Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Is the cure to male loneliness knowledge about the health benefits of social connection? An exploratory study of the role of social health knowledge in shaping social health behaviour
1Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2026.004 Vol.22,Issue 1,January 2026 pp.48-60
Submitted: 18 June 2025 Accepted: 01 September 2025
Published: 30 January 2026
*Corresponding Author(s): Kiffer G. Card E-mail: kcard@sfu.ca
Background: Despite growing recognition of the profound health risks associated with loneliness, especially among men, limited research has examined how knowledge, beliefs, and behavioral engagement with social connection influence adherence to public health guidelines and wellbeing. We aimed to examine how men’s knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and efforts regarding social connection relate to social and emotional loneliness. Methods: Across four exploratory analyses of online survey data, we examined Canadian men’s (N = 77, N = 37, N = 122, N = 1681) knowledge about social health (Study 1), their perceived importance of social connection (Study 2), their perceptions about the normativity, utility, and achievability of national public health guidelines for social connection (Study 3), and their self-reported effort to connect with others (Study 4). In each study, we examined the effects of these factors on indicators of social wellbeing (e.g., emotional and social loneliness; guideline adherence). Results: Greater knowledge of social wellbeing was associated with lower social loneliness (Study 1). Yet, participants who felt social connection was a relatively important health determinant reported higher overall loneliness (Study 2). Guideline adherence was most strongly predicted by perceived achievability and normative beliefs, rather than perceived health benefits (Study 3). Finally, men who reported greater effort to connect experienced less social loneliness but greater emotional loneliness (Study 4). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that striving and recognizing the health importance of social connection does not always meet men’s deeper emotional needs. Knowledge, while important and potentially motivating, may not be sufficient to improve social wellbeing. Beyond practical achievability, public health strategies must also enhance normative framing and support men who strive for emotionally meaningful connections to ensure that they not only try to follow public health guidance but are able to do so. Without such support, we may risk worsening experiences of loneliness among men.
Loneliness; Social connection; Health literacy; Health promotion; Behaviour change
Kiffer G. Card,Jorge Andrés Delgado-Ron. Is the cure to male loneliness knowledge about the health benefits of social connection? An exploratory study of the role of social health knowledge in shaping social health behaviour. Journal of Men's Health. 2026. 22(1);48-60.
[1] McKenzie SK, Collings S, Jenkin G, River J. Masculinity, social connectedness, and mental health: men’s diverse patterns of practice. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2018; 12: 1247–1261.
[2] Ratcliffe J. Men, masculinities, and loneliness: a mixed-methods study of men’s perspectives in a wider context [doctoral thesis]. University of York. 2022.
[3] Franklin A, Barbosa Neves B, Hookway N, Patulny R, Tranter B, Jaworski K. Towards an understanding of loneliness among Australian men: gender cultures, embodied expression and the social bases of belonging. Journal of Sociology. 2019; 55: 124–143.
[4] Nordin T, Degerstedt F, Granholm Valmari E. A scoping review of masculinity norms and their interplay with loneliness and social connectedness among men in western societies. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2024; 18: 15579883241304585.
[5] Van de Velde C. Sociology of loneliness: an introduction. Acta Sociologica. 2025.
[6] Ratcliffe J, Wigfield A, Alden S. ‘A lonely old man’: empirical investigations of older men and loneliness, and the ramifications for policy and practice. Ageing & Society. 2021; 41: 794–814.
[7] Borys S, Perlman D. Gender differences in loneliness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1985; 11: 63–74.
[8] Goddard I, Parker K. How often do Americans feel lonely, optimistic? 2025. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/2025/01/16/emotional-well-being/ (Accessed: 30 July 2025).
[9] Cox D. The state of American friendship: change, challenges, and loss. 2021. Available at: https://www.americansurveycenter.org/research/the-state-of-american-friendship-change-challenges-and-loss/ (Accessed: 30 July 2025).
[10] Statistics Canada. Loneliness by gender and province. 2025. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=4510004801 (Accessed: 30 July 2025).
[11] Lin SL. The “loneliness epidemic”, intersecting risk factors and relations to mental health help-seeking: a population-based study during COVID-19 lockdown in Canada. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2023; 320: 7–17.
