Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Male victims, experiences with seeking help from domestic violence agencies over time and across western English-speaking countries
1George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA
2Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
3Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ 07043, USA
DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2025.092 Vol.21,Issue 7,July 2025 pp.14-28
Submitted: 20 March 2025 Accepted: 03 June 2025
Published: 30 July 2025
*Corresponding Author(s): Denise A. Hines E-mail: dhines2@gmu.edu
Background: Male victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) represent a substantial but overlooked portion of IPV victims. Access to domestic violence (DV) services remains a challenge, particularly when agencies primarily serve female victims. This study examines male IPV victims’ experiences with mainstream and specialized DV agencies across four English-speaking regions: the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom/Ireland, and Australia/New Zealand. Methods: Two samples of male IPV victims from Western English-speaking countries/regions were recruited: one consisting of self-identified male IPV victims (n = 594) and the other of male IPV victims from crowdsourcing sample (n = 1380). Participants completed an anonymous online questionnaire, and among other issues, reported on their help-seeking from DV agencies, specific experiences with DV agencies, and perceived helpfulness of the DV agencies’ services. Results: Men from the victims sample were significantly more likely to seek help compared to male IPV victims from the crowdsourcing sample. Specialized DV agencies were rated as more helpful than mainstream agencies. USA respondents reported the most positive experiences, while those from other regions, particularly Canada and the UK/Ireland, reported negative encounters. Conclusions: Findings highlight the need for improved, gender-inclusive training and resources within mainstream DV agencies, as well as increased support and expansion of specialized services for male IPV victims. Policymakers and service providers must address the systematic gaps in support to ensure male victims are recognized and effectively helped across all regions.
Male victims; Intimate partner violence (IPV); Domestic violence agencies; Help-seeking behavior; Male-inclusive DV services
Denise A. Hines,Alexandra Lysova,Emily M. Douglas. Male victims, experiences with seeking help from domestic violence agencies over time and across western English-speaking countries. Journal of Men's Health. 2025. 21(7);14-28.
[1] Conroy S. Family violence in Canada: a statistical profile, 2019. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. 2021.
[2] Leemis RW, Friar N, Khatiwada S, Chen MS, Kresnow M, Smith SG, et al. The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2016/2017 report on intimate partner violence. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2022.
[3] Lysova A, Dim EE, Dutton D. Prevalence and consequences of intimate partner violence in Canada as measured by the national victimization survey. Partner Abuse. 2019; 10: 199–221.
[4] Office for National Statistics. Domestic abuse victim characteristics, England and Wales: year ending March 2020. 2020. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/domesticabusevictimcharacteristicsenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2020 (Accessed: 12 June 2025).
[5] Australian Bureau of Statistics. Personal safety, Australia. 2023. Available at: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/crime-and-justice/personal-safety-australia/2021-22 (Accessed: 12 June 2025).
[6] Lysova A, Hanson K, Mackay J. Bidirectional and unidirectional intimate partner violence: a comprehensive review. Partner Abuse. 2024: PA-2024-0039.R1.
[7] Bates EA. “Walking on egg shells”: a qualitative examination of men’s experiences of intimate partner violence. Psychology of Men & Masculinities. 2020; 21: 13–24.
[8] Hines DA, Douglas EM. Health problems of partner violence victims: comparing help-seeking men to a population-based sample. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2015; 48: 136–144.
[9] Hines DA, Douglas EM. Influence of intimate terrorism, situational couple violence, and mutual violent control on male victims. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 2018; 19: 612–623.
[10] Ansara DL, Hindin MJ. Formal and informal help-seeking associated with women’s and men’s experiences of intimate partner violence in Canada. Social Science & Medicine. 2010; 70: 1011–1018.
[11] Lysova A, Dim EE. “I thought about killing myself, but a part of me insisted on getting help”: coping experiences of male survivors of intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence. 2025. Advanced online publication.
[12] Addis ME, Mahalik JR. Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. American Psychologist. 2003; 58: 5–14.
[13] Bates EA, Douglas EM. Services for domestic violence victims in the United Kingdom and United States: where are we today? Partner Abuse. 2020; 11: 350–382.
[14] Dixon L, Hines DA, Douglas, Emily M. The Routledge Handbook of Men’s Victimisation in Intimate Relationships. Taylor and Francis: London and New York. 2025.
