Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Exploring the development and trends of prostate cancer radiotherapy research: a bibliometric analysis
1Department of Radiation Physics, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 310022 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
2Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, 310053 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
3Department of Urology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 310022 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
4Department of Radiation Physics, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, 310002 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2025.054 Vol.21,Issue 4,April 2025 pp.77-88
Submitted: 10 November 2024 Accepted: 19 December 2024
Published: 30 April 2025
*Corresponding Author(s): Yanchi Wang E-mail: wangyanchi2001@163.com
*Corresponding Author(s): Lili Zhang E-mail: bzg19564133451@163.com
† These authors contributed equally.
Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in men globally, with its incidence increasing annually due to lifestyle changes and an aging population. Radiotherapy, which has been a curative treatment for PC, has undergone continuous development and refinement since its introduction. However, few comprehensive reviews have been conducted on the hotspots and trends in this field. Therefore, this study employs bibliometric analysis to evaluate the key research domains, current research landscape, and future development patterns in PC radiotherapy over the last 30 years. Methods: Relevant literature on PC radiotherapy from 1994 to 2023 was retrieved using appropriate keywords from the Web of Science Core Collection database. A bibliometric analysis and visualization of annual production, countries, institutions, authors, journals, keywords and references were performed using CiteSpace and Bibliometrix. CiteSpace was used for systematic mapping to understand the structural evolution of this field over time. Results: A total of 4923 articles were included, and the annual number of publications showed a growing trend. The United States and the University of California System were the leading countries and institutions. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics had the highest number of publications in terms of publication output. Alongi F was the most prolific author. The main study domains focused on technological innovations, assessment of treatment efficacy, and initiatives to reduce the risk associated with PC radiation. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is currently a major research focus, with potential advancements in PC radiotherapy emphasizing adaptive radiotherapy, proton and heavy ion therapy, and multimodal imaging approaches. Conclusions: It is evident from the analysis that the field of PC radiotherapy holds promising research prospects.
Prostate cancer; Radiotherapy; Stereotactic body radiation therapy; Bibliometrics; Visualization
Qinfei Sun,Zhenguo Bu,Shuowei Jiang,Yixin Dai,Yipeng Xu,Jueqi Chen,Yanchi Wang,Lili Zhang. Exploring the development and trends of prostate cancer radiotherapy research: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Men's Health. 2025. 21(4);77-88.
[1] Carlsson SV, Vickers AJ. Screening for prostate cancer. Medical Clinics of North America. 2020; 104: 1051–1062.
[2] Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2023; 73: 17–48.
[3] Anguas-Gracia A, Antón-Solanas I, Echániz-Serrano E, Subirón-Valera AB, Rodríguez-Roca B, Juárez-Vela R, et al. Quality of life after radical prostatectomy: a longitudinal study. Nursing Reports. 2023; 13: 1051–1063.
[4] Heesterman BL, Aben KKH, de Jong IJ, Pos FJ, van der Hel OL. Radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy for high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2023; 23: 398.
[5] Podder TK, Fredman ET, Ellis RJ. Advances in radiotherapy for prostate cancer treatment. In Schatten H (ed.) Molecular & Diagnostic imaging in prostate cancer: clinical applications and treatment strategies (pp. 31–47). Springer International Publishing: Cham. 2018.
[6] Lazo A, de la Torre-Luque A, Arregui G, Rivas D, Serradilla A, Gómez J, et al. Long-term outcomes of dose-escalated hypofractionated radiotherapy in localized prostate cancer. Biology. 2022; 11: 435.
[7] Lilleby W, Kishan A, Geinitz H. Acute and long-term toxicity in primary hypofractionated external photon radiation therapy in patients with localized prostate cancer. World Journal of Urology. 2024; 42: 41.
[8] Wolf F, Sedlmayer F, Aebersold D, Albrecht C, Böhmer D, Flentje M, et al. Ultrahypofractionation of localized prostate cancer: statement from the DEGRO working group prostate cancer. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie. 2021; 197: 89–96.
[9] Sannazzari GL, Ragona R, Ruo Redda MG, Giglioli FR, Isolato G, Guarneri A. CT-MRI image fusion for delineation of volumes in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. British Journal of Radiology. 2002; 75: 603–607.
