Article Data

  • Views 415
  • Dowloads 109


Open Access

A Review about the Effectiveness of Virtual Therapy in the Recovery of Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries

  • Catalin Ionite1
  • Mariana Rotariu1,*,
  • Marius Turnea1
  • Mihai Ilea1
  • Iustina Condurache1

1University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Bioengineering, 700454 Iași, România

DOI: 10.31083/j.jomh1808160 Vol.18,Issue 8,August 2022 pp.1-12

Published: 31 August 2022

*Corresponding Author(s): Mariana Rotariu E-mail:;


Background: A spinal cord injury usually results in a significant limitation in the functional outcomes implying a challenge to the performance of activities of daily living. The main aim of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of virtual reality to improve functional performance in patients with spinal cord injury. Methods: International virtual libraries such as ISI-Thomson Web of Science and Purpose have been accessed in this article. The search criteria selected were “title”, “abstract” and “keywords”. Within the platforms of the Scopus virtual library, the keywords in the search for articles were “Spinal Cord virtual reality”. Results: Within this search, a number of 327 articles from 1996–2021 were identified. Within the platforms of the ISI Thomson Web of Science virtual library, the keywords in the search for articles were “Spinal cord virtual reality”. Within this search, a number of seventy-seven articles from 2017–2021 were identified. In order to create the article, only the articles that had the direction of researching spinal cord injury rehabilitation using virtual reality were selected. The results were inconclusive for other results. Conclusions: Most of the studies analyzed did not confirm beneficial effects on functional performance compared to conventional physical therapy programs. The results showed that virtual reality does not prove to be more effective than conventional physical therapy programs in improving functional performance in patients with spinal cord injury, but taken together and acting as a complementary package the results are much more. As can be seen in the articles that tried to demonstrate the effectiveness of the product, the studies used a small number of patients, which is statistically irrelevant. The authors preferred to integrate these devices into the patient rehabilitation process but to use an irrelevant number of patients, so that they do not gain statistical relevance.


virtual reality; spinal cord injury; rehabilitation; physical therapy

Cite and Share

Catalin Ionite,Mariana Rotariu,Marius Turnea,Mihai Ilea,Iustina Condurache. A Review about the Effectiveness of Virtual Therapy in the Recovery of Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries. Journal of Men's Health. 2022. 18(8);1-12.


[1] Bickenbach J, Officer A, Shakespeare T, Von Groote P. Interna-tional Perspectives on Spinal Cord Injury: Summary. Publisher: ISCOS: Buckinghamshire. 2013.

[2] Stoica S, Tănase I, Onose G. Influences and consequences re-sulting in addictions in general and to chronic alcoholism, es-pecially for patients with spinal cord injury. Balneo and PRM Research Journal. 2021; 12: 129–132.

[3] National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Spinal Cord Injury Information Page. Available at: https://www.ninds. (Ac-cessed: 9 March 2021).

[4] Kirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, Donovan W, Graves DE, Jha A, et al. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2011; 34: 535–546.

[5] Wyndaele M, Wyndaele J. Incidence, prevalence and epidemi-ology of spinal cord injury: what learns a worldwide literature survey? Spinal Cord. 2006; 44: 523–529.

[6] Kraus JF, Franti CE, Riggins RS, Richards D, Borhani NO. In-cidence of traumatic spinal cord lesions. Journal of Chronic Dis-eases. 1975; 28: 471–492.

[7] Fitzharris M, Cripps RA, Lee BB. Estimating the global inci-dence of traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2014; 52: 117–122.

[8] Furlan JC, Sakakibara BM, Miller WC, Krassioukov AV. Global Incidence and Prevalence of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences. 2013; 40: 456–464.

[9] DeVivo M, Biering-Sørensen F, Charlifue S, Noonan V, Post M, Stripling T, et al. International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set. Spinal Cord. 2006; 44: 535–540.

[10] Merritt CH, Taylor MA, Yelton CJ, Ray SK. Economic impact of traumatic spinal cord injuries in the United States. Neuroim-munol Neuroinflamm. 2019; 6: 9.

[11] Lele A. Virtual reality and its military utility. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. 2013; 4: 17–26.

[12] Rose T, Nam CS, Chen KB. Immersion of virtual reality for re-habilitation - Review. Applied Ergonomics. 2018; 69: 153–161.

