Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Health professionals' perceptions of a group intervention to address men's psychosocial distress
1Department of Social Work and Social Services, Faculty of Social Sciences, Pablo de Olavide University, 41013 Seville, Spain
2Department of Social, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, Psychology and Sport Sciences, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain
DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2025.114 Vol.21,Issue 9,September 2025 pp.24-33
Submitted: 05 June 2025 Accepted: 28 July 2025
Published: 30 September 2025
*Corresponding Author(s): Antonio Iáñez-Domínguez E-mail: aiadom@upo.es
Background: Men’s psychosocial distress rates are underestimated, and the reason may be linked to gender mandates which make them reluctant to seek help. Their distress and mental health problems, therefore, may be silenced and are being concealed from the health system. In this line, the Andalusian Public Health System (Spain) is currently developing an initiative to address psychosocial distress: the GRUSE (socio-educational groups) intervention. The study objective was to explore how health professionals perceived the impact of the intervention initiative on men experiencing psychosocial distress. Methods: A qualitative phenomenological approach was followed. Four focus groups took place between 2023 and 2024 in which health professionals participated (n = 37). A semi-structured script was used. Two researchers (interviewer and observer) implemented the groups, audio-recorded the discourses, and subsequently transcribed them for later analysis. Twenty-five codes were defined and sorted into five thematic categories. Results: The health professionals underscored the fact that hegemonic masculinity norms have negative effects on men’s health. They highlighted group intervention as a valuable and effective health system strategy to promote mental health based on a non-medicalising approach. The professionals stressed that the group presented the benefit of providing a platform for emotional containment, peer support, and the generation of networks. In addition, a change in the men’s attitude was observed after the intervention: though initially reluctant, they learned to seek help, without perceptions of male weakness. Conclusions: The health professionals recognised the benefits of the intervention for the male participants but found it difficult to initially engage and involve men. Therefore, the challenge is to design specific strategies to increase men’s participation and achieve greater overall effectiveness and social impact. It is important to consider the gender perspective when implementing this type of intervention and to train health professionals to ensure the non-reproduction of traditional gender roles.
Men; Masculinity; Gender roles; Mental health; Psychosocial distress; Healthcare system
Antonio Iáñez-Domínguez,María Soledad Palacios-Gálvez,Elena Morales-Marente. Health professionals' perceptions of a group intervention to address men's psychosocial distress. Journal of Men's Health. 2025. 21(9);24-33.
[1] World Health Organization. World mental health report: transforming mental health for all. 2022. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240049338 (Accessed: 20 April 2025).
[2] World Health Organization. Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. 2017. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/depression-global-health-estimates (Accessed: 20 April 2025).
[3] Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (INE). Deaths due to suicide (In Spanish). 2023. Available at: https://www.ine.es/jaxi/Datos.htm?tpx=72065 (Accessed: 23 April 2025).
[4] Connell RW, Messerschmidt JW. Hegemonic masculinity: rethinking the concept. Gender & Society. 2005; 19: 829–859.
[5] Elliott K, Roberts S, Ralph B, Robards B, Savic M. Understanding autonomy and relationality in men’s lives. The British Journal of Sociology. 2022; 73: 571–586.
[6] Zuo J, Tang S. Breadwinner status and gender ideologies of men and women regarding family roles. Sociological Perspectives. 2000; 43: 29–43.
[7] Aggarwal A. “Examining emotional resilience”: a comparative analysis of gender differences in emotional strength between women and men. Library Progress International. 2024; 44: 22653–22666.
[8] Stanaland A, Gaither S, Gassman-Pines A. When is masculinity “fragile”? An expectancy-discrepancy-threat model of masculine identity. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2023; 27: 359–377.
[9] von Zimmermann C, Hübner M, Mühle C, Müller CP, Weinland C, Kornhuber J, et al. Masculine depression and its problem behaviors: use alcohol and drugs, work hard, and avoid psychiatry! European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 2024; 274: 321–333.
[10] Logoz F, Eggenberger L, Komlenac N, Schneeberger M, Ehlert U, Walther A. How do traditional masculinity ideologies and emotional competence relate to aggression and physical domestic violence in cisgender men? Frontiers in Psychology. 2023; 14: 1100114.
[11] River J, Flood M. Masculinities, emotions and men’s suicide. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2021; 43: 910–927.
[12] Galvez-Sánchez CM, Camacho-Ruiz JA, Castelli L, Limiñana-Gras RM. Exploring the role of masculinity in male suicide: a systematic review. Psychiatry International. 2025; 6: 1–21.
[13] Vickery A. Men’s help-seeking for distress: navigating varied pathways and practices. Frontiers in Sociology. 2021; 26: 724843.
