Article Data

  • Views 234
  • Dowloads 104

Original Research

Open Access

Sex divergences in sustainable nutrition and lifestyle phenotypes among Italian adults

  • Valentina Micheluzzi1
  • Alessio Lo Cascio2
  • Simone Santori3
  • Agnese Broccolo4
  • Michela Piredda5
  • Elena Sandri6,*,

1Clinical and Interventional Cardiology, Sassari University Hospital, 07100 Sassari, Italy

2Direction of Health Professions, La Maddalena Cancer Center, 90146 Palermo, Italy

3Tor Vergata University, 00133 Rome, Italy

4Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University, 00133 Rome, Italy

5Research Unit Nursing Science, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico di Roma University, 00128 Rome, Italy

6Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Catholic University of Valencia San Vicente Mártir, 46001 Valencia, Spain

DOI: 10.22514/jomh.2026.049 Vol.22,Issue 6,June 2026 pp.36-46

Submitted: 05 March 2026 Accepted: 12 May 2026

Published: 30 June 2026

*Corresponding Author(s): Elena Sandri E-mail: elena.sandri@ucv.es

Abstract

Background: Dietary behaviors and lifestyle factors co-occur in integrated profiles that shape cardiometabolic and mental health risk. Sustainable nutrition, particularly plant-forward eating, has become a relevant dimension of dietary quality, yet its adoption varies across population subgroups and may differ by sex. This study examined sex divergences in sustainable nutrition and lifestyle profiles among Italian adults and the potential indirect association of sustainability awareness in the relationship between sex and plant-based diet adherence. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 1066 Italian adults using the validated Nutritional and Social Health Habits inventory for Italian people (NutSo-HH-Ita) to assess sustainable nutrition and lifestyle factors. Data were analyzed using independent-samples t-tests and Chi-square tests for sex comparisons, mediation analysis to examine the indirect effect of sustainability awareness on the sex–plant-based diet association, and K-means clustering with multinomial logistic regression to identify lifestyle phenotypes and test sex as a predictor of cluster membership, while adjusting for age, education, and income. Results: Women showed higher plant-based diet adherence (Cohen’s d = 0.33; 95% confidence intervals (CI) [0.20, 0.46]) and higher sustainability awareness (Cohen’s d = 0.14), while men reported higher physical activity (Cohen’s d = 0.21). Sustainability awareness was statistically associated with a small indirect component in the association between sex and plant-based diet adherence (p = 0.045). Cluster analysis identified distinct lifestyle phenotypes, and sex independently predicted phenotype membership after covariate adjustment (p < 0.001), with men more likely to belong to a profile characterized by relatively higher activity combined with poorer sustainability engagement and less healthy lifestyle habits. Conclusions: Sex differences in sustainable nutrition are embedded within broader lifestyle phenotypes. Integrating sustainability-related predispositions with behavioral phenotyping may support sex-sensitive prevention strategies and help identify “Active-Low Engagement” male subgroup that could be overlooked when evaluating single behaviors in isolation.


Keywords

Men’s health; Sustainable nutrition; Sex differences; Physical activity; Cluster analysis; Plant-based diet


Cite and Share

Valentina Micheluzzi,Alessio Lo Cascio,Simone Santori,Agnese Broccolo,Michela Piredda,Elena Sandri. Sex divergences in sustainable nutrition and lifestyle phenotypes among Italian adults. Journal of Men's Health. 2026. 22(6);36-46.

References

[1] Murray CJL, Aravkin AY, Zheng P, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi-Kangevari M, et al. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020; 396: 1223–1249.

[2] Brauer M, Roth GA, Aravkin AY, Zheng P, Abate KH, Abate YH, et al. Global burden and strength of evidence for 88 risk factors in 204 countries and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet. 2024; 403: 2162–2203.

[3] St-Onge MP, Grandner MA, Brown D, Conroy MB, Jean-Louis G, Coons M, et al. Sleep duration and quality: impact on lifestyle behaviors and cardiometabolic health: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016; 134: e367–e386.

[4] Lloyd-Jones DM, Allen NB, Anderson CAM, Black T, Brewer LC, Foraker RE, et al. Life’s essential 8: updating and enhancing the American Heart Association’s construct of cardiovascular health: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022; 146: e18–e43.

[5] Verswijveren SJJM, Dingle S, Donnelly AE, Dowd KP, Ridgers ND, Carson BP, et al. How are different clusters of physical activity, sedentary, sleep, smoking, alcohol, and dietary behaviors associated with cardiometabolic health in older adults? A cross-sectional latent class analysis. Journal of Activity, Sedentary and Sleep Behaviors. 2023; 2: 16.

