovaz JL, Russell KW. The Role of shoulder and hip torques generated during a backward giant swing on rings. Journal of Applied Biomechanics. 2000; 16: 289–300.
 Brewin MA, Yeadon MR, Kerwin DG. Minimising peak forces at the shoulders during backward longswings on rings. Human Movement Science. 2000; 19: 717–736.
 Ningxiang Z, Mingxin G, Lejun W, Jiangbo W. A kinematic analysis of Yan Mingyong’s landing from rings after the backward giant swing tuck of 2-circle back flip and a 360° turn. In: 2012 International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI2012). IEEE. 2012; 1050–1053.
 Schärer C, Hübner K. Accuracy of prediction of maximum resistance at increased holding times based on a three seconds maximum static strength test of the three main strength elements on rings. Science of Gymnastics Journal. 2016; 8: 125–314.
 Hübner K, Schärer C. Relationship between the elements swallow, support scale and iron cross on rings and their specific preconditioning strengthening exercises. Science of Gymnastics Journal. 2015; 7: 59–68.
 Bango Melcon B, Sillero Quintana M, Grande Rodriguez I. New tool to assess the force production in the swallow. Science of Gymnastics Journal. 2013; 5: 47–58.
 Bernasconi SM, Tordi NR, Parratte BM, Rouillon JR. Can shoulder muscle coordination during the support scale at ring height be replicated during training exercises in gymnastics? Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2009; 23: 2381–2388.
 Bernasconi SM, Tordi NR, Parratte BM, Rouillon JD, Monnier GG. Effects of two devices on the surface electromyography responses of eleven shoulder muscles during Azarian in gymnastics. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2006; 20: 53–57.
 Bernasconi S, Tordi N, Parratte B, Rouillon JD, Monnier G. Surface electromyography of nine shoulder muscles in two iron cross conditions in gymnastics. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2004; 44: 240–245.
 Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Physical Therapy. 2003; 83: 713–721.
 Kamimura T, Ikuta Y. Evaluation of grip strength with a sustained maximal isometric contraction for 6 and 10 seconds. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2001; 33: 225–229.
 Rozand V, Cattagni T, Theurel J, Martin A, Lepers R. Neuromuscular fatigue following isometric contractions with similar torque time integral. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015; 36: 35–40.
 Starischka S. Considerations for creating discipline-specific strength training programs in artistic gymnastics. Competitive sport. 1978; 8: 405–411.
 Starischka S, Tschiene P. Training control notes. Competitive sport. 1977; 7: 275–281.
 Reynolds JM, Gordon TJ, Robergs RA. Prediction of one repetition maximum strength from multiple repetition maximum testing and anthropometry. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2006; 20: 584–592.
 Brechue WF, Mayhew JL. Upper-body work capacity and 1rm prediction are unaltered by increasing muscular strength in college football players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2009; 23: 2477–2486.
 Sprigings EJ, Lanovaz JL, Glen Watson L, Russell KW. Removing swing from a handstand on rings using a properly timed backward giant circle. Journal of Biomechanics. 1998; 31: 27–35.
 International Gymnastics Federation. Code of points 1997–2000 for men’s artistic gymnastics competitions. 1997. Available at: https://www.docdroid.net/dR5jZJ9/mag-cop-2017-2020-draft-1-pdf (Accessed: 20 August 2022).
 International Gymnastics Federation. Code of points 2017–2020 for men’s artistic gymnastics competitions. 2019. Available at: https://www.docdroid.net/dR5jZJ9/mag-cop-2017-2020-draft-1-pdf (Accessed: 20 August 2022).
 Nissinen MA. Kinematic and kinetic analysis of the giant swing on rings. Biomech VIII-B. 1983; 781–786.
 Čuk I. Handgrip in artistic gymnastics. Science of Gymnastics Journal. 2015; 7: 128.
 Kolar E, Kolar KA, Štuhec S. Gymnastics. Sports Biomechanics. 2002; 1: 69–78.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.
SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)
Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.
Scopus: CiteScore 0.7 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).