Article Data

  • Views 241
  • Dowloads 122

Original Research

Open Access

''I feel freer here'': engaging older men in mental health-promoting communities through a Shared Reading intervention

  • Mette Marie Kristensen1,*,
  • Anna Paldam Folker1
  • Andreas Melson Gregersen2,†
  • Lars Berg Schovsbo3,†
  • Nana Cecilie Halmsted Kongsholm1

1National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark

2Danish Reading Society, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark

3DaneAge Association, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark

DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2025.080 Vol.21,Issue 6,June 2025 pp.53-61

Submitted: 17 February 2025 Accepted: 16 May 2025

Published: 30 June 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Mette Marie Kristensen E-mail: memk@sdu.dk

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

Background: Older men face higher rates of chronic illness, mental health challenges and social isolation, exacerbated by traditional masculinity norms that discourage emotional openness and help-seeking. Retirement and aging can further disrupt their social roles and identity, contributing to poorer well-being. Shared Reading, a reading group concept for guided collective engagement with literary texts, has shown potential to improve mental health outcomes and foster community among older men. This study aims to explore how Shared Reading may engage older men in health-promoting communities. Methods: The study was a qualitative exploration of a Shared Reading intervention targeting men aged 60 and above. It was based on six site visits to local Shared Reading group locations across Denmark, including interviews with local reading guides, participants in the Shared Reading groups across the sites, and the intervention project management. Results: We identified three central mechanisms for engagement across the Shared Reading groups: (1) the literature, serving as a common objective, a tool, and a window for the male participants; (2) the all-male setting, creating a safe space where the men felt more authentic, and (3) the combination of the all-male safe space and attributes of the literature created a confidential community, where participants felt at home and able to let their guards down. Based on these findings, we suggest that Shared Reading may be an effective way to engage men in mental health-promoting communities. Conclusions: The study highlights the broader implications of Shared Reading for mental health promotion among men. It demonstrates the importance of creating safe, activity-based and gender-sensitive interventions that resonate with male participants while subtly challenging traditional norms of masculinity. On this basis, we suggest that Shared Reading offers a framework for promoting mental well-being and provides valuable insights into the potential of literature for fostering connection and emotional exploration in male communities.


Keywords

Shared reading; Older men; Mental health; Men’s health; Mental health promotion


Cite and Share

Mette Marie Kristensen,Anna Paldam Folker,Andreas Melson Gregersen,Lars Berg Schovsbo,Nana Cecilie Halmsted Kongsholm. ''I feel freer here'': engaging older men in mental health-promoting communities through a Shared Reading intervention. Journal of Men's Health. 2025. 21(6);53-61.

References

[1] Mostert S, Hoogland M, Huibers M, Kaspers G. Excess mortality across countries in the Western World since the COVID-19 pandemic: ‘Our World in Data’ estimates of January 2020 to December 2022. BMJ Public Health. 2024; 2: e000282.

[2] White A, De Sousa B, De Visser R, Hogston R, Madsen SA, Makara P, et al. Men’s health in Europe. Journal of Men’s Health. 2011; 8: 192–201.

[3] Yoong M, Fong CL, Ying-Yeh C. Gender inequality and suicide: a systematic review of empirical studies. In Schouler-Ocak M, Khan MM (eds.) Suicide across cultures (pp. 83–98). 1st edn. Oxford University Press: Oxford. 2024.

[4] Robbins MJ, Wester SR, McKean NB. Masculinity across the life span: implications for older men. In Wong YJ, Wester SR (eds.) APA handbook of men and masculinities (pp. 389–409). American Psychological Association: Washington, DC. 2016.

[5] Ragonese C, Barker G. Understanding masculinities to improve men’s health. The Lancet. 2019; 394: 198–199.

[6] Baker P, Shand T. Men’s health: time for a new approach to policy and practice? Journal of Global Health. 2017; 7: 010306.

[7] Tannenbaum C, Frank B. Masculinity and health in late life men. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2011; 5: 243–254.

[8] Mahalik JR, Burns SM, Syzdek M. Masculinity and perceived normative health behaviors as predictors of men’s health behaviors. Social Science & Medicine. 2007; 64: 2201–2209.

[9] Thompson Jr EH, Whearty PM. Older men’s social participation: the importance of masculinity ideology. The Journal of Men’s Studies. 2004; 13: 5–24.

[10] Thomas GM, Thurnell-Read T. Later-life masculinities:(Re) forming the gendered lives of older men. Men and Masculinities. 2024; 27: 190–209.

[11] Kristensen MM, Simonsen P, Mørch KKS, Pihl ML, Rod MH, Folker AP. “It’s not that I don’t have things to do. It just all revolves around me”—men’s reflections on meaning in life in the transition to retirement in Denmark. Journal of Aging Studies. 2023; 64: 101112.

