Article Data

  • Views 245
  • Dowloads 123

Original Research

Open Access Special Issue

Study of Damage to the Drawing Arm Subacromial Bursa in Recurve Archers Based on a Finite Element Model

  • Cheng Guo1,2,†,
  • Kai Liu1,†,
  • Yi Yang3
  • Jin Wu4
  • Jun Yin1,*,

1Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, 100191 Beijing, China

2Hebei Institute of Sports Science, 050011 Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China

3Research and Innovation Department of ANTA Group - Innovation Laboratory, 361000 Xiamen, Fujian, China

4Beijing City University, 100083 Beijing, China

DOI: 10.31083/j.jomh1805123 Vol.18,Issue 5,May 2022 pp.1-7

Submitted: 16 March 2022 Accepted: 08 April 2022

Published: 31 May 2022

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physical and Mental Health in Sports)

*Corresponding Author(s): Jun Yin E-mail: yinjun68@163.com

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to simulate the drawing arm of male recurve archers by finite element method. And observe the stress changes of humerus and scapula on the subacromial bursa under different stages of special techniques. To investigate the mechanism of the subacromial bursa injury in male recurve archers. Methods: Collected a 22-year-old healthy men shoulder CT and MRI data, construct the bow side shoulder joint finite element model, contains the structure of the shoulder blades, clavicle, humerus, and subacromial bursa. The humerus on the drawing side of the curve was simulated to perform the raising the bow, drawing, holding and releasing actions on the scapula plane, analysis of stress changes in subacromial bursa. Results: The peak stress on the subacromial bursa varied greatly. From the start of raising the bow to the start of drawing, the stress peak decreased markedly from 0.280 MPa to 0.036 MPa. Then, the peak stress immediately increased to 0.347 MPa at the beginning of the holding and decreased to 0.262 MPa at releasing. Conclusions: The reason for the stress surge on the subacromial bursa in the holding phase is that its structure is easily squeezed by multiple surrounding tissue structures, resulting in high stress and susceptibility to damage. In combination with the depth of the structural site and the surrounding structural characteristics, this can prevent subacromial bursa injury. The results of this work are particularly relevant to the prevention of subacromial bursa injury in male recurve archers.


Keywords

recurve arch; drawing arm; shoulder; finite element method; subacromial bursa


Cite and Share

Cheng Guo,Kai Liu,Yi Yang,Jin Wu,Jun Yin. Study of Damage to the Drawing Arm Subacromial Bursa in Recurve Archers Based on a Finite Element Model. Journal of Men's Health. 2022. 18(5);1-7.

References

[1] Mann L, Littke N. Shoulder injuries in archery. Canadianjournal of Sport Sciences.1989; 14: 85–92.

[2] Bac A, Niemiec U, Golec E. Long-term evaluation of treat-ment of traumatic injuries and motor organ overuse syndromes in archers. Fizjoterapia Polska. 2011; 11: 155–168.

[3] Hariri S, Safran MR. Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury in the Overhead Athlete: diagnosis and treatment. Clinics in Sports Medicine. 2010; 29: 619–644.

[4] Bak K. Nontraumatic glenohumeral instability and coracoacro-mial impingement in swimmers. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science Sports. 1996; 6: 132–144.

[5] Braun S, Kokmeyer D, Millett PJ. Shoulder Injuries in the Throwing Athlete. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2009; 91: 966–978.

[6] Wilk KE, Obma P, Simpson CD, Cain EL, Dugas J, Andrews JR. Shoulder Injuries in the Overhead Athlete. Journal of Or-thopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2009; 39: 38–54.

[7] Pieper H-, Quack G, Krahl H. Impingement of the rotator cuff in athletes caused by instability of the shoulder joint. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 1993; 1: 97–99.

[8] Sein ML, Walton J, Linklater J, Appleyard R, Kirkbride B, Kuah D, et al. Shoulder pain in elite swimmers: primarily due to swim-volume-induced supraspinatus tendinopathy. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2010; 44: 105–113.

[9] Polard B. The prevalence of shoulder pain in elite British swim-mers and the effects of training technique [BScThe-sis]. Hud-dersfield: University of Huddersfield. 2001.

[10] Grover JK, Sinha AGK. Prevalence of Shoulder Pain in Com-petitive Archery. Asian Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017; 8: e40971.

