Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Results of a China external quality assessment program for seminal plasma biochemistry: a 5 years experience
1Department of Andrology/Human Sperm Bank, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, 610000 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
2Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, 610000 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
3Sichuan Sexology Association, 610000 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Submitted: 08 July 2025 Accepted: 18 August 2025
Online publish date: 21 November 2025
*Corresponding Author(s): Qingyuan Cheng E-mail: qycheng@scu.edu.cn
*Corresponding Author(s): Fuping Li E-mail: lfpsnake@scu.edu.cn
Background: This 5-year external quality assessment (EQA) study evaluated laboratory performance in analyzing seminal plasma biomarkers (zinc, citrate, fructose, neutral α-glucosidase (NAG)), assessing inter-lab variability, methodological trends, and technique-related differences. Methods: From 2021 to 2025, a total of 113 laboratories participated in this EQA program. Standardized lyophilized seminal plasma samples were prepared from pooled ejaculates and adjusted to target biomarker concentrations. Participants analyzed these samples using their routine methods. Results: Over the five-year period, zinc exhibited the lowest mean coefficient of variation (CV) at 27.0%(range: 15.1–50.5%), with the Five-Br-2-(5-Bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-[N-propyl-N-(3-sulfopropyl)amino]phenol (Five-Br-PAPS) method demonstrating superior precision (mean CV: 14.5%) compared to the resorcinol monosodium salt (PAR) (21.5%) and 1-(2-Pyridylazo)-2-naphthol (PAN) (19.9%) methods, though inter-method differences were not statistically significant. For citrate, the mean CV was 41.9% (range: 16.6–62.7%), with no significant difference between the citrate lyase (mean CV: 36.8%) and Fe3+ complexation methods (36.3%). Fructose analysis showed the highest variability, with a mean CV of 44.7% (range: 22.7–63.9%). The hexokinase method (mean CV: 39.5%) outperformed the indole method (49.5%), though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.213). NAG exhibited a mean CV of 42.0% (range: 25.1–59.1%), with the kinetic method (mean CV: 25.7%) showing significantly better precision than the endpoint method (44.2%). Conclusions: The study highlights inter-laboratory variability in seminal plasma biochemical testing, underscoring the need for standardized methodologies and enhanced quality control. Continuous EQA participation and targeted training are essential to improve diagnostic reliability in male infertility assessments.
Seminal plasma biochemistry; External quality assessment; Male infertility; Laboratory variability
Yan Zheng,Lijuan Ying,Lin Yu,Yingbi Wu,Yuan Liu,Jintao Yuan,Chengcheng Diao,Yi Ma,Qingyuan Cheng,Fuping Li. Results of a China external quality assessment program for seminal plasma biochemistry: a 5 years experience. Journal of Men's Health. 2025.doi:10.22514/jomh.2025.129.
[1] Agarwal A, Baskaran S, Parekh N, Cho CL, Henkel R, Vij S, et al. Male infertility. The Lancet. 2021; 397: 319–333.
[2] World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 6th edn. World Health Organization: Geneva. 2021.
[3] Moellering H, Gruber W. Determination of citrate with citrate lyase. Analytical Biochemistry. 1966; 17: 369–376.
[4] Heite HJ, Wetterauer W. Acid phosphatase in seminal fluid-method of estimation and diagnostic significance. Andrologia. 1979; 11: 113–122.
[5] Lei B, Xing R, Zhou X, Lv D, Wan B, Shu F, et al. Neutral alpha-1,4-glucosidase and fructose levels contribute to discriminating obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia in Chinese men with azospermia. Andrologia. 2016; 48: 670–675.
[6] Chen Y, Wang X, Zhou J, Wang G, Gao T, Wei H, et al. Association of seminal plasma zinc levels with human semen quality and its toxic effects on sperm motility. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2024; 284: 116889.
[7] Qiu Z, Chu Q, Zhang W, Luo C, Quan S. Level of neutral alpha-1,4-glucosidase in seminal plasma of Chinese men. Andrologia. 2018; 50: e12948.
[8] Juyena NS, Stelletta C. Seminal plasma: an essential attribute to spermatozoa. Journal of Andrology. 2012; 33: 536–551.
[9] Zhao J, Dong X, Hu X, Long Z, Wang L, Liu Q, et al. Zinc levels in seminal plasma and their correlation with male infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. 2016; 6: 22386.
[10] Lu JC, Chen F, Xu HR, Huang YF, Lu NQ. Standardization and quality control for determination of fructose in seminal plasma. Journal of Andrology. 2007; 28: 207–213.
[11] Lu JC, Xu HR, Chen F, Huang YF, Lu NQ. Standardization and quality control for the determination of alpha-glucosidase in seminal plasma. Archives of Andrology. 2006; 52: 447–453.
[12] Hamdi SM, Sanchez E, Garimbay D, Albarede S. External quality assessment program for biochemical assays of human seminal plasma: a French 6-years experience. Basic and Clinical Andrology. 2020; 30: 18.
[13] International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 15189:2022 Medical laboratories: particular requirements for quality and competence. 2022. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/76677.html (Accessed: 06 December 2022).
[14] International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 13528:2022 Medical laboratories: particular requirements for quality and competence. 2022. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/78879.html (Accessed: 18 August 2022).
[15] Mann T. Studies on the metabolism of semen: 3. Fructose as a normal constituent of seminal plasma. Site of formation and function of fructose in semen. Biochemical Journal. 1946; 40: 481–491.
[16] Lundquist F. Studies on the biochemistry of human semen: some properties of prostatic phosphatase. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. 1947; 14: 263–275.
[17] Mann T, Davies DV, Humphrey GF. Fructose and citric acid assay in the secretions of the accessory glands of reproduction as indicator tests of male sex hormone activity. Journal of Endocrinology. 1949; 6: 75–85.
[18] Eliasson R. Biochemical analyses of human semen in the study of the physiology and pathophysiology of the male accessory genital glands. Fertility and Sterility. 1968; 19: 344–350.
[19] World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 4th edn. World Health Organization: Geneva. 1999.
[20] World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th edn. World Health Organization: Geneva. 2010.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.
SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)
Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.1 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).
Top