Article Data

  • Views 202
  • Dowloads 135

Original Research

Open Access

Comparative effects of laparoscopic TAPP and TEP hernia repair on pelvic floor nerve and erectile function in male patients: a retrospective study

  • Guofeng Yu1
  • Yan Wang2,*,
  • Haibo Deng3,*,
  • Jianming Ju1
  • Wei Xu1
  • Yousheng Yang1
  • Lei Huang1

1Department of General Surgery, Suzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, 215101 Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

2Department of Nosocomial Infection Management, Suzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, 215101 Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

3Department of Urology, Suzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, 215101 Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2026.010 Vol.22,Issue 1,January 2026 pp.115-124

Submitted: 25 August 2025 Accepted: 15 October 2025

Published: 30 January 2026

*Corresponding Author(s): Yan Wang E-mail: yan_wangy084@163.com
*Corresponding Author(s): Haibo Deng E-mail: dhb51@126.com

Abstract

Background: The long-term impact of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs on pelvic floor nerve and erectile function in men remains unclear. This study compared the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) techniques. Methods: The data of 170 male patients with unilateral inguinal hernia who underwent surgery at our institution between June 2020 and June 2023 were retrospectively reviewed, comprising 85 cases treated with TAPP and 85 with TEP. Comparative analyses were performed for operative parameters, indices of pelvic floor nerve function, erectile function quantified by the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), the incidence of (erectile dysfunction) ED, and postoperative complications. Results: The mean operative time was significantly longer in the TAPP group than in the TEP group (68.72 ± 10.66 min vs. 58.62 ± 11.84 min, p < 0.001), whereas the total hospitalization cost was higher for TEP (2.68 ± 0.48 vs. 2.40 ± 0.49 × 104 yuan, p < 0.001). At both 6 months and 1 year postoperatively, the TAPP group showed higher incidences of neuropathic pain (15.29%/10.59% vs. 5.88%/2.35%) and ED (27.06%/14.12% vs. 9.41%/4.71%) compared with the TEP group (all p < 0.05); however, these differences were no longer significant at 2 years after surgery. At 6 months postoperatively, the abnormal epididymal reflex in the TAPP group (18.82% vs. 7.06%) was significantly higher than that in the TEP group, and the difference disappeared one year after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression identified TEP as an independent protective factor against postoperative ED (odds ratio = 0.308, p = 0.020). Conclusions: Compared to TAPP, TEP repair demonstrated better early preservation of pelvic floor nerve and erectile function, likely due to less extensive dissection. Functional outcomes equalized by two years, suggesting the surgical approach should be individualized based on patient characteristics and needs.


Keywords

Inguinal hernia; Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP); Totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP); Pelvic floor nerve function; Erectile dysfunction


Cite and Share

Guofeng Yu,Yan Wang,Haibo Deng,Jianming Ju,Wei Xu,Yousheng Yang,Lei Huang. Comparative effects of laparoscopic TAPP and TEP hernia repair on pelvic floor nerve and erectile function in male patients: a retrospective study. Journal of Men's Health. 2026. 22(1);115-124.

References

[1] Abebe MS, Tareke AA, Alem A, Debebe W, Beyene A. Worldwide magnitude of inguinal hernia: systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies. SAGE Open Medicine. 2022; 10: 20503121221139150.

[2] Haladu N, Alabi A, Brazzelli M, Imamura M, Ahmed I, Ramsay G, et al. Open versus laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: an overview of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. Surgical Endoscopy. 2022; 36: 4685–4700.

[3] McBee PJ, Walters RW, Fitzgibbons RJ. Current status of inguinal hernia management: a review. International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery. 2022; 5: 159–164.

[4] Andresen K, Rosenberg J. Transabdominal pre‐peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2024; 7: CD004703.

[5] Shenoy KG. Enhanced view totally extraperitoneal approach: a better alternative to transabdominal preperitoneal approach for irreducible inguinoscrotal and giant inguinal hernias! Journal of Minimal Access Surgery. 2025; 21: 97–99.

[6] Mubark M, Mohammed HA, Mohamed MA, A MY. Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair. SVU-International Journal of Medical Sciences. 2023; 6: 676–683.

[7] Aykanat IC, Er S, Senel C, Comcali B, Aslan Y, Balci M, et al. Comparison of the impact of open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia operations on male sexual function and pain during sexual activity. Andrologia. 2022; 54: e14254.

[8] Cantay H, Ezer M, Binnetoglu K, Uslu M, Anuk T, Bayram H. What is the effect of inguinal hernia operations on sexual functions? Cureus. 2022; 14: e24137.

[9] Supsamutchai C, Wattanapreechanon P, Saengsri S, Wilasrusmee C, Poprom N. Sexual dysfunction between laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery. 2023; 408: 277.

[10] Nethaji K, Kumari R, Jaiswal P, Jha PK, Ranjan R, Akela A. Comparison of extended total extraperitoneal (E-TEP) repair and trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) mesh repair in inguinal hernia repair. Cureus. 2023; 15: e39420.

[11] Raza A, Fayyaz MU, Malik MN. Comparison of total extra peritoneal and transabdominal pre-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research. 2025; 3: 177–180.

[12] Şenol Z, Güleç B, Gülşen T, Kızıltoprak N. Our experiences and comparison of total extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) techniques in laparoscopic inguinal herni repair. Journal of Cukurova Anesthesia and Surgical Sciences. 2022; 5: 433–436.

