Article Data

  • Views 206
  • Dowloads 113

Original Research

Open Access

Acute neuromuscular fatigue responses to Russian current in Paralympic powerlifting athletes

  • Taísa Pereira Santos1,2
  • Felipe J. Aidar1,2,3
  • Márcio Getirana-Mota1,2,3
  • Danielle Rabelo Ganzalez4
  • Pablo Santana Prata1,2
  • Moazzam Tanveer1,*,
  • Georgian Badicu6
  • Luca Paolo Ardigò7,*,

1Graduate Program in Movement Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe, 49100-000 São Cristóvão, SE, Brazil

2Group of Studies and Research of Performance, Sport, Health and Paralympic Sports—GPEPS, The Federal University of Sergipe, 49100-000 São Cristóvão, SE, Brazil

3Graduate Program of Physiological Science, Federal University of Sergipe, 49100-000 São Cristóvão, SE, Brazil

4Department of Medicine, Catholic University of Brasilia, 71966-700 Brasília, DF, Brazil

5Department of Allied Health Sciences, Health Services Academy, 44000 Islamabad, Pakistan

6Department of Physical Education and Special Motricity, Transilvania University of Brasov, 500068 Brasov, Romania

7Department of Teacher Education, NLA University College, 0166 Oslo, Norway

DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2026.024 Vol.22,Issue 3,March 2026 pp.29-35

Submitted: 19 August 2025 Accepted: 07 January 2026

Published: 30 March 2026

*Corresponding Author(s): Moazzam Tanveer E-mail: moazzam@hsa.edu.pk
*Corresponding Author(s): Luca Paolo Ardigò E-mail: luca.ardigo@nla.no

Abstract

Background: Paralympic powerlifting (PP) focuses on increasing strength through specific mechanical adaptations. Neuromuscular activations are known to differ between conventional and Paralympic athletes, making it essential to investigate strategies to optimize training and improve performance in the sport. This study investigates the impact of Russian current associated with traditional training on dynamic strength indicators (speed and power) in PP athletes after a single session. Methods: This is a randomized crossover clinical trial, conducted over three weeks, in which maximum velocity (MV), mean propulsive velocity (MPV), and power (PO) were analyzed before, during, after, 24 h, and 48 h after the intervention. In the first week, athletes performed initial and familiarization tests. In the following weeks, they underwent conventional training (TT) and training preceded by electrical stimulation (TPE), with protocols reversed between weeks. Results: At 45% of 1RM (maximum repetition), there was a significant reduction in power between the time points after 24 h (466.40 W) and before (522.69 W) (p = 0.009), with no differences between the conditions. At 80% of 1RM, MPV differed in series 4 (p = 0.026) and MV in series 1 (p = 0.020) and 4 (p = 0.003). There was no impact on power. Conclusions: Acute use of electrostimulation did not improve performance. Clinical Trial Registration: https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-8ypr4kj, RBR-8ypr4k (Retrospectively registered).


Keywords

Paralympic powerlifting; Strength training; Electrostimulation; Electrical stimulation; Russian current


Cite and Share

Taísa Pereira Santos,Felipe J. Aidar,Márcio Getirana-Mota,Danielle Rabelo Ganzalez,Pablo Santana Prata,Moazzam Tanveer,Georgian Badicu,Luca Paolo Ardigò. Acute neuromuscular fatigue responses to Russian current in Paralympic powerlifting athletes. Journal of Men's Health. 2026. 22(3);29-35.

References

[1] International Paralympic Committee. History of para powerlifting. 2024. Available at: https://www.paralympic.org/powerlifting/about (Accessed: 26 December 2024).

[2] van den Hoek D, Garrett J, Howells R, Latella C. Paralympians are stronger than you know: a comparison of para and nondisabled powerlifting bench press world records. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2023; 37: 452–456.

[3] Ribeiro Neto F, Dorneles JR, Costa RRG. Are the flat and arched bench press really similar? Sports Biomechanics. 2023; 22: 784–785.

[4] Loturco I, Pereira LA, Winckler C, Santos WL, Kobal R, McGuigan M. Load-velocity relationship in national Paralympic powerlifters: a case study. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2019; 14: 531–535.

[5] Getirana-Mota M, Aidar FJ, Ribeiro Neto F, Santos TP, Almeida-Neto PF, Cabral BGAT, et al. Comparison of neuromuscular fatigue in powerlifting Paralympics in different training methods. Sports Medicine International Open. 2024; 8: a22077922.

[6] Mendonça TP, Aidar FJ, Matos DG, Souza RF, Marçal AC, Almeida-Neto PF, et al. Force production and muscle activation during partial vs. full range of motion in Paralympic powerlifting. PLOS ONE. 2021; 16: e0257810.

[7] Aidar FJ, Clemente FM, de Lima LF, de Matos DG, Ferreira ARP, Marçal AC, et al. Evaluation of training with elastic bands on strength and fatigue indicators in Paralympic powerlifting. Sports. 2021; 9: 142.