[12] Robertson S, Gough B, Hanna E, Raine G, Robinson M, Seims A, et al. Successful mental health promotion with men: the evidence from ‘tacit knowledge’. Health Promotion International. 2016; 33: 334–344.

[13] Nordin T, Degerstedt F, Granholm Valmari E. A scoping review of masculinity norms and their interplay with loneliness and social connectedness among men in western societies. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2024; 18: 15579883241304585.

[14] Sharp P, Bottorff JL, Rice S, Oliffe JL, Schulenkorf N, Impellizzeri F, et al. “People say men don’t talk, well that’s bullshit”: a focus group study exploring challenges and opportunities for men’s mental health promotion. PLOS ONE. 2022; 17: e0261997.

[15] Evans J, Frank B, Oliffe JL, Gregory D. Health, illness, men and masculinities (HIMM): a theoretical framework for understanding men and their health. Journal of Men’s Health. 2011; 8: 7–15.

[16] Marmot M. Review of social determinants and the health divide in the WHO European Region: final report. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen. 2014.

[17] Greaves L, Ritz SA. Sex, gender and health: mapping the landscape of research and policy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19: 2563.

[18] Seaton CL, Bottorff JL, Jones-Bricker M, Oliffe JL, DeLeenheer D, Medhurst K. Men’s mental health promotion interventions: a scoping review. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2017; 11: 1823–1837.

[19] Billington J, Farrington G, Lampropoulou S, Lingwood J, Jones A, Ledson J, et al. A comparative study of cognitive behavioural therapy and shared reading for chronic pain. Medical Humanities. 2017; 43: 155–165.

[20] Andersen TR. Regaining autonomy, competence, and relatedness: experiences from two shared reading groups for people diagnosed with cancer. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022; 13: 1017166.

[21] Dowrick C, Billington J, Robinson J, Hamer A, Williams C. Get into reading as an intervention for common mental health problems: exploring catalysts for change. Medical Humanities. 2012; 38: 15–20.

[22] Longden E, Davis P, Billington J, Lampropoulou S, Farrington G, Magee F, et al. Shared reading: assessing the intrinsic value of a literature-based health intervention. Medical Humanities. 2015; 41: 113–120.

[23] Kristensen MM, Simonsen P, Pihl MEL, Rod MH, Folker AP. “We’re opening 20 doors!”: exploring the collective dimensions of shared reading as mental health promotion among newly retired men in Denmark. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 2023; 8: 100639.

[24] Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2017; 12: 297–298.

[25] Galdas PM, Seidler ZE, Oliffe JL. Designing men’s health programs: the 5C framework. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2023; 17: 15579883231186463.

[26] Oliffe J, Rossnagel E, Bottorff JL, Chambers SK, Caperchione C, Rice SM. Community-based men’s health promotion programs: eight lessons learnt and their caveats. Health Promotion International. 2019; 35: 1230–1240.

[27] Foettinger L, Albrecht BM, Altgeld T, Gansefort D, Recke C, Stalling I, et al. The role of community-based men’s sheds in health promotion for older men: a mixed-methods systematic review. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2022; 16: 15579883221084490.

[28] Markham S, Hanna E. Shed talk: discourses of men and masculinities in the context of men’s sheds. In Brookes G, Chałupnik M (eds.) Masculinities and discourses of men’s health (pp. 101–127). 1st edn. University of Oxford: Oxford. 2023.

[29] Kristensen MM. Read, Man! An ethnographic investigation of Shared Reading as mental health promotion for newly retired men [doctoral thesis]. Det Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet: Syddansk Universitet. 2024.

[30] Pihl M-EL, Kristensen MM, Folker AP, Simonsen P. Approaching literary connectivity: early reflections on a shared reading intervention in the light of postcritical thought. Orbis Litterarum. 2024; 79: 145–153.

[31] Steenberg M, Christiansen C, Dalsgård AL, Stagis AM, Ahlgren LM, Nielsen TL, et al. Facilitating reading engagement in shared reading. Poetics Today. 2021; 42: 229–251.

[32] Belfiore E, Bennett O. Determinants of impact: towards a better understanding of encounters with the arts. Cultural Trends. 2007; 16: 225–275.

[33] Reed A. Henry and I: an ethnographic account of men’s fiction reading. Ethnos. 2002; 67: 181–200.

[34] Kristensen MM, Rod MH, Simonsen P, Folker AP. ‘You come as a human being…’: exploring sense of equality in arts interventions through an ethnographic study of shared reading. Medical Humanities. 2024; 51: 4–12.

[35] Cowen K, Collins T, Carr S, Wilson-Menzfeld G. Supporting older men’s social participation: a framework for engagement. The Journal of Men’s Studies. 2024; 33: 155–182.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.1 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).

Submission Turnaround Time

Top