[12] Carpenter S. The male loneliness epidemic and how it affects fathers. 2023. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/18/health/male-loneliness-epidemic-wellness (Accessed: 30 July 2025).
[13] Baumeister RF, Sommer KL. What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: comment on Cross and Madson (1997). Psychological Bulletin. 1997; 122: 38–44.
[14] Benenson JF. Gender differences in social networks. The Journal of Early Adolescence. 1990; 10: 472–495.
[15] Mattison SM, MacLaren NG, Liu R, Reynolds AZ, Baca GD, Mattison PM, et al. Gender differences in social networks based on prevailing kinship norms in the Mosuo of China. Social Sciences. 2021; 10: 253.
[16] Connell RW, Messerschmidt JW. Hegemonic masculinity: rethinking the concept. Gender & Society. 2005; 19: 829–859.
[17] Rogers AA, Nielson MG, Santos CE. Manning up while growing up: a developmental-contextual perspective on masculine gender-role socialization in adolescence. Psychology of Men & Masculinities. 2021; 22: 354–364.
[18] Foettinger L, Albrecht BM, Altgeld T, Gansefort D, Recke C, Stalling I, et al. The role of community-based men’s sheds in health promotion for older men: a mixed-methods systematic review. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2022; 16: 15579883221084490.
[19] Kelly D, Steiner A, Mason H, Teasdale S. Men’s sheds: a conceptual exploration of the causal pathways for health and well-being. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2019; 27: 1147–1157.
[20] Kaya A, Iwamoto DK, Brady J, Clinton L, Grivel M. The role of masculine norms and gender role conflict on prospective well-being among men. Psychology of Men & Masculinities. 2019; 20: 142–147.
[21] Friebel G, Lalanne M, Richter B, Schwardmann P, Seabright P. Gender differences in social interactions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2021; 186: 33–45.
[22] Masi CM, Chen HY, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2011; 15: 219–266.
[23] Dahlberg L, McKee KJ. Correlates of social and emotional loneliness in older people: evidence from an English community study. Aging & Mental Health. 2014; 18: 504–514.
[24] Courtenay WH. Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: a theory of gender and health. Social Science & Medicine. 2000; 50: 1385–1401.
[25] Johar H, Atasoy S, Beutel M, Braehler E, Schomerus G, Binder H, et al. Gender-differential association between loneliness and alcohol consumption: a pooled analysis of 17,808 individuals in the multi-cohort GESA consortium. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2025; 23: 1–23.
[26] Ernst M, Klein EM, Beutel ME, Brähler E. Gender-specific associations of loneliness and suicidal ideation in a representative population sample: young, lonely men are particularly at risk. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2021; 294: 63–70.
[27] Biglan A, Van Ryzin MJ, Moore KJ, Mauricci M, Mannan I. The socialization of boys and men in the modern era: an evolutionary mismatch. Development and Psychopathology. 2019; 31: 1789–1799.
[28] Holt-Lunstad J, Robles TF, Sbarra DA. Advancing social connection as a public health priority in the United States. The American Psychologist. 2017; 72: 517–530.
[29] Lim MH, Qualter P, Ding D, Holt-Lunstad J, Mikton C, Smith BJ. Advancing loneliness and social isolation as global health challenges: taking three priority actions. Public Health Research and Practice. 2023; 33: e3332320.
[30] Holt-Lunstad J. Social connection as a public health issue: the evidence and a systemic framework for prioritizing the “Social” in social determinants of health. Annual Review of Public Health. 2022; 43: 193–213.
[31] Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology. 2001; 52: 1–26.
[32] Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior. 2004; 31: 143–164.
[33] Aaby A, Friis K, Christensen B, Rowlands G, Maindal HT. Health literacy is associated with health behaviour and self-reported health: a large population-based study in individuals with cardiovascular disease. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2017; 24: 1880–1888.
[34] Fleary SA, Joseph P, Pappagianopoulos JE. Adolescent health literacy and health behaviors: a systematic review. Journal of Adolescence. 2018; 62: 116–127.
