Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
The influence of sub-factors of smartphone addiction on suicidal ideation among adolescents: focusing on the moderating effect of gender
1Department of Social Welfare, Jeonbuk National University, 54896 Jeonju, Republic of Korea
2School of Glocal Studies, Kyungwoon University, 39524 Gumi, Republic of Korea
DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2025.124 Vol.21,Issue 10,October 2025 pp.27-34
Submitted: 22 April 2025 Accepted: 26 June 2025
Published: 30 October 2025
*Corresponding Author(s): Dohun Song E-mail: dhsong417@jbnu.ac.kr
Background: Smartphone addiction has been identified as a critical mental health issue among adolescents, potentially influencing suicidal ideation. This study investigates the influence of four sub-factors of smartphone addiction on suicidal ideation, with a particular focus on the moderating role of gender. Methods: Data were drawn from the sixth wave (2023) of the Korean Children and Youth Panel Survey, a nationally representative dataset. A total of 4425 middle and high school third-grade students were included in the analysis. Smartphone addiction was measured using the Smartphone Addiction Proneness Scale (SAPS), which comprises four sub-factors: daily life disturbance, virtual world orientation, withdrawal, and tolerance. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to assess the relationships between these sub-factors and suicidal ideation, and to examine the moderating effect of gender. Results: All four sub-factors significantly predicted suicidal ideation. Daily life disturbance, virtual world orientation, and withdrawal were positively associated with suicidal ideation, while tolerance was negatively associated. Although gender had no direct effect on suicidal ideation, it significantly moderated the relationship between tolerance and suicidal ideation. Specifically, higher levels of tolerance were linked to lower suicidal ideation in male adolescents but to higher suicidal ideation in female adolescents. Conclusions: The findings highlight the importance of gender-sensitive approaches in addressing smartphone addiction among adolescents. Tailored interventions based on gender-specific risk patterns may enhance the effectiveness of suicide prevention strategies. Nonetheless, the use of a single-item measure for suicidal ideation and the limited inclusion of control variables due to the nature of secondary data are considered important limitations of this study.
Smartphone addiction; Suicidal ideation; Adolescents; Gender differences; Tolerance; Moderation analysis
Kyu-Hyoung Jeong,Dohun Song,Jiwon Kim,Geonwoo Jeon,Heeran J. Cho. The influence of sub-factors of smartphone addiction on suicidal ideation among adolescents: focusing on the moderating effect of gender. Journal of Men's Health. 2025. 21(10);27-34.
[1] Beak YE, Chung HW. Classifying latent classes in adolescent’s social emotional development and exploring influencing variables. Studies on Korean Youth. 2024; 35: 29–58. (In Korean)
[2] Steinberg L, Morris AS. Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology. 2001; 52: 83–110.
[3] Lee ES, Park SW, Kim EH. Predictors of suicidal ideation in adolescents. The Korean Journal of School Psychology. 2024; 21: 1–26. (In Korean)
[4] Sun RC, Hui EK. Psychosocial factors contributing to adolescent suicidal ideation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2007; 36: 775–786.
[5] Choi JW, Hong SO. Effectiveness analysis of the Life-Respect Program for youth suicide prevention. Industry Promotion Research. 2022; 7: 43–51. (In Korean)
[6] Gould M, Jamieson P, Romer D. Media contagion and suicide among the young. American Behavioral Scientist. 2003; 46: 1269–1284.
[7] Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Foundation for Suicide Prevention. Suicide statistics yearbook. 2025. Available at: https://kfsp-datazoom.or.kr/noticeview.do (Accessed: 05 April 2025).
[8] Lee TH, Kim KH. Predictors of suicidal ideation trajectory among adolescence. Korean Journal of Youth Studies. 2023; 30: 31–59. (In Korean)
[9] Bridge JA, Goldstein TR, Brent DA. Adolescent suicide and suicidal behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2006; 47: 372–394.
[10] Klonsky ED, May AM, Saffer BY. Suicide, suicide attempts, and suicidal ideation. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2016; 12: 307–330.
[11] Im Y, Oh WO, Suk M. Risk factors for suicide ideation among adolescents: five-year national data analysis. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 2017; 31: 282–286.
[12] Rueter MA, Kwon HK. Developmental trends in adolescent suicidal ideation. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2005; 15: 205–222.
[13] Brodersen K, Hammami N, Katapally TR. Smartphone use and mental health among youth: it is time to develop smartphone-specific screen time guidelines. Youth. 2022; 2: 23–38.
[14] Huang Q, Lin S, Li Y, Huang S, Liao Z, Chen X, et al. Suicidal ideation is associated with excessive smartphone use among Chinese college students. Frontiers in Public Health. 2022; 9: 809463.
[15] Lee MS, Lee H. Problematic smartphone use and its relationship with anxiety and suicidal ideation. Psychiatry Investigation. 2023; 20: 843.
