Article Data

  • Views 613
  • Dowloads 127

Original Research

Open Access

Effect of ERAS management mode on postoperative functional exercise compliance and functional recovery in male anterior cruciate ligament injury

  • Shuang Zhang1,*,
  • Nan Lu1
  • Li Zhu1
  • Yuchen Li1
  • Tong Zheng1

1Department of Sports Medicine, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100035 Beijing, China

DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2023.103 Vol.19,Issue 10,October 2023 pp.96-102

Submitted: 08 June 2023 Accepted: 08 October 2023

Published: 30 October 2023

*Corresponding Author(s): Shuang Zhang E-mail: hzhang5779@163.com

Abstract

The study aims to investigate the effect of ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) management mode on functional exercise compliance and functional recovery after ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) reconstruction in males. Patients were admitted between June 2021 and December 2021 as the control group, and patients were admitted between January 2022 and June 2022 as the observation group. Routine nursing was adopted in the control group, while ERAS management mode was applied in the observation group for nursing. The clinical nursing efficacy, knee joint function (Lysholm score) and VAS (Visual analogue scale) score, patients’ functional training compliance and complications were compared. After intervention, the swelling disappearance time, pain disappearance time, hospital stay and other indicators of clinical nursing effect in the observation group were better (p < 0.05); the preoperative Lysholm score and VAS score showed no statistical significance (p > 0.05). The Lysholm score and VAS score at each time point after operation were markedly higher, and repeated measures analysis of variance manifested that the Lysholm score, VAS score, intergroup effect, time effect and interaction effect in both groups had statistical significance (p < 0.05). The total compliance rate of functional training in the observation group was conspicuously higher (p < 0.05); the overall incidence of complications in the observation group (13.3%) was evidently lower (28.7%) (p < 0.05). ERAS management mode can improve the functional training compliance, accelerate the recovery of joint function, reduce the incidence of complications and promote the quality of life of patients with ACL injury.


Keywords

Male patients with ACL injury; Functional recovery; ERAS management model; Functional exercise compliance


Cite and Share

Shuang Zhang,Nan Lu,Li Zhu,Yuchen Li,Tong Zheng. Effect of ERAS management mode on postoperative functional exercise compliance and functional recovery in male anterior cruciate ligament injury. Journal of Men's Health. 2023. 19(10);96-102.

References

[1] Bayer S, Meredith SJ, Wilson KW, de SA D, Pauyo T, Byrne K, et al. Knee morphological risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2020; 102: 703–718.

[2] Webster KE, Hewett TE. Anterior cruciate ligament injury and knee osteoarthritis: an umbrella systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. 2022; 32: 145–152.

[3] Musahl V, Karlsson J. Anterior cruciate ligament tear. New England Journal of Medicine. 2019; 380: 2341–2348.

[4] Reijman M, Eggerding V, van Es E, van Arkel E, van den Brand I, van Linge J, et al. Early surgical reconstruction versus rehabilitation with elective delayed reconstruction for patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture: COMPARE randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2021; 372: n375.

[5] Ljungqvist O, de Boer HD, Balfour A, Fawcett WJ, Lobo DN, Nelson G, et al. Opportunities and challenges for the next phase of enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surgery. 2021; 156: 775–784.

[6] Smith TW, Wang X, Singer MA, Godellas CV, Vaince FT. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a clinical review of implementation across multiple surgical subspecialties. The American Journal of Surgery. 2020; 219: 530–534.

[7] Truong LK, Mosewich AD, Holt CJ, Le CY, Miciak M, Whittaker JL. Psychological, social and contextual factors across recovery stages following a sport-related knee injury: a scoping review. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020; 54: 1149–1156.

[8] Huang H, Zhang S, Wang Y, Tegner Y, Wang Y, Jiang Y, et al. Reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for knee arthroplasty. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2022; 54: jrm00317.

[9] Modarresi S, Lukacs MJ, Ghodrati M, Salim S, MacDermid JC, Walton DM. A systematic review and synthesis of psychometric properties of the numeric pain rating scale and the visual analog scale for use in people with neck pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 2021; 38: 132–148.

