Editor: Dr. Jorge Pérez-Gómez,Dr. Elena Mainer-Pardos ,Dr. Thomas G. Bowman,Dr. Hadi Nobari
Submission deadline: 20 April 2022
Editor: Matthew Wosnitzer
Submission deadline: 20 May 2022
Editor: Tista Ghosh ,Luigi Cipolloni
Submission deadline: 15 February 2022
Editor: Ahmed Farouk
Submission deadline: 30 June 2022
It is essential that all who participate in producing the journal, who conduct themselves as authors, reviewers and editors, strictly adhere to the highest level of professional ethical standards. By submitting a manuscript to this journal, each author explicitly confirms that the manuscript meets the highest ethical standards from the author and coauthors including proper statistical investigations and thorough ethical reviews by the data owning organizations.
IMR Press follow the best practices such as those outlined by these organizations:
Authors must certify that the work reported in the manuscript is original and free from any plagiarism.
Authors must certify that the work has not been published elsewhere or submitted to any other journal(s) at the same time.
Authors must disclose any potential conflict of interest associated with the manuscript.
Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of all mistakes.
Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
The editor of a journal has complete responsibility and authority to make editorial decisions on all manuscripts submitted for peer-review and publication.
The editor should treat all authors with fairness, courtesy, objectivity, and honesty. All manuscripts are to be assessed objectively based on their academic merit and free of all commercial or self-interests.
The editor shall ensure that the peer review process is fair, unbiased, and timely. Research articles must typically be reviewed by at least three independent reviewers.
The editor shall ensure that all research material they accept for publication conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
The editor shall not disclose any information concerning submitted manuscripts before publication of the manuscript.
The editor shall cooperate with the publisher to describe, implement, and regularly review policies for handling ethical issues and allegations or findings of misconduct by authors and anyone else involved in the peer review process.
The editor shall be vigilant in avoiding the possibility of editors and/or referees delaying a manuscript for suspicious or unusual reasons.
The editor is responsible for developing mechanisms, in cooperation with the publisher, to ensure timely publication of accepted manuscripts.
The editor is responsible for assigning manuscripts to each reviewer following consideration of the reviewer’s area of expertise and interest.
Complying with the editor’s written instructions on the journal’s expectations for the scope, content, and quality of the review.
Determining scientific merit, originality, and scope of the work; indicating ways to improve it; and recommending acceptance or rejection using whatever rating scale the editor deems best.
Providing detailed, constructive, and unbiased evaluation, in a timely manner, on the scientific content of the manuscript.
Maintaining the confidentiality of the complete review process.
Avoiding personal comments or criticism. If reviewers have any interest that might interfere with an objective review, they should either decline the role of reviewer or disclose the conflict of interest to the editor and ask how best to address it.
Notifying the journal editor about any financial or personal conflict of interest and declining to review a manuscript when the possibility of such conflict exists.
Notifying the journal editor of any ethical concerns in their evaluation of submitted manuscripts; such as any violation of ethical treatment of animal or human subjects or any considerable similarity between a previously published article and any reviewed manuscript.
In cases of alleged or proven scientific misconduct, fraudulent publication or plagiarism, the publisher, in close collaboration with the editors, will take all appropriate measures to clarify the situation and to amend the article in question. This includes the prompt publication of an erratum, clarification or, in the most severe case, the retraction of the affected work. The publisher, together with the editors, shall take reasonable steps to identify and prevent the publication of papers where research misconduct has occurred, and under no circumstances encourage such misconduct or knowingly allow such misconduct to take place.
Science Citation Index Expanded Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Social Sciences Citation Index Social Sciences Citation Index contains over 3,400 journals across 58 social sciences disciplines, as well as selected items from 3,500 of the world’s leading scientific and technical journals. More than 9.37 million records and 122 million cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in the social and behavioral sciences.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
SCOPUS Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
DOAJ DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals.
CrossRef Crossref makes research outputs easy to find, cite, link, assess, and reuse. Crossref committed to open scholarly infrastructure and collaboration, this is now announcing a very deliberate path.
Portico Portico is a community-supported preservation archive that safeguards access to e-journals, e-books, and digital collections. Our unique, trusted process ensures that the content we preserve will remain accessible and usable for researchers, scholars, and students in the future.