[16] Li G, Conti AA, Qiu C, Tang W. Adolescent mobile phone addiction during the COVID-19 pandemic predicts subsequent suicide risk: a two-wave longitudinal study. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22: 1537.
[17] Shinetsetseg O, Park J, Kim SY, Lee K. Association between smartphone addiction and suicide. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19: 11600.
[18] Bargh JA, McKenna KY. The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology. 2004; 55: 573–590.
[19] Kwon M, Kim DJ, Cho H, Yang S. Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (SAS). PLOS ONE. 2013; 8: e56936.
[20] Cheng J, Peng C, Rong F, Wang Y, Tan Y, Yu Y. Mobile phone addiction and suicide behaviors among Chinese adolescents: the mediation of poor sleep quality. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 2024; 13: 88–101.
[21] Kim MH, Min S, Ahn JS, An C, Lee J. Association between high adolescent smartphone use and academic impairment, conflicts with family members or friends, and suicide attempts. PLOS ONE. 2019; 14: e0219831.
[22] Ministry of Science and ICT, NIA. The survey on smartphone overdependence. 2024. Available at: https://www.nia.or.kr/site/nia_kor/ex/bbs/View.do?cbIdx=65914&bcIdx=27831&parentSeq=27831 (Accessed: 05 April 2025).
[23] Kim DI, Lee Y, Lee J, Nam JK, Chung Y. Development of smartphone addiction proneness scale for adults. Korea Journal of Counseling. 2012; 13: 629–644. (In Korean)
[24] Ahn SK, Chung IJ, Kang JA, Kim SY. The latent transition analysis of smartphone dependency from parents to children. Health and Social Welfare Review. 2024; 44: 311–335. (In Korean)
[25] Hong CY, Oh KS, Kim JM. Effects of parents’ negative parenting attitudes on adolescents’ smartphone overdependence. Korean Association of Human Ecology. 2025; 34: 45–57. (In Korean)
[26] Kim BN. Effect of smartphone addiction on youth’s sociality development. Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2013; 13: 208–217. (In Korean)
[27] Kim SH, Jeong KH, Ryu JH. Parental smartphone addiction sub-factors on children’s smartphone addiction. Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences. 2022; 30: 31–49. (In Korean)
[28] Ko EJ, Choi H, Han S, Kim H. The effect of smartphone addiction on insomnia. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society. 2023; 24: 49–59. (In Korean)
[29] Park HS, Schepp KG, Jang EH, Koo HY. Predictors of suicidal ideation among high school students by gender. Journal of School Health. 2006; 76: 181–188.
[30] Kwon MJ, Kim HJ, Lee SY, Park JH. Factors related to suicidal ideation by gender in adolescents with depression. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society. 2024; 25: 543–552. (In Korean)
[31] National Youth Policy Institute. A study on the implementation of the UN convention on the rights of the child: 2024 review of Korean children’s and youth rights. 2024. Available at: https://www.nypi.re.kr/brdrr/boardrrView.do?menu_nix=4o9771b7&brd_id=BDIDX_PJk7xvf7L096m1g7Phd3YC&tab (Accessed: 05 April 2025).
[32] Lee JY, Kim JS. Factors affecting the over-dependence of adolescents’ smartphone. Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences. 2020; 11: 1171–1184.
[33] Kang J, Jang S, Kim H, Kim M, Kim H, Joo J, et al. Same but different youth: a study exploring gender differences in factors influencing suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Health and Social Welfare Review. 2023; 43: 69–84. (In Korean)
[34] Lee J. Gender differences in suicide ideation. Journal of Health Informatics and Statistics. 2022; 47: 250–257. (In Korean)
[35] Matar Boumosleh J, Jaalouk D. Depression, anxiety, and smartphone addiction. PLOS ONE. 2017; 12: e0182239.
[36] Domoff SE, Radesky JS, Lumeng JC, Miller AL, Gearhardt AN. Associations between mobile device use for calming and emotion regulation in early childhood. JAMA Pediatrics. 2022; 176: 28–35.
[37] Tamres LK, Janicki D, Helgeson VS. Sex differences in coping behavior: a meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2002; 6: 2–30.
[38] Matud MP, García MC, Fortes D. The impact of coping styles and gender on situational coping. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022; 13: 807626.
[39] Kim J. Suicidal ideation and associated factors by sex in adolescents. Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2012; 12: 261–268. (In Korean)
[40] Lee J, Yoo J, Heo G. Gender, self-esteem, and self-control on the smartphone addiction in university students. Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society. 2014; 16: 1557–1566. (In Korean)
[41] Sampasa-Kanyinga H, Chaput JP, Hamilton HA, Tremblay MS. The Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2022; 113: 312–321.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.
SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)
Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.1 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).
Top