Article Data

  • Views 430
  • Dowloads 142

Original Research

Open Access Special Issue

Gender Effects on Lower Limb Biomechanics of Novice Runners before and after a 5 km Run

  • Hairong Chen1
  • Yang Song1,2,3,
  • Qian Liu1
  • Feng Ren1
  • István Bíró3
  • Yaodong Gu1,*,

1Faculty of Sports Science, Ningbo University, 315211 Ningbo, Zhejiang, China

2Doctoral School on Safety and Security Sciences, Óbuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary

3Faculty of Engineering, University of Szeged, 6724 Szeged, Hungary

DOI: 10.31083/j.jomh1808176 Vol.18,Issue 8,August 2022 pp.1-8

Published: 31 August 2022

*Corresponding Author(s): Yaodong Gu E-mail:


Background: Gender has been considered as an influencing factor in the incidence of sports injuries. But few studies have discussed whether gender differences change after long-distance running. This study aimed at investigating whether the kinematic and ground reaction forces (GRFs) differences between males and females were altered by a 5 km run. Methods: Thirty novice runners (15 males and 15 females) with heel strikes were recruited for this study. In the test before and after the 5 km run, the participants were asked to run through the force plate with their right foot at a speed of 3.3 m/s ± 5%. Kinematics data and GRFs were collected synchronously. Each participant completed five successful running trials for further analysis of data. Results: Gender differences existed in ankle sagittal peak angle (pre: p = 0.059; post: p = 0.013), knee frontal peak angle (pre: p = 0.345; post: p = 0.014), knee horizontal nadir angle (pre: p = 0.056; post: p = 0.005), hip frontal nadir angle (pre: p = 0.103; post: p = 0.001) and peak lateral force (pre: p = 0.564; post: p = 0.001) after a 5 km run, but there were no gender differences before a 5 km run. Gender differences in the knee and hip movement in the frontal plane and horizontal plane and anterior-posterior GRFs changed obviously in the stance phase before and after a 5 km run. Conclusions: The gender difference in lower limb biomechanics during running is not constant. Differences change in peak angle, peak lateral force, knee and hip movement in the frontal plane and horizontal plane, and anterior-posterior GRFs between males and females were associated with the different incidence of running-related injuries, such as patellofemoral joint injuries, anterior cruciate ligament injury and iliotibial band syndrome, etc. These changes can give some concrete details to explore the different incidence rates of lower limb sports injuries between genders.


gender difference; biomechanics; lower limbs; long-distance running

Cite and Share

Hairong Chen,Yang Song,Qian Liu,Feng Ren,István Bíró,Yaodong Gu. Gender Effects on Lower Limb Biomechanics of Novice Runners before and after a 5 km Run. Journal of Men's Health. 2022. 18(8);1-8.


[1] Fokkema T, Hartgens F, Kluitenberg B, Verhagen E, Backx FJG, van der Worp H, et al. Reasons and predictors of discontinuation of running after a running program for novice runners. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2019; 22: 106–111.

[2] Hespanhol Junior LC, Pillay JD, van Mechelen W, Verhagen E. Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Habitual Running on Indices of Health in Physically Inactive Adults. Sports Medicine. 2015; 45: 1455–1468.

[3] Almonroeder TG, Benson LC. Sex differences in lower extrem-ity kinematics and patellofemoral kinetics during running. Jour-nal of Sports Sciences. 2017; 35: 1575–1581.

[4] Taunton JE, Ryan MB, Clement DB, McKenzie DC, Lloyd-Smith DR, Zumbo BD. A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2002; 36: 95–101.

[5] Boling M, Padua D, Marshall S, Guskiewicz K, Pyne S, Beutler A. Gender differences in the incidence and preva-lence of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2010; 20: 725–730.

[6] Macintyre JG, Taunton JE, Clement DB, Lloyd-Smith DR, McKenzie DC, Morrell RW. Running Injuries. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. 1991; 1: 81–87.

