The gender paradox: do men differ from women in suicidal behavior?
1Department of Military Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190401 Jerusalem, Israel
DOI: 10.31083/jomh.2021.099 Vol.17,Issue 4,September 2021 pp.22-29
Submitted: 05 June 2021 Accepted: 09 August 2021
Published: 30 September 2021
Is men's suicidal behavior different from that of women's? Much research has been devoted to this question since the late 1980s. Scientific literature refers to it as the "Gender Paradox". This term was coined due to the seemingly self-contradictory findings regarding the differences in suicidal behavior between males and females, whereby women attempt suicide more often but more men die by suicide. If there are indeed differences between the sexes, then it is essential to modify the various suicide prevention programs accordingly. This study aimed to investigate whether those differences are real and inherent to the sexes. It attempted to gain a better understanding of the sources of those differences and the reasons behind them by reviewing the available literature on differences between males and females regarding, suicide and suicidal behaviors. The study found that the differences between the sexes regarding suicidal behavior are indeed inherent. Whether these differences associate more with inheritance or genetics is unclear, as is whether they relate to the sex differences or to gender identity. Clearly though, for effective suicide prevention the differences between male and female suicidal behaviors have to be acknowledged, studied separately and prevention and intervention programs have to take these differences into account.
Suicide; Gender; Sex; Male; Female
Leah Shelef. The gender paradox: do men differ from women in suicidal behavior?. Journal of Men's Health. 2021. 17(4);22-29.
 Kim YJ, Burlaka V. Gender differences in suicidal behaviors: media-tion role of psychological distress between alcohol abuse/dependence and suicidal behaviors. Archives of Suicide Research. 2018; 22: 405–419.
 Langhinrichsen-Rohling J, Klibert J, Williams M. Gender considera-tions in college students’ suicidal behavior. In D. A. Lamis & D. Lester (eds.) Understanding and preventing college student suicide (pp. 47–64). Springfield: Charles C Thomas Publisher. 2011.
 McIntosh JI. Epidemiology of Adolescent Suicide in the United States. In R.W, Maris, S.S., Canetto, J.L., McIntosh, M.M., Silverman (eds). Review of Suicidology (pp. 3–33). New York: Gulford Press. 2000.
 Tsirigotis K, Gruszczynski W, Tsirigotis M. Gender differentiation in methods of suicide attempts. Medical Science Monitor. 2011; 17: PH65–PH70.
 Oquendo MA, Bongiovi-Garcia ME, Galfalvy H, Goldberg PH, Grunebaum MF, Burke AK, et al. Sax Differences in Clinical Predictors of Suicidal Acts After Major Depression: A Prospective Study. American Journal Psychiatry. 2007; 64: 134–141.
 Joseph HB, Reznik I, Mester R. Suicidal behavior of adolescent girls: profile and meaning. Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences. 2003; 40: 209–219.
 Hawton K. Sex and Suicide, Gender Differences in Suicidal Behavior. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2000; 177: 484–485.
 Hawton K, van Heeringen K. Background and epidemiology. Lancet, 2009; 373: 1372–1381.
 World Health Organization. Preventing Suicide: A Global Imperative. 2014. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/131056/97892?sequence=1 (Accessed: 10 September 2019).
 Dückers MLA, Reifels L, De Beurs DP, Brewin CR. The vulnerability paradox in global mental health and its applicability to suicide. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2019; 215: 588–593.
 De Leo D, Kõlves K. Suicide at very Advanced Age - the Extremes of the Gender Paradox. Crisis. 2017; 38: 363–366.
 Shah A, Zarate-Escudero S, Bhat R, De Leo D, Erlangsen A. Suicide in centenarians: the international landscape. International Psychogeriatrics. 2014; 26: 1703–1708.
 Wanderlich U, Bronisch T, Wittchen HU, Carter R. Gender differ-ences. In Adolescents and young adults with suicidal behavior. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2001; 104: 332–339.
 Canetto SS, Sakinofsky I. The gender paradox in suicide. Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior. 1998; 28: 1–23.
 Chang Q, Yip PSF, Chen Y. Gender inequality and suicide gender ratios in the world. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2019; 243: 297–304.
 Beautrais AL. Suicides and serious suicide attempts in youth: A multiple-group Comparison study. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2003; 160: 1093–1099.
