Article Data

  • Views 776
  • Dowloads 150

Original Research

Open Access

An Analysis of Difference in Preventive Health Behaviors for COVID-19 by Personality Characteristics in College Athletes

  • Yeon Kim1
  • YoungJae Kim2
  • JeongHyung Cho2,*,

1Department of Sports, Kyungil University, 38428 Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea

2Department of Physical Education, Chung-Ang University, 06974 Seoul, Republic of Korea

DOI: 10.31083/j.jomh1811210 Vol.18,Issue 11,November 2022 pp.1-7

Published: 30 November 2022

*Corresponding Author(s): JeongHyung Cho E-mail:


Background: Due to the uniqueness of COVID-19 compared with other infectious diseases, the need for various countermeasures against it should be emphasized, and considering that most athletes are not allowed to wear masks during competitions, stricter preventive health behaviors for COVID-19 are required among these individuals. Therefore, in an attempt to yield data that may be used to increase the engagement in preventive health behaviors for COVID-19 among college athletes, this study investigated the differences in preventive health behaviors for COVID-19 according to personality types. Material and Methods: Based on the Big Five personality theory, the relationship between preventive health behaviors for COVID-19 and personality characteristics was tested. Data were collected from 65 participants (male: n = 53, female: n = 12) through a questionnaire survey. Results: The results showed no differences in preventive health behaviors according to demographic characteristics such as sex, grade, sports type, and career. The highest score for a personality type was for conscientiousness, and those with a higher level of conscientiousness, extraversion, neuroticism, and openness reported higher scores for preventive health behavior for COVID-19. Interestingly, those with low openness also reported higher scores for preventive health behaviors for COVID-19. Conclusions: These results are expected to be used as important information to restrict the spread of COVID-19 and promote preventive health behaviors among college athletes.


COVID-19; prevention; sports; athlete; conscientiousness

Cite and Share

Yeon Kim,YoungJae Kim,JeongHyung Cho. An Analysis of Difference in Preventive Health Behaviors for COVID-19 by Personality Characteristics in College Athletes. Journal of Men's Health. 2022. 18(11);1-7.


[1] Dos Santos LM. Psychological stress, job satisfaction, and ca-reer decisions of taxi drivers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a study of male senior taxi drivers. Journal of Men’s Health. 2021; 8: 81.

[2] Kim YJ, Kim ES. Depression among Korean men during COVID-19: social media and physical activity. Journal of Men’s Health. 2022; 18: 68.

[3] Kim NS. Current status & challenge of COVID-19. Health Wel-fare Issue & Focus. 2020; 373: 1–13.

[4] Park S, Oh S. Factors associated with preventive behaviors for COVID-19 among adolescents in South Korea. Journal of Pedi-atric Nursing. 2022; 62: e69–e76.

[5] Kim YJ, Cho JH. Correlation between preventive health behav-iors and psycho-social health based on the leisure activities of South Koreans in the COVID-19 crisis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 4066.

[6] Adegboye OA, Adekunle AI, Gayawan E. Early transmission dynamics of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) in Nigeria. Inter-national Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 3054.

[7] Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea. Current status of COVID-19 outbreak in Korea. 2022. Available at: http://www. (Accessed: 26 June 2022).

[8] Roan D. COVID-19: temporary decision of suspending English Premier League. BBC NEWS Korea. 2020. Available at: https: // (Accessed: 14 March 2020).

[9] Pyo KH. A great player is good at physical management with-out injury. MK Sports. 2013. Available at: kr/news/sports/view/2013/09/795487/ (Accessed: 2 September 2013).

[10] Kim YJ, Cho JH, Kim Y. Influence of Korean professional male basketball players’ characteristics on preventive health behav-iors during COVID-19. Journal of Men’s Health. 2021; 17: 190–197.

[11] Freudenberger HJ. Staff burn‐out. Journal of Social Issues. 1974; 30: 159–165.

[12] Kim HJ. Essential advice for people who are struggling and depressed because they are “too sensitive”. BBCNEW KO-REA. 2020. Available at: s-54459516 (Accessed: 8 October 2020).

[13] Credé M, Niehorster S. Adjustment to college as measured by the student adaptation to college questionnaire: a quantitative re-view of its structure and relationships with correlates and conse-quences. Educational Psychology Review. 2012; 24: 133–165.

[14] Vazsonyi AT, Ksinan A, Mikuška J, Jiskrova G. The Big Five and adolescent adjustment: an empirical test across six cultures. Personality and Individual Differences. 2015; 83: 234–244.

[15] Centers for Disease Control. Addressing emerging infectious disease threats: a prevention strategy for the United States. Rec-ommendations and reports: Morbidity and mortality weekly re-port. Recommendations and Reports. 1994; 43: 1–18.

[16] Turiano NA, Mroczek DK, Moynihan J, Chapman BP. Big 5 personality traits and interleukin-6: evidence for “healthy Neu-roticism” in a US population sample. Brain, Behavior, and Im-munity. 2013; 28: 83–89.

[17] Kwon EJ. The study of relation of Big 5 Personality and col-lege adaptation according to sex. Learner-Centered Curriculum Education Research. 2020; 20: 1147–1167.

[18] Schmitt DP, Realo A, Voracek M, Allik J. Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology. 2008; 94: 168–182.

[19] Peltier GL, Laden R, Matranga M. Do high school athletes suc-ceed in college: a review of research. The High School Journal. 1999; 82: 234–238.

[20] Erdoğdu M, Yüksel MF, Işık B, Boyalı E, Erdağı K, Sevindi T. The effects of acute moderate intensity training on hematologi-cal parameters in elite para-badminton athletes. Journal of Men’s Health. 2022; 18: 35.

[21] Karaduman E, Bostancı Ö, Bayram L. Respiratory muscle strength and pulmonary functions in athletes: differences by BMI classifications. Journal of Men’s Health. 2022; 18: 54.

[22] Kim SW, Jang KR. The effects of mentoring on organizational socialization for intercollegiate athletes. Korean Society for the Sociology of Sport. 2005; 18: 87–101.

[23] Jang S, Eom HJ, Lee KD, Choi WM, Choi YL, Kang HW, et al. Validation of a questionnaire that surveys confidence in sports among Korean competitive athletes. Journal of Men’s Health. 2018; 14(2): e30–e41.

[24] O’Sullivan DM, Zuckerman M, Kraft M. Personality character-istics of male and female participants in team sports. Personality and Individual Differences. 1998; 25: 119–128.

[25] Kim KH, Kim EY, Kim JP, Choi CY. A study athletes’ nature and characteristics based on their sports activities. Journal of the Korean Physical Education Association for Girls and Women. 1999; 13: 259–275.

[26] Kim BG, Kong S, Lim SK. The relationship between range of motion and muscle strength of the shoulder joint in professional baseball pitchers. Journal of Men’s Health. 2021; 17: 160–166.

[27] Choi DH, Oh SM. A study on the relationship between the per-sonality traits, grit and sport coping of injury experienced stu-dent athletes. The Korea Journal of Sport. 2022; 20: 695–713.

[28] Panel E. Team Physician Consensus Statement. Medicine & Sci-ence in Sports & Exercise. 2006; 500: 2031.

[29] Ortenburger D, Wąsik J, Pavlova I, Mosler D. Anxiety level in context of chosen pro-health attitudes of male students during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Men’s Health. 2021; 17: 109–116.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.7 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (

Submission Turnaround Time