Article Data

  • Views 5043
  • Dowloads 175

Original Research

Open Access

Shear wave elastography for predicting the likelihood of sperm retrieval in microscopic testicular sperm extraction

  • Adem Tunçekin1,2,*,
  • Eyyup Sabri Pelit1
  • Mehmet Demir1
  • İsmail Yağmur1
  • Bülent Katı1
  • Halil Çiftçi1

1Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Harran University, 63300 Şanlıurfa, Türkiye

2Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Uşak University, 64000 Uşak, Türkiye

DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2025.074 Vol.21,Issue 5,May 2025 pp.120-129

Submitted: 11 February 2025 Accepted: 27 March 2025

Published: 30 May 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Adem Tunçekin E-mail: adem.tuncekin@usak.edu.tr

Abstract

Background: The gold standard procedure for retrieving mature sperm cells from the foci of spermatogenesis in the testicles of patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) is called microscopic testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE). Shear wave elastography (SWE) is an imaging technique that measures the modulus of elasticity, which represents the stiffness of tissues. We investigated the effectiveness of testicular elastography in predicting the probability of sperm retrieval during micro-TESE in patients with azoospermia. Methods: We prospectively included 84 patients diagnosed with NOA who were scheduled to undergo micro-TESE. Prior to micro-TESE, testicular elastography was performed on all patients. Six SWE measurements were recorded for each patient, representing the right upper, right middle, right lower, left upper, left middle and left lower regions. After SWE measurement, the patients underwent a micro-TESE procedure performed by the same surgeon. The patients were divided into TESE-positive and TESE-negative groups. By contrast, statistically significant differences were observed between the Klinefelter Syndrome (KS) and non-KS groups in other clinical and hormonal parameters, including Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) (p = 0.003), Luteinizing Hormone (LH) (p = 0.001), Total Testosterone (TT) (p = 0.047), and estradiol (p = 0.041), p < 0.05 and TESE-negative. The hormone levels, SWE values, and genetics of the two groups of patients were compared. Results: Following the micro-TESE procedures, sperm retrieval was successful in 45 patients (53.57%) and unsuccessful in 39 patients (46.43%). There were no significant differences between the SWE values of the TESE-positive and TESE-negative groups. Significantly higher SWE values were found in the Klinefelter syndrome group than in patients with normal genetics. Conclusions: Although testicular elastography is a noninvasive and easily applicable imaging method, it cannot be used to predict sperm retrieval in patients with NOA. Clinical Trial Registration: The Unique Identifier NCT06524258 and the URL is https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06524258.


Keywords

Shear wave elastography; Microscopic testicular sperm extraction; Azoospermia; Male infertility; Testis


Cite and Share

Adem Tunçekin,Eyyup Sabri Pelit,Mehmet Demir,İsmail Yağmur,Bülent Katı,Halil Çiftçi. Shear wave elastography for predicting the likelihood of sperm retrieval in microscopic testicular sperm extraction. Journal of Men's Health. 2025. 21(5);120-129.

References

[1] World Health Organization (WHO). Infertility. 2023. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infertility (Accessed: 09 March 2025).

[2] Agarwal A, Baskaran S, Parekh N, Cho CL, Henkel R, Vij S, et al. Male infertility. The Lancet. 2021; 23: 319–333.

[3] Sharlip ID, Jarow JP, Belker AM, Lipshultz LI, Sigman M, Thomas AJ, et al. Best practice policies for male infertility. Fertility and Sterility. 2002; 77: 873–882.

[4] Sharma M, Leslie SW. Azoospermia. StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island (FL). 2023.

[5] Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with Society for Male Reproduction and Urology. The management of infertility due to obstructive azoospermia. Fertility and Sterility. 2008; 90: 121–124.

[6] Bernie AM, Ramasamy R, Schlegel PN. Predictive factors of successful microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Basic and Clinical Andrology. 2013; 23: 5.

[7] Flannigan R, Bach PV, Schlegel PN. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Translational Andrology and Urology. 2017; 6: 745–752.

[8] Baleato-Gonzalez S, Osorio-Vazquez I, Flores-Ríos E, Santiago-Pérez MI, Laguna-Reyes JP, Garcia-Figueiras R. Testicular evaluation using shear wave elastography (SWE) in patients with varicocele. Journal of Imaging. 2023; 9: 166.

[9] Schurich M, Aigner F, Frauscher F, Pallwein L. The role of ultrasound in assessment of male fertility. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2009; 144: 192–198.

[10] Herek D, Çakmak V, Çomut E, Herek Ö. The value of multimodal ultrasonography in the evaluation of late presenting testicular torsion in a rat experimental model. British Journal of Radiology. 2024; 97: 377–385.

[11] Lin YY, Mao L, Li J, Zhu ZM, Luo YH, Zhou XH, et al. Exploring the anatomical factors influencing testes elasticity via ultrasound shear wave elastography: preliminary results. Revista Internacional de Andrología. 2023; 21: 100367.