[14] Casas Martínez ML. The medicalization of life: an interdisciplinary approach. Heliyon. 2023; 9: e16637.
[15] Bennett S, Robb K, Zortea T, Dickson A, Richardson C, O’Connor R. Male suicide risk and recovery factors: a systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis of two decades of research. Psychological Bulletin. 2023; 149: 371–417.
[16] Griffith DM. Gender health equity: the case for including men’s health. Social Science & Medicine. 2024; 351: 116863.
[17] Seidler ZE, Rice SM, River J, Oliffe JL, Dhillon HM. Men’s mental health services: the case for a masculinities model. The Journal of Men’s Studies. 2017; 26: 92–104.
[18] Richter D, Dixon J. Models of mental health problems: a quasi-systematic review of theoretical approaches. Journal of Mental Health. 2023; 32: 396–406.
[19] Mateo I, García-Cubillana P, Conde P. Guidelines for the design and implementation of socio-educational groups in primary care (GRUSE). 2011. Available at: https://www.sspa.juntadeandalucia.es/servicioandaluzdesalud/sites/default/files/sincfiles/wsas-media-pdf_publicacion/2020/GRUSE_MANUAL.pdf (Accessed: 23 April 2025).
[20] Palacios-Gálvez MS, Morales-Marente E, Iáñez-Domínguez A, Luque-Ribelles V. Impact of primary care socio-educational groups in mental health of women. Gaceta Sanitaria. 2021; 35: 345–351. (In Spanish)
[21] Franke AG, Schmidt P, Neumann S. Association between unemployment and mental disorders: a narrative update of the literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024; 21: 1698.
[22] Seidler ZE, Rice SM, River J, Oliffe JL, Dhillon HM. Men in and out of treatment for depression: strategies for improved engagement. Australian Psychologist. 2018; 53: 405–415.
[23] Kim S, Yu S. Men’s mental health and interventions tailored to masculinity: a scoping review. Journal of Men’s Health. 2023; 19: 1–10.
[24] Ogrodniczuk J, Oliffe J, Beharry J. HeadsUpGuys: Canadian online resource for men with depression. Canadian Family Physician. 2018; 64: 93–94.
[25] Seidler ZE, Wilson MJ, Benakovic R, Mackinnon A, Oliffe JL, Ogrodniczuk JS, et al. A randomized wait-list controlled trial of men in mind: enhancing mental health practitioners’ self-rated clinical competencies to work with men. American Psychologist. 2024; 79: 423–436.
[26] Taylor SJ, Bogdan R, Devault M. Introduction to qualitative research methods: a guidebook and resource. 4th edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc.: Hoboken. 2015.
[27] Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice. 4th edn. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks. 2014.
[28] Haraway D. Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. 1st edn. Routledge: New York. 1990.
[29] Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006; 3: 77–101.
[30] Stefan Ek. Gender differences in health information behaviour: a finnish population-based survey. Health Promotion International. 2015; 30: 736–745.
[31] Emslie C, Ridge D, Ziebland S, Hunt K. Men’s accounts of depression: reconstructing or resisting hegemonic masculinity? Social Science & Medicine. 2007; 62: 2246–2257.
[32] Addis ME, Mahalik JR. Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. American Psychologist. 2003; 58: 5–14.
[33] Butler J. Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge: New York.1999.
[34] Schudson ZC, Morgenroth T. Non-binary gender/sex identities. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2022; 48: 101499.
[35] Connell RW. Masculinities. 2nd edn. University of California Press: Berkeley. 2005.
[36] Connor S, Edvardsson K, Fisher C, Spelten E. Perceptions and interpretation of contemporary masculinities in western culture: a systematic review. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2021; 15: 15579883211061009.
[37] Oliffe JL, Hannan-Leith MN, Ogrodniczuk JS, Black N, Mackenzie CS, Lohan M, et al. Men’s depression and suicide literacy: a nationally representative Canadian survey. Journal of Mental Health. 2016; 25: 520–526.
[38] Ogrodniczuk JS, Oliffe JL, Kealy D, Seidler ZE, Sharp P, Rice SM. Silence and its manifestations in men’s mental illness. Nature Mental Health. 2023; 1: 446–448.
[39] Kwon M, Lawn S, Kaine C. Understanding men’s engagement and disengagement when seeking support for mental health. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2023; 17: 15579883231157971.
[40] Courtenay WH. Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: a theory of gender and health. Social Science & Medicine. 2000; 50: 1385–1401.
[41] Sharp P, Zhu P, Ogrodniczuk JS, McKenzie SK, Seidler ZE, Rice SM, et al. Men’s peer support for mental health challenges: future directions for research and practice. Health Promotion International. 2024; 39: daae046.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.
SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)
Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.1 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).
Top