[10] Tanaka H, Hayashi S, Ohtakara K, Hoshi H, Iida T. Usefulness of CT-MRI fusion in radiotherapy planning for localized prostate cancer. Journal of Radiation Research. 2011; 52: 782–788.
[11] Villeirs GM, Van Vaerenbergh K, Vakaet L, Bral S, Claus F, De Neve WJ, et al. Interobserver delineation variation using CT versus combined CT + MRI in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie. 2005; 181: 424–430.
[12] Chen C. Searching for intellectual turning points: progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004; 101: 5303–5310.
[13] Chen C. Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science. 2017; 2: 1–40.
[14] Chen C, Song M. Visualizing a field of research: a methodology of systematic scientometric reviews. PLOS ONE. 2019; 14: e0223994.
[15] Chen C, Leydesdorff L. Patterns of connections and movements in dual‐map overlays: a new method of publication portfolio analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2014; 65: 334–351.
[16] Shibata N, Kajikawa Y, Takeda Y, Matsushima K. Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in citation networks of scientific publications. Technovation. 2008; 28: 758–775.
[17] Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics. 2017; 11: 959–975.
[18] Pollack A, Zagars GK, Starkschall G, Childress CH, Kopplin S, Boyer AL, et al. Conventional vs. conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary results of dosimetry and acute toxicity. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 1996; 34: 555–564.
[19] Zimmermann FB, Molls M. Three-dimensional radiation treatment planning: principles and practice. Onkologie. 1999; 21: 474–484.
[20] Cheung P, Sixel K, Morton G, Loblaw DA, Tirona R, Pang G, et al. Individualized planning target volumes for intrafraction motion during hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy boost for prostate cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2005; 62: 418–425.
[21] De Bari B, Arcangeli S, Ciardo D, Mazzola R, Alongi F, Russi EG, et al. Extreme hypofractionation for early prostate cancer: biology meets technology. Cancer Treatment Reviews. 2016; 50: 48–60.
[22] Vicini FA, Kini VR, Edmundson G, Gustafson GS, Stromberg J, Martinez A. A comprehensive review of prostate cancer brachytherapy: defining an optimal technique. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 1999; 44: 483–491.
[23] Huddart RA, Nahum A, Neal A, McLean M, Dearnaley DP, Law M, et al. Accuracy of pelvic radiotherapy: prospective analysis of 90 patients in a randomised trial of blocked versus standard radiotherapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 1996; 39: 19–29.
[24] Oldham M, Webb S. The optimization and inherent limitations of 3D conformal radiotherapy treatment plans of the prostate. British Journal of Radiology. 2014; 68: 882–893.
[25] Kroonwijk M, Pasma KL, Quint S, Koper PCM, Visser AG, Heijmen BJM. In vivo dosimetry for prostate cancer patients using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID); demonstration of internal organ motion. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 1998; 49: 125–132.
[26] Wu QJ, Thongphiew D, Wang Z, Mathayomchan B, Chankong V, Yoo S, et al. On-line re-optimization of prostate IMRT plans for adaptive radiation therapy. Physics in Medicine & Biology. 2008; 53: 673–691.
[27] Boersma LJ, van den Brink M, Bruce AM, Shouman T, Gras L, te Velde A, et al. Estimation of the incidence of late bladder and rectum complications after high-dose (70–78 GY) conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer, using dose-volume histograms. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 1998; 41: 83–92.
[28] Corn BW, Valicenti RK, Mulholland SG, Hyslop T, Gomella L. Stage T3 prostate cancer: a nonrandomized comparison between definitive irradiation and induction hormonal manipulation plus prostatectomy. Urology. 1998; 51: 782–787.
[29] Möller T. Skeletal metastases. Acta Oncologica. 1996; 35: 125–136.
[30] Ben-Josef E, Porter AT. Radioisotopes in the treatment of bone metastases. Annals of Medicine. 1997; 29: 31–35.
[31] Chen JJ, Weg E, Liao JJ. Prostate and metastasis-directed focal therapy in prostate cancer: hype or hope? Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy. 2023; 23: 163–176.
