Article Data

  • Views 504
  • Dowloads 138

Original Research

Open Access

Differences in foot pressure distribution of males with and without basketball training in early adolescence

  • Nagihan Kırıkoğlu1
  • Aylin Özge Pekel1
  • Tülay Ceylan2,*,
  • Murat Eliöz3
  • Belma Yavaşoğlu4
  • Ayşegül Beykümül5
  • Kemal Arda Kurt1
  • Hande Yazıcıoğlu Çalışan6
  • Cihan Baykal1
  • Merve Karaman1
  • Hayati Türkoğlu7
  • Levent Ceylan8

1Faculty of Sport Sciences, Gazi University, 06560 Ankara, Türkiye

2Institute of Graduate Studies, Ondokuz Mayıs University, 55139 Samsun, Türkiye

3Yaşar Doğu Faculty of Sport Sciences, Ondokuz Mayıs University, 55139 Samsun, Türkiye

4Institute of Health Sciences, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, 40100 Kırşehir, Türkiye

5Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Gazi University Research and Application Hospital, 06560 Ankara, Türkiye

6Coordinatorship for Specialization in Sports and Health, Aksaray University, 68100 Aksaray, Türkiye

7Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Viransehir State Hospital, 63700 Şanlıurfa, Türkiye

8Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hitit University, 19169 Çorum, Türkiye

DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2025.061

Submitted: 23 January 2025 Accepted: 07 April 2025

Online publish date: 29 April 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Tülay Ceylan E-mail: tulaykaymak17@hotmail.com

Abstract

Background: In this study, the Rsscan V9 (RsScan International, Olen, Belçika) foot scanning system was used to determine the potential foot pressure distribution and foot contact times of individuals in early adolescence who did not receive sports training and those who received regular basketball training. Methods: The study involved 120 adolescent volunteers aged 11–14 years of which 60 did not receive sports training, and the other 60 received basketball training in Ankara for at least two years. The socio-demographic data of the study participants were documented. The foot pressure analyses were carried out in both fixed and moving postures. Results: When pressure values were compared between adolescents with and without basketball training, statistically significant differences were found between Q1 (left forefoot pressure) and Q2 (right forefoot pressure) values. Specifically the mean value (p < 0.05) of Q2 (right forefoot pressure) variable was higher in basketball participants compared to non-athletes. In non-athletes, Q1 (left forefoot pressure) (p < 0.05) was significantly higher than in participants who received basketball training. Similarly, with regard to the left forefoot pressure duration (left ms) variable, participants with basketball training showed significantly higher mean scores than non-athletes (p < 0.001). The findings revealed that there were differences in pressure imbalances and ground contact times between basketball players and non-players. Conclusions: If not controlled regularly, pressure imbalances can lead to serious discomfort in the feet, knees, hips and lower back, and serious injuries can be prevented if detected early. Minor injuries that develop due to repetitive movements and stress on joints from years of training can be treated early, and preventive applications can becarried out by recognising potential injuries. For this reason, it is recommended that basketball players have a regular foot pressure analysis carried out at the start of the season.


Keywords

Pedobarographic analysis; Basketball; Foot contact time; Sport


Cite and Share

Nagihan Kırıkoğlu,Aylin Özge Pekel,Tülay Ceylan,Murat Eliöz,Belma Yavaşoğlu,Ayşegül Beykümül,Kemal Arda Kurt,Hande Yazıcıoğlu Çalışan,Cihan Baykal,Merve Karaman,Hayati Türkoğlu,Levent Ceylan. Differences in foot pressure distribution of males with and without basketball training in early adolescence. Journal of Men's Health. 2025.doi:10.22514/jomh.2025.061.

References

[1] Mack CD, Herzog MM, Maak TG, Bedi A, Gondalia R, Meisel P, et al. Epidemiology of injuries among national basketball association players: 2013–2014 through 2018–2019. Sports Health. 2025; 17: 585–593.