[6] Duncan MJ, Murphy L, Oftedal S, Fenwick MJ, Vincent GE, Fenton S. The associations between physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep with mortality and incident cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes and mental health in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Journal of Activity, Sedentary and Sleep Behaviors. 2023; 2: 19.

[7] Liu S, Hu X, Jiang M, Huang N, Liang H, Zheng R, et al. Cardiovascular health (“Life’s Essential 8”), risk of depression and anxiety: a prospective cohort study. npj Cardiovascular Health. 2024; 1: 19.

[8] Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet. 2019; 393: 447–492.

[9] Biesbroek S, Kok FJ, Tufford AR, Bloem MW, Darmon N, Drewnowski A, et al. Toward healthy and sustainable diets for the 21st century: importance of sociocultural and economic considerations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2023; 120: e2219272120.

[10] Berti C, Baglioni M, La Vecchia A, D’Oria V, Bettocchi S, Agostoni C. Climate change and consumers’ food choices towards sustainability: a narrative review. Nutrition Reviews. 2025. PMID: 40906569.

[11] Springmann M, Godfray HCJ, Rayner M, Scarborough P. Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016; 113: 4146–4151.

[12] Wallnoefer LM, Riefler P, Meixner O. What drives the choice of local seasonal food? Analysis of the importance of different key motives. Foods. 2021; 10: 2715.

[13] de Boer J, Aiking H. Pro-environmental food practices in EU countries strongly suggest mutually reinforcing improvements in gender equality and environmental sustainability. Appetite. 2023; 180: 106350.

[14] Modlinska K, Adamczyk D, Maison D, Pisula W. Gender differences in attitudes to vegans/vegetarians and their food preferences, and their implications for promoting sustainable dietary patterns—a systematic review. Sustainability. 2020; 12: 6292.

[15] Strain T, Flaxman S, Guthold R, Semenova E, Cowan M, Riley LM, et al. National, regional, and global trends in insufficient physical activity among adults from 2000 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 507 population-based surveys with 5·7 million participants. The Lancet Global Health. 2024; 12: e1232–e1243.

[16] Reitsma MB, Flor LS, Mullany EC, Gupta V, Hay SI, Gakidou E. Spatial, temporal, and demographic patterns in prevalence of smoking tobacco use and initiation among young people in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019. The Lancet Public Health. 2021; 6: e472–e481.

[17] Griswold MG, Fullman N, Hawley C, Arian N, Zimsen SRM, Tymeson HD, et al. Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet. 2018; 392: 1015–1035.

[18] Rothgerber H. Real men don’t eat (vegetable) quiche: masculinity and the justification of meat consumption. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 2013; 14: 363–375.

[19] Velzeboer R, Li E, Gao N, Sharp P, Oliffe JL. Masculinity, meat, and veg*nism: a scoping review. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2024; 18: 15579883241247173.

[20] Adamczyk D, Modlińska K, Maison D, Pisula W. Gender, masculinity, and the perception of vegetarians and vegans: a mixed-methods investigation. Sex Roles. 2023; 89: 595–609.

[21] Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health program planning: an educational and ecological approach. 4th edn. McGraw-Hill: New York. 2005.

[22] Porter CM. Revisiting precede–proceed: a leading model for ecological and ethical health promotion. Health Education Journal. 2016; 75: 753–764.

[23] Saulle R, Sinopoli A, De Paula Baer A, Mannocci A, Marino M, De Belvis AG, et al. The PRECEDE–PROCEED model as a tool in Public Health screening: a systematic review. La Clinica Terapeutica. 2020; 171: e167–e177.

[24] Xiao C, McCright AM. Gender differences in environmental concern. Environment and Behavior. 2015; 47: 17–37.

[25] Chard E, Bergstad CJ, Steentjes K, Poortinga W, Demski C. Gender and cross-country differences in the determinants of sustainable diet intentions: a multigroup analysis of the UK, China, Sweden, and Brazil. Frontiers in Psychology. 2024; 15: 1355969.

[26] Rozin P, Hormes JM, Faith MS, Wansink B. Is meat male? A quantitative multimethod framework to establish metaphoric relationships. Journal of Consumer Research. 2012; 39: 629–643.

[27] Hutchesson MJ, Duncan MJ, Oftedal S, Ashton LM, Oldmeadow C, Kay-Lambkin F, et al. Latent class analysis of multiple health risk behaviors among Australian university students and associations with psychological distress. Nutrients. 2021; 13: 425.

[28] Zhou B, Gong N, He Q, Huang X, Zhu J, Zhang L, et al. Clustering of lifestyle behaviours and analysis of their associations with MAFLD: a cross-sectional study of 196,515 individuals in China. BMC Public Health. 2023; 23: 2303.

[29] Frech A. Healthy behavior trajectories between adolescence and young adulthood. Advances in Life Course Research. 2012; 17: 59–68.