[13] Stabilini C, van Veenendaal N, Aasvang E, Agresta F, Aufenacker T, Berrevoet F, et al. Update of the international HerniaSurge guidelines for groin hernia management. BJS Open. 2023; 7: zrad080.

[14] Vallejo-Medina P, Saffon JP, Álvarez-Muelas A. Colombian clinical validation of the international index of erectile function (IIEF-5). Sexual Medicine. 2022; 10: 100461.

[15] Hardt S, Bergau S, Jacques A, Tampin B. Short- and long-term test-retest reliability of the English version of the 7-item DN4 questionnaire—a screening tool for neuropathic pain. Scandinavian Journal of Pain. 2023; 23: 494–500.

[16] Lucy AT, Mustian MN. Minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair: TAPP, TEP, and eTEP approaches. Illustrative Handbook of General Surgery. 2024; 36: 409–421.

[17] Jayalal J, Raj SEK, Baghavath P, Venkatesh K. Transabdominal preperitoneal repair vs total extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine. 2024; 14: 570–576.

[18] Dokania MK, Ankur A, Agarwal N, Jain A, Anshu A, Singh RAK. Comparison of perioperative complication rates of total extraperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal repairs in primary inguinal hernia. Journal of West African College of Surgeons. 2024; 14: 69–75.

[19] Damous SHB, Damous LL, Borges VA, Fontella AK, Miranda JDS, Koike MK, et al. Bilateral inguinal hernia repair and male fertility: a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique. Surgical Endoscopy. 2023; 37: 9263–9274.

[20] Hu Y, Zhang Z, Wang F, Qiu X. Comparison of modified tumescent and conventional laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective clinical study. Journal of International Medical Research. 2024; 52: 03000605231220789.

[21] Kshirsagar V, Bendre M, Chavan S, Pande B. Inguinal hernia repair: comparative study between TEP versus extended totally extraperitoneal. Annals of African Medicine. 2025; 24: 57–60.

[22] Ortenzi M, Rapoport Ferman J, Antolin A, Bar O, Zohar M, Perry O, et al. A novel high accuracy model for automatic surgical workflow recognition using artificial intelligence in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP). Surgical Endoscopy. 2023; 37: 8818–8828.

[23] Kolli VS, Kumar K, Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S. Balloon dissection versus telescopic dissection during laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis. Hernia. 2023; 27: 527–539.

[24] Vuckovic Z, Bojovic M. Neuropathic causes of groin pain in athletes: understanding nerve involvement. International Orthopaedics. 2025; 49: 845–852.

[25] Manolakos K, Zygogiannis K, Manolakos O, Mousa C, Papadimitriou G, Fotoniatas I. Anatomical variations of ilioinguinal nerve: a systematic review of the literature. Surgical Neurology International. 2024; 15: 225.

[26] Trad KS, Thiru SS, Stirrat TP, Marino PJ, Prevou ER, Greer ME, et al. Balloon dissection for robotic totally extraperitoneal (rTEP) inguinal herniorrhaphy: description of a modified technique and report on 97 consecutive patients. Hernia. 2025; 29: 115.

[27] Ozel Y, Ergenc M, Emir S, Kara YB. A retrospective analysis of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) techniques in the treatment of unilateral inguinal hernias. Annali Italiani di Chirurgia. 2025; 96: 703–712.

[28] Iqbal T, Bakar MQA, ul Malook MS, Arbi FM, Jatt AU. Comparison of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair and transabdominal peritoneal (TAPP) repair of inguinal hernia. Journal of Islamabad Medical & Dental College. 2024; 13: 596–603.

[29] Jaiswal RK, Pandey NK, Tolat A, Kalwaniya DS, Gupta AK, Naga Rohith V, et al. A prospective comparative study of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernial repair. Cureus. 2023; 15: e42209.

[30] Trehan M, Garg S, Singh J, Singla S, Garg R, Rakesh D, et al. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair—transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach: a comparative analysis. Medical Journal of Dr. DY Patil Vidyapeeth. 2023; 16: S5–S9.

[31] Paparao S, Reddy KH. A study of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal mesh repair of inguinal hernia and trans abdominal pre-peritoneal mesh repair of inguinal hernia. Research Journal of Medical Sciences. 2025; 19: 210–213.

[32] Adhikari D, Bhattarai A, Parajuli B, Mehta AK, Yadav DK, Poudel S. Transabdominal pre-peritoneal versus totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair in Eastern Nepal. Journal of Nobel Medical College. 2023; 12: 60–65.

[33] Posthuma JJ, Sandkuyl R, Sloothaak DA, Ottenhof A, van der Bilt JDW, Gooszen JAH, et al. Transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) vs endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) procedure in unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Hernia. 2023; 27: 119–125.

[34] Aslam M, Alam J, Singh M, Kujur M. Totally extraperitoneal versus transabdominal preperitoneal approach. Saudi Journal of Laparoscopy. 2022; 7: 12–17.

[35] Iossa A, Traumueller Tamagnini G, De Angelis F, Micalizzi A, Lelli G, Cavallaro G. TEP or TAPP: who, when, and how? Frontiers in Surgery. 2024; 11: 1352196.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.1 (2024) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).

Submission Turnaround Time

Top