Article Data

  • Views 1659
  • Dowloads 228

Original Research

Open Access Special Issue

Men's psychological well-being during COVID-19: the moderator role of posttraumatic growth

  • Martim Santos1
  • Ana Mónica Machado1
  • Ana Cristina Bernardo1
  • Ângela Leite2
  • M. Graça Pereira1

1Research Center in Psychology (CIPsi), School of Psychology, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal

2School of Human and Social Sciences, University of Tràs-os-Montes and Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal

DOI: 10.31083/jomh.2021.079 Vol.17,Issue 4,September 2021 pp.62-71

Submitted: 03 April 2021 Accepted: 13 May 2021

Published: 30 September 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): M. Graça Pereira E-mail: gracep@psi.uminho.pt

PDF (757.87 kB)

Abstract

Background and objective: Men are significantly affected by COVID-19 stressors that impact psychological well-being. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between distress, risk perception, emotional representations, preventive COVID-19 infection behaviors, COVID-19 traumatic stress, posttraumatic growth, and psychological well-being, taking also into consideration sociodemographic variables as well as the moderator role of posttraumatic growth in the relationship between traumatic stress and psychological well-being.

Material and methods: A cross-sectional design was used. Data were collected during the lockdown, in Portugal, from January to March 2021. The sample included 220 men who answered the questionnaires online.

Results: Anxiety and depression symptoms (distress), traumatic stress, and emotional representations were negatively associated with psychological well-being. Older men, professionally active men, and men not in teleworking reported greater psychological well-being. The findings also showed that less emotional representations, less traumatic stress, and lower levels of distress contributed to greater psychological well-being. Finally, posttraumatic growth played a moderating role in the relationship between traumatic stress and psychological well-being.

Conclusion: Interventions and further studies must consider the buffering role of posttraumatic growth during the COVID-19 pandemic and focus on helping men handle the associated traumatic stress in order to promote psychological well-being.

Keywords

Psychological well-being; Posttraumatic growth; Men; COVID-19; Traumatic stress; Distress; Emotional representations; Risk perception; Preventive infection behaviors

Cite and Share

Martim Santos,Ana Mónica Machado,Ana Cristina Bernardo,Ângela Leite,M. Graça Pereira. Men's psychological well-being during COVID-19: the moderator role of posttraumatic growth. Journal of Men's Health. 2021. 17(4);62-71.

References

[1] World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pan-demic. 2021. Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 (Accessed: 2 April 2021).

[2] General Director of Health. New Coronavirus COVID-19. 2020. Available at: https://covid19.min-saude.pt/ponto-de-situacao-atual-em-portugal/ (Accessed: 2 April 2021).

[3] Torales J, O’Higgins M, Castaldelli-Maia JM, Ventriglio A. The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2020; 66: 317–320.

[4] Betron M, Gottert A, Pulerwitz J, Shattuck D, Stevanovic-Fenn N. Men and COVID-19: Adding a gender lens. Global Public Health. 2020; 15: 1090–1092.

[5] Global Health 5050. The COVID-19 sex-disaggregated data tracker. 2021. Available at: https://globalhealth5050.org/the-sex-gender-and-covid-19-project/ (Accessed: 15 March 2021).

[6] Gebhard C, Regitz-Zagrosek V, Neuhauser HK, Morgan R, Klein SL. Impact of sex and gender on COVID-19 outcomes in Europe. Biology of Sex Differences. 2020; 11: 29.

[7] O’Connor RC, Wetherall K, Cleare S, McClelland H, Melson AJ, Niedzwiedz CL, et al. Mental health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: longitudinal analyses of adults in the UK COVID-19 Mental Health & Wellbeing study. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2020; 218: 326–333.

[8] Cori L, Bianchi F, Cadum E, Anthonj C. Risk Perception and COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 3114.

[9] Dryhurst S, Schneider CR, Kerr J, Freeman ALJ, Recchia G, van der Bles AM, et al. Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world. Journal of Risk Research. 2020; 23: 994–1006.

