Strategies to promote men's health-seeking behaviour: a systematic review

Background: Men’s underutilisation of healthcare services remains a public health challenge, contributing to delayed diagnosis, low uptake of preventive services, avoidable complications, and poor health outcomes. Although barriers to men’s health-seeking behaviour have been widely documented, less attention has been given to synthesising evidence on strategies to address this challenge. This systematic review synthesised evidence on interventions and strategies to promote health-seeking behaviour among adult men. Methods: Systematic searches of PubMed, EBSCOhost, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar were conducted to identify studies published between January 2000 and February 2026. Grey literature was searched through repositories and relevant organisational websites. Primary studies involving men aged ≥18 years that evaluated interventions to improve health-seeking behaviour or healthcare utilisation were included. Records were managed using Rayyan, independently screened by three reviewers, and appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Owing to heterogeneity in study designs, settings, interventions, and outcomes, findings were synthesised narratively using thematic analysis. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Results: Six strategy categories were identified: peer-led male engagement, Men’s Sheds programmes, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) self-testing, digital health interventions, facility-based health education programmes, and male-friendly dedicated spaces within health facilities. These strategies were associated with increased willingness to seek healthcare, greater healthcare utilisation, improved knowledge, enhanced uptake of preventive services, and stronger engagement in health-seeking behaviours. However, evidence was limited by the small number of studies, methodological heterogeneity, and the predominance of descriptive and observational studies conducted in sub-Saharan Africa. Conclusions: Multi-component interventions integrating community-based approaches, digital health technologies, and health system adaptations are more likely to improve men’s engagement with healthcare services than single-component interventions. Rigorous, context-specific intervention studies are needed to determine which strategies are most effective, for whom, and under what circumstances. The PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024548211.