[32] Adorno Febles VR, Blacksburg S, Haas JA, Wise DR. Translating the immunobiology of SBRT to novel therapeutic combinations for advanced prostate cancer. Frontiers in Oncology. 2020; 10: 830.
[33] Kissel M, Créhange G, Graff P. Stereotactic radiation therapy versus brachytherapy: relative strengths of two highly efficient options for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Cancers. 2022; 14: 2226.
[34] Roy S, Morgan SC. Hypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: when and for whom? Current Urology Reports. 2019; 20: 53.
[35] Kesch C, Heidegger I, Kasivisvanathan V, Kretschmer A, Marra G, Preisser F, et al. Radical prostatectomy: sequelae in the course of time. Frontiers in Surgery. 2021; 8: 684088.
[36] Greenberger BA, Zaorsky NG, Den RB. Comparison of radical prostatectomy versus radiation and androgen deprivation therapy strategies as primary treatment for high-risk localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Urology Focus. 2020; 6: 404–418.
[37] Podder TK, Beaulieu L, Caldwell B, Cormack RA, Crass JB, Dicker AP, et al. AAPM and GEC-ESTRO guidelines for image-guided robotic brachytherapy: report of Task Group 192. Medical Physics. 2014; 41: 101501.
[38] Hoffman KE, Johnstone P. A 25-year perspective on the evolution of radiation treatment of urologic cancers. Urologic Oncology. 2021; 39: 577–581.
[39] Mohan R. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy—you can have your cake and eat it too! Medical Physics. 2023; 50: 74–79.
[40] Sun H, Wang N, Huang G, Liu X. Dosimetric comparison of fixed field dynamic IMRT and VMAT techniques in simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Medicine. 2022; 101: e32063.
[41] Ong ALK, Knight K, Panettieri V, Dimmock M, Tuan JKL, Tan HQ, et al. Proton versus photon therapy for high-risk prostate cancer with dose escalation of dominant intraprostatic lesions: a preliminary planning study. Frontiers in Oncology. 2023; 13: 1241711.
[42] Wu YY, Fan KH. Proton therapy for prostate cancer: current state and future perspectives. British Journal of Radiology. 2022; 95: 20210670.
[43] Takagi M, Demizu Y, Fujii O, Terashima K, Niwa Y, Daimon T, et al. Proton therapy for localized prostate cancer: long-term results from a single-center experience. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2021; 109: 964–974.
[44] Dearnaley D, Syndikus I, Mossop H, Khoo V, Birtle A, Bloomfield D, et al. Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2016; 17: 1047–1060.
[45] Fransson P, Nilsson P, Gunnlaugsson A, Beckman L, Tavelin B, Norman D, et al. Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer (HYPO-RT-PC): patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2021; 22: 235–245.
[46] Staffurth JN, Haviland JS, Wilkins A, Syndikus I, Khoo V, Bloomfield D, et al. Impact of hypofractionated radiotherapy on patient-reported outcomes in prostate cancer: results up to 5 yr in the CHHiP trial (CRUK/06/016). European Urology Oncology. 2021; 4: 980–992.
[47] Kishan AU, Dang A, Katz AJ, Mantz CA, Collins SP, Aghdam N, et al. Long-term outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy for low-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2: e188006.
[48] van Dams R, Jiang NY, Fuller DB, Loblaw A, Jiang T, Katz AJ, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for high-risk localized carcinoma of the prostate (SHARP) consortium: analysis of 344 prospectively treated patients. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2021; 110: 731–737.
[49] Byrne M, Archibald-Heeren B, Hu Y, Teh A, Beserminji R, Cai E, et al. Varian ethos online adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer: early results of contouring accuracy, treatment plan quality, and treatment time. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2022; 23: e13479.
[50] Meyers SM, Winter JD, Obeidi Y, Chung P, Menard C, Warde P, et al. A feasibility study of adaptive radiation therapy for postprostatectomy prostate cancer. Medical Dosimetry. 2024; 49: 150–158.