[10] Cheng SKW, Chong GHC, Chang SSY, Wong CW, Wong CSY, Wong MTP, et al. Adjustment to severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): Roles of appraisal and post-traumatic growth. Psychology & Health. 2006; 21: 301–317.

[11] Lanciano T, Graziano G, Curci A, Costadura S, Monaco A. Risk Perceptions and Psychological Effects During the Italian COVID-19 Emergency. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020; 11: 580053.

[12] Huang Y, Zhao N. Generalized anxiety disorder, depressive symptoms and sleep quality during COVID-19 outbreak in China: a web-based cross-sectional survey. Psychiatry Research. 2020; 288: 112954.

[13] Ozamiz-Etxebarria N, Dosil-Santamaria M, Picaza-Gorrochategui M, Idoiaga-Mondragon N. Stress, anxiety, and depression levels in the initial stage of the COVID-19 outbreak in a population sample in the northern Spain. Cad Saude Publica. 2020; 36: e00054020.

[14] Tian F, Li H, Tian S, Yang J, Shao J, Tian C. Psychological symptoms of ordinary Chinese citizens based on SCL-90 during the level i emergency response to COVID-19. Psychiatry Research. 2020; 288: 112992.

[15] Silva Moreira P, Ferreira S, Couto B, Machado-Sousa M, Fernández M, Raposo-Lima C, et al. Protective elements of mental health status during the COVID-19 outbreak in the Portuguese population. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18: 1910.

[16] Pereira MG, Ferraz A, Bernardo AC, Machado AM, Evangelista M, Ribeiro I, et al. Family Functioning during COVID-19 in Portugal: Does Hope Matter? 2021.

[17] Lee Y, Baek J, Jeon Y, Im E. Illness perception and sense of well-being in breast cancer patients. Patient Preference and Adherence. 2019; 13: 1557–1567.

[18] Pereira MG, Pedras S, Machado JC, Ferreira G. Partners’ representa-tions of diabetes as mediators between patients’ representations and adherence to self-care behaviors, in type 2 diabetes. Psychology, Health & Medicine. 2016; 21: 707–714.

[19] Aqeel M, Shuja KH, Abbas J, Rehna T, Ziapour A. The Influence of Illness Perception, Anxiety and Depression Disorders on Students Mental Health during COVID-19 Outbreak in Pakistan: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey; Research Square. 2020. Available at: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-30128/v1 (Accessed: 16 March 2021).

[20] Paredes MR, Apaolaza V, Fernandez-Robin C, Hartmann P, Yañez-Martinez D. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on subjective mental well-being: the interplay of perceived threat, future anxiety and resilience. Personality and Individual Differences. 2021; 170: 110455.

[21] Anda RF, Porter LE, Brown DW. Inside the Adverse Childhood Experience Score: Strengths, Limitations, and Misapplications. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2020; 59: 293–295.

[22] Griffin G. Defining trauma and a trauma-informed COVID-19 response. Psychological Trauma. 2020; 12: S279–S280.

[23] Lv Z, Yang J, Jiang H, Nan J. Psychological impacts of the COVID-19 epidemic on Chinese people: Exposure, post-traumatic stress symptom, and emotion regulation. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2020; 13: 252.

[24] Aftyka A, Rozalska I, Milanowska J. Is post-traumatic growth possible in the parents of former patients of neonatal intensive care units?Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine. 2020; 27: 106–112.

[25] Wu P, Fang Y, Guan Z, Fan B, Kong J, Yao Z, et al. The Psychological Impact of the SARS Epidemic on Hospital Employees in China: Exposure, Risk Perception, and Altruistic Acceptance of Risk. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 2009; 54: 302–311.

[26] Tedeschi RG, Shakespeare-Finch J, Taku K, Calhoun LG. Posttrau-matic growth: Theory, research, and applications. Routledge. 2018; 131–138.

[27] Tedeschi RG, Calhoun, LG. Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry. 2004; 15: 1–18.