[15] Lysova A, Hanson K, Dixon L, Douglas EM, Hines DA, Celi EM. Internal and external barriers to help seeking: voices of men who experienced abuse in the intimate relationships. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2022; 66: 538–559.
[16] Shepard MF, Pence EL. Coordinating community response to domestic violence: lessons from Duluth and beyond. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA. 1999.
[17] Hines DA, Malley-Morrison K, Dutton LB. Family violence in the United States: defining, understanding, and combating abuse. 3rd edn. Sage: Los Angeles, CA. 2021.
[18] Dixon L, Treharne GJ, Celi EM, Hines DA, Lysova AV, Douglas EM. Examining men’s experiences of abuse from a female intimate partner in four English-speaking countries. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2022; 37: 1311–1337.
[19] Hines DA, Douglas EM. The reported availability of U.S. domestic violence services to victims who vary by age, sexual orientation, and gender. Partner Abuse. 2011; 2: 3–30.
[20] National Network to End Domestic Violence. 18th Annual Domestic Violence Counts Report 2024. Washington. 2024.
[21] Dobash RE, Dobash RP. Wives: the ‘appropriate’ victims of marital violence. Victimology. 1977; 2: 426–442.
[22] Dutton DG. The gender paradigm and the architecture of antiscience. Partner Abuse. 2010; 1: 5–25.
[23] Hine B. “It can’t be that bad, I mean, he’s a guy”: exploring judgements towards domestic violence scenarios varying on perpetrator and victim gender, and abuse type. In Bates EA, Taylor JC (eds.) Intimate partner violence: new perspectives in research and practice (pp. 43–57). Taylor and Francis: London and New York. 2019.
[24] Douglas EM, Hines DA. The helpseeking experiences of men who sustain intimate partner violence: an overlooked population and implications for practice. Journal of Family Violence. 2011; 26: 473–485.
[25] Moore T. Suggestions to improve outcomes for male victims of domestic abuse: a review of the literature. SN Social Sciences. 2021; 1: 252.
[26] Mankind Initiative. 50 key facts about male victims of domestic abuse and partner abuse (March 2020). 2020. Available at: https://www.scribd.com/document/712032509/50-Key-Facts-about-Male-Victims-of-Domestic-Abuse-and-Partner-Abuse-March-2020-final (Accessed: 13 June 2024).
[27] Roebuck BS, McGlinchey D, Lysova AV, Hastie K, Taylor M. Similar but different: intimate partner violence experienced by women and men. Journal of Family Violence. 2024; 39: 409–420.
[28] Walklate S, Fitz-Gibbon K, Reeves E, Meyer S, McGowan J. In control, out of control or losing control? Making sense of men’s reported experiences of coercive control through the lens of hegemonic masculinity. Journal of Criminology. 2022; 55: 451–467.
[29] Brown S. Men’s formal help-seeking experiences following female perpetrated intimate partner violence [master’s thesis]. Simon Fraser University. 2016.
[30] Hines DA, Douglas EM. Men’s experiences of female-perpetrated intimate partner violence. In Bates EA, Taylor JC (eds.) Domestic violence against men and boys (pp. 9–23). Routledge: London and New York. 2022.
[31] Machado A. Men victims’ experiences and meanings during the period of residential care in a Portuguese shelter. International Men and Families Conference. International Men and Families: Toronto, Canada. 2022.
[32] Lassen B, Nielsen NH, Winther M, Bates EA. Men’s exposure to intimate partner violence and their experiences with a crisis center in Denmark. Partner Abuse. 2023; 14: 133–156.
[33] Hine B, Wallace S, Bates EA. Understanding the profile and needs of abused men: exploring call data from a male domestic violence charity in the United Kingdom. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2022; 37: NP16992–NP17022.
[34] Douglas EM, Hines DA, McCarthy S. Men who sustain female-to-male partner violence: factors associated with where they seek help and how they rate those resources. Violence and Victims. 2012; 27: 871–894.
[35] Overstreet NM, Quinn DM. The intimate partner violence stigmatization model and barriers to help seeking. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 2013; 35: 109–122.
[36] Johnson MP. A typology of domestic violence: intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Northeastern University Press: Boston. 2008.
[37] Johnson MP, Ferraro KJ. Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 2000; 62: 948–963.
[38] Hines DA, Douglas EM. An empirical test of Johnson’s typology of partner violence in two samples of men. Partner Abuse. 2019; 10: 180–198.