[13] Trincado-Alonso F, Dimbwadyo-Terrer I, de los Reyes-Guzmán A, López-Monteagudo P, Bernal-Sahún A, Gil-Agudo A. Kine-matic Metrics Based on the Virtual Reality System Toyra as an Assessment of the Upper Limb Rehabilitation in People with Spinal Cord Injury. BioMed Research International. 2014; 2014: 1–11.

[14] Kizony R, Raz L, Katz N, Weingarden H, Weiss PLT. Video-capture virtual reality system for patients with paraplegic spinal cord injury. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Devel-opment. 2005; 42: 595.

[15] Riva G, Wiederhold BK, Mantovani F. Neuroscience of Vir-tual Reality: from Virtual Exposure to Embodied Medicine. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2019; 22: 82–96.

[16] Field-Fote EC. Spinal Cord Control of Movement: Implica-tions for Locomotor Rehabilitation Following Spinal Cord In-jury. Physical Therapy. 2000; 80: 477–484.

[17] Wall T, Feinn R, Chui K, Cheng MS. The effects of the Nin-tendo™ Wii Fit on gait, balance, and quality of life in individ-uals with incomplete spinal cord injury. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2015; 38: 777–783.

[18] Carlozzi NE, Gade V, Rizzo A Tulsky DS. Using virtual real-ity driving simulators in persons with spinal cord injury: three screen display versus head mounted display. Disability and Re-habilitation: Assistive Technology. 2013; 8: 176–180.

[19] Dimbwadyo-Terrer I, Trincado-Alonso F, De los Reyes-Guzman A, Bernal-Sahun A, Lopez-Monteagudo P, Polonio-Lopez B, et al. ‘Clinical, Functional and Kinematic Correlations using the Virtual Reality System Toyra (R) as Upper Limb Rehabilita-tion Tool in People with Spinal Cord Injury’. Proceedings of the Neurotechnix, International Congress on Neurotechnology, Electronics and Informatics. Algarve, Portugal. 2013.

[20] Villiger M, Bohli D, Kiper D, Pyk P, Spillmann J, Meilick B, et al. Virtual Reality–Augmented Neurorehabilitation Improves Motor Function and Reduces Neuropathic Pain in Patients with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2013; 27: 675–683.

[21] Jordan M, Richardson EJ. Effects of Virtual Walking Treatment on Spinal Cord Injury–Related Neuropathic Pain: Pilot Results and Trends Related to Location of Pain and at-level Neuronal Hypersensitivity. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Re-habilitation. 2016; 95: 390–396.

[22] Roosink M, Robitaille N, Jackson PL, Bouyer LJ, Mercier C. Interactive virtual feedback improves gait motor imagery after spinal cord injury: an exploratory study. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 2016; 34: 227–235.

[23] Pietrzak E, Pullman S, McGuire A. Using Virtual Reality and Videogames for Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation: a Struc-tured Literature Review. Games for Health Journal. 2014; 3: 202–214.

[24] Chen C, Jeng M, Fung C, Doong J, Chuang T. Psychological Benefits of Virtual Reality for Patients in Rehabilitation Ther-apy. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2009; 18: 258–268.

[25] Li Z, Han X, Sheng J, Ma S. Virtual reality for improving balance in patients after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2016; 30: 432–440.

[26] Ravi DK, Kumar N, Singhi P. Effectiveness of virtual reality rehabilitation for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: an updated evidence-based systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2017; 103: 245–258.

[27] Dimbwadyo-Terrer I, Trincado-Alonso F, de los Reyes-Guzmán A, Aznar MA, Alcubilla C, Pérez-Nombela S, et al. Upper limb rehabilitation after spinal cord injury: a treatment based on a data glove and an immersive virtual reality environment. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2016; 11: 462–467.

[28] Pazzaglia M, Giannini AM, Federico F. Acquisition of Owner-ship Illusion with Self-Disownership in Neurological Patients. Brain Science. 2020; 10: 170.

[29] Pozeg P, Palluel E, Ronchi R, Solcà M, Al-Khodairy A, Jordan X, et al. Virtual reality improves embodiment and neuropathic pain caused by spinal cord injury. Neurology. 2017; 89: 1894–1903.

[30] Riva G. Virtual reality in rehabilitation of spinal cord injuries: A case report. Rehabilitation Psychology. 2000; 45: 81–88.

[31] Schmidt H, Sorowka D, Hesse S, Bernhardt R. ‘Design of a robotic walking simulator for neurological rehabilitation’. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Lausanne, Switzerland. 2002.

