The effectiveness of “prompt sheet” in initiating a discussion of sexual dysfunction among male patients with diabetes in a primary care setting: an open-label control trial

Background: Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects millions of men worldwide yet many are undiagnosed and untreated. Both doctors and men may have a miscommunication that ED is taboo to be brought up in the consultation. This study determined the effectiveness of prompt sheet in initiating a discussion of sexual dysfunction in a primary care setting. Methods: This was an open label control trial done at two government primary care clinics, one as a control and the other, an intervention group. All doctors in the participating clinics were given education on diagnosis and management of ED. Participants who came for their diabetes mellitus follow-up were approached. Those who consented to the study had their sociodemographic data recorded and erectile function evaluated using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5). The patients in the intervention group (n = 69) received a prompt sheet allowing participants to indicate their decision, prior to consultation, of whether to discuss about erectile dysfunction. The prompt sheet was presented to their treating doctors during consultation. The control group (n = 65) received usual care. All participants would provide a written feedback whether there was any discussion about erectile dysfunction after the consultation. Results: A total of 134 participants completed the study. Ethnic distributions in intervention group differed significantly from the control group with 46.4% Chinese, 44.9% Malay, 7.2% Indian and 53.8% Chinese, 15.4% Malay, 29.2% Indian respectively. Other baseline characteristic of both groups (age, body weight, education level, employment, smoking, marital status, duration of diabetes and prevalence of ED) were similar. The prevalence of ED in both groups was about 80%. In the intervention group, only 59% of participants opted to discuss their sexual problems and among them, 80.5% of them had it discussed during the consultation. Thus, in the intervention group, 47.8% of total participants discussed about erectile dysfunction, compared to 4.6% in the control group (Odds Ratio (OR) 18.4, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 5.4–66.2, p $<$ 0.001). Sub-analysis did not reveal any relationship between either ethnicity or severity of ED and participant’s option to discuss ED. Conclusions: Prompt sheet is a simple and inexpensive tool to cue a discussion of erectile dysfunction during consultation. More importantly, prompt sheet provides patients an opportunity to indicate their interest of discussing ED to bridge the gap of miscommunication between men and doctors.

Erectile dysfunction; Primary care; Men’s health

[1] NIH Consensus Conference. Impotence. NIH Consensus Devel-opment Panel on Impotence. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1993; 270: 83–90.

[2] Ab Rahman AA, Al-Sadat N, Yun Low W. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction in primary care setting, Malaysia. Journal of Men’s Health. 2011; 8: S50–S53.

[3] Khoo EM, Tan HM, Low WY. Erectile dysfunction and co-morbidities in aging men: an urban cross-sectional study in Malaysia. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2008; 5: 2925–2934.

[4] Frederick LR, Cakir OO, Arora H, Helfand BT, McVary KT. Un-dertreatment of erectile dysfunction: claims analysis of 6.2 mil-lion patients. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2014; 11: 2546–2553.

[5] Kouidrat Y, Pizzol D, Cosco T, Thompson T, Carnaghi M, Bertoldo A, et al. High prevalence of erectile dysfunction in di-abetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 145 studies. Diabetic Medicine. 2017; 34: 1185–1192.

[6] Lo W, Fu S, Wong CH, Chen E. Prevalence, correlates, attitude and treatment seeking of erectile dysfunction among type 2 di-abetic Chinese men attending primary care outpatient clinics. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2014; 16: 755.

[7] Yu W, Zhang K, He Z, Jin J. Help-seeking behavior for erectile dysfunction: a clinic-based survey in China. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2014; 16: 131.

[8] Gülpinar O, Haliloğlu AH, Abdulmajed MI, Bogga MS, Yaman O. Help-seeking interval in erectile dysfunction: analysis of at-titudes, beliefs, and factors affecting treatment-seeking interval in Turkish men with previously untreated erectile dysfunction. Journal of Andrology. 2012; 33: 624–628.

