Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Associations of multidimensional frailty with life satisfaction in older men: a latent class approach
1Department of Social Welfare, Semyung University, 27136 Jecheon, Republic of Korea
2Institute of Social Welfare, Jeonbuk National University, 54896 Jeonju, Republic of Korea
3School of Glocal Studies, Kyungwoon University, 39160 Gumi, Republic of Korea
DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2025.084 Vol.21,Issue 6,June 2025 pp.91-99
Submitted: 07 March 2025 Accepted: 15 April 2025
Published: 30 June 2025
*Corresponding Author(s): Sunghee Kim E-mail: kim_sh@jbnu.ac.kr
Background: Frailty, encompassing physical, psychological and social vulnerabilities, significantly affects life satisfaction in older men. However, intra-gender differences in frailty remain underexplored. This study aims to classify frailty subtypes among older men and examine their associations with life satisfaction. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the 2023 National Survey of Older Koreans (N = 3824 men aged 65+). Latent Class Analysis (LCA) identified frailty subtypes, and multiple regression analysis examined their associations with life satisfaction while controlling for key demographic factors. Results: Four frailty subtypes were identified: Physically Frail and Socially Discontent (PFSD), Robust and Socially Satisfied (RSS), Robust but Socially Isolated (RSI), and Moderately Frail and Socially Adequate (MFSA). The RSS group reported the highest level of life satisfaction, while all other subtypes showed significantly lower levels. Notably, the RSI group, despite good physical health, reported lower life satisfaction than the MFSA group, highlighting that social isolation may outweigh physical health advantages in determining life satisfaction. Conclusions: This study highlights the need for integrated interventions that address physical, psychological and social well-being to enhance life satisfaction among older men.
Frailty; Older men; Life satisfaction; Social isolation; Interventions
Sangyoon Han,Sunghee Kim,Heeran J Cho. Associations of multidimensional frailty with life satisfaction in older men: a latent class approach. Journal of Men's Health. 2025. 21(6);91-99.
[1] World Health Organization. Decade of healthy ageing: baseline report. WHO Press. 2021. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240017900 (Accessed: 25 February 2025).
[2] United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects 2024 Summary of Results. 2024. Available at: https://population.un.org/wpp/assets/Files/WPP2024_Summary-of-Results.pdf (Accessed: 25 February 2025)
[3] De Lepeleire J, Iliffe S, Mann E, Degryse JM. Frailty: an emerging concept for general practice. British Journal of General Practice. 2009; 59: e177–e182.
[4] Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al.; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2001; 56: M146–M156.
[5] Chu W, Chang SF, Ho HY. Adverse health effects of frailty: systematic review and meta-analysis of middle-aged and older adults with implications for evidence-based practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2021; 18: 282–289.
[6] Kojima G, Iliffe S, Walters K. Frailty index as a predictor of mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age and Ageing. 2018; 47: 193–200.
[7] Guo Y, Miao X, Hu J, Chen L, Chen Y, Zhao K, et al. Summary of best evidence for prevention and management of frailty. Age and Ageing. 2024; 53: afae011.
[8] Cohen CI, Benyaminov R, Rahman M, Ngu D, Reinhardt M. Frailty: a multidimensional biopsychosocial syndrome. The Medical Clinics of North America. 2023; 107: 183–197.
[9] Han CJ, Rosko AE, Spakowicz DJ, Hammer MJ, Von Ah D. Associations of frailty with symptoms, and HRQOL in older cancer survivors after cancer treatments: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Quality of Life Research. 2024; 33: 583–598.
[10] Pilotto A, Custodero C, Maggi S, Polidori MC, Veronese N, Ferrucci L. A multidimensional approach to frailty in older people. Ageing Research Reviews. 2020; 60: 101047.
[11] Baek W, Min A. Frailty index and gender-specific mortality in Korean adults: findings from the Korean Longitudinal study of aging (2006–2018). Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2022; 78: 2397–2407.
[12] Lu YW, Chang CC, Chou RH, Lee WJ, Chen LK, Huang PH, et al. Sex differences in the frailty phenotype and mortality in the I-Lan longitudinal aging study cohort. BMC Geriatrics. 2024; 24: 182.
[13] Sonnenberg CM, Deeg DJ, van Tilburg TG, Vink D, Stek ML, Beekman AT. Gender differences in the relation between depression and social support in later life. International Psychogeriatrics. 2013; 25: 61–70.
[14] Mahalik JR, Dagirmanjian FR. Working-class men’s constructions of help-seeking when feeling depressed or sad. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2019; 13: 1557988319850052.
[15] Mackenzie CS, Visperas A, Ogrodniczuk JS, Oliffe JL, Nurmi MA. Age and sex differences in self-stigma and public stigma concerning depression and suicide in men. Stigma and Health. 2019; 4: 233–241.
[16] Jeong K, Kim B, Kim S, Cho HJ, Kim S. The relationship between types of depressive changes and suicidal thoughts in middle-aged Korean males. Journal of Men’s Health. 2023; 19: 66–74.
[17] Crocker TF, Brown L, Clegg A, Farley K, Franklin M, Simpkins S, et al. Quality of life is substantially worse for community-dwelling older people living with frailty: systematic review and meta-analysis. Quality of Life Research. 2019; 28: 2041–2056.
[18] O’Caoimh R, Sezgin D, O’Donovan MR, Molloy DW, Clegg A, Rockwood K, et al. Prevalence of frailty in 62 countries across the world: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level studies. Age and Ageing. 2021; 50: 96–104.