[35] Kinoshita S, Hirooka N, Kusano T, Saito K, Aoyagi R. Does health literacy influence health-related lifestyle behaviors among specialists of health management? A cross-sectional study. BMC Primary Care. 2024; 25: 29.
[36] Walters R, Leslie SJ, Polson R, Cusack T, Gorely T. Establishing the efficacy of interventions to improve health literacy and health behaviours: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20: 1040.
[37] Card K. Evidence Brief—What is the value of social health guidelines? Canadian Alliance for Social Connection and Health. 2022. Available at: https://casch.org/s/CSCG_Evidence-Brief_Guidelines_Rationale.pdf (Accessed: 30 July 2025).
[38] Holt-Lunstad J. National health guidelines for social connection: what is the evidence in support and what might the guidelines say? Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2023; 10: 41–50.
[39] Bonell C, Jamal F, Melendez-Torres GJ, Cummins S. ‘Dark logic’: theorising the harmful consequences of public health interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2015; 69: 95–98.
[40] Peplau L, Perlman D. Loneliness: a sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. 1st edn. John Wiley & Sons: New York. 1982.
[41] Hsu HC, Chao SF. Loneliness, loneliness literacy, and change in loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic among older adults: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatrics. 2022; 22: 707.
[42] Rimal RN. Closing the knowledge-behavior gap in health promotion: the mediating role of self-efficacy. Health Communication. 2000; 12: 219–237.
[43] Engfer A. Antecedents and consequences of shyness in boys and girls: a 6-year longitudinal study. In Rubin KH, Asendorpf JB (eds.) Social withdrawal, inhibition, and shyness in childhood (pp. 31). 1st edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc: Hillsdale, NJ, US. 1993.
[44] Fischer AH, Kret ME, Broekens J. Gender differences in emotion perception and self-reported emotional intelligence: a test of the emotion sensitivity hypothesis. PLOS ONE. 2018; 13: e0190712.
[45] Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2010; 40: 218–227.
[46] Health Canada. Research ethics board: consent process. 2024. Available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/science-research/science-advice-decision-making/research-ethics-board/consent-process.html (Accessed: 30 July 2025).
[47] De Jong Gierveld J, Van Tilburg T. The De Jong Gierveld short scales for emotional and social loneliness: tested on data from 7 countries in the UN generations and gender surveys. European Journal of Ageing. 2010; 7: 121–130.
[48] Rosseel Y. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software. 2012; 48: 1–36.
[49] Rosenstock IM. The health belief model and preventive health behavior. Health Education Monographs. 1974; 2: 354–386.
[50] Wolters NE, Mobach L, Wuthrich VM, Vonk P, Van der Heijde CM, Wiers RW, et al. Emotional and social loneliness and their unique links with social isolation, depression and anxiety. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2023; 329: 207–217.
[51] Strack F, Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2004; 8: 220–247.
[52] Nutbeam D. The evolving concept of health literacy. Social Science & Medicine. 2008; 67: 2072–2078.
[53] Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer US: Boston, MA. 1985.
[54] Baumeister RF, Leary MR. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin. 1995; 117: 497–529.
[55] Seidler ZE, Wilson MJ, Rice SM, Kealy D, Oliffe JL, Ogrodniczuk JS. Virtual connection, real support? A study of loneliness, time on social media and psychological distress among men. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2022; 68: 288–293.
[56] McEachan R, Taylor N, Harrison R, Lawton R, Gardner P, Conner M. Meta-analysis of the Reasoned Action Approach (RAA) to understanding health behaviors. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2016; 50: 592–612.
[57] Rodriguez M, Bellet BW, McNally RJ. Reframing time spent alone: reappraisal buffers the emotional effects of isolation. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2020; 44: 1052–1067.
[58] Seidler ZE, Rice SM, Ogrodniczuk JS, Oliffe JL, Dhillon HM. Engaging men in psychological treatment: a scoping review. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2018; 12: 1882–1900.
[59] Qualter P, Vanhalst J, Harris R, Van Roekel E, Lodder G, Bangee M, et al. Loneliness across the life span. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2015; 10: 250–264.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.
SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)
Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.1 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).
Top