[2] Tummala SV, Morikawa L, Brinkman JC, Crijns TJ, Vij N, Gill V, et al. Characterization of ankle injuries and associated risk factors in the national basketball association: minutes per game and usage rate associated with time loss. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2023; 11: 23259671231184459.

[3] Canli U, Aldhahi MI, Küçük H. Association of physiological performance, physical fitness, and academic achievement in secondary school students. Children. 2024; 11: 396.

[4] Bayraktar I, Örs BS, Bağcı E, Altunsoy M, Pekel HA. The investigation of approach run in terms of age, gender, bio-motor and technical components on vaulting table. Science of Gymnastics Journal. 2021; 13: 275–285.

[5] P Plotkin LI, Bruzzaniti A, Pianeta R. Sexual dimorphism in the musculoskeletal system: sex hormones and beyond. Journal of the Endocrine Society. 2024; 8: bvae153.

[6] Karadeniz S, Suveren C, Arslan Y, Ayyıldız Durhan T, Ceylan T, Albay F, et al. Examination of basic motor skills in children and adolescents. Frontiers in Physiology. 2024; 14: 1346750.

[7] Kale M, Boyacı A, Tolalı AB, Yol Y, Ayaz E, Tutar M, et al. The comparison of the effects of post-activity performance enhancement on foot plantar pressure and vertical jump in traditional set and cluster set training configurations. Journal of Men’s Health. 2025; 21: 66–76.

[8] González-Elena ML, Fernández-Espejo E, Castro-Méndez A, Guerra-Martín MD, Córdoba-Fernández A. A cross-sectional study of foot growth and its correlation with anthropometric parameters in a representative cohort of schoolchildren from Southern Spain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18: 4031.

[9] Arslan Y, Yavaşoğlu B, Beykumül A, Pekel AÖ, Suveren C, Karabulut EO, et al. The effect of 10 weeks of karate training on the development of motor skills in children who are new to karate. Frontiers in Physiology. 2024; 15: 1347403.

[10] Cen X, Xu D, Baker JS, Gu Y. Association of arch stiffness with plantar impulse distribution during walking, running, and gait termination. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 2090.

[11] Şahin FN, Ceylan L, Küçük H, Ceylan T, Arıkan G, Yiğit S, et al. Examining the relationship between pes planus degree, balance and jump performances in athletes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19: 11602.

[12] Gabbett T. Training the adolescent athlete. Sports Health. 2022; 14: 11–12.

[13] Jiang H, Mei Q, Wang Y, He J, Shao E, Fernandez J, et al. Understanding foot conditions, morphologies and functions in children: a current review. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2023; 11: 1192524.

[14] Molina-García C, Álvarez-Salvago F, Pujol-Fuentes C, López-del-Amo-Lorente A, Ramos-Petersen L, Martínez-Sebastián C, et al. Descriptive study of the influence of foot type on physical characteristics, laxity, strength and baropodometry in children aged 5 to 10 years. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14: 8578.

[15] Callahan E, Mangum LC. Exploring trends between dance experience, athletic participation, and injury history. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2025; 20: 410–419.

[16] Zulkifli SS, Loh WP. A state-of-the-art review of foot pressure. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2020; 26: 25–32.

[17] Lam WK, Kan WH, Chia JS, Kong PW. Effect of shoe modifications on biomechanical changes in basketball: a systematic review. Sports Biomechanics. 2022; 21: 577–603.

[18] Després JP, Prud’homme D, Pouliot MC, Tremblay A, Bouchard C. Estimation of deep abdominal adipose-tissue accumulation from simple anthropometric measurements in men. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1991; 54: 471–477.

[19] Bowen TR, Miller FM, Castagno PM, Richards J, LGBA. A method of dynamic foot-pressure measurement for the evaluation of pediatric orthopedic foot deformities. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 1998; 18: 789–793.