[19] Park C, Ko FC. The science of frailty: sex differences. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine. 2021; 37: 625–638.
[20] Qiu Y, Li G, Wang X, Liu W, Li X, Yang Y, et al. Prevalence of multidimensional frailty among community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2024; 154: 104755.
[21] da Cunha Leme DE, Neri AL, Fattori A. How do the factors associated with frailty change with sex? An exploratory network analysis. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2022; 77: 2023–2031.
[22] Jyväkorpi SK, Lindström M, Suominen MH, Kautiainen H, Salminen K, Niskanen RT, et al. Relationship between frailty, nutrition, body composition, quality of life, and gender in institutionalized older people. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. 2022; 34: 1357–1363.
[23] Gobbens RJ, Luijkx KG, Wijnen-Sponselee MT, Schols JM. Towards an integral conceptual model of frailty. The Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging. 2010; 14: 175–181.
[24] Jung HW, Jang IY, Lee YS, Lee CK, Cho EI, Kang WY, et al. Prevalence of frailty and aging-related health conditions in older koreans in rural communities: a cross-sectional analysis of the aging study of pyeongchang rural area. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2016; 31: 345–352.
[25] Morley JE, Malmstrom TK, Miller DK. A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans. The Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging. 2012; 16: 601–608.
[26] Won CW, Yang KY, Rho YG, Kim SY, Lee EJ, Yoon JL, et al. The development of Korean activities of daily living (K-ADL) and Korean instrumental activities of daily living (K-IADL) scale. Journal of the Korean Geriatrics Society. 2002; 6: 107–120.
[27] Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963; 185: 914–919.
[28] Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969; 9: 179–186.
[29] Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 1975; 12: 189–198.
[30] Song M, Lee SH, Yu KH, Kang Y. Development and validation of the full version of story memory in the Korean-mini mental state examination, 2nd edition: expanded version (K-MMSE-2: EV). Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders. 2019; 18: 96–104.
[31] Kang EN, Kim HS, Jeong CW, Kim SJ, Lee SH, Joo BH, et al. 2023 National Survey of Older Koreans. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. 2023. Available at: https://www.mohw.go.kr/board.es?mid=a10411010100&bid=0019&act=view&list_no=1483359&tag=&nPage=1 (Accessed: 20 Decmber 2024).
[32] Denson N, Ing M. Latent class analysis in higher education: an illustrative example of pluralistic orientation. Research in Higher Education. 2014; 55: 508–526.
[33] Scotto Rosato N, Baer JC. Latent class analysis: a method for capturing heterogeneity. Social Work Research. 2012; 36: 61–69.
[34] Clark SL. Mixture modeling with behavioral data [doctoral dissertation]. Los Angeles: University of California. 2010.
[35] Khodabakhsh S. Factors affecting life satisfaction of older adults in Asia: a systematic review. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2022; 23: 1289–1304.
[36] Sulandari S, Coats RO, Miller A, Hodkinson A, Johnson J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between physical capability, social support, loneliness, depression, anxiety, and life satisfaction in older adults. Gerontologist. 2024; 64: gnae128.
[37] Wu D, Liu F, Huang S. Assessment of the relationship between living alone and the risk of depression based on longitudinal studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2022; 13: 954857.
[38] Bolina AF, Araújo MDC, Haas VJ, Tavares DMDS. Association between living arrangement and quality of life for older adults in the community. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. 2021; 29: e3401.
[39] Oshio T. Gender differences in the associations of life satisfaction with family and social relations among the Japanese elderly. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology. 2012; 27: 259–274.
[40] Burr JA, Mutchler JE. Residential independence among older persons: community and individual factors. Population Research and Policy Review. 2007; 26: 85–101.
[41] Tohme RA, Yount KM, Yassine S, Shideed O, Sibai AM. Socioeconomic resources and living arrangements of older adults in Lebanon: who chooses to live alone? Ageing and Society. 2011; 31: 1–17.
[42] Sadler E, Khadjesari Z, Ziemann A, Sheehan KJ, Whitney J, Wilson D, et al. Case management for integrated care of older people with frailty in community settings. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2023; 5: CD013088.
[43] Yu R, Tong C, Woo J. Effect of an integrated care model for pre-frail and frail older people living in community. Age and Ageing. 2020; 49: 1048–1055.
[44] Hendry A, O’Caoimh R, Salem MA, Carriazo AM. Integrated care for preventing and managing frailty. Handbook of Integrated Care. 2024; Springer: 1–15.
[45] Aditya RS, Yusuf A, Rahmatika QT, Masfi A, Ramadhan MP, Sunaryo EYAB, et al. Unlocking wellness: the comprehensive impact of community-based exercise programs on older adults. Retos. 2024; 60: 1365–1371.
[46] Hwang J, Wang L, Siever J, Medico TD, Jones CA. Loneliness and social isolation among older adults in a community exercise program: a qualitative study. Aging and Mental Health. 2019; 23: 736–742.
[47] Tong F, Yu C, Wang L, Chi I, Fu F. Systematic review of efficacy of interventions for social isolation of older adults. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021; 12: 554145.
[48] Woolford SJ, Sohan O, Dennison EM, Cooper C, Patel HP. Approaches to the diagnosis and prevention of frailty. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. 2020; 32: 1629–1637.
[49] Gordon EH, Hubbard RE. Frailty: understanding the difference between age and ageing. Age Ageing. 2022; 51: afac185.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.
SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)
Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.1 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).
Top