[9] Tan H, Low WY, Ng CJ, Chen K, Sugita M, Ishii N, et al. Preva-lence and correlates of erectile dysfunction (ED) and treatment seeking for ED in Asian Men: the Asian Men’s Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (MALES) study. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2007; 4: 1582–1592.

[10] Tong SF, Low WY, Ng CJ. Profile of men’s health in Malaysia: problems and challenges. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2011; 13: 526–533.

[11] Tong SF, Low WY, Ismail SB, Trevena L, Wilcock S. Determi-nants of doctors’ decisions to inquire about sexual dysfunction in Malaysian primary care settings. Translational Andrology and Urology. 2013; 2: 281–290.

[12] Brown R, Butow PN, Boyer MJ, Tattersall MH. Promoting pa-tient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a prompt sheet and coaching in question-asking. British Journal of Cancer. 1999; 80: 242–248.

[13] Albada A, van Dulmen S, Ausems MGEM, Bensing JM. A pre-visit website with question prompt sheet for counselees facili-tates communication in the first consultation for breast cancer genetic counseling: findings from a randomized controlled trial. Genetics in Medicine. 2012; 14: 535–542.

[14] Institute for Public Health (IPH) 2015. National Health and Mor-bidity Survey 2015 (NHMS 2015). Vol. II: Non-Communicable Diseases, Risk Factors & Other Health Problems. Ministry of Health Malaysia: Putrajaya. 2015.

[15] Malaysian Urological Association and MEDACT. Clinical Prac-tice Guide in Erectile Dysfunction. Malaysian Urological Asso-ciation and MEDACT: Kuala Lumpur. 2000.

[16] Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Gendrano N. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a state-of-the-science review. Inter-national Journal of Impotence Research. 2002; 14: 226–244.

[17] Lim TO, Das A, Rampal S, Zaki M, Sahabudin RM, Rohan MJ, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the English ver-sion of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for use in Malaysia. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2003; 15: 329–336.

[18] Gao J, Gao P, Hao Z, Zhou Z, Liu J, Li H, et al. Compari-son of National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symp-tom Index with International Index of Erectile Function 5 in Men with Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: a Large Cross-Sectional Study in China. BioMed Research International. 2015; 2015: 560239.

[19] Tong SF, Low WY, Ismail SB, Trevena L, Willcock S. Physi-cian’s intention to initiate health check-up discussions with men: a qualitative study. Family Practice. 2010; 28: 307–316.

[20] Muhamad NA, Mutalip MHA, Mustapha N, Dali NSM, Aris T, Ismail F, et al. Association between Comorbidities and Selected Sociodemographic Factors with Complications of Diabetes: Re-sults from the National Diabetic Registry Malaysia. Journal of Diabetes Mellitus. 2018; 8: 84–97.

[21] Kitai E, Vinker S, Kijner F, Lustman A. Erectile dysfunction–the effect of sending a questionnaire to patients on consultations with their family doctor. Family Practice. 2002; 19: 247–250.

[22] Perttula E. Physician attitudes and behaviour regarding erectile dysfunction in at-risk patients from a rural community. Post-graduate Medical Journal. 1999; 75: 83–85.

[23] De Berardis G, Pellegrini F, Franciosi M, Pamparana F, Morelli P, Tognoni G, et al. Management of erectile dysfunction in gen-eral practice. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2009; 6: 1127–1134.

[24] Miner M, Rosenberg MT, Barkin J. Erectile dysfunction in pri-mary care: a focus on cardiometabolic risk evaluation and strat-ification for future cardiovascular events. The Canadian Journal of Urology. 2015; 21: 25–38.

[25] Burnett AL, Nehra A, Breau RH, Culkin DJ, Faraday MM, Hakim LS, et al. Erectile Dysfunction: AUA Guideline. Jour-nal of Urology. 2018; 200: 633–641.