[51] Alongi F, Rigo M, Figlia V, Cuccia F, Giaj-Levra N, Nicosia L, et al. 1.5 T MR-guided and daily adapted SBRT for prostate cancer: feasibility, preliminary clinical tolerability, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes during treatment. Radiation Oncology. 2020; 15: 69.
[52] Bolla M, Maingon P, Carrie C, Villa S, Kitsios P, Poortmans PM, et al. Short androgen suppression and radiation dose escalation for intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer: results of EORTC trial 22991. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2016; 34: 1748–1756.
[53] Kishan AU, Sun Y, Hartman H, Pisansky TM, Bolla M, Neven A, et al. Androgen deprivation therapy use and duration with definitive radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis. The Lancet Oncology. 2022; 23: 304–316.
[54] Gravis G. Systemic treatment for metastatic prostate cancer. Asian Journal of Urology. 2019; 6: 162–168.
[55] Alongi F, Fiorino C, Cozzarini C, Broggi S, Perna L, Cattaneo GM, et al. IMRT significantly reduces acute toxicity of whole-pelvis irradiation in patients treated with post-operative adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2009; 93: 207–212.
[56] Zelefsky MJ, Fuks Z, Hunt M, Yamada Y, Marion C, Ling CC, et al. High-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: early toxicity and biochemical outcome in 772 patients. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2002; 53: 1111–1116.
[57] Meier R. Dose-escalated robotic SBRT for stage I–II prostate cancer. Frontiers in Oncology. 2015; 5: 48.
[58] Yadav P, Chang SX, Cheng CW, DesRosiers CM, Mitra RK, Das IJ. Dosimetric evaluation of high-Z inhomogeneity used for hip prosthesis: a multi-institutional collaborative study. Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics. 2022; 95: 148–155.
[59] Taneja S, Barbee DL, Rea AJ, Malin M. CBCT image quality QA: establishing a quantitative program. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2020; 21: 215–225.
[60] Raaymakers BW, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Bol GH, Glitzner M, Kotte A, van Asselen B, et al. First patients treated with a 1.5 T MRI-Linac: clinical proof of concept of a high-precision, high-field MRI guided radiotherapy treatment. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2017; 62: L41–L50.
[61] Ma TM, Lamb JM, Casado M, Wang X, Basehart TV, Yang Y, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (mirage): a phase iii randomized trial. BMC Cancer. 2021; 21: 538.
[62] Bruynzeel AME, Tetar SU, Oei SS, Senan S, Haasbeek CJA, Spoelstra FOB, et al. A prospective single-arm phase 2 study of stereotactic magnetic resonance guided adaptive radiation therapy for prostate cancer: early toxicity results. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2019; 105: 1086–1094.
[63] McPartlin AJ, Li XA, Kershaw LE, Heide U, Kerkmeijer L, Lawton C, et al. MRI-guided prostate adaptive radiotherapy—a systematic review. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2016; 119: 371–380.
[64] Christiansen RL, Dysager L, Hansen CR, Jensen HR, Schytte T, Nyborg CJ, et al. Online adaptive radiotherapy potentially reduces toxicity for high-risk prostate cancer treatment. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2022; 167: 165–171.
[65] Hunt A, Hansen VN, Oelfke U, Nill S, Hafeez S. Adaptive radiotherapy enabled by MRI guidance. Clinical Oncology. 2018; 30: 711–719.
[66] Moazzezi M, Rose B, Kisling K, Moore KL, Ray X. Prospects for daily online adaptive radiotherapy via ethos for prostate cancer patients without nodal involvement using unedited CBCT auto-segmentation. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2021; 22: 82–93.
[67] Cusumano D, Dhont J, Boldrini L, Chiloiro G, Teodoli S, Massaccesi M, et al. Predicting tumour motion during the whole radiotherapy treatment: a systematic approach for thoracic and abdominal lesions based on real time MR. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2018; 129: 456–462.
[68] Tzikas A, Karaiskos P, Papanikolaou N, Sandilos P, Koutsouveli E, Lavdas E, et al. Investigating the clinical aspects of using CT vs. CT-MRI images during organ delineation and treatment planning in prostate cancer radiotherapy. Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment. 2011; 10: 231–242.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.
SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)
Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.
Scopus: CiteScore 0.9 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).
Top