Article Data

  • Views 404
  • Dowloads 170

Case Report

Open Access

Laparoscopic isolated caudate lobectomy of two symptomatic familiar giant liver hemangiomas, case reports and literature review

  • Alessandro Anselmo1
  • Daniele Sforza2
  • Marco Pellicciaro3
  • Carlo Gazia3
  • Angelo Gabriele Epifani4
  • Leandro Siragusa3
  • Laura Tariciotti1
  • Alessandro Parente3
  • Giuseppe Tisone3

1HBP and Transplant Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy

2Department of Emergency, Policlinico Tor Vergata Hospital, 00133 Rome, Italy

3Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy

4Department of Surgery, University of Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy

DOI: 10.31083/jomh.2021.109 Vol.17,Issue 4,September 2021 pp.310-315

Submitted: 16 April 2021 Accepted: 17 May 2021

Published: 30 September 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): Alessandro Anselmo E-mail: alessandroanselmo.ptv@hotmail.com

PDF (1.66 MB)

Abstract

Background and objective: Liver hemangioma (LH) is the most common benign tumour of the liver, but its origin is still not clear and not much is known about a possible familiarity. Caudate lobectomy is the most effective surgical treatment for benign tumors arisen in segment I. The occurrence of giant LH within the same liver segments in different members of the same family has never been described in literature. Herein we report the first two consecutive laparoscopic caudate lobectomy for familiar giant LH in a father and his daughter.

Methods: The father showed a lesion in the caudate lobe (CL) suggestive of LH steadily grown, asymptomatic for 24 years until it has caused abdominal discomfort and pain (Dmax 89 mm). The daughter showed multiple hepatic hemangiomas with the biggest one located in the CL compressing the inferior vena cava (Dmax 88 mm).

Results: Despite the size of the masses, we opted for a pure laparoscopic approach and a caudate lobectomy was performed in both cases. Operation time was 140 and 180 min. Patients had an uneventful recovery and a good outcome after the scheduled follow up exams 6 months after the procedure.

Conclusions: A chance of familiarity transmission for hemangiomas exists and therefore should be further investigated. Laparoscopic isolated caudate lobectomy for symptomatic GLH is feasible and safely performed on selected patients by experienced hepatobiliary surgeons. Prospective randomized studies on larger populations are needed to assess if this minimally invasive approach can be proposed as a standard of care for S-I LH.

Keywords

Familial liver hemangioma; Laparoscopic liver surgery; Caudate lobe

Cite and Share

Alessandro Anselmo,Daniele Sforza,Marco Pellicciaro,Carlo Gazia,Angelo Gabriele Epifani,Leandro Siragusa,Laura Tariciotti,Alessandro Parente,Giuseppe Tisone. Laparoscopic isolated caudate lobectomy of two symptomatic familiar giant liver hemangiomas, case reports and literature review. Journal of Men's Health. 2021. 17(4);310-315.

References

[1] Choi BY, Nguyen MH. The diagnosis and management of benign hepatic tumors. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 2005; 39: 401–412.

[2] Díez Redondo P, Velicia Llames R, Caro-Patón A. Familial hepatic hemangiomas. Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2004; 27: 314–316.

[3] Admiraal GC, Van Schie A, Van Meyel JJM, Vasmel WLE. Giant liver hemangioma in three sisters. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2004; 19: 344–345.

[4] Haase VH, Glickman JN, Socolovsky M, Jaenisch R. Vascular tumors in livers with targeted inactivation of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001; 98: 1583–1588.

[5] Moser C, Hany A, Spiegel R. Familial giant hemangiomas of the liver. Study of a family and review of the literature. Praxis. 1998; 87: 461–468.

[6] Gourgiotis S, Moustafellos P, Zavos A, Dimopoulos N, Vericouki C, Hadjiyannakis EI. Surgical treatment of hepatic haemangiomas: a 15-year experience. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2006; 76: 792–795.

[7] Zhang W, Huang ZY, Ke CS, Wu C, Zhang ZW, Zhang BX, et al. Surgical Treatment of Giant Liver Hemangioma Larger than 10 cm: a Single Center’s Experience with 86 Patients. Medicine. 2015; 94: e1420.

[8] Yoon SS, Charny CK, Fong Y, Jarnagin WR, Schwartz LH, Blumgart LH, et al. Diagnosis, management, and outcomes of 115 patients with hepatic hemangioma. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2003; 197: 392–402.

[9] Ribeiro MA, Papaiordanou F, Gonçalves JM, Chaib E. Spontaneous rupture of hepatic hemangiomas: a review of the literature. World Journal of Hepatology. 2010; 2: 428–433.

[10] Kim IS, Kwon CHD. Feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for giant hemangioma of greater than 6 cm in diameter. Korean Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. 2014; 18: 118–121.

[11] Hoekstra LT, Bieze M, Erdogan D, Roelofs JJTH, Beuers UHW, van Gulik TM. Management of giant liver hemangiomas: an update. Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2013; 7: 263–268.

[12] Gunel M, Laurans MSH, Shin D, DiLuna ML, Voorhees J, Choate K, et al. KRIT1, a gene mutated in cerebral cavernous malformation, encodes a microtubule-associated protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2002; 99: 10677–10682.

[13] Folkman J, D’Amore PA. Blood vessel formation: what is its molecular basis? Cell. 1996; 87: 1153–1155.

