Article Data

  • Views 5143
  • Dowloads 185

Review

Open Access

Gender differences in personalized psychological interventions for college students: a narrative review integrating the Theory of Multiple Intelligences

  • Xiaoying Zeng1,*,

1Student Affairs Office, Zhejiang Institute of Communications, 311112 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2025.063 Vol.21,Issue 5,May 2025 pp.9-17

Submitted: 11 March 2025 Accepted: 14 April 2025

Published: 30 May 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Xiaoying Zeng E-mail: zxy2021@zjvtit.edu.cn

Abstract

This narrative review explores gender differences in the design of psychological interventions for college students, using Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences (MI) as a conceptual framework. It examines how variations in mental health challenges, such as the higher prevalence of anxiety and depression among females and the greater propensity for risk-taking behaviors among males, correspond with cognitive profiles outlined in MI theory. Socialization processes further reinforce these differences, with females often exhibiting stronger linguistic and interpersonal capacities, making emotion-focused interventions—such as expressive writing and group discussions—more effective. In contrast, males, who frequently demonstrate enhanced bodily-kinesthetic and spatial abilities, may benefit more from action-oriented interventions, including physical activities or virtual reality (VR) tasks. To integrate these cognitive and psychological dimensions, this review introduces a Gender-Sensitive Psychological Integration Model, which synthesizes biological factors (e.g., neuroendocrine pathways), sociocultural influences (e.g., gender norms) and MI profiles to establish a systematic framework for personalized interventions. While universal strategies, such as mindfulness training and digital platforms, enhance accessibility, gender-specific approaches ensure that interventions align with cognitive and psychological predispositions, thereby optimizing their effectiveness. This dual-framework approach addresses both broad and individualized mental health needs. Despite its contributions, this review is limited by its focus on binary sex and gender distinctions, which may not fully capture the diversity of gender identities and psychological experiences. Future research should adopt a more inclusive perspective, incorporating non-binary and intersectional considerations to enhance the applicability of gender-sensitive psychological interventions.


Keywords

College mental health; Sex and gender differences; Multiple intelligences theory; Psychological interventions; Narrative review


Cite and Share

Xiaoying Zeng. Gender differences in personalized psychological interventions for college students: a narrative review integrating the Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Journal of Men's Health. 2025. 21(5);9-17.

References

[1] Satterthwaite TD, Wolf DH, Roalf DR, Ruparel K, Erus G, Vandekar S, et al. Linked sex differences in cognition and functional connectivity in youth. Cerebral Cortex. 2015; 25: 2383–2394.

[2] Vogel DL, Heath PJ. Men, masculinities, and help-seeking patterns. In Wong YJ, Wester SR (eds.) APA handbook of men and masculinities (pp. 685–707). American Psychological Association: Washington, USA. 2016.

[3] Gardner H. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. 1st edn. Basic Books: New York. 1983.

[4] Shearer CB, Karanian JM. The neuroscience of intelligence: empirical support for the theory of multiple intelligences? Trends in Neuroscience and Education. 2017; 6: 211–223.

[5] Kaur M. Gender differences in multiple intelligences with respect to grade level. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences. 2014; 8: 117–120.

[6] Fleith DS, Gomes CMA, Marinho-Araújo CM, Rabelo M. Academic expectations, gender and working status: comparing two cohorts of university students. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa. 2023; 39: e39304.

[7] Branca S, Slusser E. Through a more discerning lens: understanding college student expectations and experiences over the course of a semester. College Student Journal. 2022; 56: 180–196.

[8] Kolk SM, Rakic P. Development of prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022; 47: 41–57.

[9] Eisenbarth CA. Coping with stress: gender differences among college students. College Student Journal. 2019; 53: 151–162.

[10] Auerbach RP, Alonso J, Axinn WG, Cuijpers P, Ebert DD, Green JG, et al. Mental disorders among college students in the World Health Organization world mental health surveys. Psychological Medicine. 2016; 46: 2955–2970.

[11] Kuehner C. Why is depression more common among women than among men? The Lancet Psychiatry. 2017; 4: 146–158.

[12] De Welde K, Stepnick A. Introduction: from people to policies: enduring inequalities and inequities for women academics. In De Welde K, Stepnick A (eds.) Disrupting the Culture of Silence (pp. 1–27). 1st edn. Routledge: London, UK. 2023

[13] Nolen-Hoeksema S. Emotion regulation and psychopathology: the role of gender. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2012; 8: 161–187.

[14] Ay A, Çam C, Kilinç A, Fatih Önsüz M, Metintaş S. Prevalence of hazardous alcohol consumption and evaluation of associated factors in university students. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2025; 60: 223–233.