[20] Skopljak A, Muftic M, Sukalo A, Masic I, Zunic L. Pedobarography in diagnosis and clinical application. Acta Informatica Medica. 2014; 22: 374–378.

[21] Zhou H, Ugbolue UC. Is there a relationship between strike pattern and injury during running: a review. Physical Activity and Health. 2019; 3: 127–134.

[22] Cobos-Moreno P, Astasio-Picado Á, Martínez-Nova A, Sánchez-Rodríguez R, Escamilla-Martínez E, Gómez-Martín B. The Podoprint® plantar pressure platform: evaluation of reliability and repeatability, and determination of the normality parameters. Journal of Tissue Viability. 2022; 31: 619–624.

[23] Samson W, Van Hamme A, Sanchez S, Chèze L, Jan SVS, Feipel V. Foot roll-over evaluation based on 3D dynamic foot scan. Gait & Posture. 2014; 39: 577–582.

[24] Feka K, Brusa J, Cannata R, Giustino V, Bianco A, Gjaka M, et al. Is bodyweight affecting plantar pressure distribution in children? An observational study. Medicine. 2020; 99: e21968.

[25] Tománková K, Přidalová M, Svoboda Z, Cuberek R. Evaluation of plantar pressure distribution in relationship to body mass index in Czech women during walking. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 2017; 107: 208–214.

[26] Noor NE, Olama KA, Abdul-Rahman RS. Effect of body mass index on plantar pressure distribution in children during standing. International Journal of Health Sciences. 2022; 6: 373–381.

[27] Mathewson E. Foot posture in school children from the Western Cape: differences between footwear use, gender and race [master’s thesis]. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University. 2016.

[28] Kong PW, Lam WK, Ng WX, Aziz L, Leong HF. In-shoe plantar pressure profiles in amateur basketball players. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 2018; 108: 215–224.

[29] Hu L. Experimental study on the effects of basketball on plantar pressure distribution of juveniles. Leather and Footwear Journal. 2018; 18: 5–12.

[30] Hmida J, Tomschi F, Strauss AC, Hilberg T. Relationship between foot pressure and spinal parameters in healthy adults—a systematic review. Gait & Posture. 2023; 103: 126–132.

[31] Mikołajczyk E, Jankowicz-Szymańska A, Smoła E. Characteristics of foot arches and foot pressure distribution in 10–11-year-old male soccer players. Journal of Kinesiology and Exercise Sciences. 2018; 28: 37–43.

[32] Cerezci-Duygu S, Sarak-Kucukosmanoglu H, Aytar A. The effect of weight distribution in the foot on balance and plantar pressure in female adolescent athletes. Sports Health. 2024; 16: 19417381241277796.

[33] Kim TH, Lee CW, Kim SG, An BW. The effect of a pelvis-concentrated exercise program on male college students’ body alignment and foot base pressure. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2015; 27: 1165–1167.

[34] Kararti C, Bilgin S, Dadali Y, Büyükturan B, Büyükturan Ö, Bek N. Are biomechanical features of the foot and ankle related to lumbopelvic motor control? Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 2021; 111: Article_13.

[35] Lambrich J, Hagen M, Schwiertz G, Muehlbauer T. Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of pressure-detecting insoles for static and dynamic movements in healthy young adults. Sensors. 2023; 23: 4913.

[36] Caputo JM, Collins SH. Prosthetic ankle push-off work reduces metabolic rate but not collision work in non-amputee walking. Scientific Reports. 2014; 4: 7213.

[37] Lenzi T, Carrozza MC, Agrawal SK. Powered hip exoskeletons can reduce the user’s hip and ankle muscle activations during walking. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2013; 21: 938–948.

[38] Chang J, Wang S, Kuo C, Shen HC, Hong Y, Lin L. Prevalence of flexible flatfoot in Taiwanese school-aged children in relation to obesity, gender, and age. European Journal of Pediatrics. 2010; 169: 447–452.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.9 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).

Submission Turnaround Time

Top