[7] Golden GM, Pavol MJ, Hoffman MA. Sex differences in kine-matics and kinetics of the knee and hip during running and rapid change-of-direction tasks. Investigation of the Biomechan-ics of Running and Rapid Change-of-Direction Tasks Abstract approved. 2007; 1: 6.

[8] Imwalle LE, Myer GD, Ford KR, Hewett TE. Relationship be-tween Hip and Knee Kinematics in Athletic Women during Cut-ting Maneuvers: a Possible Link to Noncontact Anterior Cru-ciate Ligament Injury and Prevention. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2009; 23: 2223–2230.

[9] Ferber R, McClay Davis I, Williams III DS. Gender differences in lower extremity mechanics during running. Clinical Biome-chanics. 2003; 18: 350–357.

[10] Nohren B, Davis I, Hamill J. Prospective study of the biome-chanical factors associated with iliotibial band syndrome. Clin-ical Biomechanics. 2007; 22: 951–956.

[11] Hurd WJ, Chmielewski TL, Axe MJ, Davis I, Snyder-Mackler L. Differences in normal and perturbed walking kinematics be-tween male and female athletes. Clinical Biomechanics. 2004; 19: 465–472.

[12] Quan W, Wang M, Liu G, Fekete G, Baker JS, Ren F, et al. Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5 km Treadmill Running. Journal of Visualized Experiments: Jove. 2020; 161: 1–10.

[13] Jiang X, Yang X, Zhou H, Baker JS, Gu Y. Prolonged run-ning using bionic footwear influences lower limb biomechanics. Healthcare. 2021; 9: 236.

[14] Clark KP, Ryan LJ, Weyand PG. A general relationship links gait mechanics and running ground reaction forces. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2017; 220: 247–258.

[15] Kim HK, Mirjalili SA, Fernandez J. Gait kinetics, kinematics, spatiotemporal and foot plantar pressure alteration in response to long-distance running: Systematic review. Human Movement Science. 2018; 57: 342–356.

[16] Sinclair J, Greenhalgh A, Edmundson CJ, Brooks D, Hobbs SJ. Gender differences in the kinetics and kinematics of distance running: implications for footwear design. International Journal of Sports Science and Engineering. 2012; 6: 118–128.

[17] Willson JD, Loss JR, Willy RW, Meardon SA. Sex differences in running mechanics and patellofemoral joint kinetics following an exhaustive run. Journal of Biomechanics. 2015; 48: 4155–4159.

[18] Park SK, Koo S, Yoon SH, Park S, Kim Y, Ryu JS. Gender df-ferences in ground reaction force components. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics. 2018; 28: 101–108.

[19] Bredeweg SW, Zijlstra S, Bessem B, Buist I. The effectiveness of a preconditioning programme on preventing running-related injuries in novice runners: a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2012; 46: 865–870.

[20] Buist I, Bredeweg SW, van Mechelen W, Lemmink KAPM, Pepping G, Diercks RL. No effect of a graded training program on the number of running-related injuries in novice runners: a randomized controlled trial. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2008; 36: 33–39.

[21] Xu D, Zhou H, Baker JS, István B, Gu Y. An investigation of differences in lower extremity biomechanics during single-leg landing from height using bionic shoes and normal shoes. Fron-tiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2021; 9: 679123.

[22] Kim HK, Mirjalili SA, Zhang Y, Xiang L, Gu Y, Fernandez J. Effect of gender and running experience on lower limb biome-chanics following 5 km barefoot running. Sports Biomechanics. 2021; 1: 1–14.

[23] Isherwood J, Wang H, Sterzing T. Running biomechanics and running shoe perception of Chinese men and women. Footwear Science. 2021; 13: 55–67.

[24] Xu D, Cen X, Wang M, Rong M, István B, Baker JS, et al. Temporal kinematic differences between forward and backward jump-landing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 6669.

[25] Collins TD, Ghoussayni SN, Ewins DJ, Kent JA. A six degrees-of-freedom marker set for gait analysis: Repeatability and com-parison with a modified Helen Hayes set. Gait & Posture. 2009; 30: 173–180.