[12] Illiano E, Trama F, Ruffo A, Romeo G, Riccardo F, Crocetto F, et al. Testicular shear wave elastography in oligo-astheno-teratozoospermic individuals: a prospective case-control study. International Urology and Nephrology. 2021; 53: 1773–1783.

[13] Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Human Reproduction. 1999; 14: 131–135.

[14] Arian I, Dumbraveanu I, Ghenciu V, Machidon D, Ernu I, Ceban E. Histological and immunohistochemical outcomes after microdissection TESE in contrast with hormonal profile, testis volume and genetics in patients with azoospermia. The Journal of Medicine and Life. 2023; 16: 144–152.

[15] Marcon J, Trottmann M, Rübenthaler J, D’Anastasi M, Stief CG, Reiser MF, et al. Three-dimensional vs. two-dimensional shear-wave elastography of the testes-preliminary study on a healthy collective. Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation. 2016; 64: 447–456.

[16] Ozturker C, Karagoz E, Incedayi M. Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis: 2-D shear wave elastography, transient elastography or acoustic radiation force impulse imaging? Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 2016; 42: 3052.

[17] Magri F, Chytiris S, Capelli V, Alessi S, Nalon E, Rotondi M, et al. Shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules: feasibility in the case of coexistent chronic autoimmune Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Clinical Endocrinology. 2012; 76: 137–141.

[18] Marsaud A, Durand M, Raffaelli C, Carpentier X, Rouscoff Y, Tibi B, et al. Elastography shows promise in testicular cancer detection. Progrès en Urologie. 2015; 25: 75–82. (In French)

[19] Zhang X, Lv F, Tang J. Shear wave elastography (SWE) is reliable method for testicular spermatogenesis evaluation after torsion. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2015; 8: 7089–7097.

[20] Kantarci F, Olgun DC, Mihmanli I. Shear-wave elastography of segmental infarction of the testis. Korean Journal of Radiology. 2012; 13: 820–822.

[21] Marcon J, Trottmann M, Rübenthaler J, Stief CG, Reiser MF, Clevert DA. Shear wave elastography of the testes in a healthy study collective—differences in standard values between ARFI and VTIQ techniques. Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation. 2016; 64: 721–728.

[22] Rocher L, Criton A, Gennisson JL, Izard V, Ferlicot S, Tanter M, et al. Testicular shear wave elastography in normal and infertile men: a prospective study on 601 patients. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 2017; 43: 782–789.

[23] Kapadia AA, Greear GM, Chen T, Ball D, McClure RD, Ostrowski KA, et al. Testicular mapping-guided sperm retrieval vs. upfront microTESE in non-obstructive azoospermia: a comparison of sperm retrieval, pregnancy and live-birth rates. Translational Andrology and Urology. 2024; 13: 2672–2680.

[24] Abdelaal AMA, El-Azizi HM, GamaEl Din SF, Azzazi OAM, Mohamed MS. Evaluation of the potential role of shear wave elastography as a promising predictor of sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermic patients: a prospective study. Andrology. 2021; 9: 1481–1489.

[25] Li M, Li FH, Du J, Wang ZQ, Zheng JF, Li Z, et al. Quantitative analysis by real-time elastosonography for the differential diagnosis of azoospermia: preliminary application. National Journal of Andrology. 2012; 18: 35–38. (In Chinese)

[26] Hu JY, Huang WL, Gao Y, Yang Z, Ding L, Xie Y, et al. Preliminary investigation of the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography in evaluating the testicular spermatogenic function in patients with azoospermia. Andrologia. 2021; 53: e14039.

[27] Fu W, Cui J, Tang S. The relationship of testicular stiffness with Johnsen score and sperm retrieval outcome in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. 2024; 14: 3033–3043.

[28] Zhang S, Du J, Tian R, Xie S, Li F, Li Z. Assessment of the use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in guiding microdissection testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia. BMC Urology. 2018; 18: 48.

[29] Zhang H, Xi Q, Zhang X, Zhang H, Jiang Y, Liu R, et al. Prediction of microdissection testicular sperm extraction outcome in men with idiopathic nonobstruction azoospermia. Medicine. 2020; 99: e19934.

[30] Pozzi E, Corsini C, Belladelli F, Bertini A, Negri F, Raffo M, et al. Role of follicle-stimulating hormone, inhibin B, and anti-mullerian hormone in predicting sperm retrieval from men with nonobstructive azoospermiaundergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Urology Open Science. 2024; 65: 3–12.

[31] Abushamma F, Alazab RS, Allouh MZ, Abu Shamleh R, Abu Alwafa R, Ghalayini I. Testicular histopathology and follicular stimulating hormone to predict fertility in nonobstructive azoospermia. Urologia. 2024; 91: 800–806.

[32] Shiraishi K, Oka S, Matsuyama H. Testicular testosterone and estradiol concentrations and aromatase expression in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2021; 106: e1803–e1815.


Submission Turnaround Time

Top