[30] Mollborn S, Lawrence EM, Hummer RA. A gender framework for understanding health lifestyles. Social Science & Medicine. 2020; 265: 113182.

[31] Griffith PDM. “I AM a Man”: manhood, minority men’s health and health equity. Ethnicity & Disease. 2015; 25: 287–293.

[32] Nagata JM, Vittinghoff E, Gabriel KP, Rana JS, Garber AK, Moran AE, et al. Physical activity from young adulthood to middle age and premature cardiovascular disease events: a 30-year population-based cohort study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2022; 19: 123.

[33] Umberson D, Lin Z, Cha H. Gender and social isolation across the life course. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2022; 63: 319–335.

[34] World Medical Association. World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human participants. JAMA. 2025; 333: 71–74.

[35] Official Journal of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016. 2016. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679 (Accessed: 20 January 2026).

[36] Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika. 1965; 52: 591–611.

[37] Lumley T, Diehr P, Emerson S, Chen L. The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets. Annual Review of Public Health. 2002; 23: 151–169.

[38] Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the ‘laws’ of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice. 2010; 15: 625–632.

[39] Hayes AF, Little TD. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. 2nd edn. The Guilford Press: New York. 2018.

[40] Hartigan JA, Wong MA. Algorithm AS 136: a K-Means clustering algorithm. Applied Statistics. 1979; 28: 100–108.

[41] Hosmer DW, Lemeshow Stanley, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression. 3rd edn. Wiley: New Jersey. 2013.

[42] Sun YH. Health concern, food choice motives, and attitudes toward healthy eating: the mediating role of food choice motives. Appetite. 2008; 51: 42–49.

[43] Karam J, Haddad C, Sacre H, Serhan M, Salameh P, Jomaa L. Financial wellbeing and quality of life among a sample of the Lebanese population: the mediating effect of food insecurity. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2022; 9: 906646.

[44] Sandri E, Werner LU, Bernalte Martí V. Lifestyle habits and nutritional profile of the Spanish population: a comparison between the period during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Foods. 2024; 13: 3962.

[45] Fonseca RP, De Groeve B, Graça J. Masculinizing plant-based diets as an appeal for dietary change among men. Food Quality and Preference. 2025; 123: 105341.

[46] Rabia M, Knäuper B, Miquelon P. The eternal quest for optimal balance between maximizing pleasure and minimizing harm: the compensatory health beliefs model. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2006; 11: 139–153.

[47] World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Avoidable mortality, risk factors and policies for tackling noncommunicable diseases—leveraging data for impact: monitoring commitments in the WHO European Region ahead of the Fourth United Nations High-Level Meeting. 2025. Available at: https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/WHO-EURO-2025-12445-52219-80271 (Accessed: 20 January 2026).

[48] Health at a Glance. Organisation for economic co-operation and development. 2025. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/health-at-a-glance-2025_8f9e3f98-en/full-report.html (Accessed: 20 January 2026).

[49] Sawicki CM, Ramesh G, Bui L, Nair NK, Hu FB, Rimm EB, et al. Planetary health diet and cardiovascular disease: results from three large prospective cohort studies in the USA. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2024; 8: e666–e674.

[50] VanKim NA, Laska MN, Ehlinger E, Lust K, Story M. Understanding young adult physical activity, alcohol and tobacco use in community colleges and 4-year post-secondary institutions: a cross-sectional analysis of epidemiological surveillance data. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10: 208.

[51] Lee E, Fitzgerald N, Downs S, Kuhrt N, Visaria A, Kalbag A, et al. Misperception of diet quality among US adults: implications for cardiometabolic health promotion. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2025; 79: 762–769.

[52] Orhan BE, Alkasasbeh WJ, Karaçam A, Canlı U, Adıgüzel NS, Amawi AT. Nutrition knowledge and healthy-eating attitudes: the role of physical activity and lifestyle factors in adults. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2026; 13: 1754963.

[53] Sandri E, Olmedo GC, Broccolo A, Piredda M, Werner LU. Relationships between physical activity and nutritional and lifestyle habits: a cross-sectional survey of the Spanish population. Sport Sciences for Health. 2025; 21: 3433–3447.

[54] Freedman AA, Colangelo LA, Ning H, Borrowman JD, Lewis CE, Schreiner PJ, et al. Sex differences in age of onset of premature cardiovascular disease and subtypes: the coronary artery risk development in young adults study. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2026; 15: e044922.

[55] Lafortune L, Martin S, Kelly S, Kuhn I, Remes O, Cowan A, et al. Behavioural risk factors in mid-life associated with successful ageing, disability, dementia and frailty in later life: a rapid systematic review. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11: e0144405.


Submission Turnaround Time

Top