[39] Hines DA, Lysova A, Bates EA, Bowden CJ, Dixon L, Douglas EM, et al. Prevalence of men’s intimate partner violence victimization and perpetration among two samples of male victims: an international study of English-speaking countries. Partner Abuse. 2025. Advanced online publication.
[40] Peer E, Brandimarte L, Samat S, Acquisti A. Beyond the Turk: alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2017; 70: 153–163.
[41] Straus MA, Hamby SL, Boney-McCoy S, Sugarman D. The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS-2): development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues. 1996; 17: 283–316.
[42] Tolman RM. Psychological maltreatment of women inventory. 1995. Available at: https://websites.umich.edu/~rtolman/pmwif.htm (Accessed: 19 November 2019).
[43] Hines DA, Douglas EM, Berger JL. A self-report measure of legal and administrative aggression within intimate relationships. Aggressive Behavior. 2015; 41: 295–309.
[44] Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Krueger RF, Magdol L, Margolin G, Silva PA, et al. Do partners agree about abuse in their relationship?: A psychometric evaluation of interpartner agreement. Psychological Assessment. 1997; 9: 47–56.
[45] Hines DA, Douglas EM. Intimate terrorism by women towards men: does it exist? Journal of Aggression, Conflict, and Peace Research. 2010; 2: 36–56.
[46] Hines DA, Douglas EM. Relative influence of various forms of partner violence on the health of male victims: study of a helpseeking sample. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 2016; 17: 3–16.
[47] Novick MR, Lewis C. Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements. Psychometrika. 1967; 32: 1–13.
[48] Robinson SR, Ravi K, Schrag RJV. A systematic review of barriers to formal help seeking for adult survivors of IPV in the United States, 2005–2019. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2021; 22: 1279–1295.
[49] Allen AB, Robertson E, Patin GA. Improving emotional and cognitive outcomes for domestic violence survivors: the impact of shelter stay and self-compassion support groups. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2021; 36: NP598–NP624.
[50] McNamara JR, Tamanini K, Pelletier-Walker S. The impact of short-term counseling at a domestic violence shelter. Research on Social Work Practice. 2008; 18: 132–136.
[51] Molina O, Lawrence SA, Azhar-Miller A, Rivera M. Divorcing abused Latina immigrant women’s experiences with domestic violence support groups. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2009; 50: 459–471.
[52] Hogan KF, Clarke V, Ward T. Men’s experiences of help‐seeking for female‐perpetrated intimate partner violence: a qualitative exploration. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 2021; 21: 934–945.
[53] Hines DA, Lysova A. Male intimate partner violence victims’ experiences with seeking help from legal system services over time and across countries. Partner Abuse. 2024; 15: PA-2023-0018.R1.
[54] Hine B, Bates EA, Wallace S. “I have guys call me and say ‘I can’t be the victim of domestic abuse’”: exploring the experiences of telephone support providers for male victims of domestic violence and abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2022; 37: NP5594–NP5625.
[55] Corbally M. Accounting for intimate partner violence: a biographical analysis of narrative strategies used by men experiencing IPV from their female partners. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2015; 30: 3112–3132.
[56] Machado A, Hines D, Matos M. Help-seeking and needs of male victims of intimate partner violence in Portugal. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 2016; 17: 255–264.
[57] Tilbrook E, Allan A, Dear G. Intimate partner abuse of men. 2010. Available at: https://www.ecu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/685276/10_Tilbrook_Final-Report.pdf (Accessed: 12 June 2025).
[58] Tsui V. Male victims of intimate partner abuse: use and helpfulness of services. Social Work. 2014; 59: 121–130.
[59] Edwards KM, Dardis CM, Gidycz CA. Women’s disclosure of dating violence: a mixed methodological study. Feminism & Psychology. 2012; 22: 507–517.
[60] Simon CT, Wallace TW. Disclosure of victimization experiences of Chinese male survivors of intimate partner abuse. Qualitative Social Work. 2018; 17: 744–761.
[61] Lysova A, Dim EE. Severity of victimization and formal help seeking among men who experienced intimate partner violence in their ongoing relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2022; 37: 1404–1429.
[62] Waldrop AE, Resick PA. Coping among adult female victims of domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence. 2004; 19: 291–302.
[63] Lien MI, Lorentzen J. Men’s experiences of violence in intimate relationships. Springer International Publishing: Cham. 2019.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.
SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)
Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.1 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).
Top