[26] Nüesch C, Roos E, Egloff C, Pagenstert G, Mündermann A. The effect of different running shoes on treadmill running mechanics and muscle activity assessed using statistical parametric map-ping (SPM). Gait & Posture. 2019; 69: 1–7.

[27] Bischof JE, Abbey AN, Chuckpaiwong B, Nunley JA, Queen RM. Three-dimensional ankle kinematics and kinetics during running in women. Gait & Posture. 2010; 31: 502–505.

[28] Lin CY, Casey E, Herman DC, Katz N, Tenforde AS. Sex Differ-ences in Common Sports Injuries. PM and R. 2018; 10: 1073–1082.

[29] SELF BP, PAINE D. Ankle biomechanics during four landing techniques. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2001; 33: 1338–1344.

[30] Kellis E, Zafeiridis A, Amiridis IG. Muscle Coactivation before and after the Impact Phase of Running Following Isokinetic Fa-tigue. Journal of Athletic Training. 2011; 46: 11–19.

[31] Sallis RE, Jones K, Sunshine S, Smith G, Simon L. Compar-ing Sports Injuries in Men and Women. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2001; 22: 420–423.

[32] Bazuelo-Ruiz B, Durá-Gil JV, Palomares N, Medina E, Llana-Belloch S. Effect of fatigue and gender on kinematics and ground reaction forces variables in recreational runners. PeerJ. 2018; 6: e4489.

[33] Xu D, Jiang X, Cen X, Baker JS, Gu Y. Single-leg landings fol-lowing a volleyball spike may increase the risk of anterior cru-ciate ligament injury more than landing on both-legs. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11: 130.

[34] Slater LV, Simpson AS, Blemker SS, Hertel J, Saliba SA, Welt-man AL, et al. Biomechanical adaptations during running differ based on type of exercise and fitness level. Gait & Posture. 2018; 60: 35–40.

[35] Hughes G. A Review of Recent Perspectives on Biomechanical Risk Factors Associated with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury. Research in Sports Medicine. 2014; 22: 193–212.

[36] Powers CM. The Influence of Abnormal Hip Mechanics on Knee Injury: a Biomechanical Perspective. Journal of Or-thopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2010; 40: 42–51.

[37] Powers CM. The Influence of Altered Lower-Extremity Kine-matics on Patellofemoral Joint Dysfunction: a Theoretical Per-spective. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2003; 33: 639–646.

[38] Rodrigues P, TenBroek T, Hamill J. Runners with Anterior Knee Pain Use a Greater Percentage of their Available Prona-tion Range of Motion. Journal of Applied Biomechanics. 2013; 29: 141–146.

[39] He Y, Fekete G. The Effect of Cryotherapy on Balance Recovery at Different Moments after Lower Extremity Muscle Fatigue. Physical Activity and Health. 2021; 5: 255-270.

[40] Moore IS. Is there an Economical Running Technique? A Re-view of Modifiable Biomechanical Factors Affecting Running Economy. Sports Medicine. 2016; 46: 793–807.

[41] Hanzlick H, Hyunglae Lee. Gender difference of ankle stability in the sagittal and frontal planes. Annual International Confer-ence of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). 2017; 2017: 1621–1624.

[42] Lilley K, Dixon S, Stiles V. A biomechanical comparison of the running gait of mature and young females. Gait & Posture. 2011; 33: 496–500.

[43] Dempster J, Dutheil F, Ugbolue UC. The prevalence of lower extremity injuries in running and associated risk factors: a sys-tematic review. Physical Activity and Health, 2021; 5: 133-145.

[44] Xiang L, Mei Q, Wang A, Shim V, Fernandez J, Gu Y. Eval-uating function in the hallux valgus foot following a 12-week minimalist footwear intervention: A pilot computational analy-sis. Journal of Biomechanics. 2022; 132: 110941.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.7 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (

Submission Turnaround Time