[11] Soligard T, Steffen K, Palmer D, Alonso JM, Bahr R, Lopes AD, et al. Sports injury and illness incidence in the Rio de Janeiro 2016 Olympic Summer Games: a prospective study of 11274 athletes from 207 countries. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017; 51: 1265–1271.

[12] Shinohara H, Urabe Y, Maeda N, Xie D, Sasadai J, Fujii E.Does shoulder impingement syndrome affect the shoulder kinemat-ics and associated muscle activity in archers? Journal of Sports Medicine & Physical Fitness. 2014; 54: 772.

[13] Fan YB, Deng XY. Modeling, Simulation and Application of Biomechanical Technology. Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press: Shanghai. 2017; 12: 369–426.

[14] Zhang XZ, Hong KS. Biomechanics of Bone and Joint. Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press: Shanghai. 2017; 12: 1–11.

[15] Bao CY, Meng QH. Establishment and analysis of biomechani-cal model of human knee joint based on finite element method. Journal of Wuhan Physical Education University. 2010; 44: 56–59+66.

[16] Maurel N, Diop A, Grimberg J. A 31 finite element model of an implanted scapula: Importance of a multiparametric valida-tion using experimental data. Journal of Biomechanics. 2005; 3: 1865–1872.

[17] Ellis BJ, Debski RE, Moore SM, McMahon PJ, Weiss JA. Methodology and sensitivity studies for finite element model-ing of the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex. Journal of Biomechanics. 2007; 40: 603–612.

[18] Gupta S, van der Helm FCT. Load transfer across the scapula during humeral abduction. Journal of Biomechanics. 2004; 37: 1001–1009.

[19] Büchler P, Ramaniraka NA, Rakotomanana LR, Iannotti JP, Far-ron A. A finite element model of shoulder, Application to the comparison of normal and ostcoarthntic: joints. Clinical Biome-chanics. 2002; 17: 630–639.

[20] Büchler P, Farron A. Benefits of an anatomical reconstruction of the humeral head during shoulder arthroplasty: a finite element analysis. Clinical Biomechanics. 2004; 19: 16–23.

[21] Zhang J, Guo Y, Zhang XS, et al. Finite element analysis of the shoulder during lateral impact. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology. 2018; 49: 886–892.

[22] Ma Jian, Hou Xinping, Zhang Yan, et al. A functional model of the shoulder joint muscles. Journal of Qingdao Technological University. 2008; 98–102.

[23] Islán Marcos M, Lechosa Urquijo E, Blaya Haro F, D’Amato R, Soriano Heras E, Juanes JA. Behavior under Load of a Human Shoulder: Finite Element Simulation and Analysis. Journal of Medical Systems. 2019; 43: 132.

[24] Zheng M, Zou Z, Bartolo PJDS, Peach C, Ren L. Finite element models of the human shoulder complex: a review of their clini-cal implications and modelling techniques. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering. 2017; 33: e02777.

[25] Yu Y. Model simulation of relationship between motion ampli-tude and motion injury of joint. Computer Simulation. 2014; 31: 391–394.

[26] Li L, Li SW, Wang F, Wu XM, Li L, Li M, et al. Finite element analysis of rotator cuff biomechanics in humeral abduction. Chi-nese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2019; 7: 301–307.

[27] Li L. Finite element modeling of shoulder complex and biome-chanical analysis of rotator cuff during humeral abduction. [mas-ter’s thesis]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University. 2018.

[28] Xu YJ, Yang ZZ, Liu ZY, Yang TF, Huang WJ, Li N, et al. Finite element modeling and biomechanical analysis of rotator cuff. Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2017; 19: 279–285.

[29] Rothman RH, Marvel JP, Heppenstall RB. Anatomic Consider-ations in the Glenohumeral Joint. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 1975; 6: 341–352.

[30] Cui YC. Characteristics and treatment of archery sports injury. Sports Science and Technology. 2014; 35: 73–74+82.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

SCImago The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.)

Publication Forum - JUFO (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) Publication Forum is a classification of publication channels created by the Finnish scientific community to support the quality assessment of academic research.

Scopus CiteScore 0.7 (2021) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers Search for publication channels (journals, series and publishers) in the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers to see if they are considered as scientific. (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside).

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top