 Boeninger DK, Masyn KE, Feldman BJ, Conger RD. Sex Differ-ences in Developmental Trends of Suicide Ideation, Plans, and Attempts among European American Adolescents. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 2010; 40: 451–464.
 Denning DG, Conwell Y, King D, Cox C. Method choice, Intent, and gender in completed suicide. Suicide and Life‐Threatening Behavior, 2000; 30: 282–288.
 Qin P, Agerbo E, Bo Mortensen P. Suicide Risk in Relation to Socioeconomic, Demographic, Psychiatric, and Familial Factors: A National Register-Based study of all suicide in Denmark, 1981-1997. American Journal Psychiatry. 2003; 160: 765–772.
 Schrijvers DL, Bollen J, Sabbe BGC. The gender paradox in suicidal behavior and its impact on the suicidal process. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2012; 138: 19–26.
 De Leo D, Dello Buono M, Dwyer J. Suicide among the elderly: the long-term impact of a telephone support and assessment intervention in northern Italy. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2002; 181: 226–229.
 Oyama H, Watanabe N, Ono Y, Sakashita T, Takenoshita Y, Taguchi M, et al. Community-based suicide prevention through group activity for the elderly successfully reduced the high suicide rate for females. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 2005; 59: 337–344.
 Cantor CH. Suicide in the Western World. In: K. Howton & K. Van Heeringen (eds.).The International Handbook of suicide and Attempted Suicide (pp. 9–28). New York: Wiley. 2000.
 Shaffer D, Pfeffer CR. Practice Parameter for the Assessment and Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Suicidal Behavior. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2001; 40: 24S–51S.
 Mergl R, Koburger N, Heinrichs K, Székely A, Tóth MD, Coyne J, et al. What are Reasons for the Large Gender Differences in the Lethality of Suicidal Acts? An Epidemiological Analysis in Four European Countries. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10: e0129062.
 Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, Brent DA, Yershova KV, Oquendo MA, et al. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2011; 168: 1266–1277.
 Shojaei A, Moradi S, Alaeddini F, Khodadoost M, Barzegar A, Khademi A. Association between suicide method, and gender, age, and education level in Iran over 2006-2010. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry. 2014; 6: 18–22.
 Studdert DM, Zhang Y, Swanson SA, Prince L, Rodden JA, Holsinger EE, et al. Handgun Ownership and Suicide in California. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020; 382: 2220–2229.
 Hawton K. Studying survivors of nearly lethal suicide attempts: an important strategy in suicide research. Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior. 2001; 32: 76–84.
 Stack S, Wasserman I. Gender and Suicide Risk: the Role of Wound Site. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 2009; 39: 13–20.
 Haw C, Hawton K, Houston K, Townsend E. Correlates of relative lethality and suicidal intent among deliberate self-harm patients. Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior. 2003; 33: 353–364.
 Nock MK, Kessler RC. Prevalence of and risk factors for suicide attempts versus suicide gestures: analysis of the National Comorbidity Survey. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2006; 115: 616–623.
 Townsend E, Hawton K, Harriss L, Bale E, Bond A. Substances used in deliberate self-poisoning 1985-1997: trends and associations with age, gender, repetition and suicide intent. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2001; 36: 228–234.
 Freeman A, Mergl R, Kohls E, Székely A, Gusmao R, Arensman E, et al. A cross-national study on gender differences in suicide intent. BMC Psychiatry. 2017; 17: 234.
 Jaworski K. Suicide and gender: Reading suicide through Butler’s notion of performativity. Journal of Australian Studies. 2009;76, 137–146.
 Zhang J. Marriage and Suicide among Chinese Rural Young Women. Social Forces. 2010; 89: 311–326.
 Kõlves K, McDonough M, Crompton D, de Leo D. Choice of a suicide method: Trends and characteristics. Psychiatry Research. 2017; 260: 67–74.
 Canetto SS. Gender and suicidal behavior, theories and evidence. In: R.W. Maris, M.M. silverman, S.S. Canetto, (eds) Review of suicidology (pp.138–167). New York: Guilford. 1997.
 Arsenault-Lapierre G, Kim C, Turecki G. Psychiatric diagnoses in 3275 suicides: a meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2004; 4: 37.
 World Health Organization. Depression and other common mental disorders. Global health estimates (No. WHO/MSD/MER/2017.2). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. 2017.
 Callanan VJ, Davis MS. Gender differences in suicide methods. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2012; 47: 857–869.
