Gender difference in impact of mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual function

There is a paucity of research on the difference between men and women in the impact of mental health on sexual function during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. This study aims to explore sexual function changes and the effects of mental health on sexual function during the COVID-19 pandemic. The data from a self-administered online questionnaire completed by 180 healthy Korean volunteers were analyzed. During the COVID-19 pandemic, women tended to be more vulnerable than men in all subscales of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21), except for the stress subscale (p < 0.001). Regarding sexual function, overall sexual function, including both the total International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) score and total Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) score, was lower during the pandemic compared to before the pandemic. All subscales of DASS-21 and total DASS-21 scores were negatively correlated with total IIEF-5 and total FSFI score in men and women, respectively. On a multivariate analysis, the anxiety subscale of DASS-21 was an independent risk factor for decreased total IIEF-5 score in men (p < 0.05). Mental health during the pandemic has negatively influenced sexual function in both sexes. Particularly, anxiety was a significant risk factor for decreased erectile function in men during the pandemic.

COVID-19; Mental health; Sexual function; Korean population; Gender difference; Anxiety

[1] Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The Lancet. 2020; 395: 497–506.

[2] Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomedica. 2020; 91: 157–160.

[3] Van Bortel T, Basnayake A, Wurie F, Jambai M, Koroma AS, Muana AT, et al. Psychosocial effects of an Ebola outbreak at individual, community and international levels. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2016; 94: 210–214.

[4] Serafini G, Parmigiani B, Amerio A, Aguglia A, Sher L, Amore M. The psychological impact of COVID-19 on the mental health in the general population. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine. 2020; 113: 531–537.

[5] Park KH, Kim AR, Yang MA, Lim SJ, Park JH. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the lifestyle, mental health, and quality of life of adults in South Korea. PLOS ONE. 2021; 16: e0247970.

[6] Cao W, Fang Z, Hou G, Han M, Xu X, Dong J, et al. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Research. 2020; 287: 112934.

[7] Xiao H, Zhang Y, Kong D, Li S, Yang N. The effects of social support on sleep quality of medical staff treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in January and February 2020 in China. Medical Science Monitor. 2020; 26: e923549.

[8] Carvalho J, Campos P, Carrito M, Moura C, Quinta-Gomes A, Tavares I, et al. The relationship between COVID-19 confinement, psychological adjustment, and sexual functioning, in a sample of Portuguese men and women. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2021; 18: 1191–1197.

[9] Mendes C, Pereira H. Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on work-related quality of life through the lens of sexual orientation. Behavioral Sciences. 2021; 11: 58.

[10] Hedon F. Anxiety and erectile dysfunction: a global approach to ED enhances results and quality of life. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2003; 15: S16–S19.

[11] Kalmbach DA, Kingsberg SA, Ciesla JA. How changes in depression and anxiety symptoms correspond to variations in female sexual response in a nonclinical sample of young women: a daily diary study. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2014; 11: 2915–2927.

[12] Yang Y, Song Y, Lu Y, Xu Y, Liu L, Liu X. Associations between erectile dysfunction and psychological disorders (depression and anxiety): a cross‐sectional study in a Chinese population. Andrologia. 2019; 51: e13395.

[13] Szuster E, Kostrzewska P, Pawlikowska A, Mandera A, Biernikiewicz M, Kałka D. Mental and sexual health of polish women of reproductive age during the COVID-19 pandemic—an online survey. Sexual Medicine. 2021; 9: 100367–100367.

[14] Cedro C, Mento C, Piccolo MC, Iannuzzo F, Rizzo A, Muscatello MRA, et al. Sexual desire and body image. Gender differences and correlations before and during COVID-19 lockdown. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19: 4351.

[15] Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Depression anxiety stress scales. PsycTests Dataset. 2011. Available at: https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Ft01004-000 (Accessed: 14 July 2022).

[16] Lee E, Moon SH, Cho MS, Park ES, Kim SY, Han JS, et al. The 21-item and 12-item versions of the depression anxiety stress scales: psychometric evaluation in a Korean population. Asian Nursing Research. 2019; 13: 30–37.

[17] Rhoden EL, Telöken C, Sogari PR, Vargas Souto CA. The use of the simplified International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool to study the prevalence of erectile dysfunction. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2002; 14: 245–250.

[18] Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2000; 26: 191–208.

[19] Ahn TY, Lee DS, Kang W, Hong JH, Kim YS. Validation of an abridged Korean version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Korean Journal of Urology. 2001; 42: 535–540.

[20] Kim HY, So HS, Park KS, Jeong SJ, Lee JY, Ryu SB. Development of the Korean-version of Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Korean Journal of Andrology. 2002; 20: 50–56.