Health; Health seeking behaviour; Interventions; Men; Strategies

[1] National Department of Health. South African national integrated men’s health strategy 2020–2025. 2021. Available at: https://knowledgehub.health.gov.za/elibrary/south-african-national-integrated-mens-health-strategy-2020-2025 (Accessed: 02 November 2025).
[2] Wehmeier S, McIntosh C, Turnbull J, Ashby M. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, International Student Edition. 7th edn. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. 2010.
[3] Khadka S, Shrestha O, Koirala G, Acharya U, Adhikari G. Health seeking behavior and self-medication practice among undergraduate medical students of a teaching hospital: a cross-sectional study. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2022; 78: 103776.
[4] Seidler ZE, Benakovic R, Wilson MJ, McGee MA, Fisher K, Smith JA, et al. Approaches to engaging men during primary healthcare encounters: a scoping review. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2024; 18: 15579883241241090.
[5] Redondo-Sendino A, Guallar-Castillón P, Banegas JR, Rodríguez-Artalejo F. Gender differences in the utilization of health-care services among the older adult population of Spain. BMC Public Health. 2006; 6: 155.
[6] Tshuma N, Elakpa DN, Moyo C, Ndhlovu TM, Mokgatle MM, Moyo S, et al. Community perceived barriers to uptake of health services among men at Sedibeng district in South Africa. Health SA Gesondheid. 2024; 29: 2548.
[7] Chavalala L, Lebese TR, Makhado L. Men’s views on factors contributing to their poor health-seeking behaviour in Limpopo Province, South Africa. BMC Public Health. 2025; 25: 83.
[8] Hooper GL, Quallich SA. Health seeking in men: a concept analysis. Urologic Nursing Journal. 2016; 36: 163–172.
[9] World Health Organization. Noncommunicable diseases. 2025. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240105775 (Accessed: 25 January 2026).
[10] Freihat O, Sipos D, Aamir M, Kovacs A. Global burden and future projections of non-communicable diseases (2000–2050): progress toward SDG 3.4 and disparities across regions and risk factors. PLOS ONE. 2025; 20: e0336036.
[11] Dowden J, Mushamiri I, McFeely E, Apat D, Sacks J, Ben Amor Y. The impact of “male clinics” on health-seeking behaviors of adult men in rural Kenya. PLOS ONE. 2019; 14: e0224749.
[12] Mamabolo LL, Sibiya I, Buthelezi F. Public men’s clinic: men’s experiences of healthcare professionals and environment. African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine. 2025; 17: e1–e9.
[13] Langa JM, Netshapapame TS, Goon DT. Men’s perspective on barriers and challenges towards accessing healthcare services in the City of Mbombela, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. BMC Research Notes. 2026; 19: 32.
[14] Lockwood C, Porritt K, Munn Z, Rittenmeyer L, Salmond S, Bjerrum M, et al. Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. In Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Porritt K, Pilla B, Jordan Z (eds.) JBI manual for evidence synthesis (pp. 58–112). JBI: Adelaide, Australia. 2024.
[15] Barker TH, Hasanoff S, Aromataris E, Stone JC, Leonardi-Bee J, Sears K, et al. The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for analytical cross-sectional studies. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2026; 24: 401–408.
[16] Hong QN, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, Dagenais P, et al. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information. 2018; 34: 285–291.
[17] Prasad M. Introduction to the GRADE tool for rating certainty in evidence and recommendations. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2024; 25: 101484.
[18] Ghanotakis E, Hoke T, Wilcher R, Field S, Mercer S, Bobrow EA, et al. Evaluation of a male engagement intervention to transform gender norms and improve family planning and HIV service uptake in Kabale, Uganda. Global Public Health. 2017; 12: 1297–1314.
[19] Stern E, Pascoe L, Shand T, Richmond S. Lessons learned from engaging men in sexual and reproductive health as clients, partners and advocates of change in the Hoima district of Uganda. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2015; 17: S190–S205.
[20] Kelly D, Steiner A, Mason H, Teasdale S. Men’s sheds as an alternative healthcare route? A qualitative study of the impact of men’s sheds on user’s health improvement behaviours. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21: 553.
[21] Choko AT, Kumwenda MK, Johnson CC, Sakala DW, Chikalipo MC, Fielding K, et al. Acceptability of woman-delivered HIV self-testing to the male partner, and additional interventions: a qualitative study of antenatal care participants in Malawi. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2017; 20: 21610.
[22] Oliffe JL, Black N, Yiu J, Flannigan R, Hartrick W, Goldenberg SL. Promoting men’s health with the “don’t change much” e-program. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2021; 15: 15579883211001189.
[23] Hildon ZJL, Panchapakesan C, Hasan MT, Khaled N, Chan AY, Tripathi S, et al. Exploring theory-based behavioral interventions promoting COVID-19 prevention and healthcare-seeking for migrant worker men in Singapore: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22: 2113.
[24] Ooi CY, Ng CJ, Sales A, Teo CH. Pilot implementation study of a web-based men’s health screening app in primary care during COVID-19: a mixed-methods approach. BMC Health Services Research. 2024; 24: 1219.
[25] He J, Wang Y, Du Z, Liao J, He N, Hao Y. Peer education for HIV prevention among high-risk groups: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2020; 20: 338.
[26] Cordier R, Wilson NJ. Community-based Men’s Sheds: promoting male health, wellbeing and social inclusion in an international context. Health Promotion International. 2014; 29: 483–493.
[27] Hlongwa M, Mashamba-Thompson T, Makhunga S, Muraraneza C, Hlongwana K. Men’s perspectives on HIV self-testing in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20: 66.
[28] Choi EPH, Wu C, Choi KWY, Chau PH, Wan EYF, Wong WCW, et al. eHealth interactive intervention in promoting safer sex among men who have sex with men. npj Digital Medicine. 2024; 7: 313.
[29] Sharif Z, Babur MN, Shahid Z, Sahar G, Khan AA, Tariq S. Digital health intervention for HIV prevention and care: a systematic review of mHealth and eHealth strategies. Frontier in Medical and Health Research. 2025; 3: 979–995.
[30] Hlongwa M, Nicol E. Improving linkage to HIV care following a reactive HIV self-testing result among men in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. BMC Health Services Research. 2024; 24: 552.