Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
A radiomics model derived by combination of radiomics signature and clinical risk factors predict of lymph node metastasis for men renal pelvis urothelial carcinoma
1Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Medical and Health Group Hangzhou Hospital, 310022 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
2Department of Radiology, Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, 310006 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
3Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, 314408 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
4Department of Oncology, Zhejiang Medical and Health Group Hangzhou Hospital, 310022 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2024.072 Vol.20,Issue 5,May 2024 pp.68-75
Submitted: 21 October 2023 Accepted: 21 November 2023
Published: 30 May 2024
*Corresponding Author(s): Gang Tao E-mail: tg@zyjhzyy.com
This study aims to propose a radiomics model to identify male patients suffering from renal pelvis urothelial carcinoma (RPUC) with preoperative lymph node (LN) metastasis. In a study involving 133 male RPUC patients, 94 were assigned to a training group and 39 to a testing group. Their arterial-phase computed tomography (CT) images were analyzed to extract radiomics features, which were then refined through data reduction and feature selection. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), a radiomics signature was created, which was then incorporated into a Logistic regression classifier in the training group to predict pathologic lymph node metastases. A comprehensive radiomics model was developed using multivariate logistic regression, integrating clinical risk factors. The model’s efficacy was evaluated in both sets using discrimination, calibration and decision curve analyses in both the training and testing sets. The constructed signature, composed of eight promising imaging-derived features, showed strong discrimination ability in both sets (training: area under the curve (AUC) 0.836 and testing: AUC, 0.817). When combined with CT-reported tumor status, the radiomics model demonstrated excellent calibration and discrimination, achieving an AUC of 0.849 in the training set and 0.851 in the testing set. The radiomics model, incorporating both the radiomics signature and the CT-reported tumor status, could help in the preoperative individualized prediction of LN metastasis in male patients with RPUC.
Renal pelvis urothelial carcinoma; Radiomics; Lymph node metastasis; Computed tomography; Men
Jingyi Huang,Fan Chen,Chengcheng Gao,Zhenyu Shu,Gang Tao. A radiomics model derived by combination of radiomics signature and clinical risk factors predict of lymph node metastasis for men renal pelvis urothelial carcinoma. Journal of Men's Health. 2024. 20(5);68-75.
[1] Soria F, Shariat SF, Lerner SP, Fritsche H, Rink M, Kassouf W, et al. Epidemiology, diagnosis, preoperative evaluation and prognostic assessment of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). World Journal of Urology. 2017; 35: 379–387.
[2] Wu J, Chen S, Wu X, Mao W, Wang Y, Xu B, et al. Trends of incidence and prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences. 2021; 21: 607–619.
[3] Xu C, Yuan C, Zhang C, Fang D, Yu Y, Wang X, et al. The evolution of clinicopathological diagnostic features of upper tract urothelial carcinoma in China: a summary of 2561 cases in the last 20 years. Frontiers in Oncology. 2022; 12: 769252.
[4] Califano G, Ouzaid I, Verze P, Hermieu J, Mirone V, Xylinas E. Immune checkpoint inhibition in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World Journal of Urology. 2021; 39: 1357–1367.
[5] Rouprêt M, Babjuk M, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Compérat EM, et al. European association of urology guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: 2020 update. European Urology. 2021; 79: 62–79.
[6] Voskuilen CS, Schweitzer D, Jensen JB, Nielsen AM, Joniau S, Muilwijk T, et al. Diagnostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography for lymph node staging in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. European Urology Oncology. 2020; 3: 73–79.
[7] Pallauf M, D’Andrea D, König F, Laukhtina E, Yanagisawa T, Rouprêt M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical lymph node staging for upper tract urothelial cancer patients: a multicenter, retrospective, observational study. Journal of Urology. 2023; 209: 515–524.
[8] Rodler S, Solyanik O, Ingenerf M, Fabritius M, Schulz GB, Jokisch F, et al. Accuracy and prognostic value of radiological lymph node features in variant histologies of bladder cancer. World Journal of Urology. 2022; 40: 1707–1714.
[9] Dłubak A, Karwacki J, Logoń K, Tomecka P, Brawańska K, Krajewski W, et al. Lymph node dissection in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: current status and future perspectives. Current Oncology Reports. 2023; 25: 1327–1344.
[10] Richters A, van Ginkel N, Meijer RP, Wondergem M, Schoots I, Vis AN, et al. Staging fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: a nationwide population-based study. BJU International. 2023; 132: 420–427.
[11] Amudala Puchakayala PR, Sthanam VL, Nakhmani A, Chaudhary MFA, Kizhakke Puliyakote A, Reinhardt JM, et al. Radiomics for improved detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in low-dose and standard-dose chest CT scans. Radiology. 2023; 307: e222998.
[12] Ramtohul T, Djerroudi L, Lissavalid E, Nhy C, Redon L, Ikni L, et al. Multiparametric MRI and radiomics for the prediction of HER2-zero, -low, and -positive breast cancers. Radiology. 2023; 308: e222646.
[13] Shin J, Seo N, Baek S, Son N, Lim JS, Kim NK, et al. MRI radiomics model predicts pathologic complete response of rectal cancer following chemoradiotherapy. Radiology. 2022; 303: 351–358.
[14] Carbonell G, Kennedy P, Bane O, Kirmani A, El Homsi M, Stocker D, et al. Precision of MRI radiomics features in the liver and hepatocellular carcinoma. European Radiology. 2022; 32: 2030–2040.
[15] Chetan MR, Gleeson FV. Radiomics in predicting treatment response in non-small-cell lung cancer: current status, challenges and future perspectives. European Radiology. 2021; 31: 1049–1058.
[16] Kobayashi S, Ito M, Takemura K, Suzuki H, Yonese I, Koga F. Preoperative models incorporating the systemic immune-inflammation index for predicting prognosis and muscle invasion in patients with non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma. International Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2022; 27: 574–584.
[17] Aydh A, Abufaraj M, Mori K, Quhal F, Pradere B, Motlagh RS, et al. Performance of fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging for lymph node staging in bladder and upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review. Arab Journal of Urology. 2021; 19: 59–66.
[18] Seisen T, Colin P, Hupertan V, Yates DR, Xylinas E, Nison L, et al. Postoperative nomogram to predict cancer‐specific survival after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with localised and/or locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma without metastasis. BJU International. 2014; 114: 733–740.
[19] Cha EK, Shariat SF, Kormaksson M, Novara G, Chromecki TF, Scherr DS, et al. Predicting clinical outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. European urology. 2012; 818–825.
[20] Sugino Y, Sasaki T, Kato M, Masui S, Nishikawa K, Okamoto T, et al. Prognostic effect of preoperative psoas muscle Hounsfield unit at radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Cancers. 2021; 13: 5629.
[21] Miura N, Mori K, Laukhtina E, Schuettfort VM, Abufaraj M, Teoh JYC, et al. Prognostic value of the preoperative albumin-globulin ratio in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy: results from a large multicenter international collaboration. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2021; 51: 1149–1157.
[22] Tanaka N, Kikuchi E, Kanao K, Matsumoto K, Shirotake S, Kobayashi H, et al. The predictive value of positive urine cytology for outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy in patients with primary upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional study. Urologic Oncology. 2014; 32: 48.e19–48.e26.
Top