[32] Timoszyk WK, De Leon RD, London N, Joynes R, Minakata K, Roy RR, et al. Comparison of virtual and physical treadmill en-vironments for training stepping after spinal cord injury. Robot-ica. 2003; 21: 25–32.

[33] Keshner EA. Virtual reality and physical rehabilitation: A new toy or a new research and rehabilitation tool? Journal of Neuro-Engineering and Rehabilitation. 2004; 1: 8.

[34] Liebermann DG, Buchman AS, Franks IM. Enhancement of mo-tor rehabilitation through the use of information technologies. Clinical Biomechanics. 2006; 21: 8–20.

[35] Wellner M, Duschau-Wicke A, von Zitzewitz J, Riener R. ‘Step-ping over Virtual Obstacles with an Actuated Gait Orthosis’. 2007 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference. Charlotte, North Car-olina, USA. 2007.

[36] Weiss PL, Sveistrup H, Rand D, Kizony R. Video capture virtual reality: a decade of rehabilitation assessment and intervention. Physical Therapy Reviews. 2009; 14: 307–321.

[37] Peñasco-Martín B, de los Reyes-Guzmán A, Gil-Agudo Á, Bernal-Sahún A, Pérez-Aguilar B, de la Peña-González AI. Ap-plication of virtual reality in the motor aspects of neurorehabili-tation. Revista de neurologia. 2010; 51: 481–488.

[38] De Mauro A, Ardanza A, Chen C, Carrasco E, Oyarzun D, Tor-ricelli D, et al. Virtual Reality and Hybrid Technology for Neu-rorehabilitations. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (includ-ing subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). 2011; 352: 582–591.

[39] Villiger M, Hepp-Reymond M, Pyk P, Kiper D, Eng K, Spillman J, et al. ‘Virtual reality rehabilitation system for neuropathic pain and motor dysfunction in spinal cord injury patients’. 2011 Inter-national Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation. Zurich, Switzer-land. 2011.

[40] Sung W, Chiu T, Tsai W, Cheng H, Chen J. The effect of virtual reality-enhanced driving protocol in patients following spinal cord injury. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 2012; 75: 600–605.

[41] Mazzone B, Haubert LL, Mulroy S, Requejo P, Gotsis M, Lym-pouridis V, et al. ‘Intensity of shoulder muscle activation dur-ing resistive exercises performed with and without virtual reality games’. 2013 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR). Philadelphia, USA. 2013.

[42] Dimbwadyo-Terrer I, de los Reyes-Guzmán A, Bernal-Sahún A, López-Monteagudo P, Trincado-Alonso F, Polonio-López B, et al. Virtual Reality System Toyra: a New Tool to Assess and Treatment for Upper Limb Motor Impairment in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury. Biosystems & Biorobotics. 2013; 119: 853–858.

[43] Dimbwadyo-Terrer I, Trincado-Alonso F, De Los Reyes-Guzman A, Bernal-Sahun A, Lopez-Monteagudo P, Polonio-Lopez B, et al. Clinical, functional and kinematic correlations using the Virtual Reality System toyra® as upper limb rehabili-tation tool in people with spinal cord injury. NEUROTECHNIX 2013 - Proceedings of the International Congress on Neurotech-nology, Electronics and Informatics. Vilamoura, Algarve, Por-tugal. 2013.

[44] Trincado-Alonso F, Bernal-Sahún A, López-Monteagudo P, Dimbwadyo-Terrer I, Peñasco-Martín B, Gil-Agudo A. Use of Virtual Reality System Toyra to Develop an Objective Set of Pa-rameters to Evaluate the Motor Abilities of Upper Limbs in Pa-tients with Spinal Cord Injury. Biosystems & Biorobotics. 2013; 24: 1025–1029.

[45] Mahajan HP, Dicianno BE, Cooper RA, Ding D. Assessment of wheelchair driving performance in a virtual reality-based simu-lator. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2013; 36: 322–332.

[46] Recio AC, Becker D, Morgan M, Saunders NR, Schramm LP, McDonald JW. Use of a Virtual Reality Physical Ride-on Sailing Simulator as a Rehabilitation Tool for Recreational Sports and Community Reintegration: A Pilot Study. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2014; 92: 1104–1109.