[28] Martz E, Livneh H, Southwick SM, Pietrzak RH. Posttraumatic growth moderates the effect of posttraumatic stress on quality of life in U.S. military veterans with life-threatening illness or injury. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2018; 109: 1–8.

[29] Morrill EF, Brewer NT, O’Neill SC, Lillie SE, Dees EC, Carey LA, et al. The interaction of post-traumatic growth and post-traumatic stress symptoms in predicting depressive symptoms and quality of life. Psycho-Oncology. 2008; 17: 948–953.

[30] Ferry FR, Brady SE, Bunting BP, Murphy SD, Bolton D, O’Neill SM. The Economic Burden of PTSD in Northern Ireland. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2015; 28: 191–197.

[31] Grossi E, Groth N, Mosconi P, Cerutti R, Pace F, Compare A, et al. Psychological General well-being Index—Short Version. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2006; 4.

[32] Barroso I, Antunes M, Barroso I, Correia T, Brito I, Monteiro M. Adaptation and validation of the Psychological General well-being Index: confirmatory factor analysis of the short version. Revista De Enfermagem Referência. 2018; IV Série: 9–18.

[33] Cann A, Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG, Taku K, Vishnevsky T, Triplett KN, et al. A short form of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory. Anxiety, Stress & Coping. 2010; 23: 127–137.

[34] Lamela D, Figueiredo B, Bastos A, Martins H. Psychometric Properties of the Portuguese Version of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory Short Form among Divorced Adults. European Journal of Psycholog-ical Assessment. 2014; 30: 3–14.

[35] Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2006; 60: 631–637.

[36] McIntyre T, Araújo-Soares V, Trovisqueira A. Questionário de Crenças sobre a Doença - Versão Breve. 2004. Available at: http: //www.uib.no/ipq/ (Accessed: 20 March 2021).

[37] Taber KS. The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha when Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education. 2018; 48: 1273–1296.

[38] Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1983; 67: 361–370.

[39] Pais-Ribeiro J, Silva I, Ferreira T, Martins A, Meneses R, Baltar M. Validation study of a Portuguese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Psychology, Health & Medicine. 2007; 12: 225–227.

[40] Chang KC, Hou WL, Pakpour AH, Lin CY, Griffiths MD. Psychome-tric Testing of Three COVID-19-Related Scales Among People with Mental Illness. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2020; 1–13.

[41] Leite A, Almeida, AC, Pereira, MG. Portuguese Version of COVID-19 Traumatic Stress and Preventive COVID Infection Behaviors Scale in Portuguese Men during Covid-19. Health & Family Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Minho. 2020.

[42] Kira IA, Shuwiekh HAM, Rice KG, Ashby JS, Elwakeel SA, Sous MSF, et al. Measuring COVID-19 as Traumatic Stress: Initial Psychometrics and Validation. Journal of Loss and Trauma. 2020; 26: 220–237.

[43] Crump S. Hypertension Risk Perception, Hypertension Knowledge, and Health Value as Predictors of Health Promotion Behaviors in African American College Students. Howard University. 2010.

[44] Pereira MG, Pereira A. Validação das escalas de perceção de risco da hipertensão e importância atribuída à saúde. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia Hospitalar. 2013; 16: 137–15216. (In Por-tuguese)

[45] Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Routledge. 1988.

[46] Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin. 1992; 112: 155–159.

[47] Johnson PO, Fay LC. The Johnson-Neyman technique, its theory and application. Psychometrika. 1950; 15: 349–367.

[48] Kang L, Li Y, Hu S, Chen M, Yang C, Yang BX, et al. The mental health of medical workers in Wuhan, China dealing with the 2019 novel coronavirus. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020; 7: e14.

[49] Levkovich I, Shinan-Altman S. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on stress and emotional reactions in Israel: a mixed-methods study. International Health. 2020; 1.

[50] Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. A Clinical Approach to Posttraumatic Growth. Positive Psychology in Practice. 2012; 405–419.