 Gold LH. Suicide and gender. In R. I. Simon & R. E. Hales (eds.) The American Psychiatric Publishing textbook of suicide assessment and management (pp. 77–106). Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. 2006.
 Canetto SS. Gender issues in the treatment of suicidal individuals. Death Studies. 1994; 18: 513–527.
 Chen Y, Chen M, Lui CSM, Yip PSF. Female labour force participation and suicide rates in the world. Social Science & Medicine. 2017; 195: 61–67.
 Canetto SS. Suicidal Behaviors among Muslim Women. Crisis. 2015; 36: 447–458.
 McKay K, Milner A, Maple M. Women and suicide: beyond the gender paradox. International Journal of Culture and Mental Health. 2014; 7: 168–178.
 Lester D. Why people kill themselves: A 2000 summary of research on suicide (pp. 314–315). Springfield: Charles C Thomas Publisher. 2000.
 Selwyn CN, Langhinrichsen-Rohling J. Male gender roles, masculin-ity, and suicide: A lethal combination. In D. A. Lamis & N. J. Kaslow (eds.) Psychology of emotions, motivations and actions. Advancing the science of suicidal behavior: Understanding and intervention (pp. 237–251). New York: Nova Science Publishers. 2015.
 Joiner TE. Why people die by suicide. Boston: Cambridge, Mas-sachusetts and London England. 2005.
 Mościcki EK. Gender differences in completed and attempted suicides. Annals of Epidemiology. 1994; 4: 152–158.
 Rasmussen ML, Haavind H, Dieserud G. Young Men, Masculinities, and Suicide. Archives of Suicide Research. 2018; 22: 327–343.
 Sudak H, Maxim K, Carpenter M. Suicide and stigma: a review of the literature and personal reflections. Academic Psychiatry. 2008; 32: 136–142.
 Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Christensen H. Correlates of suicide stigma and suicide literacy in the community. Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior. 2013; 43: 406–417.
 Calear AL, Batterham PJ, Christensen H. Predictors of help-seeking for suicidal ideation in the community: risks and opportunities for public suicide prevention campaigns. Psychiatry Research. 2014; 219: 525–530.
 Zalsman G, Hawton K, Wasserman D, van Heeringen K, Arensman E, Sarchiapone M, et al. Suicide prevention strategies revisited: 10-year systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016; 3: 646–659.
 Moore F, Taylor S, Beaumont J, Gibson R, Starkey C. The gender suicide paradox under gender role reversal during industrialisation. PLoS ONE. 2018; 13: e0202487.
 Webster Rudmin F, Ferrada-Noli M, Skolbekken J. Questions of culture, age and gender in the epidemiology of suicide. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2003; 44: 373–381.
 Silverman MM, Berman AL, Sanddal ND, O’carroll PW, Joiner TE. Rebuilding the Tower of Babel: A Revised Nomenclature for the Study of Suicide and Suicdal Behavior Part 1: Back ground, Rationale, and Methodology. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 2007; 37: 248–263.
 Silverman MM, Berman AL, Sanddal ND, O’carroll PW, Joiner TE. Rebuilding the Tower of Babel: A Revised Nomenclature for the Study of Suicide and Suicdal Behavior Part 2: Suicide-Related Ideations, Communications, and Behaviors. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 2007; 37: 264–277.
 Wasserman D. (Ed.) Suicide: an unnecessary death. London: Oxford University Press. 2016.
 Deisenhammer EA, Ing C, Strauss R, Kemmler G, Hinterhuber H, Weiss EM. The Duration of the Suicidal Process: how much time is left for intervention between consideration and accomplishment of a suicide attempt? Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2008; 70: 19–24.
 Kaplan AG, Klein RB. Women and suicide. In D.H. Jacobs & H.N. Brown (eds.) Suicide: Understanding and responding (pp. 257–282). Madison, Conn: International Universities Press. 1989.
 Joiner TE, Pettit JW, Walker RL, Voelz ZR, Cruz J, Rudd MD, et al. Perceived Burdensomeness and Suicidality: Two Studies on the Suicide Notes of those Attempting and those Completing Suicide. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 2002; 21: 531–545.
 Donker T, Batterham PJ, Van Orden KA, Christensen H. Gender-differences in risk factors for suicidal behaviour identified by perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness and acquired capability: cross-sectional analysis from a longitudinal cohort study. BMC Psychology. 2014; 2: 20.