[10] Brindle M, Nelson G, Lobo DN, Ljungqvist O, Gustafsson UO. Recommendations from the ERAS® society for standards for the development of enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines. BJS Open. 2020; 4: 157–163.

[11] Debono B, Wainwright TW, Wang MY, Sigmundsson FG, Yang MMH, Smid-Nanninga H, et al. Consensus statement for perioperative care in lumbar spinal fusion: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. The Spine Journal. 2021; 21: 729–752.

[12] Xu J, Zheng M, Feng Z, Pan L, Peng Z. Meta-analysis of knee joint function recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by accelerated rehabilitation surgery. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. 2022; 2022: 5085143.

[13] Kai Sun, Lei Chen, Yao M, Hua Hu, Liang Chen, Jun Zhong, et al. Clinical application of enhanced recovery after surgery in the perioperative period of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. 2021; 25: 1647–1651. (In Chinese)

[14] Andrey Rusanov, Irina Roy, Оlga Rusanova, Nataliia Yevpak, Liudmyla Podosinova. The effects of the comprehensive rehabilitation method on quadriceps activation: outcomes in patients with an injury to the anterior cruciate ligament. Sport Mont. 2020; 18: 15–18.

[15] Fleming JD, Ritzmann R, Centner C. Effect of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture on knee proprioception within 2 years after conservative and operative treatment: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Medicine. 2022; 52: 1091–1102.

[16] Praz C, Vieira TD, Saithna A, Rosentiel N, Kandhari V, Nogueira H, et al. Risk factors for lateral meniscus posterior root tears in the anterior cruciate ligament–injured knee: an epidemiological analysis of 3956 patients from the SANTI study group. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019; 47: 598–605.

[17] Jordan MJ, Morris N, Barnert J, Lawson D, Aldrich Witt I, Herzog W. Forecasting neuromuscular recovery after anterior cruciate ligament injury: athlete recovery profiles with generalized additive modeling. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2022; 40: 2803–2812.

[18] Glattke KE, Tummala SV, Chhabra A. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction recovery and rehabilitation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2022; 104: 739–754.

[19] Nelson C, Rajan L, Day J, Hinton R, Bodendorfer BM. Postoperative rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review. 2021; 29: 63–80.

[20] An YW, Lobacz AD, Baumeister J, Rose WC, Higginson JS, Rosen J, et al. Negative emotion and joint-stiffness regulation strategies after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Journal of Athletic Training. 2019; 54: 1269–1279.

[21] Piussi R, Berghdal T, Sundemo D, Grassi A, Zaffagnini S, Sansone M, et al. Self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety after ACL injury: a systematic review. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2022; 10: 232596712110664.

[22] Gennarelli SM, Brown SM, Mulcahey MK. Psychosocial interventions help facilitate recovery following musculoskeletal sports injuries: a systematic review. The Physician and Sportsmedicine. 2020; 48: 370–377.

[23] He X. Observation on the rehabilitation effect of athletes with anterior cruciate ligament injury of the knee based on multidisciplinary combined nondrug therapy. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2022; 2022: 9528354.

[24] Jenkins SM, Guzman A, Gardner BB, Bryant SA, del Sol SR, McGahan P, et al. Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament injury: review of current literature and recommendations. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2022; 15: 170–179.

[25] Fouasson-Chailloux A, Crenn V, Louguet B, Grondin J, Menu P, Dauty M. Therapeutic patient education after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of the knowledge and certitudes with a self-report questionnaire. Healthcare. 2022; 10: 934.

[26] Deabate L, Previtali D, Grassi A, Filardo G, Candrian C, Delcogliano M. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction within 3 weeks does not increase stiffness and complications compared with delayed reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020; 48: 1263–1272.

[27] Kocher MS, Saxon HS, Hovis WD, Hawkins RJ. Management and complications of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in skeletally immature patients: survey of the Herodicus society and the ACL study group. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics. 2002; 22: 452–457.

[28] Frassanito L, Vergari A, Nestorini R, Cerulli G, Placella G, Pace V, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in hip and knee replacement surgery: description of a multidisciplinary program to improve management of the patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. Musculoskeletal Surgery. 2020; 104: 87–92.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.7 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top