[51] Han Q, Zheng B, Agostini M, Bélanger JJ, Gützkow B, Kreienkamp J, et al. Associations of risk perception of COVID-19 with emotion and mental health during the pandemic. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2021; 284: 247–255.

[52] Kamigaki T, Oshitani H. Influenza pandemic preparedness and severity assessment of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 in South-east Asia. Public Health. 2010; 124: 5–9.

[53] Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The Lancet. 2020; 395: 497–506.

[54] Mazza C, Ricci E, Biondi S, Colasanti M, Ferracuti S, Napoli C, et al. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Italian people dur-ing the COVID-19 pandemic: immediate psychological responses and associated factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 3165.

[55] Möhring K, Naumann E, Reifenscheid M, Wenz A, Rettig T, Krieger U, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic and subjective well-being: longitudinal evidence on satisfaction with work and family. European Societies. 2020; 23: S601–S617.

[56] Song Y, Gao J. Does Telework Stress Employees out? a Study on Working at Home and Subjective well-being for Wage/Salary Workers. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2020; 21: 2649–2668.

[57] Anderson AJ, Kaplan SA, Vega RP. The impact of telework on emo-tional experience: when, and for whom, does telework improve daily affective well-being? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2015; 24: 882–897.

[58] Hsu T, Barrett AE. The Association between Marital Status and Psychological well-being: Variation across Negative and Positive Dimensions. Journal of Family Issues. 2020; 41: 2179–2202.

[59] Jongbloed J. Higher education for happiness? Investigating the impact of education on the hedonic and eudaimonic well-being of Europeans. European Educational Research Journal. 2018; 17: 733–754.

[60] Galinha IC, Pais-Ribeiro JL. Cognitive, affective and contextual pre-dictors of subjective well-being. International Journal of Wellbeing. 2012; 2: 34–53.

[61] Ridner SL, Newton KS, Staten RR, Crawford TN, Hall LA. Predictors of well-being among college students. Journal of American College Health. 2016; 64: 116–124.

[62] Mazzotti E, Mazzuca F, Sebastiani C, Scoppola A, Marchetti P. Predictors of existential and religious well-being among cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2011; 19: 1931–1937.

[63] Gallagher MW, Smith LJ, Richardson AL, D’Souza JM, Long LJ. Examining the longitudinal effects and potential mechanisms of hope on COVID-19 stress, anxiety, and well-being. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. 2021; 50: 234–245.

[64] Idoiaga Mondragon N, Berasategi Sancho N, Eiguren Munitis A, Dosil Santamaria M. Exploring the social and emotional representations used by students from the University of the Basque Country to face the first outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic. Health Education Research. 2021; 36: 159–169.

[65] Liu N, Zhang F, Wei C, Jia Y, Shang Z, Sun L, et al. Prevalence and predictors of PTSS during COVID-19 outbreak in China hardest-hit areas: Gender differences matter. Psychiatry Research. 2020; 287: 112921.

[66] Lau JTF, Yang X, Tsui HY, Pang E, Wing YK. Positive mental health-related impacts of the SARS epidemic on the general public in Hong Kong and their associations with other negative impacts. The Journal of Infection. 2006; 53: 114–124.

[67] Paredes A, Pereira MG. Spirituality, Distress and Posttraumatic Growth in Breast Cancer. Journal of Religion & Health. 2018; 57: 1606–1617.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Social Sciences Citation Index Social Sciences Citation Index contains over 3,400 journals across 58 social sciences disciplines, as well as selected items from 3,500 of the world’s leading scientific and technical journals. More than 9.37 million records and 122 million cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in the social and behavioral sciences.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

SCOPUS Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

DOAJ DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals.

CrossRef Crossref makes research outputs easy to find, cite, link, assess, and reuse. Crossref committed to open scholarly infrastructure and collaboration, this is now announcing a very deliberate path.

Portico Portico is a community-supported preservation archive that safeguards access to e-journals, e-books, and digital collections. Our unique, trusted process ensures that the content we preserve will remain accessible and usable for researchers, scholars, and students in the future.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

    Top