Men’s Experiences and Perspectives Regarding Social Support after Weight Loss Surgery

The objective of the study was to explore the experiences and perspectives regarding social support among men who have undergone weight loss surgery. Utilizing phenomenology, the author engaged in qualitative interviews with men to explore the meaning and experiences of social support after surgical intervention for obesity with a focus on support received by entities outside of their family systems. Three major themes emerged in the study which included: (1) Barriers to utilization of social support 2) Feeling alone and isolated, and (3) Feeling connected online. The study includes a discussion of social support for male patients as well as a discussion of research, teaching, and clinical implications.

bariatric surgery, social support, male patients

1. Hensrud DD, Klein S. Extreme obesity: a new medical crisis in the United States. In Mayo Clin Proc 2006;81,S5-S10. 

2. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Fryar C.D, et al. (2015). Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2011–2014. NCHS data brief, no 219. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 

3. Fuchs HF, Broderick RC, Harnsberger CR, et al. Benefits of bariatric surgery do not reach obese men. J Laparoendosc & Adv Surg Tech 2015;25,196-201. 

4. Bradley LE, Sarwer DB, Forman EM, et al. A survey of bariatric surgery patients’ interest in postoperative interventions. Obes Surg 2016;26:332-338.

5. Livhits M, Mercado C, Yermilov I, et al. Is social support associated with greater weight loss after bariatric surgery?: A systematic review. Obes Rev 2011;12,142-148.

6. Spaniolas K, Kasten KR, Celio A, et al. (2016). Postoperative follow-up after bariatric surgery: effect on weight loss. Obes Surg 2016;1-4.

7. Mo PK, Malik SH, Coulson NS. Gender differences in computer-mediated communication: a systematic literature review of online health-related support groups. Patient Education and Counseling 2009;75,16-24. 

8. Lewis S, Thomas SL, Hyde J, et al. A qualitative investigation of obese men’s experiences with their weight. Am J Health Behav 2011;35,458-469. 

9. Sidhu MS, Aiyegbusi OL, Daley A, et al. Older men’s experience of weight loss and weight loss maintenance interventions: Qualitative findings from the Lighten Up Plus Trial. J Obes and Weight Loss 2016;1.

10. Moore D, Cooper C. Life after bariatric surgery: perceptions of male patients and their intimate relationships. J Marital Fam Ther 2016. 

11. Canetti L, Berry EM, Elizur Y. Psychosocial predictors of weight loss and psychological adjustment following bariatric surgery and a weight-loss program: the mediating role of emotional eating. Int J Eat Disord 2009;42:109-117. 

12. Grothe KB, Dubbert PM, O’jile JR. Psychological assessment and management of the weight loss surgery patient. Am J Med Sci 2006;331,201-206. 

13. Mahony D. (2011). Psychological assessments of bariatric surgery patients. Development, reliability, and exploratory factor analysis of the PsyBari. Obes Surg 2011;21,1395-1406. 

14. Kayman S, Bruvold W, Stern, JS. Maintenance and relapse after weight loss in women: behavioral aspects. Am J Clin Nutr 1990;52,800-807. 

15. Orth WS, Madan AK, Taddeucci RJ, et al. Support group meeting attendance is associated with better weight loss. Obes Surg 2008;18,391-394. 

16. Collins CE, Morgan, PJ, Warren, JM, et al. Men participating in a weight-loss intervention are able to implement key dietary messages, but not those relating to vegetables or alcohol: The Self-Help, Exercise and Diet using Internet Technology (SHED-IT) study. Public Health Nutr 2011;14,168-175.

17. Livhits M, Mercado C, Yermilov VI, et al. Behavioral factors associated with successful weight loss after gastric bypass. Am Surg 2010;76,1139-1142.

18. Broadhead WE, Kaplan HB, Sherman AJ, et al. The epidemiologic evidence for a relationship between social support and health. Am J Epidemiol 1983;117:521-537. 

19. Uchino BN, Cacioppo JT, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. The relationship between social support and physiological processes: a review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Psychol Bull 1996;119,488-531.

20. Moran D. Introduction to phenomenology: Robert Sokolowski. J British Society for Phenomenology 2001;32,109-112.

21. Hedt BL, Pagano M. Health indicators: eliminating bias from convenience sampling estimators. Stat Med 2011;30,560-568.

22.  Heckathorn DD. Comment: snowball versus respondent‐driven sampling. Sociological Methodology 2011;41,355-366.

23.  Thomas E, Magilvy JK. Qualitative rigor or research validity in qualitative research. J Specialists in Pediatr Nurs 2011;16,151-155.

24. Toma JD. Approaching rigor in applied qualitative research. The Sage Handbook for Research in Education: Pursuing ideas as the keystone of exemplary inquiry 2011;405-423.

25. Creswell JW, Miller DN. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theor Into Practice 2000;39,124-130. 

26. Richardson L, St. Pierre, EA. (2005). Writing a method of inquiry. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005:959-978.

27. Fischer CT. Bracketing in qualitative research: conceptual and practical matters. Psychother Res 2009;19,583-590.

28. Golafshani N. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qual Rep 2003;8,597-607.

29. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1985.

30. Morak J, Schindler K, Goerzer E, et al. A pilot study of mobile phone-based therapy for obese patients. J Telemed Telecare 2008;14,147-149. 

31. Riva G, Bacchetta M, Baruffi M, et al. Virtual reality-based multidimensional therapy for the treatment of body image disturbances in obesity: a controlled study. CyberPsychol & Behav 2001;4,511-526. 

32. Russell TG. Establishing the efficacy of telemedicine as a clinical tool for psychotherapists: From systems design to a randomized controlled trial (Doctoral thesis, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia) 2004. Retrieved from http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:157964

33. Detweiler, MB, Arif S, Candelario J, et al. A telepsychiatry transition clinic: The first 12 months experience. J Telemed Telecare 2011;17,293-297. 

34. Harvey-Berino J, Pintauro SJ, Gold, EC. The feasibility of using Internet support for the maintenance of weight loss. Behav Modif 2002;26,103-116.

35. Lewis S, Thomas, SL, Blood, RW, et al. ‘I’m searching for solutions’: why are obese individuals turning to the Internet for help and support with ‘being fat?’ Health Expectations: Int J Public Participation in Health Care & Health Policy 2011;14,339-350. 

36. Ellis DA., Janisse H, Naar-King S, et al. The effects of multisystemic therapy on family support for weight loss among obese African-American adolescents: findings from a randomized controlled trial. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2010;31,461-468. 

37. Marcoux BC, Trenkner LL, Rosenstock IM. Social networks and social support in weight loss. Patient Educ and Counseling 1990;15,229-238. 

38. Verheijden M, Bakx J, van Weel C, et al. Role of social support in lifestyle-focused weight management interventions. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005;59,1S179-S186.