[14] Vikkula M, Boon LM, Carraway KL, Calvert JT, Diamonti AJ, Goumnerov B, et al. Vascular dysmorphogenesis caused by an activating mutation in the receptor tyrosine kinase TIE2. Cell. 1996; 87: 1181–1190.

[15] Lanthaler M, Freund M, Nehoda H. Laparoscopic resection of a giant liver hemangioma. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2005; 15: 624–626.

[16] Reddy KR, Kligerman S, Levi J, Livingstone A, Molina E, Franceschi D, et al. Benign and solid tumors of the liver: relationship to sex, age, size of tumors, and outcome. American Surgeon. 2001; 67: 173–178.

[17] Buell JF, Thomas MT, Rudich S, Marvin M, Nagubandi R, Ravindra KV, et al. Experience with more than 500 minimally invasive hepatic procedures. Annals of Surgery. 2008; 248: 475–486.

[18] Yamagata M, Kanematsu T, Matsumata T, Utsunomiya T, Ikeda Y, Sugimachi K. Management of haemangioma of the liver: comparison of results between surgery and observation. British Journal of Surgery. 1991; 78: 1223–1225.

[19] Mauriello A, Rovella V, Borri F, Anemona L, Giannini E, Giacobbi E, et al. Hypertension in kidney transplantation is associated with an early renal nerve sprouting. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation. 2017; 32: 1053–1060.

[20] Mauriello A, Rovella V, Anemona L, Servadei F, Giannini E, Bove P, et al. Increased Sympathetic Renal Innervation in Hemodialysis Patients is the Anatomical Substrate of Sympathetic Hyperactivity in End-Stage Renal Disease. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2015; 4: e002426.

[21] Kuo PC, Lewis WD, Jenkins RL. Treatment of giant hemangiomas of the liver by enucleation. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 1994; 178: 49–53.

[22] Borgonovo G, Razzetta F, Arezzo A, Torre G, Mattioli F. Giant hemangiomas of the liver: surgical treatment by liver resection. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 1997; 44: 231–234.

[23] Gagner M, Rheault M, Dubuc J. Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver tumor. Surgical Endoscopy. 1992; 6: 99.

[24] Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, et al. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Annals of Surgery. 2009; 250: 825–830.

[25] Angelico R, Guzzo I, Pellicciaro M, Saffioti MC, Grimaldi C, Mourani C, et al. Same Donor Laparoscopic Liver and Kidney Procurement for Sequential Living Donor Liver-Kidney Transplantation in Primary Hyperoxaluria Type I. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2019; 29: 1616–1622.

[26] Arezzo A, Farina V, Foppa C, Gavagna L, Morino M, Pasquali S, et al. EuroSurg: a new European student-driven research network in surgery. Colorectal Disease. 2016; 18: 214–215.

[27] Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Annals of Surgery. 2015; 261: 619–629.

[28] Hasegawa Y, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H, Takahara T, Katagiri H, Umemura A, et al. A novel model for prediction of pure laparoscopic liver resection surgical difficulty. Surgical Endoscopy. 2017; 31: 5356–5363.

[29] Ishizawa T, Gumbs AA, Kokudo N, Gayet B. Laparoscopic segmen-tectomy of the liver: from segment I to VIII. Annals of Surgery. 2012; 256: 959–964.

[30] Gheorghe G, Pantea Stoian A, Gaman MA, Socea B, Neagu TP, Stanescu AMA, et al. The benefits and risks of antioxidant treatment in liver diseases. Revista de Chimie. 2019; 70: 651–655.

[31] Descottes B, Glineur D, Lachachi F, Valleix D, Paineau J, Hamy A, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection of benign liver tumors. Surgical Endoscopy. 2003; 17: 23–30.

[32] Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World Review of Laparoscopic Liver Resection-2,804 Patients. Annals of Surgery. 2009; 250: 831–841.

[33] Filling-Katz MR, Levin SW, Patronas NJ, Katz NN. Terminal trans-verse limb defects associated with familial cavernous angiomatosis. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 1992; 42: 346–351.

[34] Drigo P, Mammi I, Battistella PA, Ricchieri G, Carollo C. Familial cerebral, hepatic, and retinal cavernous angiomas: a new syndrome. Child’S Nervous System. 1994; 10: 205–209.

[35] Toldo I, Drigo P, Mammi I, Marini V, Carollo C. Vertebral and spinal cavernous angiomas associated with familial cerebral cavernous malformation. Surgical Neurology. 2009; 71: 167–171.

[36] Li, Peifeng, Wang Y, Zhang Jinmei, Geng M, Zengshan L. Dubin-Johnson Syndrome with Multiple Liver Cavernous Hemangiomas: Report of a Familial Case. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology. 2013; 6: 2636–2639.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Social Sciences Citation Index Social Sciences Citation Index contains over 3,400 journals across 58 social sciences disciplines, as well as selected items from 3,500 of the world’s leading scientific and technical journals. More than 9.37 million records and 122 million cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in the social and behavioral sciences.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

SCOPUS Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

DOAJ DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals.

CrossRef Crossref makes research outputs easy to find, cite, link, assess, and reuse. Crossref committed to open scholarly infrastructure and collaboration, this is now announcing a very deliberate path.

Portico Portico is a community-supported preservation archive that safeguards access to e-journals, e-books, and digital collections. Our unique, trusted process ensures that the content we preserve will remain accessible and usable for researchers, scholars, and students in the future.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

    Top