[47] de los Reyes-Guzman A, Dimbwadyo-Terrer I, Trincado-Alonso F, Aznar MA, Alcubilla C, Pérez-Nombela S, et al. A Data-Globe and Immersive Virtual Reality Environment for Upper Limb Rehabilitation after Spinal Cord Injury. IFMBE Proceed-ings. 2014; 41: 1759–1762.

[48] Huang D, Mao Y, Chen P, Li L. Virtual reality training improves balance function. Neural Regeneration Research. 2014; 9: 1628.

[49] Zeilig G, Weingarden H, Obuchov A, Bloch A, Gaides M, Reuveny R, et al. ‘Lokomat walking results in increased metabolic markers in individuals with high spinal cord in-jury’. 2015 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR). Valencia, Spain. 2015.

[50] Khurana M, Walia S, Noohu MM. Study on the Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Game-Based Training on Balance and Functional Performance in Individuals with Paraplegia. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 2017; 23: 263–270.

[51] Prasad S, Aikat R, Labani S, Khanna N. Efficacy of Virtual Re-ality in Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Asian Spine Jour-nal. 2018; 12: 927–934.

[52] Maresca G, Maggio MG, Buda A, La Rosa G, Manuli A, Bra-manti P, et al. A novel use of virtual reality in the treatment of cognitive and motor deficit in spinal cord injury. A case report. Medicine. 2018; 97: e13559.

[53] Duffell LD, Paddison S, Alahmary AF, Donaldson N, Burridge J. The effects of FES cycling combined with virtual reality rac-ing biofeedback on voluntary function after incomplete SCI: a pilot study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2019; 16: 149.

[54] Chi B, Chau B, Yeo E, Ta P. Virtual reality for spinal cord injury-associated neuropathic pain: Systematic review. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2019; 62: 49–57.

[55] Porter RR, Kopera KW, Trilk JL. Feasibility and Effectiveness of Community-Based Virtual Reality Group Exercise Training in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2019; 51: 167–167.

[56] Lim DY, Hwang DM, Cho KH, Moon CW, Ahn SY. A Fully Immersive Virtual Reality Method for Upper Limb Rehabilita-tion in Spinal Cord Injury. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2020; 44: 311–319.

[57] Sengupta M, Gupta A, Khanna M, Krishnan UKR, Chakrabarti D. Role of Virtual Reality in Balance Training in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: a Prospective Comparative Pre-Post Study. Asian Spine Journal. 2020; 14: 51–58.

[58] Lakhani A, Martin K, Gray L, Mallison J, Grimbeek P, Hollins I, et al. What is the Impact of Engaging with Natural Environments Delivered via Virtual Reality on the Psycho-emotional Health of People with Spinal Cord Injury Receiving Rehabilitation in Hospital? Findings from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2020; 101: 1532–1540.

[59] Abou L, Malala VD, Yarnot R, Alluri A, Rice LA. Effects of Virtual Reality Therapy on Gait and Balance among Individu-als with Spinal Cord Injury: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2020; 34: 375–388.

[60] Amaranta D M R, Dolores R, Salazar A, Camacho R, David LA. Efectiveness of Virtual Reality on Functional Performance after Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9: 2065.

[61] Putrino D, Tabacof L, Breyman E, Revis J, Soomro Z, Chopra D, et al. Pain Reduction after Short Exposure to Virtual Reality Environments in People with Spinal Cord Injury. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18: 8923.

[62] Leemhuis E, Esposito RM, Gennaro L, Pazzaglia M. Go Vir-tual to Get Real: Virtual Reality as a Resource for Spinal Cord Treatment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18: 1819.

[63] Asadzadeh A, Samad-Soltani T, Salahzadeh Z, Rezaei-Hachesu P. Effectiveness of virtual reality-based exercise therapy in reha-bilitation: a scoping review. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked. 2021; 24: 100562.

[64] Orsatti-Sanchez BA, Diaz-Hernandez O. Efficacy of Virtual Re-ality in Neurorehabilitation of Spinal Cord Injury Patients: A Systematic Review. Revista Mexicana de Inginieria Biomedica. 2021; 42: 90–113.

[65] Rutkowski S, Kiper P, Cacciante L, Cieślik B, Mazurek J, Tur-olla A, et al. Use of virtual reality-based training in different fields of rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal Rehabilitation Medicine. 2020; 52: jrm00121.

[66] Lee M J, Lee SM. The Effect of Virtual Reality Exercise Pro-gram on Sitting Balance Ability of Spinal Cord Injury Patients. Healthcare. 2021; 9: 183.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.7 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (

Submission Turnaround Time