[15] Marques LM, Uchida PM, Aguiar FO, Santos RIM, Barbosa SP. Escaping through virtual gaming—what is the association with emotional, social, and mental health? A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2023; 14: 1257685.

[16] Zentner KE, Lee H, Dueck BS, Masuda T. Cultural and gender differences in social anxiety: the mediating role of self-construals and gender role identification. Current Psychology. 2023; 42: 21363–21374.

[17] Teale Sapach MJN, Carleton RN. Can words be worse than stones? Understanding distressing social events and their relationship with social anxiety. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2020; 72: 102225.

[18] Varghese AS, Navaneeth P, Saranya TS. Social anxiety among male and female adults: a comparative study. Journal of Humanistic Studies and Social Dynamics. 2024; 1: 48–52.

[19] Oren-Yagoda R, Rosenblum M, Aderka IM. Gender differences in shame among individuals with social anxiety disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2024; 48: 720–729.

[20] Ahmed GK, Abdalla AA, Mohamed AM, Mohamed LA, Shamaa HA. Relation between internet gaming addiction and comorbid psychiatric disorders and emotion avoidance among adolescents: a cross-sectional study. Psychiatry Research. 2022; 312: 114584.

[21] Jančec L, Vorkapić ST, Vodopivec JL. Hidden curriculum determinants in (pre) school institutions: Implicit cognition in action. In Zheng J (ed.) Exploring implicit cognition: learning, memory, and social cognitive processes (pp. 216–242). IGI Global Scientific Publishing: Hershey. 2015.

[22] Ferrero M, Vadillo MA, León SP. A valid evaluation of the theory of multiple intelligences is not yet possible: problems of methodological quality for intervention studies. Intelligence. 2021; 88: 101566.

[23] Armstrong T. Multiple intelligences in the classroom. 3rd edn. ASCD: Alexandria. 2009.

[24] Kravitz DJ, Saleem KS, Baker CI, Mishkin M. A new neural framework for visuospatial processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2011; 12: 217–230.

[25] Freeman D, Reeve S, Robinson A, Ehlers A, Clark D, Spanlang B, et al. Virtual reality in the assessment, understanding, and treatment of mental health disorders. Psychological Medicine. 2017; 47: 2393–2400.

[26] Neubauer AC, Bergner S, Schatz M. Two-vs. three-dimensional presentation of mental rotation tasks: sex differences and effects of training on performance and brain activation. Intelligence. 2010; 38: 529–539.

[27] Mohamed NH, Beckstein A, Winship G, Ashraf Khan Mou T, Pang NTP, Relojo-Howell D. Effects of self-expressive writing as a therapeutic method to relieve stress among university students. Journal of Poetry Therapy. 2023; 36: 243–255.

[28] Genet JJ, Siemer M. Rumination moderates the effects of daily events on negative mood: results from a diary study. Emotion. 2012; 12: 1329.

[29] Hess JM, Magan IM, Goodkind JR. Is cultural appropriateness culturally specific? Intersectional insights from a community‐based participatory mental health intervention study conducted with diverse cultural groups. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2025; 75: 53–67.

[30] Díaz-Pereira MP, Casal-de-la-Fuente L, Delgado-Parada J, Ricoy MC, Haamer RE, Kamińska D, et al. Virtual reality scenarios to reduce stress of assessment in university students: gender perspective guidelines. Interactive Learning Environments. 2024; 33: 244–259.

[31] Grigsby TJ, Forster M, Soto DW, Unger JB. Changes in the strength of peer influence and cultural factors on substance use initiation between late adolescence and emerging adulthood in a Hispanic sample. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse. 2017; 16: 137–154.

[32] Mahan RM, Swan SA, Macfie J. Interpersonal psychotherapy and mindfulness for treatment of major depression with anxious distress. Clinical Case Studies. 2018; 17: 104–119.

[33] Daisy A. Digital mental health education: alleviating stigma and enhancing well-being in schools. In Mobo FD (ed.) Advancing sustainable development goals with educational technology (pp. 143–180). 1st edn. IGI Global: Hershey, PA. 2025.

[34] Eliot L, Ahmed A, Khan H, Patel J. Dump the “dimorphism”: comprehensive synthesis of human brain studies reveals few male-female differences beyond size. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2021; 125: 667–697.

[35] Durbeej N, Abrahamsson N, Papadopoulos FC, Beijer K, Salari R, Sarkadi A. Outside the norm: mental health, school adjustment and community engagement in non-binary youth. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2021; 49: 529–538.

[36] Sharma C. From IQ to multiple intelligences. In Ranganathan N (ed.) Contemporary perspectives on childhood and adolescence (pp. 21). 1st edn. Routledge India: Sri Lanka. 2025.

[37] Crenshaw KE. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum. 1989; 1: 139–167.


Submission Turnaround Time

Top