[21] Güzel A, Döndü A. Changes in sexual functions and habits of healthcare workers during the ongoing COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-sectional survey study. Irish Journal of Medical Science. 2022; 191: 1013–1021.

[22] Ballester-Arnal R, Nebot-Garcia JE, Ruiz-Palomino E, Giménez-García C, Gil-Llario MD. “INSIDE” project on sexual health in Spain: sexual life during the lockdown caused by COVID-19. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. 2021; 18: 1023–1041.

[23] Costantini E, Trama F, Villari D, Maruccia S, Li Marzi V, Natale F, et al. The impact of lockdown on couples’ sex lives. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10: 1414.

[24] Panzeri M, Ferrucci R, Cozza A, Fontanesi L. Changes in sexuality and quality of couple relationship during the COVID-19 lockdown. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020; 11: 565823.

[25] Sotiropoulou P, Ferenidou F, Owens D, Kokka I, Minopoulou E, Koumantanou E, et al. The impact of social distancing measures due to COVID-19 pandemic on sexual function and relationship quality of couples in Greece. Sexual Medicine. 2021; 9: 100364–100364.

[26] Amerio A, Lugo A, Bosetti C, Fanucchi T, Gorini G, Pacifici R, et al. Italians do it … less. COVID-19 lockdown impact on sexual activity: evidence from a large representative sample of Italian adults. Journal of Epidemiology. 2021; 31: 648–652.

[27] Asiamah N, Opuni FF, Mends-Brew E, Mensah SW, Mensah HK, Quansah F. Short-term changes in behaviors resulting from COVID-19-related social isolation and their influences on mental health in Ghana. Community Mental Health Journal. 2021; 57: 79–92.

[28] Coombe J, Kong FYS, Bittleston H, Williams H, Tomnay J, Vaisey A, et al. Love during lockdown: findings from an online survey examining the impact of COVID-19 on the sexual health of people living in Australia. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2021; 97: 357–362.

[29] Chen T, Bhambhvani HP, Kasman AM, Eisenberg ML. The association of the COVID-19 pandemic on male sexual function in the United States: a survey study of male cannabis users. Sexual Medicine. 2021; 9: 100340–100340.

[30] Chone JS, Lima SVMA, Fronteira I, Mendes IAC, Shaaban AN, Martins MDRO, et al. Factors associated with chemsex in Portugal during the COVID-19 pandemic. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. 2021; 29: e3474.

[31] Tribowo JA, Tanojo TD, Supardi S, Pakpahan C, Siswidiyanto EB, Rezano A, et al. The impact of the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic on sexual behavior of marriage people in Indonesia. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021; 9: 440–445.

[32] Cascalheira CJ, McCormack M, Portch E, Wignall L. Changes in sexual fantasy and solitary sexual practice during social lockdown among young adults in the UK. Sexual Medicine. 2021; 9: 100342–100342.

[33] Mercer CH, Clifton S, Riddell J, Tanton C, Freeman L, Copas AJ, et al. Impacts of COVID-19 on sexual behaviour in Britain: findings from a large, quasi-representative survey (Natsal-COVID). Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2022; 98: 469–477.

[34] Etheridge B, Spantig L. The gender gap in mental well-being at the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic: evidence from the UK. European Economic Review. 2022; 145: 104114.

[35] Hwang S, Shin H. Gender gap in mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea: a decomposition analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20: 2250.

[36] Vloo A, Alessie RJM, Mierau JO, Boezen MH, Mierau JO, Franke L, et al. Gender differences in the mental health impact of the COVID-19 lockdown: longitudinal evidence from the Netherlands. SSM—Population Health. 2021; 15: 100878.

[37] Deng J, Li T, Wang J, Teng L. Longitudinal influence of COVID-19-related stress on sexual compulsivity symptoms in Chinese undergraduates. BMC Psychiatry. 2021; 21: 376.

[38] Karagöz MA, Gül A, Borg C, Erihan İB, Uslu M, Ezer M, et al. Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on sexuality: a cross-sectional study among couples in Turkey. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2021; 33: 815–823.

[39] Szuster E, Kostrzewska P, Pawlikowska A, Mandera A, Biernikiewicz M, Kałka D. Mental and sexual health of polish women of reproductive age during the COVID-19 pandemic—an online survey. Sexual Medicine. 2021; 9: 100367–100367.

[40] Velurajah R, Brunckhorst O, Waqar M, McMullen I, Ahmed K. Erectile dysfunction in patients with anxiety disorders: a systematic review. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2022; 34: 177–186.