 Klonsky ED, May A. Rethinking Impulsivity in Suicide. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 2010; 40: 612–619.
 Maser JD, Akiskal HS, Schettler P, Scheftner W, Mueller T, Endicott J, et al. Can Temperament Identify Affectively Ill Patients who Engage in Lethal or near-Lethal Suicidal Behavior? A 14-Year Prospective Study. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 2002; 32: 10–32.
 Dumais A, Lesage AD, Alda M, Rouleau G, Dumont M, Chawky N, et al. Risk Factors for Suicide Completion in Major Depression: a Case-Control Study of Impulsive and Aggressive Behaviors in Men. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2005; 162: 2116–2124.
 Conner KR, Cox C, Duberstein PR, Tian L, Nisbet PA, Conwell Y. Violence, Alcohol, and Completed Suicide: a Case-Control Study. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2001; 158: 1701–1705.
 Chapple CL, Johnson KA. Gender Differences in Impulsivity. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice. 2007; 5: 221–234.
 Chen P, Coccaro EF, Jacobson KC. Hostile attributional bias, negative emotional responding, and aggression in adults: moderating effects of gender and impulsivity. Aggressive Behavior. 2012; 38: 47–63.
 Verona E, Curtin JJ. Gender differences in the negative affective priming of aggressive behavior. Emotion. 2006; 6: 115-24.
 Knight GP, Guthrie IK, Page MC, Fabes RA. Emotional arousal and gender differences in aggression: a meta-analysis. Aggressive Behavior. 2002; 28: 366–393.
 Glenn CR, Kleiman EM, Kellerman J, Pollak O, Cha CB, Esposito EC, et al. Annual Research Review: A metanalytic review of worldwide suicide rates in adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2020; 61: 294–308.
 Fleischmann A, De Leo D. The World Health Organization’s Report on Suicide: a fundamental step in worldwide suicide prevention. Crisis. 2014; 35: 289–291.
 McLoughlin AB, Gould MS, Malone KM. Global trends in teenage suicide: 2003-2014. Monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians. 2016; 108: 765–780.
 Phillips MR, Li X, Zhang Y. Suicide rates in China, 1995-99. Lancet. 2002; 359: 835–840.
 Lewinsohn PM, Rohde P, Seeley JR, Baldwin CL. Gender differences in suicide attempts from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2001; 40: 427–434.
 Xie B, Fan B, Wang W, Li W, Lu C, Guo L. Sex differences in the associations of nonmedical use of prescription drugs with self-injurious thoughts and behaviors among adolescents: a large-scale study in China. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2021; 285: 29–36.
 Abrutyn S, Mueller AS. Are Suicidal Behaviors Contagious in Adolescence? Using Longitudinal Data to Examine Suicide Suggestion. American Sociological Review. 2014; 79: 211–227.
 Foto-Özdemir D, Akdemir D, Çuhadaroğlu-Çetin F. Gender differ-ences in defense mechanisms, ways of coping with stress and sense of identity in adolescent suicide attempts. the Turkish Journal of Pediatrics. 2017; 58: 271–281.
 Hankin BL, Wetter E, Cheely C. Sex differences in child and adolescent depression: A developmental psychopathological approach. In J. R. Z. Abela & B. L. Hankin (eds.) Handbook of depression in children and adolescents (pp. 377–414). New York. The Guilford Press. 2008.
 Turecki G, Brent DA. Suicide and suicidal behaviour. the Lancet. 2016; 387: 1227–1239.
 Mallon S, Galway K, Hughes L, Rondón‐Sulbarán J, Leavey G. An exploration of integrated data on the social dynamics of suicide among women. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2016; 38: 662–675.
Science Citation Index Expanded Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Social Sciences Citation Index Social Sciences Citation Index contains over 3,400 journals across 58 social sciences disciplines, as well as selected items from 3,500 of the world’s leading scientific and technical journals. More than 9.37 million records and 122 million cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in the social and behavioral sciences.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
SCOPUS Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
DOAJ DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals.
CrossRef Crossref makes research outputs easy to find, cite, link, assess, and reuse. Crossref committed to open scholarly infrastructure and collaboration, this is now announcing a very deliberate path.
Portico Portico is a community-supported preservation archive that safeguards access to e-journals, e-books, and digital collections. Our unique, trusted process ensures that the content we preserve will remain accessible and usable for researchers, scholars, and students in the future.