[8] Shi L, Cai Z, Chen S, Han D. Acute effects of variable resistance training on force, velocity, and power measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ. 2022; 10: e13870.

[9] Filho GFDS, Aidar FJ, Getirana-Mota M, Brito CJ, Aedo-Muñoz E, de Almeida Paz Â, et al. Analysis of velocity, power and skin temperature in Paralympic powerlifting athletes with fixed and variable resistance. Sports. 2024; 12: 250.

[10] Lee MC, Ho CS, Hsu YJ, Wu MF, Huang CC. Effect of 8-week frequency-specific electrical muscle stimulation combined with resistance exercise training on muscle mass, strength, and body composition in men and women: a feasibility and safety study. PeerJ. 2023; 11: e16303.

[11] Akagi R, Miyokawa Y, Shiozaki D, Yajima Y, Yamada K, Kano K, et al. Eight-week neuromuscular electrical stimulation training produces muscle strength gains and hypertrophy, and partial muscle quality improvement in the knee extensors. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2023; 41: 2209–2228.

[12] Hasan S, Kandasamy G, Alyahya D, Alonazi A, Jamal A, Iqbal A, et al. Effect of plyometric training and neuromuscular electrical stimulation assisted strength training on muscular, sprint, and functional performances in collegiate male football players. PeerJ. 2022; 10: e13588.

[13] Montenegro EJN, Santos KV dos, Alencar GG de, Siqueira GR de, Maia JN, Andrade M do A. Use of Russian and Aussie current in isometric tetanization of the quadriceps femoris. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte. 2019; 25: 142–146.

[14] Oliveira P, Modesto KAG, Bottaro M, Babault N, Durigan JLQ. Training effects of alternated and pulsed currents on the quadriceps muscles of athletes. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018; 39: 535–540.

[15] Maffiuletti NA. Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2010; 110: 223–234.

[16] Adams V. Electromyostimulation to fight atrophy and to build muscle: facts and numbers. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle. 2018; 9: 631–634.

[17] Pérez-Castilla A, Piepoli A, Delgado-García G, Garrido-Blanca G, García-Ramos A. Reliability and concurrent validity of seven commercially available devices for the assessment of movement velocity at different intensities during the bench press. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2019; 33: 1258–1265.

[18] French DN, Kraemer WJ, Cooke CB. Changes in dynamic exercise performance following a sequence of preconditioning isometric muscle actions. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2003; 17: 678–685.

[19] Sale DG. Influence of exercise and training on motor unit activation. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. 1987; 15: 95–151.

[20] Nakagawa K, Bergquist AJ, Yamashita T, Yoshida T, Masani K. Motor point stimulation primarily activates motor nerve. Neuroscience Letters. 2020; 736: 135246.

[21] Sánchez-Medina L, González-Badillo JJ. Velocity loss as an indicator of neuromuscular fatigue during resistance training. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2011; 43: 1725–1734.

[22] Sanchez-Medina L, Perez CE, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ. Importance of the propulsive phase in strength assessment. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2010; 31: 123–129.

[23] Macaluso A, De Vito G. Muscle strength, power and adaptations to resistance training in older people. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2004; 91: 450–472.

[24] Alcazar J, Cornejo-Daza PJ, Sánchez-Valdepeñas J, Alegre LM, Pareja-Blanco F. Dose-response relationship between velocity loss during resistance training and changes in the squat force-velocity relationship. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2021; 16: 1736–1745.

[25] Pareja-Blanco F, Alcazar J, Sánchez-Valdepeñas J, Cornejo-Daza PJ, Piqueras-Sanchiz F, Mora-Vela R, et al. Velocity loss as a critical variable determining the adaptations to strength training. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2020; 52: 1752–1762.

[26] Jukic I, Castilla AP, Ramos AG, Van Hooren B, McGuigan MR, Helms ER. The acute and chronic effects of implementing velocity loss thresholds during resistance training: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and critical evaluation of the literature. Sports Medicine. 2023; 53: 177–214.

[27] Rissanen J, Walker S, Pareja-Blanco F, Häkkinen K. Velocity-based resistance training: do women need greater velocity loss to maximize adaptations? European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2022; 122: 1269–1280.

[28] Izquierdo M, González-Badillo JJ, Häkkinen K, Ibáñez J, Kraemer WJ, Altadill A, et al. Effect of loading on unintentional lifting velocity declines during single sets of repetitions to failure during upper and lower extremity muscle actions. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2006; 27: 718–724.

[29] Mesquita Souza RL, Aidar FJ, Villar R, Greco G, Santos L dos, Poli L, et al. Assessment of asymmetry at different intensities between conventional and Paralympic powerlifting athletes. Heliyon. 2023; 9: e16211.

[30] Aidar FJ, Fraga GS, Getirana-Mota M, Marçal AC, Santos JL, de Souza RF, et al. Effects of ibuprofen use on lymphocyte count and oxidative stress in elite Paralympic powerlifting. Biology. 2021; 10: 986.


Submission Turnaround Time

Top